Rationality under uncertainty: classic and current criticisms of the Bayesian viewpoint

References

• Allais, M. 1953. “Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel Devant le Risque: Critique des Postulats et Axioms de l’Ecole Americaine.” Econometrica 21: 503–546. doi:10.2307/1907921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allais, M. 1979 [1953]. “The Foundations of a Positive Theory of choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulate and Axioms of the American School.” In Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox, edited by M. Allais and O. Hagen, 27–145. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Allais, M., and Hagen, O., eds. 1979. Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Najjar N. I., and J. Weinstein. 2009. “The Ambiguity Aversion Literature: A Critical Assessment.” Economics and Philosophy 25: 249−284. doi:10.1017/S026626710999023X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arló-Costa, H., and J. Helzner. 2010. “Ambiguity Aversion: The Explanatory Power of Indeterminate Probabilities.” Synthese 172: 37−55. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9475-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumol, W. J. 1951. “The Neumann-Morgenstern Utility Index: An Ordinalist View.” Journal of Political Economy 59: 61–66. doi:10.1086/257028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. W., and F. O. Brownson. 1964. “What Price Ambiguity? Or The Role of Ambiguity in Decision Making.” Journal of Political Economy 72: 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binmore, K. 2009. Rational Decisions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binmore, K., L. Stewart, and A. Voorhoeve. 2012. “How Much Ambiguity Aversion? Finding Indifferences Between Ellsberg’s Risky and Ambiguous Bets.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 45: 215–238. doi:10.1007/s11166-012-9155-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, L. E., and D. Easley. 2008. “Rationality.” In: The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, edited by L. E. Blume, and S. N. Durlauf, 2nd Edition, 884−893. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, K. R. W. 1963. “Decision Under Uncertainty: Comment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 77: 159–161. doi:10.2307/1879380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., and M. Weber. 1992. “Recent Developments in Modelling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5: 325–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Finetti, B. 1951. “Recent Suggestions for the Reconciliation of Theories of Probability.” In Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, edited by J. Neyman, 217–225. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Finetti, B. 1964 [1937] “Foresight: Its Logical Laws, its Subjective Sources.” In Studies in Subjective Probability, edited by H. E. Jr. Kyburg, and H. E. Smokler, 93–158. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Eichberger, J., and D. Kelsey. 1999. “E-capacities and the Ellsberg Paradox.” Theory and Decision 46: 107–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichberger, J., and D. Kelsey. 2009. “Ambiguity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Rational and Social Choice, edited by P. Anand, P. Pattanaik, and C. Puppe, 113–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einhorn, H. J. and R. Hogarth. 1986. “Decision Making Under Ambiguity.” Journal of Business, 59: 225–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsberg, D. 1961. “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75: 643–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsberg, D. 1963. “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms: Reply.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 77: 336–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsberg, D. 2001 [1962]. Risk, Ambiguity and Decision. New York: Garland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fellner, W. 1961. “Distortion of Subjective Probabilities as a Reaction to Uncertainty.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 670–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fellner, W., 1963. “Slanted Subjective Probabilities and Randomization: A Reply to Howard Raiffa and K. R. W. Brewer.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 77: 676–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishburn, P. C., and P. Wakker. 1995. “The Invention of the Independence Condition for Preferences.” Management Science 41: 1130–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., and L. J. Savage. 1948. “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk.” Journal of Political Economy, 56: 279–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., and L. J. Savage. 1952. “The Expected-Utility Hypothesis and the Measurability of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy, 60: 463–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärdenfors, P., and N.-E. Sahlin. 1982. “Unreliable Probabilities, Risk Taking and Decision Making.” Synthese 53: 361–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghirardato, P., F. Maccheroni, and M. Marinacci. 2004. “Differentiating Ambiguity and Ambiguity Attitude.” Journal of Economic Theory 118: 133–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa, I. 2009. Theory of Decision Under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilboa, I. 2015. “Rationality and the Bayesian Paradigm.” Journal of Economic Methodology 22: 312–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa, I., and M. Marinacci. 2016. “Ambiguity and the Bayesian Paradigm.” In Readings in Formal Epistemology, edited by H. Arló-Costa, V. F. Hendricks, and J. van Benthem, 385–439. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gilboa, I., A. W. Postlewaite, and D. Schmeidler. 2008. “Probability and uncertainty in economic modelling.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 22: 173–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa, I., A. W. Postlewaite, and D. Schmeidler. 2009. “Is it Always Rational to Satisfy Savage’s Axioms?” Economics and Philosophy 25: 285–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa, I., A. W. Postlewaite, and D. Schmeidler. 2012. “Rationality of Belief or: Why Savage’s Axioms are Neither Necessary nor Sufficient for Rationality.” Synthese 187: 11–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa, I., and D. Schmeidler. 1989. “Maxmin Expected Utility With Non-Unique Prior.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 18: 141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboa, I., and D. Schmeidler. 2001. A Theory of Case Based Decision Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, D. 2000. Philosophical Theories of Probabilities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giocoli, N. 2003. Modeling Rational Agents: From Interwar Economics to Early Modern Game Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Good, I. J. 1952. “Rational Decisions.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 14: 107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Guala, F. 2000. “The Logic of Normative Falsification: Rationality and Experiments in Decision Theory.” Journal of Economic Methodology, 7: 59–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1975. The Emergence of Probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halevy, Y. 2007. “Ellsberg Revisited: An Experimental Study.” Econometrica 75: 503–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, P. J., and H. Zank. 2014. “Rationality and Dynamic Consistency Under Risk and Uncertainty.” In The Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, edited by M. Machina, and W. K. Viscusi, 41–98. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. 2015. Normative Rational Choice Theory: Past, Present And Future. Mimeo: University of Puget Sound. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1738671
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. P. 2014. “Nobel Lecture: Uncertainty Outside and Inside Economic Models.” Journal of Political Economy, 122, 945–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herfeld, D. 2015. “Rational Choice as a Toolbox for the Economist: An Interview With Itzhak Gilboa.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 7: 116–141.
   Google Scholar
• Herfeld, D. 2018. “From Theories of Human Behavior to Rules of Rational Choice: Tracing a Normative Turn at the Cowles Commission, 1943–54.” History of Political Economy 50: 1−48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heukelom, F. 2014. Behavioural Economics: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurwicz, L. 1951. “Some Specification Problems and Application to Econometric Models (abstract).” Econometrica 19: 343–344.
   Google Scholar
• Jallais, S., and P.-C. Pradier. 2005. “Changes in Expected Utility Theory and the Allais Experiment.” In The Experiment in the History of Economics, edited by P. Fontaine, and R. Leonard, 21–42. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. 1948. Theory of Probability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and R. H. Thaler. 2006. “Utility Maximization and Experienced Utility.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20: 221–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsey, D., and J. Quiggin. 1992. “Theories of Choice under Ignorance and Uncertainty.” Journal of Economic Surveys 6: 133−53.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1973 [1921]. A Treatise on Probability. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. VII, edited by D.E. Moggridge. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Klibanoff, P., M. Marinacci, and S. Mukerji. 2005. “A Smooth Model of Decision Making Under Ambiguity.” Econometrica 73: 1849–1892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopman, B. O. 1940. “The Axioms and Algebra of Intuitive Probability.” Annals of Mathematics 41: 269–292.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, I. 1980. The Enterprise of Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, I. 2001. Introduction. In D. Ellsberg, Risk, Ambiguity and Decision., ix–xxxvii. New York: Garland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, D., and H. Raiffa. 1957. Games and Decisions. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon, K. 1968. “Descriptive and Normative Implications of the Decision-Theory Postulates.” In Risk and Uncertainty: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economic Association, edited by K. Borch, and J. Mossin, 3−23. London: Macmillan and Co.
   Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon, K., and S. Larson. 1979. “Utility Theory: Axioms versus ‘Paradoxes’.” In Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. Theory and Decision Library, edited by M. Allais and O. Hagen, 333−409. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company
   Google Scholar
• Machina, M. 1987. “Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 1: 121–154.
   Google Scholar
• Machina, M., K. Ritzberger, and N. Yannelis. 2011. “Introduction to the Symposium Issue.” Economic Theory 48: 219–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machina, M., and M. Siniscalchi. 2014. “Ambiguity and Ambiguity Aversion.” In The Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, edited by M. Machina, and W. K. Viscusi, 729–807. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Marschak, J. 1946. “Neumann’s and Morgenstern’s New Approach to Static Economics.” Journal of Political Economy 54: 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschak, J. 1950. “Rational Behaviour, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility.” Econometrica 18: 111–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschak, J. 1951. “Why ‘should’ statisticians and businessmen maximize ‘moral expectation’?” In Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, edited by J. Neyman, 493–506. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mongin, P. 2014. “Le paradoxe d’Allais: comment lui rendre sa signification perdue.” Revue économique 65: 743–779.
   Google Scholar
• Moscati, I. 2016. “Retrospectives: How Economists Came to Accept Expected Utility Theory. The Case of Samuelson and Savage.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30: 219–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukerji, S. 2009. “Foundations of Ambiguity and Economic Modelling.” Economics and Philosophy 25: 297–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukerji, S. and J.-M. Tallon. 2004. “An Overview of Economic Applications of David Schmeidler’s Models of Decision Making Under Uncertainty.” In Uncertainty in economic theory, edited by I. Gilboa, 283–302. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H. 1961. “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms: A Comment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 690–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raiffa, H., and R. Schlaifer. 1961. Applied Statistical Decision Theory. Boston: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. P. 1964 [1931]. “Truth and Probability.” In Studies in Subjective Probability, edited by H. E. Jr. Kyburg, and H. E. Smokler, 61–92. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, H. V. 1963. “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms: A Comment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 77: 327–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. A. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behaviour.” Economica 5: 61–71
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. 1950. “Probability and the Attempts to Measure Utility.” Economic Review 1: 167–173.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, L. J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, L. J. 1970. “Reading Suggestions for the Foundations of Statistics.” The American Statistician 24: 23−27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeidler, D. 1989. “Subjective Probability and Expected Utility Without Additivity.” Econometrica 57: 571–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer, G. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., and A. Tversky. 1974. “Who Accepts Savage’s Axioms?” Behavioural Science 19: 368–378.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A. B. 1961. “Consistency in Statistical Inference.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 23: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. 1991. “Rational Choice: A Survey of Contributions From Economics and Philosophy.” Economic Journal 101: 751–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starmer, C., 2005. “Normative Notions in Descriptive Dialogues.” Journal of Economic Methodology 12: 277–89.
   Google Scholar
• Trautmann, S. T., and G. van de Kuilen. 2015. “Ambiguity Attitudes.” In The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, edited by G. Keren, and G. Wu, 89−116. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. 2nd Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wakker, P. 2008. “Uncertainty.” In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, edited by L. E. Blume, and S. N. Durlauf, 2nd Edition, 428−439. London: Palgrave Macmillan,.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, A. W. 1981. “Memorial Service Tribute.” In L. J. Savage, The Writings of Leonard Jimmie Savage: A Memorial Selection, 11−24. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association and Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Zappia, C. 2016. “Daniel Ellsberg and the Validation of Normative Propositions.” OEconomia. History, Methodology, Philosophy 6: 57−79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappia, C. 2018. Inside Critics of the Bayesian Mainstream in Economics and Statistics: Letters to Leonard Jimmie Savage. Mimeo: University of Siena.
   Google Scholar