Using digital technology in early education teaching: learning from teachers’ teaching practice with interactive whiteboard

References

• Cabus, Sofie, Carla Haelermans, and Sonja Franken. 2017. “SMART in Mathematics? Exploring the Effects of in-Class-Level Differentiation Using SMARTboard on Math Proficiency.” British Journal of Educational Technology 48 (1): 145–161. doi:10.1111/bjet.12350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, Larry. 2001. Oversold and Underused : Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. 2013. Inside the Black Box of Classroom Practice: Change Without Reform in American Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutrim Schmid, Euline. 2008. “Potential Pedagogical Benefits and Drawbacks of Multimedia Use in the English Language Classroom Equipped with Interactive Whiteboard Technology.” Computers and Education 51 (4): 1553–1568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaney, Rosemary, Arthur Chapman, and Sara Hennessy. 2009. “A Case-Study of One Teacher’s Use of an Interactive Whiteboard System to Support Knowledge Co-Construction in the History Classroom.” Curriculum Journal 20 (4): 365–387. doi:10.1080/09585170903424898.
   Google Scholar
• Gillen, Julia, and Natalia Kucirkova. 2018. “Percolating Spaces: Creative Ways of Using Digital Technologies to Connect Young Children’s School and Home Lives.” British Journal of Educational Technology 49 (5): 834–846. doi:10.1111/bjet.12666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, Ann, Bronwen Cowie, and Megan Heazlewood. 2010. ““Keeping in Touch with Learning: The Use of an Interactive Whiteboard in the Junior School.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 19 (2): 237–243. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2010.491234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heemskerk, Irma, E. Kuiper, and J. Meijer. 2014. “Interactive Whiteboard and Virtual Learning Environment Combined: Effects on Mathematics Education.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 30 (5): 465–478. doi:10.1111/jcal.12060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, Steve, Emma Mercier, Liz Burd, and Andrew Joyce-Gibbons. 2012. “Multi-Touch Tables and Collaborative Learning.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (6): 1041–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01259.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). 2017. ISTE Standards for Educators: A Guide For Teachers And Other Professionals. Accessed 15 April 2019 https://www.iste.org/standards/for-educators.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, Matthew, and Sandy Schuck. 2008. “Exploring Pedagogy with Interactiue Whiteboards in Australian Schools.” Australian Educational Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, Matthew, Sandy Schuck, Peter Aubusson, and Paul F. Burke. 2018. “Teachers’ Technology Adoption and Practices: Lessons Learned from the IWB Phenomenon.” Teacher Development 22 (4): 481–496. doi:10.1080/13664530.2017.1363083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoumi, Davoud. 2015. “Preschool Teachers’ Use of ICTs: Towards a Typology of Practice.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 16 (1): 5–17. doi:10.1177/1463949114566753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, Neil, Sara Hennessy, and Paul Warwick. 2010. ““Using Interactive Whiteboards to Orchestrate Classroom Dialogue.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 19 (2): 195–209. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2010.491230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Dave, and Derek Glover. 2007. “Into the Unknown: The Professional Development Induction Experience of Secondary Mathematics Teachers Using Interactive Whiteboard Technology.” Learning, Media and Technology 32(3): 319-331. doi:10.1080/17439880701511156.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Hani. 2010. “Teaching with the Interactive Whiteboard: An Engaging way to Provide Instruction.” Focus on Elementary 22 (3): 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, Gemma, and Carey Jewitt. 2010. “Policy, Pedagogy and Interactive Whiteboards: What Lessons Can Be Learnt from Early Adoption in England?” In Interactive Whiteboards for Education: Theory, Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-715-2.ch002.
   Google Scholar
• Plowman, Lydia, and Christine Stephen. 2013. “Guided Interaction: Exploring How Adults Can Support Children’s Learning with Technology in Preschool Settings.” Hong Kong Journal of Early Childhood 12 (1): 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Pramling, Niklas, and Cecilia Wallerstedt. 2019. “Lekresponsiv undervisning – ett undervisningsbegrepp och en didaktik för förskolan.” Forskning om undervisning och lärande 7 (1): 7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, Nils. 2012. Skolan och digitaliseringen: Blir utbildningen bättre med digital teknik. Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• SFS. 2010. 800. “Skollag (Education Act).” Government Offices of Sweden. Accessed November 12, 2018. http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokumentlagar/dokument/svenskforfattningssamling/skollag2010800_sfs-2010-800#K8.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, Sonja, Anette Sandberg, and Pia Williams. 2015. Förskollärarkompetens i förändring. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Heather J, Steve Higgins, Kate Wall, and Jen Miller. 2005. “Interactive Whiteboards: Boon or Bandwagon? A Critical Review of the Literature.” Computer Assisted Learning 21: 91–101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00117.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish Media Council. 2015. Kids & Media”. Accessed September 24, 2019. Stockholm: https://statensmedierad.se/download/18.126747f416d00e1ba946903a/1568041620554/Ungar%20och%20medier%202019%20tillganglighetsanpassad.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Agency for Education. 2018. Revised Curriculum for the Preschool. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Research Council. 2017. Good Research Practice. Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, Lev Simkhovich. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Jennifer, Stephanie Branson, Megan D Cross, and Ilene R Berson. 2016. “Exploring Developmental Appropriateness of Multitouch Tables in Prekindergarten: A Video Analysis.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 48 (3): 227–238. doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1175855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. 1991. Voices of the Mind: A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, James V. 1998. Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, Robyn, and Steve Lerman. 2008. “Learning Environments Using Interactive Whiteboards: New Learning Spaces or Reproduction of Old Technologies?” Mathematics Education Research 20 (q): 108–126.
   Google Scholar