Corruption and Popular Support for Democracy and Government in Transitional Contexts: The Case of Kyrgyzstan

References

• Almond, G. & Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Countries (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).10.1515/9781400874569
   Google Scholar
• Alymbekov, M. (2012) ‘IATs “Kabar”: Bor’ba s korruptsiei v Kyrgyzstane dostigla vysokikh chinov’, Kabar, 29 November, available at: http://www.kabar.kg/rus/kabar/full/44910, accessed 21 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J. & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003) ‘Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes Toward Government in Contemporary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 47, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, H. (2001) ‘Corruption and the Collapse of the Czech Transition Miracle’, East European Politics and Societies, 1, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Armah-Attoh, D., Gyimah-Boadi, E. & Chikwanha, A. B. (2007) Corruption and Institutional Trust in Africa: Implications for Democratic Development, Working Paper 81, Afrobarometer (Cape Town, Institute for Democracy in South Africa), available at: http://afrobarometer.org/sites/default/files/publications/Working%20paper/AfropaperNo81.pdf, accessed 1 June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bohn, S. (2012) ‘Corruption in Latin America: Understanding the Perception-Exposure Gap’, Journal of Politics in Latin America, 4, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, M., Mattes, R. & Gyiman-Boadi, E. (2005) Public Opinion, Democracy, and Market Reform in Africa (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Canache, D. & Allison, M. (2005) ‘Perceptions of Corruption in Latin American Government’, Latin American Politics and Society, 47, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catterberg, G. & Moreno, A. (2005) ‘The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E. & Chu, Y. (2006) ‘Corruption and Trust? Exceptionalism in Asian Democracies?’, The Journal of Politics, 68, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, W. & Kirwin, M. (2007) A Vicious Cycle of Corruption and Mistrust in Institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Micro-Level Analysis, Working Paper 71, Afrobarometer (Cape Town, Institute for Democracy in South Africa), available at: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/Pnadk531.pdf, accessed 3 June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, B., Kraay, A. & Nyiri, Z. (2011) ‘Corruption and Confidence in Public Institutions: Evidence from a Global Survey’, The World Bank Economic Review, 25, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, K. (2006) Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia (New York, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. (2011) ‘Kyrgyzstan’s Latest Revolution’, Journal of Democracy, 22, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley, A. (2012) Great Games, Local Rules: The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia (Oxford, Oxford University Press).10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929825.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1971) Polyarchy (New Haven, Yale University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dawisha, K. (2014) Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? (New York, NY, Simon and Schuster).
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. (2000) ‘Social Capital, Beliefs in Government and Political Corruption’, in Pharr, S. & Putnam, R. (eds).
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (1999) Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2002) ‘Thinking About Hybrid Regimes’, Journal of Democracy, 12, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2011) ‘Why Democracies Survive’, Journal of Democracy, 22, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dininio, P. & Orttung, R. (2005) ‘Explaining Patterns of Corruption in the Russian Regions’, World Politics, 57, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engvall, J. (2014) ‘Why are Public Offices Bought and Sold in Kyrgyzstan?’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 30, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, M. S. (2005) Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics (New York, Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511791062
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. (2011) ‘The Myth of Mass Russian Support for Autocracy: The Public Opinion Foundations of a Hybrid Regime’, Europe-Asia Studies, 63, 8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, H. (2014) Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9781139683524
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, J. (1998) ‘Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions’, World Politics, 50, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1997) Modernization and Post-Modernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence (New York, NY, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2010) ‘Changing Mass Priorities: The Link Between Modernization and Democracy’, Perspectives on Politics, 8, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knack, S. (2007) ‘Measuring Corruption: A Critique of Indicators in Eastern Europe and Central Asia’, Journal of Public Policy, 27, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Kupatadze, A. (2008) ‘Organized Crime Before and After the Tulip Revolution: the changing dynamics of upperworld–underworld networks’, Central Asian Survey, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A. V. (1998) Russia’s Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking and Informal Exchange (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. (2008) ‘Growth Without Prosperity in Africa’, Journal of Democracy, 19, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marat, E. (2006) The Tulip Revolution: Kyrgyzstan One Year After March 15, 2005 (Washington, DC, Jamestown Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Marat, E. (2012) ‘Nations in Transit 2012: Kyrgyzstan’, Freedom House, available at: www.freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2012/kyrgyzstan, accessed 1 August 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Marat, E. (2015) ‘Nations in Transit 2015: Kyrgyzstan’, Freedom House, available at: https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2015/kyrgyzstan, accessed 1 August 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Martini, M. (2013) ‘Overview of Corruption and Anti-corruption in Kyrgyzstan’, Transparency International, 9 January, available at: http://www.transparency.org/files/content/corruptionqas/363_Overview_of_Corruption_in_Kyrgyzstan.pdf, accessed 10 April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• McGlinchey, E. (2011) Chaos, Violence, Dynasty: Politics and Islam in Central Asia (Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press).10.2307/j.ctt5vkhbq
   Google Scholar
• McMann, K. (2009) ‘Market Reform as a Stimulus to Particularistic Politics’, Comparative Political Studies, 42, February.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, H. (2010) ‘Congressional Panel Told Corruption Allegations at Kyrgyz Airbase Hurt US Image’, RFE/RL, 24 April, available at: http://www.rferl.org/content/Congressional_Panel_Told_Corruption_At_Kyrgyz_Air_Base_Hurt_US_Image/2023292.html, accessed 15 March 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mauro, P. (1995) ‘Corruption and Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W. & Rose, R. (2001a) ‘What are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies’, Comparative Political Studies, 34, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W. & Rose, R. (2001b) ‘Political Support for Incomplete Democracies: Realist Versus Idealist Theories and Measures’, International Political Science Review, 22, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moehler, D. C. (2008) Distrusting Democrats: Outcomes of Participatory Constitution-Making (Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press).10.3998/mpub.203954
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S. D. & Klesner, J. (2010) ‘Corruption and Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence from Mexico’, Comparative Politics Studies, 43, 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (1999) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance (Oxford, Oxford University Press).10.1093/0198295685.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Olimpieva, I. & Pachenkov, O. (2013) ‘Corrupt Intermediaries in Post-Socialist Russia: Mutations of Economic Institutions’, Europe-Asia Studies, 65, 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSCE (2016) ‘Kyrgyz Republic Parliamentary Elections 4 October 2015’, OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report, Warsaw, 28 January, available at: http://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/kyrgyzstan/219186?download=true, accessed 1 October 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pannier, B. (2007) ‘Kyrgyzstan: Thousands Demand President’s Resignation’, RFE/RL, 11 April, available at: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1075803.html, accessed 15 April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pharr, S. & Putnam, R. (eds) (2000) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Democracies? (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pobedinov, A. (2005) ‘Bol’shaya semeika’, Kommersant’’, 27, 7 July, available at: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/589685, accessed 3 June 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Radnitz, S. (2010) Weapons of the Wealthy: Predatory Regimes and Elite-Led Protests in Central Asia (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Razinkin, V. (1995) Vory v Zakone’ i prestupnye klany (Moscow, Kriminologicheskaya assotsiyatsiya).
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. & Mishler, W. (2002) ‘Comparing Regime Support in Non-democratic and Democratic Countries’, Democratization, 9, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. & Mishler, W. (1996) ‘Testing the Churchill Hypothesis: Popular Support for Democracy and its Alternatives’, Journal of Public Policy, 16, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R., Mishler, W. & Haepfer, C. (1998) Democracy and its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies (Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R., Shin, D. & Munro, N. (1999) ‘Tensions Between the Democratic Ideal and Reality: South Korea’, in Norris, P. (ed.) Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rose Ackerman, S. (1999) Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and Reform (New York, Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9781139175098
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A., Diamond, L. & Plattner, M. (1999) The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies (Boulder, CO, Lynne Rienner Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Seligson, M. (2002) ‘The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Counties’, Journal of Politics, 64, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharafutdinova, G. (2010) ‘What Explains Corruption Perceptions? The Dark Side of Political Competition in Russia’s Regions’, Comparative Politics, 42, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sydykova, Z. (1998) ‘A Small Matter of Corruption’, Index on Censorship, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. (2000) ‘The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-national Study’, Journal of Public Economics, 76, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, C. & Latcheva, R. (2006) ‘Economic Transformation Outside the Law: Corruption, Trust in Public Institutions and the Informal Economy in Transition Countries of Central and Eastern Europe’, Europe-Asia Studies, 58, 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, C. (2007) The Best System Money Can Buy: Corruption in the European Union (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Zechmeister, E. & Zizumbo-Colunga, D. (2013) ‘The Varying Political Toll of Concerns about Corruption in Good Versus Bad Economic Times’, Comparative Political Studies, 46, October.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar