442
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Can Russian Research Policy be Called Neoliberal? A Study in the Comparative Sociology of Quantification

References

  • Adams, J., Clemens, E. & Orloff, A. (2005) ‘Social Theory, Modernity, and Three Waves of Historical Sociology’, in Adams, J., Clemens, E. & Orloff, A. (eds) Remaking Modernity: Politics, History and Sociology (Durham, NC, Duke University Press).
  • Aghion, P., Algan, Y., Cahuc, P. & Shleifer, A. (2010) ‘Regulation and Distrust’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 3.
  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970) ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 3.
  • Auranen, O. & Nieminen, M. (2010) ‘University Research Funding and Publication Performance—An International Comparison’, Research Policy, 39, 6.
  • Baldi, S. (1998) ‘Normative Versus Social Constructivist Processes in the Allocation of Citations: A Network-Analytic Model’, American Sociological Review, 63, 6.
  • Banfield, E. (1958) The Moral Basis of a Backward Society (New York, NY, The Free Press).
  • Barker, K. (2007) ‘The UK Research Assessment Exercise: The Evolution of a National Research Evaluation System’, Research Evaluation, 16, 1.
  • Berman, E. P. & Hirschman, D. (2018) ‘The Sociology of Quantification: Where Are We Now?’, Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 47, 3.
  • Bikbov, A. (2010) ‘How Russian Universities Became the Future of World Education’, Eurozine, 1 July, available at: https://www.eurozine.com/how-russian-universities-became-the-future-of-world-education/, accessed 28 February 2020.
  • Bobkov, N. & Oschepkov G. (2005) ‘Konkurentsiya obrazovatel’nykh programm v usloviyakh eksperimenta po GIFO’, Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2.
  • Boliver, V. (2015) ‘Are There Distinctive Clusters of Higher and Lower Status Universities in the UK?’, Oxford Review of Education, 41, 5.
  • Braun, D. (1993) ‘Who Governs Intermediary Agencies? Principal–Agent Relations in Research Policy-making’, Journal of Public Policy, 13, 2.
  • Butler, L. (2003) ‘Explaining Australia’s Increased Share of ISI Publications—the Effects of a Funding Formula Based on Publication Counts’, Research Policy, 32, 1.
  • Chirikov, I. (2016) ‘Do Russian Research Universities have a Secret Mission? A Response to Forrat’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 32, 4.
  • Dezhina, I. (2020) ‘Nauchnaya politika v vedushchikh rossiiskikh universitetakh: effecty “novogo menedzherialisma”’, Universitetskoe upravlenie: Praktika i analiz, 24, 3.
  • Elton, L. (2000) ‘The UK Research Assessment Exercise: Unintended Consequences’, Higher Education Quarterly, 54, 3.
  • Emerson, R. M. (1962) ‘Power–Dependence Relations’, American Sociological Review, 27, 1.
  • Espeland, W. N. & Sauder, M. (2007) ‘Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds’, American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1.
  • Espeland, W. N. & Stevens, M. (2008) ‘A Sociology of Quantification’, European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 49, 3.
  • Espeland, W. N., Sauder, M. & Espeland, W. (2016) Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability (New York, NY, Russell Sage Foundation).
  • Fanelli, D., Costas, R., Fang, F. C., Casadevall, A. & Bik, E. M. (2017) ‘Why do Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Data? A Matched-control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications’, bioRxiv, 126805, available at: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2017/04/12/126805.full.pdf, accessed 28 February 2021.
  • Forrat, N. (2016) ‘The Political Economy of Russian Higher Education: Why Does Putin Support Research Universities?’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 32, 4.
  • Froumin, I. & Lisyutkin, M. (2018) ‘The State as the Driver of Competitiveness in Russian Higher Education: The Case of the Project 5–100’, in Chirikov, I., Oleksiyenko, A., Zha, Q. & Li, J. (eds) International Status Anxiety and Higher Education: Soviet Legacy in China and Russia (Hong Kong, CERC-Springer).
  • Galiullina, R. & Ilyina, K. (2013) ‘Zhurnaly o sebe i dlya sebya: universitetskie izaniya pervoi poloviny XIX veka’, in Vishlenkova, E. A. & Savelieva, I. M. (eds) Soslovi russkikh professorov. Sozdateli statusov i smyslov (Moscow, Higher School of Economics Press).
  • Gel’man, V. (2017) ‘Political Foundations of Bad Governance in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Towards a Research Agenda’, East European Politics, 33, 4.
  • Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates (New York, NY, Anchor Books).
  • Gounko, T. & Smale, W. (2007) ‘Russian Higher Education Reforms: Shifting Policy Perspectives’, European Education, 39, 2.
  • Graham, L. R. & Dezhina, I. (2008) Science in the New Russia: Crisis, Aid, Reform (Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press).
  • Greif, A. & Laitin, D. (2004) ‘A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change’, American Political Science Review, 98, 4.
  • Guba, K., Sokolov, M. & Sokolova, N. (2020a) ‘Dinamika dissertatsionnoi industrii v Rossii, 2005–2015: Izmenil li novyi institutsional’nyi trafaret akademicheskoe povedenie?’, Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya, 21, 1.
  • Guba, K., Sokolov, M. & Tsivinskaya, A. (2020b) ‘Fictitious Efficiency: What the Russian Survey of Performance of Higher Education Institutions Actually Assessed’, Educational Studies, 1.
  • Guba, K. & Zavadskaya, M. (2017) Luchshe byt’ neeffektivnym, chem negosudarstvennym, Working Paper (St Petersburg, Institute for the Rule of Law).
  • Hargens, L. (2000) ‘Using the Literature; Reference Networks, Reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship’, American Sociological Review, 65, 6.
  • Hicks, D. (2012) ‘Performance-based University Research Funding Systems’, Research Policy, 41, 2.
  • Jensen, M. & Meckling, W. (1976) ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Information Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 4.
  • Kopotev, M., Rostovtsev, A. & Sokolov, M. (2021) ‘Shifting the Norm: The Case of Academic Plagiarism Detection’, in Gritsenko, D., Wijermars, M. & Kopotev, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies (Cham, Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Lamont, M. (2012) ‘Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation’, Annual Review of Sociology, 38.
  • Magun, A. (2011) ‘Higher Education in Russia: Is There a Way Out of a Neoliberal Impasse?’, in Rehbein, B. (ed.) Globalization and Inequality in Emerging Societies (London, Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Makeeva, A., Tsivinskaya, A., Sokolov, M., Sokolova, N. & Guba, K. (2020) ‘Nekorrektnie zaimstvovaniya v rossiikikh doktorskikh dissertatsiyakh: skol’ko, gde i u kogo?’, Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya, 29, 2.
  • Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I. & Yudkevich, M. (2021) ‘The Effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on Publications and Collaboration Patterns’, Journal of Informetrics, 15, 1.
  • McNay, I. (2003) ‘Assessing the Assessment: An Analysis of the UK Research Assessment Exercise, 2001, and its Outcomes, with Special Reference to Research in Education’, Science and Public Policy, 30, 1.
  • Minina, E. (2018) ‘Money Versus the Soul: Neoliberal Economics in the Education Modernisation Reform in Post-Soviet Russia’, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 16, 4.
  • Norris, M. & Oppenheim, C. (2003) ‘Citation Counts and the Research Assessment Exercise V: Archaeology and the 2001 RAE’, Journal of Documentation, 59, 6.
  • Paneyakh, E. (2014) ‘Faking Performance Together: Systems of Performance Evaluation in Russian Enforcement Agencies and Production of Bias and Privilege’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 30, 2–3.
  • Poldin, O., Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I. & Yudkevich, M. (2017) ‘Publication Activities of Russian Universities: the Effects of Project 5–100’, Educational Studies, 2.
  • Porter, T. (1996) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
  • Power, M. (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • Rijcke, S. D., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P. & Hammarfelt, B. (2016) ‘Evaluation Practices and Effects of Indicator Use—A Literature Review’, Research Evaluation, 25, 2.
  • Rostovtsev, A. & Kostinskiy, A. (2016) ‘Fake Academic Degrees as an Indicator for Severe Reputation Crisis in the Scientific Community of Russian Federation’, in 21st International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators-STI 2016. Book of Proceedings, Valencia, 14–16 September.
  • Schutz, A. (1962) ‘Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences’, in Natanson, M. (ed.) Collected Papers, Vol. 1 (Dordrecht, Springer).
  • Shapin, S. (2008) The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).
  • Shore, C. & Wright, S. (1999) ‘Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British Higher Education’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5, 4.
  • Skocpol, T. & Sommers, M. (1980) ‘The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosociological Inquiry’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22, 2.
  • Smolentseva, A. (2017) ‘Where Soviet and Neoliberal Discourses Meet: The Transformation of the Purposes of Higher Education in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia’, Higher Education, 74, 6.
  • Sokolov, M. (2017) ‘The Myth of University Strategy. Market Niches and Organizational Careers of Russian Universities’, Educational Studies, 2.
  • Sokolov, M., Guba, K., Safonova, M., Tchoikina, S. & Zimenkova, T. (2015) Kak stanovyatsya professorami: Akademicheskie kar’ery, rynki i vlast’ v pyati stranakh (Moscow, Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie).
  • Titarenko, L. & Zdravomyslova, E. (2017) Sociology in Russia: A Brief History (Berlin, Springer).
  • Trow, M. (1996) ‘Trust, Markets and Accountability in Higher Education: A Comparative Perspective’, Higher Education Policy, 9, 4.
  • Whitley, R., Gläser, J. & Laudel, G. (2018) ‘The Impact of Changing Funding and Authority Relationships on Scientific Innovations’, Minerva, 56, 1.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.