Bayesian game theorists and non-Bayesian players

References

• Armbruster, W., and W. Böge. 1979. “Bayesian Game Theory.” Game Theory and Related Topics 17: 28.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, B. C., and S. J. Press. 1989. “Compatible Conditional Distributions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 84 (405): 152–156. doi:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J. 1974. “Subjectivity and Correlation in Randomized Strategies.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 1 (1): 67–96. doi:10.1016/0304-4068(74)90037-8
   Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J. 1976. “Agreeing to Disagree.” The Annals of Statistics 4 (6): 1236–9. doi:10.1214/aos/1176343654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J. 1987. “Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 55 (1): 1–18. doi:10.2307/1911154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J. 1999. “Interactive Epistemology I: knowledge.” International Journal of Game Theory 28 (3): 263–300. doi:10.1007/s001820050111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J. 2005. “An Interview with Robert Aumann, by Sergiu Hart.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 9: 683–740. doi.org/10.1017/S1365100505050078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J. 2010. In V. Hendricks & O. Roy (Eds.), Epistemic Logic: Five Questions, 21–33. Copenhagen: Automatic Press/VIP.
   Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J., and A. Brandenburger. 1995. “Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 63 (5): 1161–1180. doi:10.2307/2171725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J., and J. H. Drèze. 2008. “Rational Expectations in Games.” The American Economic Review 98 (1): 72–86. doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J., and J. H. Drèze. 2009. “Assessing Strategic Risk.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 1 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1257/mic.1.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J., and M. Maschler. 1967. Repeated Games with Incomplete Information: A Survey of Recent Results, Mathematica, Inc. Report ST-116, 287–403, Princeton. Reprinted as Chapter II in Aumann and Maschler (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J., and M. Maschler. 1968. Repeated Games of Incomplete Information: The Zero-Sum Extensive Case, Mathematica, Inc. Report ST-143, 37–116, Princeton. Reprinted as Chapter IV in Aumann and Maschler (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Aumann, R. J., and M. Maschler. 1995. Repeated Games of Incomplete Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, M. 1985. “Some Extensions of a Claim of Aumann in an Axiomatic Model of Knowledge.” Journal of Economic Theory 37 (1): 167–190. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(85)90035-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacharach, M. 2006. Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and Frames in Game Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, M., and S. Hurley. 1991. “Introduction.” In Issues and Advances in the Foundations of Decision Theory, edited by M. Bacharach and S. Hurley, 1–38. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Battigalli, P., and G. Bonanno. 1999. “Recent Results on Belief, Knowledge and the Epistemic Foundations of Game Theory.” Research in Economics 53 (2): 149–225. doi:10.1006/reec.1999.0187
   Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D. 1984. “Rationalizable Strategic Behavior.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 52 (4): 1007–1028. doi:10.2307/1911196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernheim, B. D. 1986. “Axiomatic Characterizations of Rational Choice in Strategic Environments.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88 (3): 473–488. doi:10.2307/3440381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binmore, K. G. 1992. Fun and Games: A Text on Game Theory. Lexington, MA: Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Binmore, K. G. 1993. “De-Bayesing Game Theory.” In Frontiers of Game Theory, K. G. Binmore, A. P. Kirman, and P. Tani. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binmore, K. G. 2009. Rational Decisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Board, O. 2004. “Dynamic Interactive Epistemology.” Games and Economic Behavior 49 (1): 49–80. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2003.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böge, W. 1974. Gedanken über die angewandte Mathematik. In Mathematiker über die mathematic, 288–328. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Böge, W., and T. Eisele. 1979. “On Solutions of Bayesian Games.” International Journal of Game Theory 8 (4): 193–215. doi:10.1007/BF01766706
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A. 2007. “The Power of Paradox: Some Recent Developments in Interactive Epistemology.” International Journal of Game Theory 35 (4): 465–492. doi:10.1007/s00182-006-0061-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A. 2010. “Origins of Epistemic Game Theory.” In Epistemic Logic: Five Questions, edited by V. Hendricks and O. Roy, 59–69. Copenhagen: Automatic Press/VIP.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A. 2014. The Language of Game Theory: Putting Epistemics into the Mathematics of Games, Vol. 5. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A., and E. Dekel. 1987a. “Common Knowledge with Probability 1.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 16 (3): 237–245. doi:10.1016/0304-4068(87)90010-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A., and E. Dekel. 1987b. “Rationalizability and Correlated Equilibria.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 55 (6): 1391–402. doi:10.2307/1913562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburger, A., and E. Dekel. 1993. “Hierarchies of Beliefs and Common Knowledge.” Journal of Economic Theory 59 (1): 189–198. doi:10.1006/jeth.1993.1012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F., T. H. Ho, and J. K. Chong. 2004. “A Cognitive Hierarchy Model of Games.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (3): 861–898. doi:10.1162/0033553041502225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman, A. M., and M. Bacharach. 1997. “Payoff Dominance and the Stackelberg Heuristic.” Theory and Decision 43 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1023/A:1004911723951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubitt, R. P., and R. Sugden. 2003. “Common Knowledge, Salience and Convention: A Reconstruction of David Lewis’ Game Theory.” Economics & Philosophy 19 (2): 175–210. doi:10.1017/S0266267103001123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliashberg, J. 1980. Bayesian Analysis of Competitive Decision-Making Situations. unpublished mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Eliashberg, J. 1981. “An Investigation of Competitive Preference Structures and Posterior Performance through a Bayesian Decision-Theoretic Approach.” Management Science 27 (7): 785–801. doi:10.1287/mnsc.27.7.785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedell, M. F. 1969. “On the Structure of Shared Awareness.” Behavioral Science 14 (1): 28–39. doi:10.1002/bs.3830140105
   Google Scholar
• Giocoli, N. 2003. Modeling Rational Agents: From Interwar Economics to Early Modern Game Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Giocoli, N. 2009. “Three Alternative (?) Stories on the Late 20th-Century Rise of Game Theory.” Studi e Note di Economia 14 (2): 187–210. doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1140111
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. 1990. The Theory of Social Situations: An Alternative Game-Theoretic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guala, F. 2016. Understanding Institutions: The Science and Philosophy of Living Together. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gul, F. 1998. “A Comment on Aumann's Bayesian View.” Econometrica 66 (4): 923–7. doi:10.2307/2999578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves Heap, S., D. Rojo Arjona, and R. Sugden. 2014. “How Portable Is Level‐0 Behavior? A Test of Level‐k Theory in Games with Non‐Neutral Frames.” Econometrica 82 (3): 1133–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, P. J. 2009. Isolation, Assurance and Rules: Can Rational Folly Supplant Foolish Rationality? In Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen. Volume I: Ethics, Welfare, and Measurement, edited by K. Basu and R. Kanbur. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C. 1962. “Bargaining in Ignorance of the Opponent's Utility Function.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 6 (1): 29–38. doi:10.1177/002200276200600104
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C. 1968. “Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’ Players, I-III.” Management Science 14 (7): 486–182. 320–334, 486–502. doi:10.1287/mnsc.14.7.486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C. 1975. “The Tracing Procedure: A Bayesian Approach to Defining a Solution Forn-Person Noncooperative Games.” International Journal of Game Theory 4 (2): 61–94. doi:10.1007/BF01766187
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C. 1977. Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge England New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C. 1982a. “Comment – Subjective Probability and the Theory of Games: Comments on Kadane and Larkey’s Paper.” Management Science 28 (2): 120–124. doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.2.120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C. 1982b. “Rejoinder to Professors Kadane and Larkey.” Management Science 28 (2): 124–125. doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.2.124a
   Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C., and R. Selten. 1972. “A Generalized Nash Solution for Two-Person Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information.” Management Science 18 (5-part-2): 80–106. doi:10.1287/mnsc.18.5.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J. C., and R. Selten. 1988. A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, Z., and D. Samet. 2012. “How Common Are Common Priors?” Games and Economic Behavior 74 (2): 517–525. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2011.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillas, J., and E. Kohlberg. 2002. “Foundations of Strategic Equilibrium.” In Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edited by R. Aumann and S. Hart. Vol. 3, 1597–1663. Amsterdam: North Holland
   Google Scholar
• Infante, G., G. Lecouteux, and R. Sugden. 2016. “Preference Purification and the Inner Rational Agent: A Critique of the Conventional Wisdom of Behavioural Welfare Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 23 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2015.1070527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocenti, A. 1995. “Oskar Morgenstern and the Heterodox Potentialities of the Application of Game Theory to Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17 (02): 205–227. doi:10.1017/S1053837200002601
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, J. M. 2002. “Levi on Causal Decision Theory and the Possibility of Predicting One's Own Actions.” Philosophical Studies 110 (1): 69–102. doi:10.1023/A:1019839429878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadane, J. B., and P. D. Larkey. 1982a. “Subjective Probability and the Theory of Games.” Management Science 28 (2): 113–120. doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.2.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadane, J. B., and P. D. Larkey. 1982b. “Reply to Professor Harsanyi.” Management Science 28 (2): 124. doi:10.1287/mnsc.28.2.124
   Google Scholar
• Kadane, J. B., and P. D. Larkey. 1983. “The Confusion of is and Ought in Game Theoretic Contexts.” Management Science 29 (12): 1365–1379. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.12.1365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadane, J. B., and T. Seidenfeld. 1992. Equilibrium, Common Knowledge, and Optimal Sequential Decisions. In Knowledge, Belief, and Strategic Interaction, edited by C. Bicchieri and M. L. dalla Chiara, 27–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, E., and S. Zamir. 1974. “Repeated Games of Incomplete Information: The Symmetric Case.” The Annals of Statistics 2 (5): 1040–1041. doi:10.1214/aos/1176342824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, E. 1975a. “Optimal Strategies in Repeated Games with Incomplete Information.” International Journal of Game Theory 4 (1): 7–24. doi:10.1007/BF01766399
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, E. 1975b. “The Information Revealed in Infinitely-Repeated Games of Incomplete Information.” International Journal of Game Theory 4 (2): 57–59. doi:10.1007/BF01766186
   Google Scholar
• Kripke, S. A. 1963. “Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I Normal Modal Propositional Calculi.” Zeitschrift Für Mathematische Logik Und Grundlagen Der Mathematik 9 (5-6): 67–96. doi:10.1002/malq.19630090502
   Google Scholar
• Larrouy, L., and G. Lecouteux. 2017. “Mindreading and Endogenous Beliefs in Games.” Journal of Economic Methodology 24 (3): 318–343. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2017.1335425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecouteux, G. 2018. “What Does ‘We’ Want? Team Reasoning, Game Theory, and Unselfish Behaviours.” Revue D'économie Politique 128 (3): 311–332. doi:10.3917/redp.283.0311
   Google Scholar
• Levi, I. 1998. “Prediction, Bayesian Deliberation and Correlated Equilibrium.” In Game Theory, Experience, Rationality: Foundations of Social Sciences, Economics and Ethics in Honor of John C. Harsanyi, edited by W. Leinfellner and E. Köhler, 173–185. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., and H. Raiffa. 1957. Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D., and E. W. Adams. 1956. “The Determination of Subjective Characteristic Functions in Games with Misperceived Payoff Functions.” Econometrica 24 (2): 158–171. doi:10.2307/1905749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, M. 1995. “Is Bayesian Rationality Compatible with Strategic Rationality?” The Economic Journal 105 (432): 1099–109. doi:10.2307/2235406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariotti, M. 1997. “Decisions in Games: Why There Should Be a Special Exemption from Bayesian Rationality.” Journal of Economic Methodology 4 (1): 43–60. doi:10.1080/13501789700000003
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, J. F. 1971. “The Value of Two-Person Zero-Sum Repeated Games the Extensive Case.” International Journal of Game Theory 1 (1): 217–227. doi:10.1007/BF01753446
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, J. F., and S. Zamir. 1971. “The Value of Two-Person Zero-Sum Repeated Games with Lack of Information on Both Sides.” International Journal of Game Theory 1 (1): 39–64. doi:10.1007/BF01753433
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, J. F., and S. Zamir. 1985. “Formulation of Bayesian Analysis for Games with Incomplete Information.” International Journal of Game Theory 14 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1007/BF01770224
   Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P. 1981. “An Axiomatic Characterization of Common Knowledge.” Econometrica 49 (1): 219–222. doi:10.2307/1911137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monderer, D., and D. Samet. 1989. “Approximating Common Knowledge with Common Beliefs.” Games and Economic Behavior 1 (2): 170–190. doi:10.1016/0899-8256(89)90017-1
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern, O. 1935. “Perfect Foresight and Economic Equilibrium.” In Selected Economic Writings of Oskar Morgenstern, edited by A. Schotter 169–183. New York: New York Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, R. B. 1990. Game Theory. Analysis of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, R. B. 2004. “Comments on “Games with Incomplete Information Played by ‘Bayesian’Players, I–III Harsanyi's Games with Incoplete Information.” Management Science 50 (12_supplement): 1818–1824. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0297
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, R. 1995. “Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study.” The American Economic Review 85 (5): 1313–1326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyarko, Y. 2010. “Most Games Violate the Common Priors Doctrine.” International Journal of Economic Theory 6 (1): 189–194. doi:10.1111/j.1742-7363.2009.00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. G. 1984. “Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 52 (4): 1029–1050. doi:10.2307/1911197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, A. 2012. Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perea, A. 2014. “From Classical to Epistemic Game Theory.” International Game Theory Review 16 (01): 1440001. doi:10.1142/S0219198914400015
   Google Scholar
• Ponssard, J. P. 1975a. “A Note on the LP Formulation of Zero-Sum Sequential Games with Incomplete Information.” International Journal of Game Theory 4 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1007/BF01766398
   Google Scholar
• Ponssard, J. P. 1975b. “Zero-Sum Games with “Almost” Perfect Information.” Management Science 21 (7): 794–805. doi:10.1287/mnsc.21.7.794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponssard, J. P., and S. Zamir. 1973. “Zero-Sum Sequential Games with Incomplete Information.” International Journal of Game Theory 2 (1): 99–107. doi:10.1007/BF01737562
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowicz, W. 2002. “Does Practical Deliberation Crowd Out Self-Prediction?” Erkenntnis 57 (1): 91–122. doi:10.1023/A:1020106622032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, A. 1989. “The Electronic Mail Game: Strategic Behavior under “Almost Common Knowledge”.” The American Economic Review 79: 385–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samet, D. 1990. “Ignoring Ignorance and Agreeing to Disagree.” Journal of Economic Theory 52 (1): 190–207. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(90)90074-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanghvi, A. P. 1978. “Sequential Games as Stochastic Processes.” Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 6 (3): 323–336. doi:10.1016/0304-4149(78)90029-7
   Google Scholar
• Sanghvi, A. P., and M. J. Sobel. 1976. “Bayesian Games as Stochastic Processes.” International Journal of Game Theory 5 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1007/BF01770983
   Google Scholar
• Savage, L. J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schotter, A., and G. Schwödiauer. 1980. “Economics and the Theory of Games: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 18 (2): 479–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sent, E. M. 2004. “Behavioral Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back into Economics.” History of Political Economy 36 (4): 735–760. doi:10.1215/00182702-36-4-735
   Google Scholar
• Shefrin, H. M. 1978. “Differential Information and Informational Equilibrium.” Economics Letters 1 (1): 33–37. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(78)90092-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shefrin, H. M. 1981. “Games with Self-Generating Distributions.” The Review of Economic Studies 48 (3): 511–519. doi:10.2307/2297163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skyrms, B. 1990. The Dynamics of Rational Deliberation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorin, S. 1979. “A Note on the Value of Zero-Sum Sequential Repeated Games with Incomplete Information.” International Journal of Game Theory 8 (4): 217–223. doi:10.1007/BF01766707
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, W. 1977. “Where Luce and Krantz Do Really Generalize Savage's Decision Model.” Erkenntnis 11 (1): 113–134. doi:10.1007/BF00169847
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, W. 1982. How to make sense of game theory. In Philosophy of Economics, 239–270. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, D. O., and P. W. Wilson. 1994. “Experimental Evidence on Players' Models of Other Players.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 25 (3): 309–327. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(94)90103-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. 1994. “On the Evaluation of Solution Concepts.” Theory and Decision 37 (1): 49–73. doi:10.1007/BF01079205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 2015. “Looking for a Psychology for the Inner Rational Agent.” Social Theory and Practice 41 (4): 579–598. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract201541432
   Google Scholar
• Tan, T .C. C., and S. R. D. C. Werlang. 1988. “The Bayesian Foundations of Solution Concepts of Games.” Journal of Economic Theory 45 (2): 370–391. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(88)90276-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderschraaf, P., and G. Sillari. 2014. “Common Knowledge.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Spring 2014 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/common-knowledge/.
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1953. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 3rd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zamir, S. 1971. “On the Relation between Finitely and Infinitely Repeated Games with Incomplete Information.” International Journal of Game Theory 1 (1): 179–198. doi:10.1007/BF01753442
   Google Scholar