Data rich, information poor? Phytobenthos assessment and the Water Framework Directive

References

• Andrén, C. & Jarlman, A. (2009). Benthic diatoms as indicators of acidity in streams. Fundamental and Applied Limnology, 173: 237–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, P.D. (1979). The effects of mine drainage and organic enrichment on benthos in the River Nent system, Northern Pennines. Hydrobiologia, 74: 119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Springe, G., Riis, T., Larsen, S.E., Sand-Jensen, K. & Kjellerup-Larsen, L.M. (2008). The search for reference conditions for stream vegetation in northern Europe. Freshwater Biology, 53: 1890–1901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, D.J. & Hajibabaei, M. (2012). Biomonitoring 2.0: a new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next-generation DNA sequencing. Molecular Ecology, 21: 2039–2044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battarbee, R.W., Simpson, G.L., Shilland, E.M., Flower, R.J., Kreiser, A., Yang, H. & Clarke, G. (2012). Recovery of UK lakes from acidification: an assessment using combined palaeoecological and contemporary diatom assemblage data. Ecological Indicators, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.10.024.
   Google Scholar
• Behre, K.-E. (1988). The rôle of man in European vegetation history. In Vegetation history (Huntley, B. & Webb, T, editors), 633–672. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bennion, H., Fluin, J. & Simpson, G.L. (2004). Assessing eutrophication and reference conditions for Scottish freshwater lochs using subfossil diatoms. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41: 124–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennion, H., Kelly, M.G., Juggins, S., Yallop, M.L., Burgess, A., Reddihough, G., Jamieson, J., & Krokowski, J. (2014). Assessment of ecological status in UK lakes using benthic diatoms. Freshwater Science, (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Besse-Lotoskaya, A., Verdonschot, P.F.M. & Sinkeldam, J.A. (2006). Uncertainty in diatom assessment: sampling, identification and counting variation. Hydrobiologia, 566: 247–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besse-Lotoskaya, A., Verdonschot, P., Coste, M. & Van de Vijver, B. (2011). Evaluation of European diatom trophic indices. Ecological Indicators, 11: 456–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F. & Kilroy, C. (2000). Stream periphyton monitoring manual. NIWA, Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F. & Thomsen, H.A. (1995). Disturbance of stream periphyton by perturbations in shear stress:time to structural failure and differences in community resistance. Journal of Phycology, 31: 233–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, B.J.F., Stevenson, R.J. & Lowe, R.L. (1998). A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 143: 21–56.
   Google Scholar
• Birk, S., Willby, N.J., Kelly, M.G., Bonne, W., Borja, A., Poikane, S. & van de Bund, W. (2013). Intercalibrating classifications of ecological status: Europe’s quest for common management objectives of aquatic ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 454-455: 490–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowes, M.J., Smith, J.T., Hilton, J., Sturt, M.M. & Armitage, P.D. (2007). Periphyton biomass response to changing phosphorus concentrations in a nutrient-impacted river: a new methodology for phosphorus target setting. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 64: 227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, J., Jr (1980). The ABCs of biological monitoring. In Biological monitoring of fish (Hocault, C.H. & Stauffer, J.R. Jr, editors), 43–58. D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Carrick, H.J. & Lowe, R.L. (1988). Response of Lake Michigan benthic algae to in situ enrichment with Si, N, and P. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 45: 271–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, A. (1987). Periphyton in lakes of different trophy. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 44: 296–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEMAGREF (1982). Etude de méthodes biologiques quantitatives d‘appreciation de la qualité des eaux. Rapport Q.E. Lyon-A.F.B. Rhône-Mediterranée-Corse.
   Google Scholar
• CEN (2003). Water quality – guidance standard for the surveying of aquatic macrophytes in running waters. EN 14184: 2003. Comité European de Normalisation, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• CEN (2004). Water quality – Guidance standard for the identification, enumeration and interpretation of benthic diatom samples from running waters. EN 14407:2004. Comité European de Normalisation, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, D.F. & Whitehead, D.R. (1986). The PIRLA project: paleoecological investigation of recent lake acidification. Hydrobiologia, 143: 13–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A.L., Weckström, K., Conley, D.J., Anderson, N.J., Adser, F., Andrén, E., de Jonge, V.N., Ellegaard, M., Juggins, S., Kauppila, P., Korhola, A., Reuss, N., Telford, R.J. & Vaalgamaa, S. (2006). Long-term trends in eutrophication and nutrients in the coastal zone. Limnology and Oceanography, 51: 385–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R.T. (2012). Estimating confidence of European WFD ecological status class and WISERBUGS (WISER Bioassessment Uncertainty Guidance Software). Hydrobiologia, 704: 39–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coring, E., Schneider, S., Hamm, A. & Hofmann, G. (1999). Durchgehendes Trophiesystem auf der Grundlage der Trophieindikation mit Kieselalgen. Deutscher Verband für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturbau e.V., Koblenz.
   Google Scholar
• Coste, M., Boutry, S., Tison-Rosebery, J. & Delmas, F. (2009). Improvements of the Biological Diatom Index (BDI): description and efficiency of the new version (BDI-2006). Ecological Indicators, 9: 621–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgardo, C., Pardo, I. & Liliana, G. (2010). A multimetric diatom index to assess the ecological status of coastal Galician rivers (NW Spain). Hydrobiologia, 644: 371–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Uomo, A. (1998). Use of algae for monitoring rivers in Italy: current situation and perspectives. In Use of algae for monitoring rivers III (Prygiel, J., Whitton, B.A. & Bukowska, J., editors), 17–25. Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, Douai.
   Google Scholar
• Denys, L. (2009). Palaeolimnology without a core: 153 years of diatoms and cultural environmental change in a shallow lowland lake (Belgium). Fottea, 9: 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derwent, R.G. & Wilson, R.B. (2012). Acidification research: evaluation and policy applications, a United Kingdom policy response. In Acidification research: evaluation and policy applications (Schneider, T., editor), 253–256. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Descy, J-P. (1979). A new approach to water quality estimation using diatoms. Nova Hedwigia, 64: 305–323.
   Google Scholar
• Descy, J-P. & Coste, M. (1991). A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Verhandlungen, Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie, 24: 2112–2116.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, W.K. (2006). Eutrophication and trophic state in rivers and streams. Limnology and Oceanography, 51: 671–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, W.K. & Gudder, D.A. (1992). The ecology of Cladophora. Journal of Phycology, 28: 415–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ector, L. (2011). 1st European Workshop on Diatom Taxonomy. Algological Studies, 136/137: 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2009). Guidance document on eutrophication assessment in the context of European water policies. Guidance Document 23, version 12. Directorate-General for the Environment, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Community (1991). Council directive of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (91/271/EEC). Official Journal of the European Community, Series L, 135: 40–52.
   Google Scholar
• European Court of Justice (2009). Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 December 2009 (Case C-390/07). European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 91/271/EEC – Urban waste water treatment – Article 3(1) and (2), Article 5(1) to (3) and (5) and Annexes I and II – Initial failure to identify sensitive areas – Concept of ‘eutrophication’ – Criteria – Burden of proof – Relevant date when considering the evidence – Implementation of collection obligations – Implementation of more stringent treatment of discharges into sensitive areas. Official Journal of the European Union, C 24/4.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, Series L, 327: 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2008). Commission Decision of 30 October 2008 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise. Official Journal of the European Union, Series L, 332: 20–44.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2013). Commission Decision of 20 September 2013 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as  a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, Series L, 266: 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Feio, M.J., Aguiar, F.C., Almeida, S.F., Ferreira, J., Ferreira, M.T., Elias, C., Serra, S.R., Buffagni, A., Cambra, J., Chauvin, C., Delmas, F., Dörflinger, G., Erba, S., Flor, N., Ferréol, M., Germ, M., Mancini, L., Manolaki, P., Marcheggiani, S., Minciardi, M.R., Munné, A., Papastergiadou, E., Prat, N., Puccinelli, C., Rosebery, J., Sabater, S., Ciadamidaro, S., Tornés, E., Tziortzis, I., Urbanič, G. & Vieira, C. (2013). Least disturbed condition for European Mediterranean rivers. Science of the Total Environment. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.056.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, R.J. & Battarbee, R.G. (1983). Diatom evidence for recent acidification of two Scottish lochs. Nature, 305: 130–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajnal, E., Stenger-Kovács, C., Ács, É. & Padisak, J. (2009). DILSTORE software for ecological status assessment of lakes based on benthic diatoms. Fottea, 9: 351–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassall, A.H. (1850). Memoir on the organic analysis or microscopic examination of water supplied to the inhabitants of London and the suburban districts. Lancet, 1: 230–235.
   Google Scholar
• Hassall, A.H. (1852). A history of the British freshwater algae, including descriptions of the Desmidacea and Diatomacea. 1. (Text). Taylor, Walton and Maberley, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, J., O‘Hare, M., Bowes, M.J. & Jones, J.I. (2006). How green is my river? A new paradigm of eutrophication in rivers. Science of the Total Environment, 365: 66–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, G. (1999). Trophiebewertung von Seen anhand von Aufwuchsdiatomeen. In Biologische Gewässeruntersuchung, vol. 2 (Tümpling. W. & Friedrich, G., editors), 319–333. Gustav Fischer, Jena.
   Google Scholar
• ISO (1999). Safety aspects – guidelines for their inclusion in standards. ISO/IEC Guide 51. International Standards Organisation, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• James, D.A., Ranney, S.H., Chipps, S.R. & Spindler, B.D. (2010). Invertebrate composition and abundance associated with Didymosphenia geminata in a montane stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 25: 235–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, D.M., Whitton, B.A. & Brook, A.J. (2011). The freshwater algal flora of the British Isles. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, V.J., Stevenson, A.C. & Battarbee, R.W. (1989). Acidification of lakes in southwest Scotland: a diatom and pollen study of the post-glacial history of the Round Loch of Glenhead. Journal of Ecology, 77: 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juggins, S. & Kelly, M. (2012). A WFD-compatible approach to assess acidification using diatoms in UK and Irish rivers. Report SC070034/TR2, Environment Agency, Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G. (2006). A comparison of diatoms with other phytobenthos as indicators of ecological status in streams in northern England. In Proceedings of the 18th International Diatom Symposium 2004 (Witkowski, A., editor), 139–151. Biopress, Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G. (2011). The Emperor’s new clothes? A comment on Besse-Lototskaya et al. (2011). Ecological Indicators, 11: 1492–1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G. (2012). The semiotics of slime: visual representation of phytobenthos as an aid to understanding ecological status. Freshwater Reviews, 5: 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G. & Ector, L. (2012). Effect of streamlining taxa lists on diatom-based indices: implications for intercalibrating ecological status. Hydrobiologia, 695: 253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G. & Whitton, B.A. (1995). The Trophic Diatom Index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology, 7: 433–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G., Cazaubon, A., Coring, E., Dell’Uomo, A., Ector, L., Goldsmith, B., Guasch, H., Hürlimann, J., Jarlman, A., Kawecka, B., Kwandrans, J., Laugaste, R., Lindstrøm, E.-A., Leitao, M., Marvan, P., Padisák, J., Pipp, E., Prygiel, J., Rott, E., Sabater, S., van Dam, H. & Vizinet, J. (1998). Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. Journal of Applied Phycology, 10: 215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., Juggins, S., Guthrie, R., Pritchard, S., Jamieson, J., Rippey, B., Hirst, H. & Yallop, M. (2008a). Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biology, 53: 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G., King, L., Jones, R.I., Barker, P.A. & Jamieson, B.J. (2008b). Validation of diatoms as proxies for phytobenthos when assessing ecological status in lakes. Hydrobiologia, 610: 125–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G., Bennion, H., Burgess, A., Ellis, J., Juggins, S., Guthrie, R., Jamieson, J., Adriaenssens, V. & Yallop, M. (2009a). Uncertainty in ecological status assessments of lakes and rivers using diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 633: 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G., Bennett, C., Coste, M., Delgado, C., Delmas, F., Denys, L., Ector, L., Fauvlle, C., Ferreol, M., Golub, M., Jarlman, A., Kahlert, M., Lucey, J., ní Chatháin, B., Pardo, I., Pfister, P., Picinska-Faltynowicz, J., Rosebery, J., Schranz, C., Schaumburg, J., van Dam, H. & Vilbaste, S. (2009b). A comparison of national approaches to setting ecological status boundaries in phytobenthos assessment for the European Water Framework Directive: results of an intercalibration exercise. Hydrobiologia, 621: 169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G., King, L. & Ní Chatháin, B. (2009c). The conceptual basis of ecological status assessments using diatoms. Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 109B: 175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M.G., Gómez-Rodríguez, C., Kahlert, M., Almeida, S.F.P., Bennett, C., Bottin, M., Delmas. F., Descy, J.-P., Dörflinger, G., Kennedy, B., Marvan, P., Opatrilova, L., Pardo, I., Pfister, P., Rosebery, J., Schneider, S. & Vilbaste, S. (2012). Establishing expectations for pan-European diatom based ecological status assessments. Ecological Indicators, 20: 177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermarrec, L., Franc, A., Rimet, F., Chaumeil, P., Humber, J.F. & Bouchez, A. (2013). Next-generation sequencing to inventory taxonomic diversity in eukaryotic communities: a test for freshwater diatoms. Molecular Ecology Resources. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolkwitz, R. & Marsson, M. (1908). Ökologie der pflanzliche Saprobien. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft, 26: 505–519.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, J., Real, M., Juggins, S., Monteith, D.T., Flower, R.J. & Beaumont, W.R.C. (1996). Monitoring temporal changes in the biology of acid waters. Freshwater Biology, 36: 179–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange-Bertalot, H. (1979). Pollution tolerance as a criterion for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwigia, 64: 285–304.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, I., Dillon, P.J. & Campeau, S. (2008a). The effect of excluding diatom taxa and reducing taxonomic resolution on multivariate analyses and stream bioassessment. Ecological Indicators, 9: 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, I., Campeau, S., Darchambeau, F., Cabana, G. & Dillon, P. (2008b). Are diatoms good integrators of temporal variability in stream water quality? Freshwater Biology, 53: 827–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecointe, C., Coste, M. & Prygiel, J. (1993). Omnidia: software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia, 269/270: 509–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, D.G., Sato, S., Trobajo, R., Vanormelingen, P. & Souffreau, C. (2010). DNA barcoding for species identification and discovery in diatoms. Cryptogamie, Algologie, 31: 557–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marker, A.F.H. & Collett, G.D. (1997). Spatial and temporal characteristics of algae in the River Great Ouse. II. The epiphytic algal flora. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 13: 235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, B. (2008). The Water Framework Directive: total environment or political compromise? Science of the Total Environment, 400: 32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, T., Heathwaite, A.L., Moss, B., Reynolds, C., Beven, K.J., Pope, L. & Willows, R. (2012). Managing the impacts of nutrient enrichment on river systems: dealing with complex uncertainties in risk analysis. Freshwater Biology, 57: 108–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., Stevenson, R.J., Hill, B.H., Kaufmann, P.R. & Herlihy, A.T. (1999). Spatial patterns and ecological determinants of benthic algal assemblages in mid-Atlantic streams, USA. Journal of Phycology, 35: 460–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, J.L. & Stoermer, E.F. (1996). Quantitative method for determining a representative algal count. Journal of Phycology, 32: 693–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, I., Gómez-Rodríguez, C., Wasson, J-G., Owen, R., van de Bund, W., Kelly, M., Bennett, C., Birk, S., Buffagni, A., Erba, S., Mengin, N., Murray-Bligh, J. & Ofenböeck, G. (2012). The European reference condition concept: a scientific and technical approach to identify minimally-impacted river ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 420: 33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passy, S.I. (2001). Spatial paradigms of lotic diatom distribution: a landscape ecology perspective. Journal of Phycology, 37: 370–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picinska-Faltynowicz, J. & Blachuta, J. (2008). Zasady poboru i opracowania prób fitobentosu okrzemkowego z rzek i jezior. Przewodnik metodyczny, Warsaw, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Poikane, S. (2013). Intercalibration of biological elements for lake water bodies. Contributions to the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive. JRC scientific and policy reports, European Commission, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Prygiel, J. & Coste, M. (1993). The assessment of water quality in the Artois-Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. Hydrobiologia, 269/270: 343–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prygiel, J., Carpentier, P., Almeida, S., Coste, M., Druart, J.-C., Ector, L., Guillard, D., Honoré, M.-A., Iserentant, R., Ledeganck, P., Lalanne-Cassou, C., Lesniak, C., Mercier, I., Moncaut, P., Nazart, M., Nouchet, N., Peres, F., Peeters, V., Rimet, F., Rumeau, A., Sabater, S., Straub, F., Torrisi, M., Tudesque, L., van der Vijver, B., Vidal, H., Vizinet, J. & Zydek, N. (2002). Determination of the biological diatom index (IBD NF T 90-354): results of an intercomparison exercise. Journal of Applied Phycology, 14: 27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renberg, I. & Hellberg, T. (1982). The pH history of lakes in south-western Sweden, as calculated from the subfossil diatom flora of the sediments. Ambio, 11: 30–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimet, F. (2012). Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 683: 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimet, F. & Bouchez, A. (2012). Biomonitoring river diatoms: implications of taxonomic resolution. Ecological Indicators 15: 92–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rott, E., Hofmann, G., Pall, K., Pfister, P. & Pipp, E. (1997). Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen. Teil 1: Saprobielle Indikation. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Rott, E., Pipp, E., Pfister, P., van Dam, H., Ortler, K., Binder, N. & Pall, K. (1999). Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen in Österreichischen Fliessgewassern. Teil 2: Trophieindikation. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Schaumburg, J., Schranz, C., Hofmann, G., Stelzer D., Schneider, S. & Schmedtje, U. (2004). Macrophytes and phytobenthos as indicators of ecological status in German lakes – a contribution to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica, 34: 302–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaumburg, J., Schranz, C., Stelzer, D., Hofmann, G., Gutowski, A. & Foerster, J. (2006). Instruction protocol for the ecological assessment of running waters for implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive: macrophytes and phytobenthos. Bavarian Environment Agency, Augsburg.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. & Lindstrøm, E.-A. (2009). Bioindication in Norwegian rivers using non-diatomaceous benthic algae: the acidification index periphyton (AIP). Ecological Indicators, 9: 1206–1211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. & Lindstrøm, E.-A. (2011). The periphyton index of trophic status PIT: a new eutrophication metric based on non-diatomaceous benthic algae in Nordic rivers. Hydrobiologia, 665: 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. & Melzer, A. (2003). The trophic index of macrophytes (TIM) – a new tool for indicating the trophic state of running waters. International Review of Hydrobiology, 88: 49–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S.C., Lawniczak, A.E., Picińska-Faltynowicz, J. & Szoszkiewicz, K. (2012). Do macrophytes, diatoms and non-diatom benthic algae give redundant information? Results from a case study in Poland. Limnologica, 43: 204–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S.C., Kahlert, M. & Kelly, M.G. (2013a). Nutrient supply and pH interact in determining benthic algal assemblages in streams: consequences for biodiversity and ecological assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 444: 73–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider, S.C., Moe, T.F., Hessen, D.O. & Kaste, Ø (2013b). Juncus bulbosus nuisance growth in oligotrophic freshwater ecosystems: different triggers for the same phenomenon in rivers and lakes? Aquatic Botany, 104: 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönfelder, I. (2005). Analyse von planktischen und benthischen Diatomeen in ausgewähltenFließgewässern und Seen im Raum Berlin-Brandenburg im Rahmen eines Praxistests des Bewertungsverfahrens PHYLIB zur Umsetzung der EU-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Abschlussbericht im Auftrag des Berliner Betriebes für Zentrale Gesundheitliche Aufgaben und dem Institut für Lebensmittel, Arzneimittel und Tierseuchen Berlin (ILAT).
   Google Scholar
• Shubert, L.E. (1984). Algae as ecological indicators. Academic Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Skulberg, O.M. & Lillehammer, A. (1984). Glåma. In Ecology of European rivers (Whitton, B.A., editor), 469–498. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Stenger-Kovács, C., Buczkó, K., Hajnal, E. & Padisák, J. (2007). Epiphytic, littoral diatoms as bioindicators of shallow lake trophic status: Trophic Diatom Index for Lakes (TDIL) developed in Hungary. Hydrobiologia, 589: 141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturt, M.M., Jansen, M.A.K. & Harrison, S.S.C. (2011). Invertebrate grazing and riparian shade as controllers of nuisance algae in a eutrophic river. Freshwater Biology, 56: 2580–2593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansley, A.G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16: 284–307.
   Google Scholar
• Tett, P., Gowen, R., Mills, D., Fernandes, T., Gilpin, L., Huxham, M., Kennington, K., Read, P., Service, M., Wilkinson, M. & Malcolm, S. (2006). Defining and detecting undesirable disturbance in the context of marine eutrophication. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 55: 282–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tison, J., Park, Y.-S., Coste, M., Wasson, J.G., Ector, L., Rimet, F. & Delmas, F. (2005). Typology of diatom communities and the influence of hydro-ecoregions: a study on the French hydroecosystem scale. Water Research, 39: 3177–3188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Várbiró, G., Borics, G., Csányi, B., Fehér, G., Grigorszky, I., Kiss, K.T., Tóth, A. & Ács, É. (2012). Improvement of the ecological water qualification system of rivers based on the first results of the Hungarian phytobenthos surveillance monitoring. Hydrobiologia, 695: 125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VMM (2009). Biological assessment of the natural, heavily modified and artificial surface water bodies in Flanders according to the European Water Framework Directive. Vlaamse Milieumaatschappij, Erembodegem, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, A., Beier, T., Braun, J. & Raeder, U. (2005). Does the process of drying submerged macrophytes affect community structure and composition of epiphytic diatoms? Hydrobiologia, 541: 237–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, M.M., Takeuchi, Y. & Takamura, N. (1988). Cu tolerance of a freshwater benthic diatom, Achnanthes minutissima. In Biological monitoring of environmental pollution (Yasuno, M. & Whitton, B.A., editors), 171–177. Tokai University Press, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• West, G.S. & Fritsch, F.E. (1927). A treatise on the British freshwater algae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Whitton, B.A. (1980). Zinc and plants in rivers and streams. In Zinc in the environment. Part II: Health effects. (Nriagu, J.O., editor), 363–400. Wiley–Interscience, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Whitton, B.A. & Kelly, M.G. (1995). Use of algae and other plants for monitoring rivers. Australian Journal of Ecology, 20: 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yallop, M., Hirst, H., Kelly, M., Juggins, S., Jamieson, J. & Guthrie, R. (2009). Validation of ecological status concepts in UK rivers using historic diatom samples. Aquatic Botany, 90: 289–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinka, M. & Marvan, P. (1961). Zur Präzisierung der biologischen Klassifikation des Reinheit fliessender Gewässer. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 57: 389–407.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, J., Jahn, R. & Gemeinholzer, B. (2011). Barcoding diatoms: evaluation of the V4 subregion on the 18S rRNA gene, including new primers and protocols. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution, 11: 173–193.
   Google Scholar