Understanding Deep Disagreement

References

• Brenner, W., & D. Godden. 2010. “Wittgenstein and the Logic of Deep Disagreement.” Cogency (2): 41–80.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J. A. 2017. “Epistemic Pluralism, Epistemic Relativism and ‘Hinge’ Epistemology.” In Epistemic Pluralism, edited by A. Coliva and N. J. L. L. Pedersen, 229–252. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, D. 2007. “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.” The Philosophical Review 116 (2): 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2006-035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. 2013. “A Defence of the (Almost) Equal Weight View.” In The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays, edited by D. Christensen and J. Lackey, 98–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coliva, A. 2010. “Was Wittgenstein an Epistemic Relativist?” Philosophical Investigations 33:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.2009.01394.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coliva, A. 2015. Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elga, A. 2007. “Reflection and Disagreement.” Noûs 41 (3): 478–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, R. 2007. “Reasonable Religious Disagreements.” In Philosophers without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life, edited by L. Antony, 194–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fogelin, R. J. 1985. “The Logic of Deep Disagreements.” Informal Logic 7 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v7i1.2696.
   Google Scholar
• Kappel, K. 2012. “The Problem of Deep Disagreement.” Discipline Filosofiche (22): 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kusch, M. 2016. “Wittgenstein’s On Certainty and Relativism.” In Analytic and Continental Philosophy: Methods and Perspectives, edited by S. Rinofner-Kreidl and H. A. Wiltsche, 29–46. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lavorerio, V. 2020. “Fogelin’s Theory of Deep Disagreements: A Relativistic Reading.” Philosophical Investigations 43 (4): 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. 2010. “Epistemic Circularity and Epistemic Incommensurability.” In Social Epistemology, edited by A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D. Pritchard, 262–277. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGinn, M. 1989. Sense and Certainty: A Dissolution of Scepticism. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Moyal-Sharrock, D. 2004. Understanding Wittgenstein’s on Certainty. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2010. “Epistemic Relativism, Epistemic Incommensurability and Wittgensteinian Epistemology.” In The Blackwell Companion to Relativism, edited by S. Hales, 266–285. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2011. “Wittgensteinian Quasi-Fideism.” Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion (4): 145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2015. Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2017a. “Faith and Reason.” Philosophy 81:101–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135824611700025X.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2017b. “Wittgenstein on Hinges and Radical Scepticism in On Certainty.” In Blackwell Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by H.-J. Glock and J. Hyman, 563–575. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2018a. “Disagreement, of Belief and Otherwise.” In Voicing Dissent: The Ethics and Epistemology of Making Disagreement Public, edited by C. Johnson, 22–39. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2018b. “Intellectual Humility and the Epistemology of Disagreement.” Synthese 198 (S7): 1711–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02024-5].
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2018c. “Wittgensteinian Hinge Epistemology and Deep Disagreement.” Topoi 40 (5): 1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9612-y.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2019. “Disagreement, Intellectual Humility, and Reflection”. In Thinking About Oneself: The Place and Value of Reflection in Philosophy and Psychology, edited by W. Da Silva Filho, ch. 5. Dordrecht, Holland:Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2020. “Educating for Intellectual Humility and Conviction.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 54 (2): 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2022a. “Exploring Quasi-Fideism”. In Extending Hinge Epistemology, edited by D. Moyal-Sharrock and C. Sandis, ch. 2. London:Anthem.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2022b. “Quasi-Fideism and Epistemic Relativism.” Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2135820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. 2022c. “Virtuous Arguing with Conviction and Humility.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10328-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. Forthcoming-a. “Deep Disagreement.” In Routledge Handbook to Philosophy of Disagreement, edited by M. Baghramian, J. A. Carter, and R. Rowland. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. Forthcoming-b. “Honest Doubt: Quasi-Fideism and Epistemic Vertigo.” In Wittgenstein and the Epistemology of Religion, edited by D. H. Pritchard and N. Venturinha. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. H. Forthcoming-c. “Religious Vertigo.” In Religionsphilosophie nach Wittgenstein (Philosophy of Religion after Wittgenstein), edited by E. Ramharter. Stuttgart, Germany: Metzler/Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ranalli, C. 2020. “Deep Disagreement and Hinge Epistemology.” Synthese 197 (11): 4975–5007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01956-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranalli, C. 2021. “What is Deep Disagreement?” Topoi 40 (5): 983–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9600-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönbaumsfeld, G. 2014. “Wittgenstein and the ‘Factorization Model’ of Religious Belief.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6:93–110. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v6i1.193.
   Google Scholar
• Schönbaumsfeld, G. 2016. The Illusion of Doubt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. 2021. “Hinges, Disagreements, and Arguments: (Rationally) Believing Hinge Propositions and Arguing Across Deep Disagreements.” Topoi 40 (5): 1107–1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9625-6.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. 1985. Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiberius, V. 2018. Well-Being as Value Fulfilment: How We Can Help Each Other to Live Well. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 1991. Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2004. “Wittgenstein’s Refutation of Idealism.” In Wittgenstein and Scepticism, edited by D. McManus, 76–96. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2007. “Why (Wittgensteinian) Contextualism is Not Relativism.” Episteme 4 (1): 93–114. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2007.4.1.93.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1969. On Certainty. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Translated by D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1977. Culture and Value. Edited by G. H. von Wright. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. J. G. 2004. “Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 78 (supp.), 167–212.
   Google Scholar