59
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Unknown Peers

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ballantyne, N. 2015. “The Significance of Unpossessed Evidence.” The Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260): 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu096.
  • Christensen, D. 2007. “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.” The Philosophical Review 116 (2): 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2006-035.
  • Elga, A. 2007. “Reflection and Disagreement.” Noûs 41 (3): 478–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x.
  • Enoch, D. 2010. “Not Just a Truthometer: Taking Oneself Seriously (But Not Too Seriously) in Cases of Peer Disagreement.” Mind 119 (476): 953–997. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzq070.
  • Goldberg, S. 2013. “Disagreement, Defeat, and Assertion.” In The Epistemology of Disagreement, edited by D. Christensen and J. Lackey, 167–189. Oxford: OUP.
  • Hall, R., and C. Johnson. 1998. “The Epistemic Duty to Seek More Evidence.” American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (2): 129–140.
  • Kelly, T. 2005. “The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.” In Vol. 1 of Oxford Studies in Epistemology, edited by J. Hawthorne and T. Gendler, 167–196. Oxford: OUP.
  • Kelly, T. 2010. “Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence.” In Disagreement, edited by R. Feldman and T. Warfield, 111–174. Oxford: OUP.
  • King, N. 2011. “Disagreement: What’s the Problem? Or A Good Peer is Hard to Find.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2): 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00441.x.
  • Lackey, J. 2010. “A Justificationist View of Disagreement’s Epistemic Significance.” In Social Epistemology, edited by A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D. Pritchard, 298–325. Oxford: OUP.
  • Lackey, J. 2013. “Disagreement and a Dependence: Why Numbers Matter.” In The Epistemology of Disagreement, edited by D. Christensen and J. Lackey, 243–268. Oxford: OUP.
  • Lasonen-Aarnio, M. 2014. “Higher-Order Evidence and the Limits of Defeat.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2): 314–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12090.
  • Matheson, J. 2015. The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rosenkranz, S., and M. Schulz. 2015. “Peer Disagreement: A Call for the Revision of Prior Probabilities.” Dialectica 69 (4): 551–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-8361.12103.
  • Titelbaum, M. G. 2015. “Rationality’s Fixed Point (or: In Defense of Right Reason).” In Vol. 5 of Oxford Studies in Epistemology, edited by J. Hawthorne and T. Gendler, 253–294. Oxford: OUP.
  • Vorobej, M. 2011. “Distant Peers.” Metaphilosophy 42 (5): 708–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01714.x.
  • Weatherson, B. 2019. Normative Externalism. Oxford: OUP.
  • Weber, M. A. Unpublished. “Disagreement Among Many: Why Numbers Do Not Matter.”
  • Weber, M. A. 2017a. “Armchair Disagreement.” Metaphilosophy 48 (4): 527–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12254.
  • Weber, M. A. 2017b. “Epistemic Peerhood, Likelihood, and Equal Weight.” Logos & Episteme 8 (3): 307–344. https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20178325.
  • Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: OUP.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.