CSR managers as hybrid professionals: managing at the intersection of coexisting logics

References

• Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Mapelli, F. (2018). What drives the evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility strategies? An institutional logics perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomgren, M., & Waks, C. (2015). Coping with contradictions: Hybrid professionals managing institutional complexity. Journal of Professions and Organization, 2(1), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jou010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borglund, T., Frostenson, M., Helin, S., & Arbin, K. (2023). The professional logic of sustainability managers: Finding underlying dynamics. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-05000-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brès, L., Mosonyi, S., Gond, J.-P., Muzio, D., Mitra, R., Werr, A., & Wickert, C. (2019). Rethinking professionalization: A generative dialogue on CSR practitioners. Journal of Professions and Organization, 6(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joz009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerbone, D., & Maroun, W. (2020). Materiality in an integrated reporting setting: Insights using an institutional logics framework. The British Accounting Review, 52(3), 100876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlmann, F., & Grosvold, J. (2017). Environmental managers and institutional work: Reconciling tensions of competing institutional logics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Grosbois, D., & Fennell, D. A. (2022). Determinants of climate change disclosure practices of global hotel companies: Application of institutional and stakeholder theories. Tourism Management, 88, 104404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations culture and environment (pp. 3–21). Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 114–149. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertuna, B., Gu, H., & Yu, L. (2022). “A thread connects all beads”: Aligning global CSR strategy by hotel MNCs. Tourism Management, 91, 104520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertuna, B., Karatas-Ozkan, M., & Yamak, S. (2019). Diffusion of sustainability and CSR discourse in hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(6), 2564–2581. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2018-0464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatima, T., & Elbanna, S. (2023). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation: A review and a research agenda towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05047-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fong, V. H. I., Wong, I. A., & Hong, J. F. L. (2018). Developing institutional logics in the tourism industry through coopetition. Tourism Management, 66, 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font, X., & Lynes, J. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in tourism and hospitality. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7), 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1488856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gond, J.-P., & Moser, C. (2021). Critical essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to ‘micro’corporate social responsibility. Human Relations, 74(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719864407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Rodríguez, M. R., Martín-Samper, R. C., Köseoglu, M. A., & Okumus, F. (2019). Hotels’ corporate social responsibility practices, organizational culture, firm reputation, and performance. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(3), 398–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1585441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411406824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guix, M., Bonilla-Priego, M. J., & Font, X. (2018). The process of sustainability reporting in international hotel groups: An analysis of stakeholder inclusiveness, materiality and responsiveness. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7), 1063–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2017.1410164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guix, M., & Font, X. (2020). The Materiality Balanced Scorecard: A framework for stakeholder-led integration of sustainable hospitality management and reporting. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümüsay, A. A., Claus, L., & Amis, J. (2020). Engaging with grand challenges: An institutional logics perspective. Organization Theory, 1(3), 263178772096048. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720960487
   Google Scholar
• Hotels Magazine. (2015). 325 hotels. Hotels Magazine, July/August. [Retrieved from http://www.hotelsmag.com]
   Google Scholar
• Høvring, C. M., & Andersen, S. E. (2021). Navigating multidirectional CSR tensions: A micro perspective on CSR middle managerial practice. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2021(1), 12993. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2021.12993abstract
   Google Scholar
• Hunoldt, M., Oertel, S., & Galander, A. (2020). Being responsible: How managers aim to implement corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 59(7), 1441–1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650318777738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefhaber, E., Pavlovich, K., & Spraul, K. (2020). Sustainability-related identities and the institutional environment: The case of New Zealand owner–managers of small-and medium-sized hospitality businesses. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3990-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., & Ravasi, D. (2019). Visual artifacts as tools for analysis and theorizing. In The production of managerial knowledge and organizational theory: New approaches to writing, producing and consuming theory. Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., Steele, C. W., Wang, M. S., & Toubiana, M. (2021). New directions in the study of institutional logics: From tools to phenomena. Annual Review of Sociology, 47(1), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734
   Google Scholar
• Luo, X. R., Wang, D., & Zhang, J. (2017). Whose call to answer: Institutional complexity and firms’ CSR reporting. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, C. U., & Waldorff, S. B. (2019). Between advocacy, compliance and commitment: A multilevel analysis of institutional logics in work environment management. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(1), 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. (2007). From “pure” to “hybrid” professionalism: Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration & Society, 39(6), 761–785. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707304434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. (2015). Hybrid professionalism and beyond:(New) Forms of public professionalism in changing organizational and societal contexts. Journal of Professions and Organization, 2(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jov002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocasio, W., Thornton, P. H., & Lounsbury, M. (2017). Advances to the institutional logics perspective. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (Vol. 2, pp. 509–531). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013a). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In Institutional logics in action, part B (Vol. 39, pp. 3–35). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013b). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., & Jones, C. (2016). Qualitatively capturing institutional logics. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015589981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risi, D., & Wickert, C. (2017). Reconsidering the ‘symmetry’between institutionalization and professionalization: The case of corporate social responsibility managers. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 613–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, F. C. (2015). Elucidating social science concepts: An interpretivist guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. V. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. (2015). Reflexivity in sustainability accounting and management: Transcending the economic focus of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2058-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipilov, A. V., Greve, H. R., & Rowley, T. J. (2010). When do interlocks matter? Institutional logics and the diffusion of multiple corporate governance practices. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 846–864. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.52814614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirris, S. (2019). Coherent identities and roles? Hybrid professional managers’ prioritizing of coexisting institutional logics in differing contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(4), 101063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2019.101063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, M., Aristidou, A., & Whittington, R. (2017). Towards a practice-driven institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (Vol. 2, pp. 384–411). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smets, M., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2013). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66(10), 1279–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712471407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T., & Spee, P. (2015). Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932–970. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877–904. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research : Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (Vol. 840, pp. 99–128). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP, United Nations Environmental Programme and University of Surrey. (June 2022). Managing, measuring and reporting of waste footprint in the hospitality sector. Retrieved from https://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/
   Google Scholar
• Uyar, A., Koseoglu, M. A., Kılıç, M., & Mehraliyev, F. (2021). Thematic structure of sustainability reports of the hospitality and tourism sector: A periodical, regional, and format-based analysis. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(18), 2602–2627. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1847050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickert, C., & De Bakker, F. G. (2018). Pitching for social change: Toward a relational approach to selling and buying social issues. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(1), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2015.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wut, T. M., Xu, B., & Wong, H. S.-M. (2022). A 15-year review of “corporate social responsibility practices” research in the hospitality and tourism industry. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 23(1), 240–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2020.1864566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. (2011). Institutional multiplicity in practice: A tale of two high-tech conferences in Israel. Organization Science, 22(6), 1539–1559. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar