Ethical Theories and Controversial Intuitions

References

• Alfano, M. 2016. Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. 1999. “What is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109 (2): 287–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/233897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archard, D. 2011. “Why Moral Philosophers are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts.” Bioethics 25 (3): 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01748.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvan, M. 2016. Rightness as Fairness: A Moral and Political Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bedau, H. A., and E. Kelly. 2015. “Punishment.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/punishment/.
   Google Scholar
• Boonin, D. 2008. The Problem of Punishment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, D. 2010. “Disagreement, Question-Begging, and Epistemic Self Criticism.” Philosophers’ Imprint 11 (6): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosker-Rowland, R. 2017. “Our Intuitions About the Experience Machine.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 12 (1): 110–117. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v12i1.216.
   Google Scholar
• Cosker-Rowland, R. 2020. Moral Disagreement. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cosker-Rowland, R., and D. Killoren. 2020. “Moral Deliberation and Moral Judgment Shift.” Unpublished m.s.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. 2003. “Equality, Priority, and Compassion.” Ethics 113 (4): 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1086/373954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuneo, T., and R. Shafer-Landau. 2014. “The Moral Fixed Points: New Directions for Moral Nonaturalism.” Philosophical Studies 171 (3): 399–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0277-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, O. S., D. A. Mullins, and H. Whitehouse. 2019. “Is It Good to Cooperate? Testing the Theory of Morality-As-Cooperation in 60 Societies.” Current Anthropology 60 (1): Online First. https://doi.org/10.1086/701478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancy, J. 2000. “Should We Pass the Buck?” In Philosophy, the Good, the True, and the Beautiful, edited by A. O’Hear, 159–173. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• De Brigard, F. 2010. “If You Like It, Does It Matter if It’s Real?” Philosophical Psychology 23 (1): 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080903532290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaul, M. 2006. “Intuitions in Moral Inquiry.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, edited by D. Copp, 595–623. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D., and B. Sterumer. 2016. “Are the Moral Fixed Points Conceptual Truths?” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 10 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v10i1.183.
   Google Scholar
• Finlay, S. 2008. “The Error in the Error Theory.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3): 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400802001921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, P. 1978. Virtues and Vices. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Gauch, H. G. 2003. Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J., J. Haidt, and B. Nosek. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Personality Processes and Individual Differences 96 (5): 1029–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. 2013. Moral Tribes. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, M., F. Cushman, L. Young, R. K.-X. Jin, and J. Mikhail. 2007. “A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications.” Mind & Language 22 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00297.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, A. 2009. “Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology.” Ethics 120 (1): 94–127. https://doi.org/10.1086/648610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooker, B. 2001. Ideal Code Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooker, B. 2015. “Rule Consequentialism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/consequentialism-rule/.
   Google Scholar
• Huemer, M. 2005. Ethical Intuitionism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Huemer, M. 2013. The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, R. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, R., and G. Pettigrove. 2016. “Virtue Ethics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/ethics-virtue.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. 2018. “Support for Same-Sex Marriage Grows Sharply in U.S., Survey Finds.” NBC News. May 2, 2018. Accessed February 24, 2019. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/support-same-sex-marriage-grows-sharply-u-s-survey-finds-n870586.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. 2017. “Americans Hold Record Liberal Views on Most Moral Issues.” gallup.com. May 11, 2017. Accessed November 21, 2018. https://news.gallup.com/poll/210542/americans-hold-record-liberal-views-moral-issues.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. 2001. “Thinking About Cases.” In Moral Knowledge, edited by E. F. Paul, F. Miller, and J. Paul, 44–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamm, F. 2007. Intricate Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelman, M., and T. Admati Kreps. 2014. “Playing with Trolleys: Intuitions About the Permissibility of Aggregation.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 11 (2): 197–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. R., J.-S. Kang, and S. Yun. 2012. “Moral Intuitions and Political Orientation: Similarities and Differences Between South Korea and the United States.” Psychological Report: Sociocultural Issues in Psychology 111 1:173–185. https://doi.org/10.2466/17.09.21.PR0.111.4.173-185.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V. 2016. “Psychopathy and Internalism.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (3): 318–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1165571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 2002. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, J. 2008. “A Justificationist View of Disagreement’s Epistemic Significance.” In Social Epistemology, edited by A. Millar, A. Haddock, and D. Pritchard, 298–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, S. 2008. “Moral Disagreement and Moral Expertise.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, edited by R. Shafer-Landau, Vol. 3, 87–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, S. 2009. “The Puzzle of Pure Moral Deference.” Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1): 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2009.00174.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, S. 2011. “Skepticism About Moral Expertise as a Puzzle for Moral Realism.” Journal of Philosophy 108 (3): 111–137. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201110837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogensen, A. 2017. “Disagreements in Moral Intuition as Defeaters.” Philosophical Quarterly 67 (267): 282–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, P. 2015. “Polyamory: Taboo for Religous Americans but Not for the Rest.” yougov.com. August 13, 2015. Accessed November 21, 2015. https://today.yougov.com/topics/lifestyle/articles- reports/2015/08/12/polyamory-taboo-religious-americans.
   Google Scholar
• Narveson, J., and J. B. Sugden Sherwood. 2003. “We Don’t Owe Them a Thing! A Tough-Minded but Soft-Hearted View of Aid to the Faraway Needy.” The Monist 86 (3): 419–433. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist200386323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcross, A. 2000. “Contractualism and the Ethical Status of Animals.” Southwest Philosophy Review 17 (1): 137–143. https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview200017116.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nozick, R. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliphant, B. 2018. “Public Support for the Death Penalty Ticks up.” Pew Research Center. June 11, 2018. Accessed February 24, 2019. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/06/11/us-support-for-death-penalty-ticks-up-2018/.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J. 2014. Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971) 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rini, R. 2015. “How Not to Test for Philosophical Expertise.” Synthese 192 (2): 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0579-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. 2002. “Rawls on Justification.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by S. Freeman, 139–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. M. 2014. Being Realistic About Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer-Landau, R. 2012. The Fundamentals of Ethics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. 1972. “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1): 229–243.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, P. 1975. “Is Act-Utilitarianism Self-Defeating?” The Philosophical Review 81 (1): 94–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184228.
   Google Scholar
• Stratton-Lake, P. 2016. “Intuitionism in Ethics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/intuitionism-ethics/.
   Google Scholar
• Streumer, B. 2017. Unbelievable Errors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Temkin, L. 2003. “Egalitarianism Defended.” Ethics 113 (4): 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1086/373955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkin, L. 2012. Rethinking the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. J. 1985. “The Trolley Problem.” The Yale Law Journal 94 (6): 1395–1415. https://doi.org/10.2307/796133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedgwood, R. 2010. “The Moral Evil Demons.” In Disagreement, edited by R. Feldman and T. Warfield, 216–246. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weijers, D. 2014. “Nozick’s Experience Machine is Dead, Long Live the Experience Ma- Chine!” Philosophical Psychology 27 (4): 513–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2012.757889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijers, D., P. Unger, and J. Sytsma. 2019. “Trolley Problems Reconsidered: Testing the Method of Several Options.” Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Zagzebski, L. 2004. Divine Motivation Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar