1,002
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

International Criminal Law and Russia: From ‘Nuremberg’ Passion to ‘The Hague’ Prejudice

ORCID Icon

References

  • Abashidze, A. Kh. (2009) ‘Uchastie gosudarstv v Rimskom statute Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda kak novyi vid obyazatel’stv erga omnes’, in Bogush, G. I. & Trikoz, E. N. (eds) Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie: sovremennye problemy (Moscow, Institut prava i publichnoi politiki).
  • Ambos, K. (2013) Treatise on International Criminal Law, Volume I: Foundations and General Part (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • Antonov, A. N. (2013) ‘Reshenie tribunala po byvshei Yugoslavii v dele Gotovina/Markach kak otrazhenie otdel’nykh tendentsii razvitiya mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo pravosudiya’, Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, 4.
  • Asatur, A. A. (2000) ‘Razvitie mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava i deyatel’nost’ mezhdunarodnykh sudov’, Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, 2.
  • Berlyavskii, L. G. (2011) ‘65-letie Nyurnbergskogo protsessa nad glavnymi nemetskimi voennymi prestupnikami: uroki istorii’, Rossiiskaya yustitsiya, 10.
  • Bogush, G. I. (2007) ‘Nyurnbergskii protsess i sovremennost’ (nekotorye razmyshleniya k 60-letiyu Mezdunarodnogo voennogo tribunala nad glavnymi natsistskimi voennymi prestupnikami)’, in Volzhenkin, B. V. (ed.) Rossiiskii ezhegodnik ugolovnogo prava. 2006 (St Petersburg, St Petersburg University Press).
  • Bogush, G. I. (2011) ‘O mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom prave: razmyshleniya penalista-mezhdunarodnika’, Kazanskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, 4.
  • Bogush, G. & Nuzov, I. (2016) ‘Russia’s Supreme Court Rewrites History of the Second World War’, EJIL: Talk!, 28 October, available at: http://www.ejiltalk.org/russias-supreme-court-rewrites-history-of-the-second-world-war/, accessed 19 November 2016.
  • Boyashov, A. S. (2014) ‘Pravosudie mezhdunarodnykh sudebnykh organisatsii v sovremennoi mezhdunarodnoi sisteme’, in Tarkhanov, I. A., Abdullin, A. I., Kurdyukov, G. I. & Davletgil’deev, R. Sh. (eds) Mezhdunarodnyi pravoporyadok v sovremennom mire i rol’ Rossii v ego ukreplenii (Moscow, Statut).
  • Cassese, A., Gaeta, P., Baig, L., Fan, M., Gosnell, C. & Whiting, A. (2013) International Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • Dzhatiev, V. S. & Kotyash, R. N. (2006) ‘Gaagskii tribunal: organ mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya ili sudilishche?’, Yuridicheskii mir, 7.
  • Egorov, S. A. (2014) ‘Gibridnye (smeshannye) tribunaly i sudy’, Mezdhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii, 3.
  • Egorov, S. A. (2014a) ‘Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi tribunal po byvshei Yugoslavii’, Mezdhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii, 4.
  • Egorov, S. A. (2014b) ‘Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi tribunal po Ruande’, Pravo i zhizn, 192.
  • Esakov, G. A. (2015) ‘Rossiskii opyt kriminalizatsii ser’eznykh narushenii mezdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava’, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya ‘Pravo’, 3.
  • Galenskaya, L. N. (1970) ‘O ponyatii mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava’, in Bobrov, R. L. (ed.) Sovetskii ezegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 1969 (Moscow, Nauka).
  • Giladi, R. (2014) ‘The Enactment of Irony: Reflections on the Origins of the Martens Clause’, European Journal of International Law, 25.
  • Grigor’ev, V. N. & Antonov, A. N. (2013) ‘Reshenie tribunala po byvshei Yugoslavii po delu Gotovina/Markach kak (ocherednoi) proval mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya’, Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya, 3.
  • Helfman, T. (2012) ‘Francis Biddle and the Nuremberg Legacy: Waking the Human Conscience’, The Journal Jurisprudence, 15.
  • Heller, K. J. (2011) The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199554317.001.0001
  • Hirsch, F. (2008) ‘The Soviets at Nuremberg: International Law, Propaganda, and the Making of the Postwar Order’, American Historical Review, 113, 3.
  • Inogamova-Khegai, L. V. (2003) Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo (St Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press).
  • Ispolinov, A. S. (2016) ‘Faktory uspekha Nyurnbergskogo tribunala i sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie’, Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal, 6.
  • Jia, B. B (2006) ‘China and the International Criminal Court: The Current Situation’, Singapore Year Book of International Law, 10.
  • Jianping, L. & Zhixiang, W. (2005) ‘China’s Attitude Towards the ICC’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 3, 3.
  • Karpets, I. I. (1979) Prestupleniya mezhdunarodnogo kharaktera (Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura).
  • Kayumova, A. R. (2009) ‘Chrezvychainye sudebnye palaty Kambodzhi v kachestve tribunala s gibridnoi yurisdiktsiei’, Sovremennoe pravo, 2.
  • Kelina, S. G. & Kudryavtsev, V. N. (eds) (1987) Ugolovnyi zakon. Opyt teoreticheskogo modelirovaniya (Moscow, Nauka).
  • Kibal’nik, A. G. (2003) Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo (St Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press).
  • Kibal’nik, A. G. (2007) ‘Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i natsional’nye interesy Rossii’, in Volzhenkin, B. V. (ed.) Rossiiskii ezhegodnik ugolovnogo prava. 2006 (St Petersburg, St Petersburg University Press).
  • Kostenko, N. I. (2014) Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo na sovremennom etape (Moscow, Yurlitinform).
  • Kudryavtsev, V. N. (ed.) (1995) Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo (Moscow, Nauka).
  • Lawrence, J. (1947) ‘The Nuremberg Trial’, International Affairs, 23, 2.
  • Ledyakh, I. A. & Lukashuk, I. I. (eds) (1995) Nyurnbergskii protsess: pravo protiv voiny i fashizma (Moscow, Institut gosudarstva i prava RAN).
  • Lopashenko, N. A., Kobzeva, E. V., Khutov, K. M. & Dolotov, R. O. (2016) ‘Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Obshchaya chast’. Proekt’, Biblioteka ugolovnogo prava i kriminologii, 6.
  • Lukashuk, I. I. & Naumov, A. V. (1999) Mezdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo (Moscow, Spark).
  • Lysov, I. S. (2012) ‘Praktika primeneniya instituta sovmestnykh prestupnykh deiistvii v prave Chrezvychainykh palat v sudakh Kambodzhi dlya presledovaniya za prestypleniya, sovershennye v period Demokraticheskoi Kampuchii’, Biblioteka kriminalista, 1.
  • Mälksoo, L. (2012) ‘Friedrich Fromhold Von Martens (Fyodor Fyodorovich Martens) (1845–1909)’, in Fassbender, B. & Peters, A. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • Mälksoo, L. (2014) ‘F.F. Martens and His Time: When Russia Was an Integral Part of the European Tradition of International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 25, 3.
  • Mälksoo, L. (2015) Russian Approaches to International Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • Marusin, I. S. (2003) ‘Spetsial’nyi sud po S’erra-Leone—novyi organ mezhdunaronoi ugolovnoi yustitsii’, Pravovedenie, 2.
  • Meron, T. (2000) ‘The Martens Clause, Principles of Humanity, and Dictates of Public Conscience’, American Journal of International Law, 94, 1.
  • Mezyaev, A. B. (2014) ‘Mezhdunarodnyi sudebnyi aktivizm kak sposob izmeneniya mezhdunarodnogo prava’, in Tarkhanov, I. A., Abdullin, A. I., Kurdyukov, G. I. & Davletgil’deev, R. Sh. (eds) Mezhdunarodnyi pravoporyadok v sovremennom mire i rol’ Rossii v ego ukreplenii (Moscow, Statut)
  • Mikhailov, N. G. (2006) Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi tribunal po byvshei Yugoslavii: kompetentsiya, istochniki prava, osnovnye printsipy deyatel’nosti (Moscow, Izdatel’skii dom Shumilovoi).
  • Muller, W. (2013) Beyond History and Sovereignty. China and the Future of International Law, LL.D. thesis, Florence, European University Institute.
  • Naumov, A. V. (2004) Rossiiskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast’ (Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura).
  • Naumov, A. V. (2009) ‘Sovremennye problemy mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava i mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya’, in Bogush, G. I. & Trikoz, E. N. (eds) Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie: sovremennye problemy (Moscow, Institut prava i publichnoi politiki).
  • Naumov, A. V., Kibal’nik, A. G., Orlov, V. N. & Volosyuk, P. V. (2015) Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo (Moscow, Yurait).
  • Oivin, V. N. (2009) ‘Rossiya i Mezhdunarodnyi ugolovnyi sud’, in Bogush, G. I. & Trikoz, E. N. (eds) Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie: sovremennye problemy (Moscow, Institut prava i publichnoi politiki).
  • Piontkovskii, A. A. (1948) Voprosy material’nogo ugolovnogo prava na Nyurnbergskom protsesse (Moscow, Moskovskii yuridicheskii institut).
  • Poltorak, A. I. (1966) Nyurnbergskii protsess. Osnovnye pravovye problemy (Moscow, Nauka).
  • Pustogarov, V. V. (1999) ‘The Martens Clause in International Law’, Journal of the History of International Law, 1.
  • Pustogarov, V. V. (2000) Our Martens: F.F. Martens, International Lawyer and Architect of Peace (The Hague, Kluwer Law International).
  • Rabtsevich, O. I. (2007) ‘Internatsionalizirovannye ugolovnye tribunaly―organy mezhdunarodnoi ugolovnoi yustitsii’, Pravo i politika, 12.
  • Raginskii, M. Yu. (1985) Militaristy na skam’e podsudimykh. Po materialam Tokiiskogo i Khabarovskogo protsessov (Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura).
  • Rarog, A. I. (ed.) (2009) Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Osobennaya chast’ (Moscow, Eksmo).
  • Rekunkov, A. M., Lebedeva, N. S. & Alekseev, N. S. (eds) (1987–1999) Nyurnbergskii protsess, 8 vols (Moscow, Yuridicheskaya literatura).
  • Romashkin, P. S. (1975) ‘Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo na sluzhbe mira i demokratii’, Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 5.
  • Rudenko, R. A., Nikitchenko, I. T. & Poltorak, A. I. (eds) (1957–1961) Nyurnbergskii protsess nad glavnymi nemetskimi voennymi prestupnikami, 7 vols (Moscow, Gosyurizdat).
  • Sellars, K. (2013) ‘Crimes against Peace’ and International Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9781139236980
  • Shargorodskii, M. D. (1947) ‘Nekotorye voprosy mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava’, Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 3, reprinted in Shargorodskii, M. D. (2004) Izbrannye trudy (St Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press).
  • Shulepov, N. A. (2009) ‘Rimskii statut Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda i natsional’noe voenno-ugolovnoe zakonodatel’stvo’, in Bogush, G. I. & Trikoz, E. N. (eds) Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie: sovremennye problemy (Moscow, Institut prava i publichnoi politiki).
  • Skuratova, A. Yu. (2006) ‘Spetsial’nyi sud po S’erra-Leone: pravovaya model’ i praktika’, Yurist-mezhdunarodnik, 4.
  • Skuratova, A. Yu. (2012) Mezhdunarodnye prestupleniya: sovremennye problemy kvalifikatsii (Moscow, Norma).
  • Smirnov, L. N. & Zaitsev, E. B. (1980) Sud v Tokio (Moscow, Voenizdat).
  • Stepanenko, V. I. (1982) ‘O ponyatii mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava’, Pravovedenie, 3.
  • Subbotina, E. N. (2012) Mekhanizm implementatsii mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava v zarubezhnykh stranakh i v Rossii (Moscow, Yurlitinform).
  • Sukharev, A. Ya. (2007) ‘Nyurnbergskii protsess i problem mezdunarodnoi zakonnosti’, Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava, 1.
  • Ticehurst, R. (1997) ‘La clause de Martens et le droit des conflits armés’, Revue internationale de la Croix-Rouge, 79.
  • Trainin, A. N. (1935) Ugolovnaya interventsiya (Moscow, Sovetskoe zakonodatel’stvo).
  • Trainin, A. N. (1937) Zashchita mira i ugolovnyi zakon (Moscow, Yuridicheskoe izdatel’stvo Narodnogo komissariata yustitsii SSSR), reprinted in Trainin, A. N. (2004) Izbrannye trudy (St Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press).
  • Trainin, A. N. (1944–1945) Ob ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti gitlerovtsev (Moscow, Yuridicheskoe izdatel’stvo Narodnogo komissariata yustitsii SSSR), reprinted in Trainin, A. N. (2004) Izbrannye trudy (St Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press).
  • Trainin, A. N. (1945–1946) Na Nyurnbergskom protsesse (Moscow, Yuridicheskoe izdatel’stvo Narodnogo komissariata yustitsii SSSR), reprinted in Trainin, A. N. (2004) Izbrannye trudy (St Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press).
  • Trainin, A. N. (1956) Zashchita mira i bor’ba s prestupleniyami protiv chelovechestva (Moscow, Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR), reprinted in Trainin, A. N. (2004) Izbrannye trudy (St Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press).
  • Trainin, A. N. (2004) Izbrannye trudy (St Petersburg, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press).
  • Trikoz, E. N. (2009) ‘Implementatsiya obyazatel’stv, vytekayushchikh iz Rimskogo statuta: ramochnaya model’ dlya Rossiiskoi Federatsii’, in Bogush, G. I. & Trikoz, E. N. (eds) Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie: sovremennye problemy (Moscow, Institut prava i publichnoi politiki).
  • Tuzmukhamedov, B. R. (2009) ‘O nekotorykh problemakh sootvetstviya Rimskogo statuta Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda Konstitutsii Rossiiskoi Federatsii’, in Bogush, G. I. & Trikoz, E. N. (eds) Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie: sovremennye problemy (Moscow, Institut prava i publichnoi politiki).
  • Vaipan, G. V. (2011) ‘Otvetstvennost’ nachal’nikov za mezhdunarodnye prestupleniya, sovershennye podchinennymi: razlichnye podkhody v resheniyakh mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh sudov’, Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya, 2.
  • Vasiliev, S. & Ogorodova, A. (2005) ‘Implementation of the Rome Statute in Russia’, Finnish Yearbook of International Law, 16.
  • Vedernikova, O. N. (2007) ‘Rossiiskoe ugolovnoe zakonodatel’stvo v sisteme natsional’nogo i mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka’, in Volzhenkin, B. V. (ed.) Rossiiskii ezhegodnik ugolovnogo prava. 2006 (St Petersburg, St Petersburg University Press).
  • Vedernikova, O. N. (2010) ‘K voprosu o ratifikatsii Rimskogo statuta Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda’, Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo, 4.
  • Werle, G. (2009) Principles of International Criminal Law (The Hague, TMC Asser Press).10.1007/978-90-6704-559-9

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.