Adam Smith on Portuguese wine and English cloth

References

• Aldrich, J. 2004. “The Discovery of Comparative Advantage.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26: 379–399. doi:10.1080/1042771042000263858.
   Google Scholar
• Almodovar, A., and J. L. Cardoso. 1998. A History of Portuguese Economic Thought. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. W. 2014. “Rent Seeking and the Treaty of Methuen.” Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice/Economia delle Scelte Pubbliche 32: 113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Boxer, C. R. 1969. The Portuguese Seaborne Empire 1415-1825. London: Hutchinson, as reprinted Harmondsworth, UK: Pelican, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon, R. 1759. Essay on the Nature of Commerce in General, trans. H. Higgs, ed. with new introduction by A. Brewer. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Books; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, J. L. 2014. “The diffusion of Ricardo in Portugal.” In The Reception of David Ricardo in Continental Europe and Japan, edited by G. Faccarello and M. Izumo. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, J. L. forthcoming. “The Anglo-Portuguese Methuen Treaty of 1703: Opportunities and Constraints of Economic Development.” in A. Alimento and K. Stapelbroek (Eds.), The Politics of Commercial Treaties in the Eighteenth Century: Balance of Power, Balance of Trade, edited by A. Alimento and K. Stapelbroek. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, G. T., and A. Amawi, eds. 1991. The Theoretical Evolution of International Political Economy. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand, R. W. 1990. “Fixed Capital in the Ricardian Theory of Value and Distribution.” Review of Political Economy 2: 292–309. doi:10.1080/09538259000000031.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand, R. W. 2000. “Ricardo and International Trade Theory.” History of Economic Ideas 8: 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand, R. W., ed. 2004. The Origins of International Economics, 10 Vol. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand, R. W. 2005. “David Hume on Canadian Paper Money.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 37: 783–787. doi:10.1353/mcb.2005.0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimand, R. W. 2013. “David Hume and Irving Fisher on the Quantity Theory of Money in the Short Run and the Long Run.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20: 284–304. doi:10.1080/09672567.2012.758760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, R., P. A. Samuelson, and R. M. Solow, 1958. Linear Programming and Economic Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, P.-S. 1788. Lettre à la Chambre de Commerce de Normandie sur la Mémoire qu’elle a publié relativement au Traité de Commerce avec l’Angleterre. Rouen (A. Smith’s copy is in New College Library, Edinburgh).
   Google Scholar
• Elmslie, B. 2018. “Retrospective: Adam Smith’s Discovery of the Gravity Trade Model.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 32: 209–222. doi:10.1257/jep.32.2.209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccarello, G. 2015a. “A Calm Investigation into Mr. Ricardo’s Principles of International Trade.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22: 754–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faccarello, G. 2015b. “Comparative Advantage.” In The Elgar Companion to David Ricardo, edited by H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori, 69–77. Cheltenham, UK, and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fay, C. R. 1950. Great Britain from Adam Smith to the Present Day: An Economic and Social Survey, 5th ed. Longmans, London.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, R. 1984. “Growth and Development in Trade Models.” In Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 1, International Trade, edited by R. W. Jones and P. B. Kenen. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, H. E. S. 1971. The Portugal Trade: A Study of Anglo-Portuguese Commerce, 1700-1770. London: Methuen. doi:10.1086/ahr/76.5.1519.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, A. D. 1960. “John Methuen and the Anglo-Portuguese Treaties of 1703.” The Historical Journal 3: 103–124. doi:10.1017/S0018246X00022858.
   Google Scholar
• Godinho, V. M. 1970. “Portugal and Her Empire, 1680-1720.” In The New Cambridge Modern History, Vol. VI: The Rise of Great Britain and Russia 1688-1725, edited by J. S. Bromley, 509–540. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, L. 2003. The Economics and Ideology of Free Trade: An Historical Review. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Grantham, G. 1999. “Contra Ricardo: On the Macroeconomics of Pre-Industrial Economies.” European Review of Economic History 3: 199–232. doi:10.1017/S1361491699000106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, D. J. 2003. “L’emergence d’une économie de reseau (1640-1815): le vin de Madère.” Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 58: 649–672. doi:10.1017/S0395264900004820.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. 1973. The Economics of Adam Smith. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hülsemeyer, A., ed. 2010. International Political Economy: A Reader. Don Mills, ON: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. 1752. “Of the Balance of Trade,” In Political Discourses, edited by D. Hume, as reprinted in E. Rotwein, ed., David Hume: Writings on Economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1955, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, T. M. 1981. “Adam Smith and the Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments.” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Review 68, as reprinted in T. M. Humphrey, Essays on Inflation, 5th ed., Richmond, VA: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 1986, 180–187.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. 1996. Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, M. K. 1951. “The Fluctuations of the Anglo-Gascon Wine Trade during the Fourteenth Century.” Economic History Review, 2nd series, 4: 170–196. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.1951.tb00607.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C. 1721. The British Merchant, or Commerce Preserved, 3 volumes. London: Baldwin.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1990. Rethinking International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1998. “Ricardo’s Difficult Idea: Why Intellectuals Don’t Understand Comparative Advantage.” In The Economics and Politics of International Trade, edited by G. Cook. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, H. D., 2017. “A Plain Man’s Guide to David Ricardo’s Principle of Comparative Advantage.” In Ricardo and International Trade, edited by S. Senga, M. Fujimoto and T. Tabuchi, Chapter 1. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laidler, D. 1981. “Adam Smith as a Monetary Economist.” Canadian Journal of Economics 14: 185–201. doi:10.2307/134793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lains, P. 2017. “Portugal’s Wine Globalization Waves, 1750–2015,” European Historical Economics Society, EHES Working Papers in Economic History No. 113, forthcoming in K. Anderson and V. Pinilla, eds. Wine’s Evolving Globalization: A New Comparative History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• List, F. 1841–44. The National System of Political Economy, trans. S. Lloyd. Longmans, Green, London, 1885; reprinted (with 1904 introductory essay by J. S. Nicholson), August M. Kelley Reprints of Economic Classics, New York, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, R. 1896. “Methuen Treaty,” In Dictionary of Political Economy, edited by R. H. I. Palgrave, Vol. II. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maneschi, A. 1992. “Ricardo’s International Trade Theory: Beyond the Comparative Cost Example.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 16: 421–437. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneschi, A. 1998. Comparative Advantage in International Trade: A Historical Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Maneschi, A. 2004. “The True Meaning of David Ricardo’s Four Magic Numbers.” Journal of International Economics 62: 433–443. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00008-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneschi, A. 2008. “How Would David Ricardo Have Taught the Principle of Comparative Advantage?” Southern Economic Journal 74: 1167–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneschi, A. 2017. “David Ricardo’s Trade Theory: Anticipations and Later Developments.” In Ricardo and International Trade, edited by S. Senga, M. Fujimoto and T. Tabuchi, Chapter 3. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, J. R. 1845. The Literature of Political Economy: A Classified Catalogue. London: Longman, Brown, Green and Longmans; reprinted Fairfield, NJ: Augustus M. Kelley, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. V. C. 2007. War, Wine, and Taxes: The Political Economy of Anglo-French Trade, 1689–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perdices de Blas, L., and A. Sánchez Hormigo, eds. 2008. 500 Años de Economía a Través de los Libros Españoles y Portugeses/500 Years of Economic Writing in Spanish and Portuguese. Madrid: Biblioteca Complutense, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, and Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza.
   Google Scholar
• Plumb, J. H. 1966. “Sir Robert Walpole’s Wine.” In Men and Places, edited by J. H. Plumb, Harmondsworth: Penguin (Pelican).
   Google Scholar
• Ricardo, D. 1817. “On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation.” In The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by P. Sraffa, Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, L. L., and R. Craig, 2004. “English Mercantilist Influences on the Foundation of the Portuguese School of Commerce,” Atlantic Economic Journal 32: 329–345. doi:10.1007/BF02304238.
   Google Scholar
• Ruffin, R. J. 2002. “David Ricardo’s Discovery of Comparative Advantage.” History of Political Economy 34: 727–748. doi:10.1215/00182702-34-4-727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffin, R. J. 2017. “Ricardo and International Trade Theory.” In Ricardo and International Trade, edited by S. Senga, M. Fujimoto and T. Tabuchi, Chapter 3. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Senga, S., M. Fujimoto, and T. Tabuchi, eds. 2017. Ricardo and International Trade Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, L. M. E. 1998. “The Marques de Pombal (1699–1782): How He Broke Britain’s Commercial Ascendancy in Portugal.” Journal of European Economic History 27: 537–554.
   Google Scholar
• Shillington, V. M., and B. W. Chapman, 1907. The Commerce and Relations of England and Portugal. New York: E. P. Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Sideri, S. 1970. Trade and Power: Informal Colonialism in Anglo-Portuguese Relations. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, edited by R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 1978. Lectures on Jurisprudence, edited by R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael, and P. G. Stein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 1987. Correspondence of Adam Smith, revised ed., E. C. Mossner, and I. S. Ross. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. 1930. “An Alleged Correction of Ricardo.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 44: 539–545. doi:10.2307/1885795.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist, 2017. “Free exchange: The law of comparative advantage at 200: still winning prizes,” April 22, p. 69.
   Google Scholar
• West, E. G. 2000. “Unilateral Free Trade versus Reciprocity in The Wealth of Nations,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22: 29–42. doi:10.1080/104277100112536.
   Google Scholar