2,470
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Transnistria’s Order of Friendship: Legitimacy Through Diplomatic Practice

References

  • Adler-Nissen, R. (2008) ‘The Diplomacy of Opting-out: a Bourdieudian Approach to National Integration Strategies’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 46, 3.
  • Albert, M. (2017) ‘Beyond Integration and Differentiation? The Holy See and the Pope in the System of World Politics’, The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 15, 4.
  • Aliyev, H. (2015) ‘Post-Soviet Informality: Towards Theory-Building’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35, 3–4.
  • Anderson, C., Hildreth, J. A. D. & Howland, L. (2015) ‘Is the Desire for Status a Fundamental Human Motive? A Review of the Empirical Literature’, Psychological Bulletin, 141, 3.
  • Antonsich, M. & Skey, M. (2017) ‘Introduction: The Persistence of Banal Nationalism’, in Skey, M. & Antonsich, M. (eds) Everyday Nationhood (London, Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Applebaum, R. (2015) ‘The Friendship Project: Socialist Internationalism in the Soviet Union and Czechoslovakia in the 1950s and 1960s’, Slavic Review, 74, 3.
  • Bakke, K. M., O’Loughlin, J., Toal, G. & Ward, M. D. (2014) ‘Convincing State-Builders? Disaggregating Internal Legitimacy in Abkhazia’, International Studies Quarterly, 58, 3.
  • Balmaceda, M. M. (2013) ‘Privatization and Elite Defection in de facto States: The Case of Transnistria, 1991–2012’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 46, 4.
  • Bénabou, R. & Tirole, J. (2006) ‘Incentives and Prosocial Behavior’, American Economic Review, 96, 5.
  • Berg, E. & Mölder, M. (2012) ‘Who is Entitled to “Earn Sovereignty”? Legitimacy and Regime Support in Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh’, Nations and Nationalism, 18, 3.
  • Berg, E. & Vits, K. (2018) ‘Quest for Survival and Recognition: Insights into the Foreign Policy Endeavours of the Post-Soviet de facto States’, Ethnopolitics, 17, 4.
  • Billig, M. (1995) Banal Nationalism (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage).
  • Blakkisrud, H. & Kolstø, P. (2011) ‘From Secessionist Conflict Toward a Functioning State: Processes of State- and Nation-Building in Transnistria’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 27, 2.
  • Bouris, D. & Fernández-Molina, I. (2018) ‘Contested States, Hybrid Diplomatic Practices, and the Everyday Quest for Recognition’, International Political Sociology, 12, 3.
  • Broers, L. (2013) ‘Recognising Politics in Unrecognised States: 20 Years of Enquiry into the de facto States of the South Caucasus’, Caucasus Survey, 1, 1.
  • Bueger, C. & Gadinger, F. (2015) ‘The Play of International Practice’, International Studies Quarterly, 59, 3.
  • Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J. & Pedersen, O. K. (2013) ‘Coding in-Depth Semistructured Interviews: Problems of Unitization and Intercoder Reliability and Agreement’, Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 3.
  • Caspersen, N. (2008) ‘Separatism and Democracy in the Caucasus’, Survival, 50, 4.
  • Caspersen, N. (2009) ‘Playing the Recognition Game: External Actors and De facto States’, The International Spectator, 44, 4.
  • Caspersen, N. (2015) ‘Degrees of Legitimacy: Ensuring Internal and External Support in the Absence of Recognition’, Geoforum, 66, 1.
  • Chamberlain-Creangă, R. & Allin, L. K. (2010) ‘Acquiring Assets, Debts and Citizens: Russia and the Micro-Foundations of Transnistria’s Stalemated Conflict’, Demokratizatsiya, 18, 4.
  • Coggins, B. (2011) ‘Friends in High Places: International Politics and the Emergence of States from Secessionism’, International Organization, 65, 3.
  • Comai, G. (2017) ‘Quantitative Analysis of Web Content in Support of Qualitative Research. Examples from the Study of Post-Soviet de facto States’, Studies of Transition States and Societies, 9, 1.
  • Comai, G. (2018) ‘Conceptualising Post-Soviet de facto States as Small Dependent Jurisdictions’, Ethnopolitics, 17, 2.
  • Cornut, J. (2018) ‘Diplomacy, Agency, and the Logic of Improvisation and Virtuosity in Practice’, European Journal of International Relations, 24, 3.
  • Dembińska, M. & Campana, A. (2017) ‘Frozen Conflicts and Internal Dynamics of De facto States: Perspectives and Directions for Research’, International Studies Review, 19, 1.
  • Dembińska, M. & Mérand, F. (2019) ‘The Role of International Brokers in Frozen Conflicts: The Case of Transnistria’, Asia Europe Journal, 17, 1.
  • Deudney, D. & Ikenberry, G. J. (2009) ‘The Unravelling of the Cold War Settlement’, Survival, 51, 6.
  • Devyatkov, A. (2012) ‘Russian Policy Toward Transnistria. Between Multilateralism and Marginalization’, Problems of Post-Communism, 59, 3.
  • Fitzpatrick, K. R. (2012) ‘Defining Strategic Publics in a Networked World: Public Diplomacy’s Challenge at Home and Abroad’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7, 4.
  • Fox, J. E. & Miller-Idriss, C. (2008) ‘Everyday Nationhood’, Ethnicities, 8, 4.
  • Frey, B. S. & Gallus, J. (2016) ‘Honors: A Rational Choice Analysis of Award Bestowals’, Rationality and Society, 28, 3.
  • Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W. & Wicki, B. (2008) ‘What Passes as a Rigorous Case Study?’, Strategic Management Journal, 29, 13.
  • Gnedina, E. (2015) ‘“Multi-Vector” Foreign Policies in Europe: Balancing, Bandwagoning or Bargaining?’, Europe-Asia Studies, 67, 7.
  • Grant, T. D. (1998) ‘Defining Statehood: The Montevideo Convention and its Discontents’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 37, 1
  • Gregory, B. (2008) ‘Public Diplomacy: Sunrise of an Academic Field’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 1.
  • Griffiths, R. D. (2017) ‘Admission to the Sovereignty Club: The Past, Present, and Future of the International Recognition Regime’, Territory, Politics, Governance, 5, 2.
  • Hale, H. E. (2014) Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
  • Henrich, J. & Gil-White, F. J. (2001) ‘The Evolution of Prestige: Freely Conferred Deference as a Mechanism for Enhancing the Benefits of Cultural Transmission’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 3.
  • Herring, S. C. (2009) ‘Web Content Analysis: Expanding the Paradigm’, in Hunsinger, J., Klastrup, L. & Allen, M. (eds) International Handbook of Internet Research (Dordrecht, Springer).
  • Isachenko, D. (2012) The Making of Informal States: Statebuilding in Northern Cyprus and Transdniestria (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Istomin, I. & Bolgova, I. (2016) ‘Transnistrian Strategy in the Context of Russian–Ukrainian Relations: The Rise and Failure of “Dual Alignment”’, Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea, 16, 1.
  • Jeffrey, A., Mcconnell, F. & Wilson, A. (2015) ‘Understanding Legitimacy: Perspectives from Anomalous Geopolitical Spaces’, Geoforum, 66, 1.
  • Kang, H. (2013) ‘The Prevention and Handling of the Missing Data’, Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 64, 5.
  • Karlsson, M. & Sjøvaag, H. (2016) ‘Content Analysis and Online News. Epistemologies of Analysing the Ephemeral Web’, Digital Journalism, 4, 1.
  • Ker-Lindsay, J. (2015) ‘Engagement Without Recognition: the Limits of Diplomatic Interaction with Contested States’, International Affairs, 91, 2.
  • Ker-Lindsay, J. & Berg, E. (2018) ‘Introduction: A Conceptual Framework for Engagement with de facto States’, Ethnopolitics, 17, 4.
  • Kertzer, D. I. (1988) Ritual, Politics, and Power (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press).
  • Kinne, B. J. (2014) ‘Dependent Diplomacy: Signaling, Strategy, and Prestige in the Diplomatic Network’, International Studies Quarterly, 58, 2.
  • Kireyeva, M. (2017) ‘Pridnestrovskii ordenopad: komu dostalos’ bolee 15 600 nagrad ot Shevchuka’, Media Center, available at: http://mediacenter.md/proekti_seichas/kachestvennaia_jurnalistika/1190-pridnestrovskiy-ordenopad-komu-dostalos-bolee-15-600-nagrad-ot-shevchuka.html, accessed 13 August 2017.
  • Koller, P. (2009) ‘On the Legitimacy of Political Communities. A General Approach and its Application to the European Union’, Perspectives in Moral Science, 22, 1.
  • Kolstø, P. (2006) ‘The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States’, Journal of Peace Research, 43, 6.
  • Kolstø, P. & Blakkisrud, H. (2008) ‘Living with Non-Recognition: State and Nation-Building in South Caucasian Quasi-states’, Europe-Asia Studies, 60, 3.
  • Kolstø, P. & Blakkisrud, H. (2017) ‘Regime Development and Patron–Client Relations: The 2016 Transnistrian Presidential Elections and the “Russia Factor”’, Demokratizatsiya, 25, 4.
  • Kopeček, V., Hoch, T. & Baar, V. (2016) ‘De facto States and Democracy: The Case of Abkhazia’, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 32, 1.
  • Koschut, S. & Oelsner, A. (2014) Friendship and International Relations (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Kosienkowski, M. (2012) Continuity and Change in Transnistria’s Foreign Policy (Lublin, Catholic University of Lublin Publishing House).
  • Kosienkowski, M. (2020) ‘The Patron–Client Relationship Between Russia and Transnistria’, in Hoch, T. & Kopeček, V. (eds) De Facto States in Eurasia (Abingdon & New York, NY, Routledge).
  • Kratochwil, F. V. (2001) ‘The Politics of Place and Origin: An Enquiry into the Changing Boundaries of Representation, Citizenship and Legitimacy’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 1, 1.
  • Lake, D. (2010) ‘Building Legitimate States after Civil Wars’, in Hartzell, C. & Hoddie, M. (eds) Strengthening Peace in Post-Civil War States: Transforming Spoilers into Stakeholders (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).
  • Lewis, S. C., Zamith, R. & Hermida, A. (2013) ‘Content Analysis in an Era of Big Data: A Hybrid Approach to Computational and Manual Methods’, Journal of Broadcasting Media, 57, 1.
  • Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. & Campanella Bracken, C. (2002) ‘Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability', Human Communication Research, 28, 4.
  • Mayring, P. (2000) ‘Qualitative Content Analysis’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1, 2.
  • McConnell, F. (2017) ‘Liminal Geopolitics: The Subjectivity and Spatiality of Diplomacy at the Margins’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42, 1.
  • Melissen, J. (2005) The New Public Diplomacy Soft Power in International Relations (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Mitzen, J. (2006) ‘Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma’, European Journal of International Relations, 12, 3.
  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002) The Content Analysis Guidebook (London, Sage).
  • Nitoiu, C. (2018) ‘The Influence of External Actors on Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Space’, Europe-Asia Studies, 70, 5.
  • O’Loughlin, J., Kolossov, V. & Toal, G. (2014) ‘Inside the Post-Soviet de facto States: A Comparison of Attitudes in Abkhazia, Nagorny Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Transnistria’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 55, 5.
  • Onuf, N. (2013) ‘Recognition and the Constitution of Epochal Change’, International Relations, 27, 2.
  • Osipov, A. & Vasilevich, H. (2019) ‘Transnistrian Nation-Building: A Case of Effective Diversity Policies?', Nationalities Papers, 47, 6.
  • Pacher, A. (2018a) ‘The Ritual Creation of Political Symbols: International Exchanges in Public Diplomacy’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 47, 6.
  • Pacher, A. (2018b) ‘Strategic Publics in Public Diplomacy: A Typology and a Heuristic Device for Multiple Publics’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 13, 3.
  • Pacher, A. (2019) ‘The Diplomacy of Post-Soviet De Facto States: Ontological Security Under Stigma’, International Relations, 33, 4
  • Pegg, S. (1998) De facto States in the International System (Aldershot, Ashgate).
  • Pegg, S. & Berg, E. (2016) ‘Lost and Found: The Wikileaks of de facto State–Great Power Relations’, International Studies Perspectives, 17, 3.
  • Polese, A. & Rekhviashvili, L. (2017) ‘Introduction: Informality and Power in the South Caucasus’, Caucasus Survey, 5, 1.
  • Pouliot, V. (2008) ‘The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities’, International Organization, 62, 2.
  • Pouliot, V. & Cornut, J. (2015) ‘Practice Theory and the Study of Diplomacy: A Research Agenda’, Cooperation and Conflict, 50, 3.
  • Protsyk, O. (2012) ‘Secession and Hybrid Regime Politics in Transnistria’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 45, 1.
  • Rogstad, A. (2018) ‘The Next Crimea? Getting Russia’s Transnistria Policy Right’, Problems of Post-Communism, 65, 1.
  • Roshchin, E. (2011) ‘Friendship of the Enemies: Twentieth Century Treaties of the United Kingdom and the USSR’, International Politics, 48, 1.
  • Scott-Smith, G. (2018) ‘Special Issue: The Evolution of Diplomacy’, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 14, 1.
  • Sending, O. J., Pouliot, V. & Neumann, I. B. (2015) Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
  • Sharp, P. (1999) ‘For Diplomacy: Representation and the Study of International Relations’, International Studies Review, 1, 1.
  • Skey, M. (2009) ‘The National in Everyday Life: A Critical Engagement with Michael Billig's Thesis of Banal Nationalism', The Sociological Review, 57, 2.
  • Souleimanov, E. A., Abrahamyan, E. & Aliyev, H. (2018) ‘Unrecognized States as a Means of Coercive Diplomacy? Assessing the Role of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Russia’s Foreign Policy in the South Caucasus’, Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea, 18, 1.
  • Tam, L. & Kim, J. N. (2018) ‘Who Are Publics in Public Diplomacy? Proposing a Taxonomy of Foreign Publics as an Intersection Between Symbolic Environment and Behavioral Experiences’, Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15, 1.
  • Thoric, V. & Silitcaia, N. (2016) ‘Media Sheriffs from Transnistria’, Rise Moldova, 3 May, available at: https://www.rise.md/english/underground-deals-media-sheriffs-from-transnistria/, accessed 10 August 2017.
  • Toomla, R. (2016) ‘Charting Informal Engagement Between de facto States: A Quantitative Analysis’, Space and Polity, 20, 3.
  • Transnistrian Foreign Ministry (2010) ‘V Tiraspole proshla Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya “20 let so Dnya obrazovaniya Pridnestrovskoi Moldavskoi Respubliki”’, 3 September, available at: http://mid.gospmr.org/ru/fsk, accessed 12 August 2017.
  • Transnistrian Foreign Ministry (2011) ‘Ministry of Foreign Affairs Concludes Cooperation Agreement with Pridnestrovien Union of Industrialists, Agrarians and Entrepreneurs’, 6 July, available at: http://mfa-pmr.org/en/xys, accessed 19 August 2018.
  • Transnistrian Foreign Ministry (2012) ‘Sergey Gavrilov: “I Hope that all Pridnestrovian Deputies Understand Our Common Responsibility for Development of Interaction with Russia”’, 31 October, available at: http://mid.gospmr.org/en/dsr, accessed 12 August 2017.
  • Transnistrian Foreign Ministry (2013) ‘Farit Muhametshin: “Rossiya vsegda budet s vami”’, 13 June, available at: http://mid.gospmr.org/ru/kpD, accessed 12 August 2017.
  • Transnistrian Foreign Ministry (2016) ‘Evgenii Shevchuk provel vstrechu s Alekseem Zhuravlevym’, 30 March, available at: http://mid.gospmr.org/ru/hqP, accessed 12 August 2017.
  • Troy, J. (2018) ‘“The Pope’s Own Hand Outstretched”: Holy See Diplomacy as a Hybrid Mode of Diplomatic Agency’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20, 3.
  • Voller, Y. (2015) ‘Contested Sovereignty as an Opportunity: Understanding Democratic Transitions in Unrecognized States’, Democratization, 22, 4.
  • von Steinsdorff, S. & Fruhstorfer, A. (2012) ‘Post-Soviet de facto States in Search of Internal and External Legitimacy’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 45, 1.
  • Weber, M. (1972) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (5th edn) (Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck).
  • Wille, T. (2019) ‘Representation and Agency in Diplomacy: How Kosovo Came to Agree to the Rambouillet Accords’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 22, 4.
  • Zatulin, K. (2016) ‘Prezident Pridnestrov’ya nagradil Institut stran SNG Ordenom druzhby’, available at: https://zatulin.ru/prezident-pridnestrovya-nagradil-institut-stran-sng-ordenom-druzhby/, accessed 20 August 2018.