381
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Donum, exchange and common good in Aquinas: the dawn of civil economy

References

  • Addante, P. 1972. Antonio Genovesi e la polemica antibayliana nella filosofia del ‘700. Bari: Centro Ricerche Storico-filosofiche.
  • Addante, P. 1982. Il movimento antibayliano nel mezzogiorno d’Italia dal piro al Genovesi. Bari: Edizione Levante.
  • Aguiar, P. A. P., & Auer, T. (Eds.). (2009). The human person and a culture of freedom. CUA Press.
  • Aquinas, S. T. [1270] 1947. Summa theologiae. New York: Benzinger Brothers.
  • Aquinas, S. T. [1256–1259] 1952. Questiones disputatae de veritate. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.
  • Aquinas, S. T. [1256–1259] 1956. Summa Contra Gentiles. United States: Doubleday & Company.
  • Aquinas, S. T. [1271–1272] 1964. In decem libros ethicorum Aristotelis ad nicomachum exposition. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
  • Aquinas, S. T. 1997. “On the Government of Rulers.” De Regimine Principum. Translated by J. M. Blythe. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Baeck, L. 1994. The Mediterranean Tradition in Economic Thought. London: Routledge.
  • Baldwin, J. W. 1959. “The Medieval Theories of the Just Price: Romanist, Canonist, and Theologians in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 49 (4): 1–92. doi:10.2307/1005819.
  • Barbieri, G. 2013. Decline and Economic Ideas in Italy in the Early Modern Age. Florence: Leo S. Olschki.
  • Bruni, L. 2006. Civil Happiness. Economics and Human Flourishing in Historical Perspective. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Bruni, L. 2017. “On the Concept of Economia Civile and ‘Felicitas Publica’: A Comment on Federico D’Onofrio.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 39 (2): 273–279. doi:10.1017/S1053837216000237.
  • Bruni, L. 2018. “Capitalism and Its New-Old Religion: A Civil Economy Perspective.” Journal for Markets and Ethics 6 (1): 121–131. doi:10.2478/jome-2018-0032.
  • Bruni, L., and P. Santori. 2018. “The Plural Roots of Rewards: Awards and Incentives in Aquinas and Genovesi.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (4): 637–657. doi:10.1080/09672567.2018.1481989.
  • Bruni, L., and P. Santori. 2020. What Theodicy for What Economy? The Theological Roots of Smith’s and Genovesi’s Accounts of Commercial Society. Working paper.
  • Bruni, L., and R. Sugden. 2008. “Fraternity: Why the Market Need Not Be a Morally Free Zone.” Economics and Philosophy 24 (01): 35–64. doi:10.1017/S0266267108001661.
  • Bruni, L., and S. Zamagni. 2007. Civil Economy: Efficiency, Equity, Public Happiness. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Casadei, E. (2013). Vita interiore, discernimento politico e impegno civile: l’influsso della contemplazione filosofica sul giudizio civile e politico in Tommaso D’Aquino. Soveria Mannelli: Rubettino.
  • Chaplygina, I., and A. Lapidus. 2016. “Economic Thought in Scholatiscism.” In Handbook of the History of Economic Analysis, Vol. 2, Schools of Thought in Economics, edited by Gilbert Faccarello and Heinz D. Kurz, 20–42. Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar.
  • Cima, L. R., and T. L. Schubeck. 2001. “Self-Interest, Love, and Economic Justice: A Dialogue between Classical Economic Liberalism and Catholic Social Teaching.” Journal of Business Ethics 30 (3): 213–231.
  • Costabile, L. 2012. “Scuola Napoletana.” In Il contributo Italiano alla storia del pensiero, edited by Vera Negri Zamagni and Pier Luigi Porta, 240–251. Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti.
  • Dal Degan, F. 2018. “Beyond Virtues and Vices: Antonio Genovesi’s and Adam Smith’s ‘Science of Relationships.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (4): 562–581. doi:10.1080/09672567.2018.1452953.
  • De Roover, R. 1955. “Scholastic Economics: Survival and Lasting Influence from the Sixteenth Century to Adam Smith.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (2): 161–190. doi:10.2307/1882146.
  • De Roover, R. 1958. “The Concept of the Just Price: Theory and Economic Policy.” The Journal of Economic History 18 (4): 418–434. doi:10.1017/S0022050700107624.
  • Di Liso, S. 2016. Antonio Genovesi metafisico e mercatante. Roma: Aracne.
  • D’Onofrio, F. 2015. “On the Concept of ‘Felicitas Publica’ in Eighteenth-Century Political Economy.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 37 (3): 449–471. doi:10.1017/S1053837215000401.
  • Fanfani, A. 1933. Le origini dello spirito capitalistico in Italia. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  • Fanfani, A. 1942. Il volontarismo. Milano-Messina: Principato.
  • Franks, C. A. 2009. He Became Poor: The Poverty of Christ and Aquinas’s Economic Teachings. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
  • Friedman, D. 1987. “Just Price.” In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Vol. 2, edited by John Eatwell, 1043–1044. London: Macmillan.
  • Gallagher, R. L. 2013. “The Role of Grace in Aristotle’s Theory of Exchange.” Méthexis 26 (1): 143–162. doi:10.1163/24680974-90000618.
  • Genovesi, A. 1743–1748. Elementa metaphysicae. Venezia: Thomas Bettinelli.
  • Genovesi, A. 1759. Lettere filosofiche ad un amico provinciale per servire di rischiaramento agli elementi metafisici dell’Ab. Genovesi. Napoli: Simoniana.
  • Genovesi, A. [1762] 1818. La logica per i Giovinetti. Bassano: Remondini.
  • Genovesi, A. 1763. Rerum metaphisicarum pars quinta, editio quarta Neapolitana multo auctior et correctior. Napoli: Typographia Simoniana.
  • Genovesi, A. 1764. 1791. Lettere accademiche sulla questione se sieno più felici gli scienziati o gl’ignoranti. Venezia: Pietro Savoni.
  • Genovesi, A. [1766] 1973. Della diceosina. Milano: Marzorati.
  • Genovesi, A. [1765–1767] 2013. Lezioni di economia civile. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  • Gorday, P. 2012. Francois Fenelon a Biography: The Apostle of Pure Love. Cape Cod, Massachusetts: Paraclete Press.
  • Grant, R. W. 2011. Strings Attached: Untangling the Ethics of Incentives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Harvie, T. 2013. “Thomas Aquinas, Amartya Sen and a Critical Economic Discourse.” Philosophy, Culture and Traditions 9: 73–87.
  • Hollander, S. 1965. “On the Interpretation of the Just Price.” Kyklos 18 (4): 615–634. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1965.tb00992.x.
  • Kaye, J. 1998. Economy and Nature in the Fourteenth Century. Money, Market Exchange and the Emergence of Scientific Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Koehn, D., and B. Wilbratte. 2012. “A Defense of a Thomistic Concept of the Just Price.” Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (3): 501–526. doi:10.5840/beq201222332.
  • Langholm, O. 1992. Economics in the Medieval Schools: Wealth, Exchange, Value, Money, and Usury according to the Paris Theological Tradition, 1200–1350. Leiden, New York: E. J. Brill.
  • Langholm, O. 1998. The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lapidus, A. 1994. “Norm, Virtue and Information: The Just Price and Individual Behaviour in Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 1 (3): 435–473. doi:10.1080/10427719400000097.
  • Milbank, J., and A. Pabst. 2016. The Politics of Virtue: Post-Liberalism and the Human Future. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
  • Miner, R. 2014. Thomas Aquinas on the Passions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Monsalve, F. 2014. “Scholastic Just Price Versus Current Market Price: Is It Merely a Matter of Labelling?” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 21 (1): 4–20. doi:10.1080/09672567.2012.683019.
  • Pabst, A. 2018. “Political Economy of Virtue: Civil Economy, Happiness and Public Trust in the Thought of Antonio Genovesi.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (4): 582–604. doi:10.1080/09672567.2018.1487462.
  • Porta, P. L., and R. Scazzieri. 2002. “Pietro Verri’s Political Economy: Commercial Society, Civil Society, and the Science of the Legislator.” History of Political Economy 34 (1): 83–110. doi:10.1215/00182702-34-1-83.
  • Robertson, H. M. 1935. Aspects of the Rise of Economic Individualism. Cambridge: Cambridge Universiy Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/40.2.328.
  • Ronila, M. 2013. “Leibniz and the Amor Pur Controversy.” Journal of Early Modern Studies 2 (2): 35–55.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. [1954] 2006. History of Economic Analysis. Florence: Taylor & Francis e-Library: Routledge.
  • Sherwin, M. S. 2005. By Knowledge and by Love. Charity and Knowledge in the Moral Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America.
  • Sturn, R. 2017. “Agency, Exchange, and Power in Scholastic Thought.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 24 (4): 640–669. doi:10.1080/09672567.2017.1338393.
  • Theocarakis, N. J. 2008. “Antipeponthos and Reciprocity: The Concept of Equivalent Exchange from Aristotle to Turgot.” International Review of Economics 55 (1–2): 29–44. doi:10.1007/s12232-007-0030-5.
  • Todeschini, G. 2000. “Ecclesia e mercati nei linguaggi dottrinali di Tommaso d’Aquino.” Quaderni Storici 35 (3): 585–622.
  • Vasoli, C. 1974. Vico, Tommaso d’Aquino e il Tomismo. Napoli: Centro di studi vichiani.
  • Weber, M. [1930] 2005. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Wilson, G. W. 1975. “The Economics of the Just Price.” History of Political Economy 7 (1): 56–74. doi:10.1215/00182702-7-1-56.
  • Young, J. T., and B. Gordon. 1992. “Economic Justice in the Natural Law Tradition: Thomas Aquinas to Francis Hutcheson.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1017/S1053837200004363.
  • Zambelli, P. 1972. La formazione filosofica di Antonio Genovesi. Napoli: Morano.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.