250
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evaluating the Evaluators in Russia: When Academic Citizenship Fails

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. & Caprasecca, A. (2009) ‘Gender Differences in Research Productivity. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Italian Academic System’, Scientometrics, 79, 3.
  • Abramo, G., Tindaro, C. & D’Angelo, C. (2013) ‘Individual Research Performance. A Proposal for Comparing Apples to Oranges’, Journal of Informetrics, 7, 2.
  • Abramov, R., Gruzdev, I. A. & Terent’yev, E. A. (2017) ‘Rabochee vremya i rolevye napryazheniya sotrudnikov sovremennogo Rossiyskogo universiteta’, Voprosy obrazovaniya, 1.
  • Altbach, P. G. (1995) ‘Problems and Possibilities: The US Academic Profession’, Studies in Higher Education, 20, 1.
  • Alvesson, M. & Spicer, A. (2012) ‘A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organizations’, Journal of Management Studies, 49, 7.
  • Androushchak, G. & Yudkevich, M. (2012) ‘Russian Higher Education: Salaries and Contracts’, in Altbach, P., Reisberg, L., Yudkevich, M., Androuschak, G. & Pacheco, I. (eds) Paying the Professoriate: A Global Comparison of Compensation and Contracts (New York, NY, Routledge).
  • Baccini, A., Barabesi, L., Cioni, M. & Pisani, C. (2014) ‘Crossing the Hurdle. The Determinants of Individual Scientific Performance’, Scientometrics, 101, 3.
  • Batista, P. D., Campiteli, M. G. & Kinouchi, O. (2006) ‘Is it Possible to Compare Researchers with Different Scientific Interests?’, Scientometrics, 68, 1.
  • Bazhanov, V. (2015) ‘Kakov smysl protsedury akkreditatsii vuzov?’, Troitskii variant, 6 October, available at: https://trv-science.ru/2015/10/kakov-smysl-procedury-akkreditacii-vuzov/, accessed 3 May 2021.
  • Bergeron, D. M. (2007) ‘The Potential Paradox of Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Good Citizens at What Cost?’, Academy of Management Review, 32, 4.
  • Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B. & Furst, S. A. (2013) ‘Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Career Outcomes’, Journal of Management, 39, 4.
  • Biagioli, M., Kenney, M., Martin, B. R. & Walsh, J. P. (2019) ‘Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment’, Research Policy, 48, 2.
  • Billing, D. (2004) ‘International Comparisons and Trends in External Quality Assurance of Higher Education. Commonality or Diversity?’, Higher Education, 47, 1.
  • Bolino, M., Klotz, A., Turnley, W. & Harvey, J. (2013) ‘Exploring the Dark Side of Organizational Citizenship Behavior’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 4.
  • Bonaccorsi, A. & Daraio, C. (2003) ‘Age Effects in Scientific Productivity. The Case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR)’, Scientometrics, 58, 1.
  • Broz, L. & Stöckelová, T. (2018) ‘The Culture of Orphaned Texts’, Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70, 6.
  • Carayol, N. & Matt, M. (2006) ‘Individual and Collective Determinants of Academic Scientists’ Productivity’, Information Economics and Policy, 18, 1.
  • Chavarro, D., Tang, P. & Rafols, I. (2017) ‘Why Researchers Publish in Non-Mainstream Journals. Training, Knowledge Bridging, and Gap Filling’, Research Policy, 46, 9.
  • Clark, B. (1983) The Higher Education System. Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press).
  • Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T. N. & Bordons, M. (2010) ‘A Bibliometric Classificatory Approach for the Study and Assessment of Research Performance at the Individual Level. The Effects of Age on Productivity and Impact’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 46, 2.
  • Dubrovskiy, D. (2017) ‘Escape from Freedom. The Russian Academic Community and the Problem of Academic Rights and Freedoms’, Interdisciplinary Political Studies, 3, 1.
  • Evetts, J. (2002) ‘New Directions in State and International Professional Occupations. Discretionary Decision-Making and Acquired Regulation’, Work, Employment and Society, 16, 2.
  • Farris, D. (2018) ‘Organisational Citizenship Behaviour in University Administrative Committees’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 40, 3.
  • Fox, M. F. (1983) ‘Publication Productivity among Scientists: A Critical Review’, Social Studies of Science, 13, 2.
  • Freidson, E. (1994) Professionalism Reborn. Theory, Prophecy, and Policy (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press).
  • Froumin, I., Kouzminov, Y. & Semyonov, D. (2014) ‘Institutional Diversity in Russian Higher Education: Revolutions and Evolution’, European Journal of Higher Education, 4, 3.
  • Froumin, I. & Lisyutkin, D. (2018) ‘The State as the Driver of Competitiveness in Russian Higher Education: The Case of Project 5–100’, in Oleksiyenko, A., Zha, Q., Chirikov, I. & Li, J. (eds) International Status Anxiety and Higher Education: The Soviet Legacy in China & Russia (Hong Kong, Springer).
  • Gel’man, V. (2017) ‘Political Foundations of Bad Governance in Post-Soviet Eurasia. Towards a Research Agenda’, East European Politics, 33, 4.
  • Glänzel, W. & Schoepflin, U. (1999) ‘A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences’, Information Processing and Management, 35, 1.
  • Goode, W. J. (1960) ‘A Theory of Role Strain’, American Sociological Review, 25, 4.
  • Gounko, T. & Smale, W. (2007) ‘Modernization of Russian Higher Education. Exploring Paths of Influence’, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37, 4.
  • Guba, K., Makeyeva, A., Sokolov, M. & Tsivinskaya, A. (2018) Kak rabotaet Rosobrnadzor: analiz otkrytykh dannykh o kontrol’no-nadzornoy deyatel’nosti v sfere vysshego obrazovaniya, Working Paper (St Petersburg, Tsentr institutsional’nogo analiza nauki i obrazovaniya).
  • Guba, K., Sokolov, M. & Tsivinskaya, A. (2020) ‘Fictitious Efficiency: What the Russian Survey of Performance of Higher Education Institutions Actually Assessed’, Educational Studies Moscow, 1.
  • Guskov, A., Kosyakov, D. & Selivanova, I. (2018) ‘Boosting Research Productivity in Top Russian Universities: The Circumstances of Breakthrough’, Scientometrics, 117, 2.
  • Hargens, L. L. (2000) ‘Using the Literature. Reference Networks, Reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship’, American Sociological Review, 65, 6.
  • Harris-Huemmert, S. (2011) Evaluating Evaluators. An Evaluation of Education in Germany (Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
  • Hicks, D. (2004) ‘The Four Literatures of Social Science’, in Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W. & Schmoch, U. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (Dordrecht & London, Kluwer Academic Publishers).
  • Hicks, D. (2012) ‘Performance-based University Research Funding Systems’, Research Policy, 41, 2.
  • Ho, D., Imai, K., King, G. & Stuart, E. (2007) ‘Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference’, Political Analysis, 15, 3.
  • Jaeger, A. J. & Thornton, C. H. (2006) ‘Neither Honor nor Compensation: Faculty and Public Service’, Educational Policy, 20, 2.
  • Kaczmarska, K. (2018) ‘Academic Community and Policymaking in Russia’, Problems of Post-Communism, 66, 4.
  • Kelchtermans, S. & Veugelers, R. (2011) ‘The Great Divide in Scientific Productivity. Why the Average Scientist Does Not Exist’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 20, 1.
  • Langfeldt, L., Stensaker, B., Harvey, L., Huisman, J. & Westerheijden, D. F. (2010) ‘The Role of Peer Review in Norwegian Quality Assurance. Potential Consequences for Excellence and Diversity’, Higher Education, 59, 4.
  • Leslie, L. L. & Rhoades, G. (1995) ‘Rising Administrative Costs. Seeking Explanations’, Journal of Higher Education, 66, 2.
  • Levy, D. (2006) ‘The Unanticipated Explosion: Private Higher Education's Global Surge’, Comparative Education Review, 50, 2.
  • Long, J. S. (1978) ‘Productivity and Academic Position in the Scientific Career’, American Sociological Review, 43, 6.
  • Long, J. S. (1990) ‘The Origins of Sex Differences in Science’, Social Forces, 68, 4.
  • Long, J. S. & Fox, M. F. (1995) ‘Scientific Careers. Universalism and Particularism’, Annual Review of Sociology, 21.
  • Lotka, A. J. (1926) ‘The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity’, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 12.
  • Louis, K. S., Anderson, M. S. & Rosenberg, L. (1995) ‘Academic Misconduct and Values. The Department’s Influence’, The Review of Higher Education, 18, 4.
  • Lawrence, J., Ott, M. & Bell, A. (2012) ‘Faculty Organizational Commitment and Citizenship’, Research in Higher Education, 53.
  • Macfarlane, B. (2008) ‘Defining and Rewarding Academic Citizenship. The Implications for University Promotions Policy’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29, 3.
  • Mamiseishvili, K., Miller, M. T. & Lee, D. (2016) ‘Beyond Teaching and Research. Faculty Perceptions of Service Roles at Research Universities’, Innovative Higher Education, 41, 4.
  • Matveeva, N., Sterligov, I. & Yudkevich, M. (2021) ‘The Effect of Russian University Excellence Initiative on Publications and Collaboration Patterns’, Journal of Infometrics, 15, 1.
  • McDowell, J., Singell, L. & Stater, M. (2009) ‘Congratulations or Condolences? The Role of Human Capital in the Cultivation of a University Administrator’, Economics of Education Review, 28.
  • Milem, J. F., Berger, J. B. & Dey, E. L. (2000) ‘Faculty Time Allocation: A Study of Change Over Twenty Years’, Journal of Higher Education, 71, 4.
  • Miller, D. (1993) ‘The Architecture of Simplicity’, Academy of Management Review, 18, 1.
  • Minina, E. (2016) ‘“Quality Revolution” in Post-Soviet Education in Russia. From Control to Assurance?’, Journal of Education Policy, 32, 2.
  • Minina, E., Piattoeva, N., Centeno, V. G., Zhou, X., Candido, H. & Hinke, D. (2018) ‘Transnational Policy Borrowing and National Interpretations of Educational Quality in Russia, China and Brazil’, in Chankseliani, M. & Silova, I. (eds) Comparing Post-Socialist Transformations. Purposes, Policies, and Practices in Education (Oxford, Symposium Books).
  • Moed, H., Markusova, V. & Akoev, M. (2018) ‘Trends in Russian Research Output Indexed in Scopus and Web of Science’, Scientometrics, 116, 2.
  • Moskaleva, O., Pislyakov, V., Sterligov, I., Akoev, M. & Shabanova, S. (2018) ‘Russian Index of Science Citation. Overview and Review’, Scientometrics, 116, 1.
  • Mutz, R. & Daniel, H.-D. (2019) ‘How to Consider Fractional Counting and Field Normalization in the Statistical Modeling of Bibliometric Data. A Multilevel Poisson Regression Approach’, Journal of Informetrics, 13, 2.
  • Nechepurenko, I. (2018) ‘In Russia, a Top University Lacks Just One Thing: Students’, New York Times, 26 August, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/26/world/europe/european-university-st-petersburg-russia.html, accessed 7 May 2021.
  • Nederhof, A. J. (2006) ‘Bibliometric Monitoring of Research Performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities. A Review’, Scientometrics, 66, 1.
  • Neumann, A. & Terosky, A. (2007) ‘To Give and to Receive. Recently Tenured Professors’ Experiences of Service in Major Research Universities’, The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 3.
  • Oliver, C. (1991) ‘Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes’, Academy of Management Review, 16, 1.
  • Piperski, A. (2020) ‘Budni prepodavatelya: RPD, PK-16, PUD i izhe s nimi’, Troitskii variant, 28 January, available at: https://trv-science.ru/2020/01/budni-prepodavatelya-vuza/, accessed 3 May 2021.
  • Platonova, D. & Semyonov, D. (2018) ‘Russia: The Institutional Landscape of Russian Higher Education’, in Huisman, J., Smolentseva, A., Froumin, I. (eds) 25 Years of Transformations of Higher Education Systems in Post-Soviet Countries. Reform and Continuity (New York, NY, Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Qiu, J. (2010) ‘Publish or Perish in China’, Nature, 463, 7278.
  • Rebora, G. & Turri, M. (2011) ‘Critical Factors in the Use of Evaluation in Italian Universities’, Higher Education, 61, 5.
  • Rijcke, S., Wouters, P. F., Rushforth, A. D., Franssen, T. P. & Hammarfelt, B. (2016) ‘Evaluation Practices and Effects of Indicator Use—A Literature Review’, Research Evaluation, 25, 2.
  • Romzek, B. S. (2000) ‘Dynamics of Public Sector Accountability in an Era of Reform’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, 1.
  • Rousseau, R., Egghe, L. & Guns, R. (2018) Becoming Metric-Wise. A Bibliometric Guide for Researchers (Cambridge, MA, Chandos Publishing).
  • Rudakov, V. N. & Prakhov, I. A. (2021) ‘Gender Differences in Pay among University Faculty in Russia’, Higher Education Quarterly, 75, 2.
  • Seglen, P. O. (1992) ‘The Skewness of Science’, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 43, 9.
  • Shibanova, E., Platonova, D. & Lisyutkin M. (2018) ‘5–100: Development Dynamics and Patterns’, Russian Education and Society, 60, 8–9.
  • Sivak, E. & Yudkevich, M. (2015) ‘Academic Immobility and Inbreeding in Russian Universities’, in Yudkevich, M., Altbach, P. & Rumbley, L. (eds) Academic Inbreeding and Mobility in Higher Education (New York, NY, Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Sivak, E. & Yudkevich, M. (2017) ‘The Academic Profession in Russia’s Two Capitals: The Impact of 20 Years of Transition’, European Educational Research Journal, 16, 5.
  • Smolentseva, A. (2017) ‘Where Soviet and Neoliberal Discourses Meet. The Transformation of the Purposes of Higher Education in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia’, Higher Education, 74, 6.
  • Sterligov, I. (2017) ‘The Monster Ten You Have Never Heard of: Top Russian Scholarly Megajournals’, Higher Education in Russia and Beyond, 1, 11.
  • Suspitsin, D. (2007) ‘Between the State and the Market: Sources of Sponsorship and Legitimacy in Russian Nonstate Higher Education’, in Slantcheva, S. & Levy, D. (eds) Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe, Search of Legitimacy (New York, NY, Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Tomusk, V. (2004) The Open World and Closed Societies. Essays on Higher Education Policies in Transition (New York, NY, Palgrave Macmillan).
  • van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L. & McLean Parks, J. (1995) ‘Extra-role Behaviors: in Pursuit of Construct and Definitional Clarity (A Bridge Over Muddied Waters)’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 17.
  • van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., Moed, H. F., Nederhof, T. & Van Raan, A. (2003) ‘The Holy Grail of Science Policy. Exploring and Combining Bibliometric Tools in Search of Scientific Excellence’, Scientometrics, 57, 2.
  • van Vught, F. A. & Westerheijden, D. F. (1994) ‘Towards a General Model of Quality Assessment in Higher Education’, Higher Education, 28, 3.
  • Wildgaard, L., Schneider, J. W. & Larsen, B. (2014) ‘A Review of the Characteristics of 108 Author-Level Bibliometric Indicators’, Scientometrics, 101, 1.
  • Wood, S. N., Pya, N. & Säfken, B. (2016) ‘Smoothing Parameter and Model Selection for General Smooth Models’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111, 516.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.