References
- Ballantyne, N. 2015. “The Significance of Unpossessed Evidence.” The Philosophical Quarterly 65 (260): 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu096.
- Christensen, D. 2007. “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News.” The Philosophical Review 116 (2): 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2006-035.
- Elga, A. 2007. “Reflection and Disagreement.” Noûs 41 (3): 478–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x.
- Enoch, D. 2010. “Not Just a Truthometer: Taking Oneself Seriously (But Not Too Seriously) in Cases of Peer Disagreement.” Mind 119 (476): 953–997. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzq070.
- Goldberg, S. 2013. “Disagreement, Defeat, and Assertion.” In The Epistemology of Disagreement, edited by D. Christensen and J. Lackey, 167–189. Oxford: OUP.
- Hall, R., and C. Johnson. 1998. “The Epistemic Duty to Seek More Evidence.” American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (2): 129–140.
- Kelly, T. 2005. “The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.” In Vol. 1 of Oxford Studies in Epistemology, edited by J. Hawthorne and T. Gendler, 167–196. Oxford: OUP.
- Kelly, T. 2010. “Peer Disagreement and Higher-Order Evidence.” In Disagreement, edited by R. Feldman and T. Warfield, 111–174. Oxford: OUP.
- King, N. 2011. “Disagreement: What’s the Problem? Or A Good Peer is Hard to Find.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (2): 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00441.x.
- Lackey, J. 2010. “A Justificationist View of Disagreement’s Epistemic Significance.” In Social Epistemology, edited by A. Haddock, A. Millar, and D. Pritchard, 298–325. Oxford: OUP.
- Lackey, J. 2013. “Disagreement and a Dependence: Why Numbers Matter.” In The Epistemology of Disagreement, edited by D. Christensen and J. Lackey, 243–268. Oxford: OUP.
- Lasonen-Aarnio, M. 2014. “Higher-Order Evidence and the Limits of Defeat.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2): 314–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12090.
- Matheson, J. 2015. The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Rosenkranz, S., and M. Schulz. 2015. “Peer Disagreement: A Call for the Revision of Prior Probabilities.” Dialectica 69 (4): 551–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-8361.12103.
- Titelbaum, M. G. 2015. “Rationality’s Fixed Point (or: In Defense of Right Reason).” In Vol. 5 of Oxford Studies in Epistemology, edited by J. Hawthorne and T. Gendler, 253–294. Oxford: OUP.
- Vorobej, M. 2011. “Distant Peers.” Metaphilosophy 42 (5): 708–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01714.x.
- Weatherson, B. 2019. Normative Externalism. Oxford: OUP.
- Weber, M. A. Unpublished. “Disagreement Among Many: Why Numbers Do Not Matter.”
- Weber, M. A. 2017a. “Armchair Disagreement.” Metaphilosophy 48 (4): 527–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12254.
- Weber, M. A. 2017b. “Epistemic Peerhood, Likelihood, and Equal Weight.” Logos & Episteme 8 (3): 307–344. https://doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20178325.
- Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: OUP.