Legislative Turnover and Executive Control in Russia’s Regions (2003–2014)

References

• Aguinis, H. (2004) Regression Analysis for Categorical Moderators (New York, NY, Guilford Press).
   Google Scholar
• Altman, D. & Chasquetti, D. (2005) ‘Reelection and Political Career Paths in the Uruguayan Congress, 1985–99’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 11, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Best, H. (2007) ‘New Challenges, New Elites? Changes in the Recruitment and Career Patterns of European Representative Elites’, Comparative Sociology, 6, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, D. K. & Henry, A. R. (1981) ‘The Family Factor in State Legislative Turnover’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 6, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakkisrud, H. (2011) ‘Medvedev’s New Governors’, Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakkisrud, H. (2015) ‘Governing the Governors: Legitimacy vs. Control in the Reform of the Russian Regional Executive’, East European Politics, 31, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, J. (1973) Comparative Legislatures (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Boix, C. & Svolik, M. W. (2013) ‘The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships’, Journal of Politics, 75, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, D. W. (1998) Critical Elections and Congressional Policymaking (Palo Alto, CA, Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, V. J. (1981) Do Leaders Make a Difference? Executive Succession and Public Policy under Capitalism and Socialism (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Buzin, A. Y. & Lyubarev, A. E. (2008) Prestuplenie bez nakazaniya: Administrativnye tekhnologii federal’nykh vyborov 2007–2008 godov (Moscow, TsPK Nikkolo M and Tsentr Panorama).
   Google Scholar
• Demchenko, O. & Golosov, G. V. (2016) ‘Federalism, Gubernatorial Power and the Incorporation of Subnational Authoritarianism in Russia: A Theory-testing Empirical Inquiry’, Acta Politica, 51, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, W. L. & Baker, J. R. (1986) ‘Why Do US State Legislators Vacate Their Seats?’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (2000) ‘The (Relatively) Victorious Incumbent under PR–STV: Legislative Turnover in Ireland and Malta’, in Bowler, S. & Grofman, B. (eds) Elections in Australia, Ireland and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote (Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J. (2008) Political Institutions under Dictatorship (New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. (2015) Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing Post-Soviet Regime Changes (Pittsburgh, PA, University of Pittsburgh Press).
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2002) ‘Party Support or Personal Resources? Factors of Success in the Plurality Portion of the 1999 National Legislative Elections in Russia’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 35, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2003) ‘The Vicious Circle of Party Underdevelopment in Russia: The Regional Connection’, International Political Science Review, 24, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2006) ‘Disproportionality by Proportional Design: Seats and Votes in Russia’s Regional Legislative Elections’, Europe-Asia Studies, 58, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2011) ‘Russia’s Regional Legislative Elections, 2003–2007: Authoritarianism Incorporated’, Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2012) ‘The 2012 Political Reform in Russia: The Interplay of Liberalizing Concessions and Authoritarian Corrections’, Problems of Post-Communism, 59, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2013a) ‘Proportional Representation and Authoritarianism: Evidence from Russia’s Regional Election Law Reform’, Representation, 49, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2013b) ‘Machine Politics: The Concept and Its Implications for Post-Soviet Studies’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 21, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2014a) ‘The Territorial Genealogies of Russia’s Political Parties and the Transferability of Political Machines’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 30, 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2014b) ‘The Last Resort of Political Regionalism: Electoral Blocs in Russia’s Regional Legislative Elections, 2003–2005’, East European Politics, 30, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2014c) ‘Authoritarian Electoral Engineering and its Limits: A Curious Case of the Imperiali Highest Averages Method in Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 66, 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2014d) ‘Growing Old without Grace: Electoral Authoritarianism and the Age Composition of Russia’s Regional Legislative Assemblies’, Representation, 50, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2014e) ‘Co-optation in the Process of Dominant Party System Building: The Case of Russia’, East European Politics, 30, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. (2016) ‘The September 2015 Regional Elections in Russia: A Rehearsal for Next Year’s National Legislative Races’, Regional and Federal Studies, 26, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. V. & Konstantinova, M. (2016) ‘Gubernatorial Powers in Russia: The Transformation of Regional Institutions under the Centralizing Control of the Federal Authorities’, Problems of Post-Communism, 63, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, J. P. (2004) ‘The Push for Regional Enlargement in Putin’s Russia’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 20, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, J. P. (2007) ‘The Puzzle of Putin’s Gubernatorial Appointments’, Europe-Asia Studies, 59, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guterbock, T. M. (1980) Machine Politics in Transition: Party and Community in Chicago (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E. (2003) ‘Explaining Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions: Economy, Ethnicity, and Legacy’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 19, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E. (2004) ‘The Origins of United Russia and the Putin Presidency: The Role of Contingency in Party-system Development’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 12, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R. L. & Van Houweling, R. P. (1995) ‘Avarice and Ambition in Congress: Representatives’ Decisions to Run or Retire from the US House’, American Political Science Review, 89, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinsohn, T. (2014) ‘Institutional Determinants of Legislative Turnover in the German State Parliaments: 1947–2012’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 20, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Heinsohn, T. & Freitag, M. (2012) ‘Institutional Foundations of Legislative Turnover: A Comparative Analysis of the Swiss Cantons’, Swiss Political Science Review, 18, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilonszki, G. & Edinger, M. (2007) ‘MPs in Post-Communist and Post-Soviet Nations: A Parliamentary Elite in the Making’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 13, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J. & Turrisi, R. (2003) Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression, 2nd edn (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. (1994) ‘Stability and Renewal: Incumbency and Parliamentary Composition’, in Somit, A., Wildenmann, R., Bell, B. & Rommel, A. (eds) The Victorious Incumbent: A Threat to Democracy? (Aldershot, Dartmouth).
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, N. M., Malesky, E. & Weymouth, S. (2014) ‘Unbundling the Relationship between Authoritarian Legislatures and Political Risk’, British Journal of Political Science, 44, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. (2002) Federalism, Democratization, and the Rule of Law in Russia (New York, NY, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kam, C. D. & Franzese, R. J. (2007) Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis (Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. (1992) A Guide to Econometrics (Oxford, Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Kerby, M. & Blidook, K. (2011) ‘It’s Not You, It’s Me: Determinants of Voluntary Legislative Turnover in Canada’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononenko, P. B. (2003) ‘Politicheskie factory konstitutsionnogo stroitel’stva v respublikakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii’, Polis, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Kousser, T. (2004) Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lust, E. (2009) ‘Competitive Clientelism in the Middle East’, Journal of Democracy, 20, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. & Kricheli, R. (2010) ‘Political Order and One-party Rule’, Annual Review of Political Science, 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, S. (1999) Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil (Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., Schuler, P. & Tran, A. (2012) ‘The Adverse Effects of Sunshine: A Field Experiment on Legislative Transparency in an Authoritarian Assembly’, American Political Science Review, 106, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manow, P. (2007) ‘Electoral Rules and Legislative Turnover: Evidence from Germany’s Mixed Electoral System’, West European Politics, 30, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E. & Studlar, D. T. (2004) ‘Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross-National Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, 34, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezey, M. (1979) Comparative Legislatures (Durham, NC, Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Moncrief, G. F., Niemi, R. G. & Powell, L. W. (2004) ‘Time, Term Limits, and Turnover: Trends in Membership Stability in US State Legislatures’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraski, B. J. (2006) ‘Mandating Party Development in the Russian Federation: Effects of the 2001 Party Law’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 16, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Moraski, B. J. (2015) ‘Closed-list Proportional Representation in Russia: The Fates of Former District Deputies’, Party Politics, 21, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, Y. L. (2012) ‘The Era of Electoral Authoritarianism’, World Politics, 64, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, R. G. & Winsky, L. R. (1987) ‘Membership Turnover in US State Legislatures: Trends and Effects of Districting’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (1993) ‘Conclusion: Comparative Legislative Recruitment in Western Democracies’, in Lovenduski, J. & Norris, P. (eds) Gender and Party Politics (London, Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. & Krook, M. L. (2009) One of Us: Multilevel Models Examining the Impact of Descriptive Representation on Civic Engagement, Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP09–030 (Boston, MA, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University).
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. & Lovenduski, J. (1995) Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament (New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Obydenkova, A. & Libman, A. (2013) ‘National Autocratization and the Survival of Sub-national Democracy: Evidence from Russia’s Parliamentary Elections of 2011’, Acta Politica, 48, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padró i Miquel, G. & Snyder, J. M. (2006) ‘Legislative Effectiveness and Legislative Careers’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 31, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, M. (1979) ‘The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility’, European Journal of Political Research, 7, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, T. (2014) ‘The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism’, British Journal of Political Science, 44, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrov, N. & Titkov, A. (2013) Reiting demokratichnosti regionov Moskovskogo Tsentra Karnegi: 10 let v stroiu (Moscow, Moscow Carnegie Center).
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1976) The Comparative Studies of Political Elites (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Reddaway, P. & Orttung, R. W. (eds) (2004) The Dynamics of Russian Politics: Putin’s Reform of Federal–Regional Relations, Vol. 1 (Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield).
   Google Scholar
• Reisinger, W. M. & Moraski, B. J. (2013) ‘Deference or Governance? A Survival Analysis of Russia’s Governors Under Presidential Control’, in Reisinger, W. M. (ed.) Russia’s Regions and Comparative Subnational Politics (New York, NY, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. J. (2013) ‘Regional Patrons and Hegemonic Party Electoral Performance in Russia’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 29, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. J. & Robertson, G. B. (2015) ‘Legislatures, Cooptation, and Social Protest in Contemporary Authoritarian Regimes’, Journal of Politics, 77, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, O. J. & Turovsky, R. (2014) ‘Dominant Party Rule and Legislative Leadership in Authoritarian Regimes’, Party Politics, 20, 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C. (2003) Federalism and Democratization in Post-Communist Russia (Manchester, Manchester University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, D. (2000) ‘Ambition and Competition: Explaining Legislative Turnover in Brazil’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. (ed.) (2006) Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition (Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner).
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, J. (1966) Ambition and Politics (Chicago, IL, Rand McNally).
   Google Scholar
• Sharafutdinova, G. (2010) ‘Subnational Governance in Russia: How Putin Changed the Contract with His Agents and the Problems it Created for Medvedev’, Publius, 40, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, K. S. & Jackson, J. S. (1979) ‘Membership Turnover in US State Legislatures: 1931–1976’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirikov, A. (2010) Anatomiya bezdeistviya: Politicheskie instituty i konflikty v byudzhetnom protsesse regionov Rossii (St Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Evropeiskogo Universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge).
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. S. & Carey, J. (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics (New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Solnick, S. L. (1998) ‘Gubernatorial Elections in Russia, 1996–1997’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 14, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umnova, I. (1998) ‘Razdelenie zakonodatel’noi i ispolnitel’noi vlastei v sub’ektakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii: pravovye aspekty’, in Gel’man, V., Kuz’min, A., Lyukhterkhand, G. & Ryzhenkov, S. (eds) Organy gosudarstvennoi vlasti sub’ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Moscow, Institut gumanitarno-politicheskikh issledovanii).
   Google Scholar
• Uppal, Y. (2011) ‘Does Legislative Turnover Adversely Affect State Expenditure Policy? Evidence from Indian State Elections’, Public Choice, 147, 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Way, L. (2015) Pluralism by Default: Weak Autocrats and the Rise of Competitive Politics (Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2008) ‘Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment’, American Journal of Political Science, 52, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. & Escribà-Folch, A. (2012) ‘Authoritarian Institutions and Regime Survival: Transitions to Democracy and Subsequent Autocracy’, British Journal of Political Science, 42, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar