Political Philosophy, Political Theory, and the Analytic-Continental Divide

References

• Akehurst, T. L. 2008. “The Nazi Tradition: The Analytic Critique of Continental Philosophy in Mid-century Britain.” History of European Ideas 34 (4): 548–557. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2008.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akehurst, T. L. 2010. The Cultural Politics of Analytic Philosophy: Britishness and the Spectre of Europe. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Baghramian, M., and S. Marchetti, eds. 2018. Pragmatism and the European Traditions: Encounters with Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology before the Great Divide. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bataille, G., and A. Michelson. [1951] 1986. “Un-knowing and Its Consequences.” A. Michelson, translator, October 36: 80–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/778554.
   Google Scholar
• Beaney, M. 2013. “What Is Analytic Philosophy?” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by M. Beaney, 3–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. A., Cutrofello, A., and Livingston, P. M. (eds). 2016. Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biletzki, A. 2001. “Introduction: Bridging the Analytic-Continental Divide.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3): 291–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550110058867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver, L. 2007. A Thing of This World: A History of Continental Anti-Realism. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, R. [1931] 1959. “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language.” In Logical Positivism, (translated by) edited by A. Pap and A. J. Ayer, 60–81. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celikates, R., S. Haslanger, and J. Stanley, eds. 2019. Analyzing Ideology: Rethinking the Concept. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, J., and J. Reynolds. 2011. Analytic versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy. Stocksfield, UK: Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., and L. Thomassen. 2016. “Introduction: Analytic, Continental and the Question of a Bridge.” European Journal of Political Theory 15 (2): 133–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115582078.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. 2016. “Beyond Analytic and Continental in Contemporary Political Thought: Pragmatic Methodological Pluralism and the Situated Turn.” European Journal of Political Theory 15 (2): 205–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115582076.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. E. 1994. “Analytical and Continental Philosophy.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94 (1): 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/94.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Corradini, A., S. Galvan, and E. J. Lowe. 2006. Analytic Philosophy Without Naturalism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• D’Agostini, F. 2001. “From a Continental Point of View: The Role of Logic in the Analytic-Continental Divide.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3): 349–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550110058821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahms, H. J. 1994. Positivismusstreit, Die Auseinandersetzung der Frankfurter Schule mit dem logischen Positivismus, dem amerikanischen Pragmatismus und dem kritischen Rationalismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Dascal, M. 2001. “How Rational Can a Polemic across the Analytic M Continental ‘Divide’ Be?” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3): 313–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550110058849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue, J. T., and P. Ochoa Espejo. 2016. “The analytical-Continental Divide: Styles of Dealing with Problems.” European Journal of Political Theory 15 (2): 138–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115585324.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. 1993. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutilh Novaes, C. 2020. “Carnap Meets Foucault: Conceptual Engineering and Genealogical Investigations.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1860122, December 17.
   Google Scholar
• Eldridge, R. 2019. “Analytic Philosophy of Film: (Contrasted with Continental Film Theory).” In The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures, edited by N. Carroll, L. Di Summa, and S. Loht, 237–258. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, J. 2016. “Analytics and Continentals: Divided by Nature but United by Praxis?” European Journal of Political Theory 15 (2): 155–171. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115582075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 2000. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger. Chigago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Glendinning, S., ed. 1999. The Edinburgh Encyclopaedia of Continental Philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glendinning, S. 2006. The Idea of Continental Philosophy: A Philosophical Chronicle. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glock, H. J., L. Haaparanta, C. Pincock, P. Raatikainen, and G. Stevens. 2013. “Book Symposium: Hans-Johann Glock, What Is Analytic Philosophy?” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (2): 1–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.4148/jhap.v2i2.1949.
   Google Scholar
• Glock, H. J. 2008. What Is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. E. 2010. Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnell, J. G. 1988. “American Political Science, Liberalism, and the Invention of Political Theory.” American Political Science Review 82 (1): 71–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1958059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinämaa, S. 2016. “Hermeneutics and the Analytic-Continental Divide.” In The Blackwell Companion to Hermeneutics, edited by N. Keane and C. Lawn, 573–584. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. [1937] 1972. “The Latest Attack on Metaphysics.” In Critical Theory: Selected Essays, 132–187. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, N. 2003. “Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Explaining the Differences.” Metaphilosophy 34 (3): 284–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion, M. 2018. “Was Royaumont Merely a Dialogue de Sourds? An Introduction to the Discussion Générale.” Philosophical Inquiries 6 (1): 197–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion, M. 2014. “Wittgenstein on Heidegger and Cosmic Emotions.” In Mind, Values, and Metaphysics, edited by A. Reboul, 435–458. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrahi, M., and M. Dickinson. 2021. “The Analytic-continental Divide in Philosophical Practice: An Empirical Study.” Metaphilosophy 52 (5): 668–680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12519, September 25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurath, O. [1931] 1973. Empiricsm and Sociology, eds. M. Neurath and R. S. Cohen. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Maoilearca, J. 2019. “When the Twain Shall Meet: On the Divide between Analytic and Continental Film Philosophy.” In The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures, edited by N. Carroll, L. Di Summa, and S. Loht, 259–283. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, J., and T. Uebel. 2004. “Horkheimer and Neurath: Restarting a Disrupted Debate.” European Journal of Philosophy 12 (1): 75–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-8373.2004.00199.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgaard, S., P. Gilbert, and S. Burwood. 2013. An Introduction to Metaphilosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overgaard, S. 2010. “Royaumont Revisited.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5): 899–924. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2010.524764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, D. 2016. “Reasons and Practices of Reasoning: On the analytic/Continental Distinction in Political Philosophy.” European Journal of Political Theory 15 (2): 172–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115587120.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, P. 2016. “Government, Rights and Legitimacy: Foucault and Liberal Political Normativity.” European Journal of Political Theory 15 (2): 223–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115582077.
   Google Scholar
• Picardi, E. 2001. “Rorty, Sorge and Truth.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3): 431–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550110058777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prado, C. G., ed. 2003. A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy. New York: Humanity Books.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, A. 2005. “The Implications of Recent Work on the History of Analytic Philosophy.” The Bertrand Russell Society Quarterly 127: 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, C., D. Neiva, and S. S. Gouveia. 2019. Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. 2017. Phenomenology, Naturalism and Science: A Hybrid and Heretical Proposal. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. 1981. “Sartre and Ryle on the Imagination.” In The Philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre, edited by P. Schilpp, 167–178. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Roholt, T. 2017. “On the Divide: Analytic and Continental Philosophy of Music.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75 (1): 49–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. 2001. “The Identity Of, and the Difference Between, Analytical and Continental Philosophy.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3): 341–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672550110058830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 1935. “The Ancestry of Fascism.” In In Praise of Idleness, 82–108. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. [1962] 2009. “Phenomenology Vs. The Concept of Mind.” In Collected Papers: Critical Essays, 179–196. Vol. 1. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. 1929. “Review of Heidegger’s Sein und Zeit.” Mind XXXVIII (151): 355–370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XXXVIII.151.355.
   Google Scholar
• Sebold, R. 2014. Continental Anti-Realism: A Critique. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, P. 2001. “Whose Fault? The Origins and Evitability of the Analytic–Continental Rift.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (3): 295–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulez, A. 2019. “Does Understanding Mean Forgiveness? Otto Neurath and Plato’s “Republic” in 1944–45ʹ.” In Neurath Reconsidered, Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, edited by J. Cat and A. Tuboly, 435–449. Vol. 336. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A. 2019. “Genealogy, Epistemology, and Worldmaking.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119 (2): 127–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoz009.
   Google Scholar
• Strassfeld, J. 2020. “American Divide: The Making of ‘Continental’ Philosophy.” Modern Intellectual History 17 (3): 833–866. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244318000513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trakakis, N. 2007. “Meta-Philosophy of Religion.” Ars Disputandi 7 (1): 179–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15665399.2007.10819969.
   Google Scholar
• Uebel, T. 2019. “Neurath on Verstehen.” European Journal of Philosophy 27 (4): 912–938. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhaegh, S. 2019. “The Behaviorisms of Skinner and Quine: Genesis, Development, and Mutual Influence.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (4): 707–730. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2019.0074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrahimis, A. 2011. “Review of Chase and Reynolds, Analytic versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (4): 633–637. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2011.608571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrahimis, A. 2013b. “Is the Royaumont Colloquium the Locus Classicus of the Divide between Analytic and Continental Philosophy? Reply to Overgaard.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (1): 177–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2012.689751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrahimis, A. 2013. Encounters between Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vrahimis, A. 2018. “Is There a Methodological Divide between Analytic and Continental Philosophy of Music? Response to Roholt.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 76 (1): 108–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrahimis, A. 2020a. “Scientism, Social Praxis, and Overcoming Metaphysics: A Debate between Logical Empiricism and the Frankfurt School.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2): 562–597.
   Google Scholar
• Vrahimis, A. 2020b. “The Vienna Circle’s Reception of Nietzsche.” Journal for the History of Analytic Philosophy 8 (9): 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Vrahimis, A. 2021. “Wittgenstein, Loos, and the Critique of Ornament.” Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 58 (2): 144–159.
   Google Scholar
• Vrahimis, A. 2022. “Philosophy (And Wissenschaft) without Politics? Schlick on Nietzsche, German Idealism, and Militarism.” In The Socio-Ethical Dimension of Knowledge: The Mission of Logical Empiricism (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook), edited by C. Damböck, and A. T. Tuboly eds . Basel: Springer 53–84.
   Google Scholar
• Vrahimis, A. forthcoming. Bergsonism and the History of Analytic Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. K. 2016. “Continental and Analytic Lenses in Relation to the Communicative Action Paradigm: Reconstructive Thoughts.” European Journal of Political Theory 15 (2): 189–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885115595626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. 2013. “Analytic Political Philosophy.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy, edited by M. Beaney, 795–822. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar