Rationalising the supply-and-demand cross, 1838–1890

References

• Aspromourgos, T. 2009. The Science of Wealth: Adam Smith and the Framing of Political Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aspromourgos, T. 2019. “What is Supply-and-Demand? The Marshallian Cross versus Classical Economics.” Review of Political Economy 31 (1): 26–41. doi:10.1080/09538259.2018.1537646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, K. 1978. “The Subversion of Classical Analysis: Alfred Marshall’s Early Writing on Value.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 2 (3): 253–271. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluff, A. 1881. Catalogue des Livres Anciens et Modernes Provenant en Partie de feu M.A. Quetelet et M.E. Quetelet. Bruxelles: Hayez.
   Google Scholar
• Chipman, J. S. 2014. German Utility Theory: Analysis and Translations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cournot, A.-A. 1835. J. F. W. Herschel, Traité d’Astronomie. Traduit de l’Anglais par Auguste Cournot. Augmenté d’un chapitre sur l’application de la théorie des chances à la série des orbites des comètes. Bruxelles: Haumann.
   Google Scholar
• Cournot, A.-A. 1838. Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses. Paris: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Cournot, A.-A. 1897. Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth by Augustin Cournot, 1838. Translated by N.T. Bacon. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuit, J. 1844. “De la Mesure de L’Utilité Des Travaux Publics.” Annales des Ponts et Chaussées no. 116: 332–375.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuit, J. 1849. “De L’Influence Des Péages Sur L’Utilité Des Voies de Communication”, 4th Part of “Des Péages.” Annales des Ponts et Chaussées no. 207: 207–248.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuit, J. 1952. “On the Measurement of the Utility of Public Works.” International Economic Papers, no. 2, 83–110. Translated by R. H. Barback. London: Macmillan; French ed., 1844.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuit, J. 1962. “On Tolls and Transport Charges.” International Economic Papers, no. 11, 7–31. Translated by E. Henderson. London: Macmillan; French ed., 1849.
   Google Scholar
• Groenewegen, P. D. 1995. A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall, 1842–1924. Aldershot: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hennings, K. H. 1979. “Karl Heinrich Rau and the Graphic Representation of Supply and Demand.” Diskussionspapier no. 35 (Serie C, Volkswirtschaftslehre), Universität Hannover.
   Google Scholar
• Hennings, K. H. 1980. “The Transition from Classical to Neoclassical Economic Theory: Hans von Mangoldt.” Kyklos 33 (4): 658–681. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1980.tb00718.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, T. M. 2010. “Marshallian Cross Diagrams.” In Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics, edited by M. Blaug and P. Lloyd, 29–37. Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkin, F. 1887a. “On the Principles Which Regulate the Incidence of Taxes.” In Papers Literary, Scientific, &c. by the Late Fleeming Jenkin, F.R.S., LL.D., vol. 2, edited by S. Colvin and J.A. Ewing, 107–121. London: Longmans, Green and Co. repr. from (1871–2) Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 7 (no. 84): 618–631.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkin, F. 1887b. “The Graphic Representation of the Laws of Supply and Demand, and Their Application to Labour.” In Colvin and Ewing, 76–106. repr. from A. Grant (ed.) (1870) Recess Studies. Edinburgh: Edmonston & Douglas.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkin, F. 1887c. “Trade-Unions: How Far Legitimate.” In Colvin and Ewing, 3–75. repr. from (1868) North British Review 48 (March): 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, H. D. 1986. “Classical and Early Neoclassical Economists on Joint Production.” Metroeconomica 38 (1): 1–37. repr. in Kurz, 1990, Capital, Distribution and Effective Demand: Studies in the “Classical” Approach to Economic Theory, 135–169. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, J.R., ed. 1828. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. By Adam Smith, LL.D. With a Life of the Author, an Introductory Discourse, Notes, and Supplemental Dissertations, 4 vols. Edinburgh: A. Black and W. Tait; and London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green.
   Google Scholar
• von Mangoldt, H. K. E. 1863. Grundriss der Volkswirthshaftslehre. Stuttgart: Maier.
   Google Scholar
• von Mangoldt, H. K. E. 1962. “The Exchange Ratio of Goods.” International Economic Papers, no. 11, 32–59. Translated by E. Henderson. London: Macmillan; translation of von Mangoldt (1863), bk III, ch. 3, part 1, 46–73.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1873. “Graphic Representation by Aid of a Series of Hyperbolas of Some Economic Problems Having Reference to Monopolies.” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2 (Oct): 318–319.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1879. “The Pure Theory of Foreign Trade. The Pure Theory of (Domestic) Values” (privately printed). repr. in 1930, Reprints of Scarce Tracts in Economics and Political Science, no. 1. London: London School of Economics and Political Science (2nd impression, 1935).
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1949 [1920]. Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume. 8th ed. London: Macmillan (reset 1949).
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A., and M. P. Marshall. 1879. The Economics of Industry. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mosca, M. 1998. “Jules Dupuit, the French ‘Ingénieurs Économistes’ and the Société D’Économie Politique.” In Studies in the History of French Political Economy: From Bodin to Walras, edited by G. Faccarello, 254–283. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Opocher, A., and I. Steedman. 2015. Full Industry Equilibrium: A Theory of the Industrial Long Run. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, K. H. 1826. Grundsätze der Volkswirthschaftslehre (Lehrbuch der Volkswirthschaftslehre, Bd 1). Heidelberg: C.F. Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, K. H. 1847. Grundsätze der Volkswirthschaftslehre, 5th ed. Heidelberg: C.F. Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E. 1960. “Hans von Mangoldt on Price Theory: A Contribution to the History of Mathematical Economics.” Econometrica 28 (2): 380–392. doi:10.2307/1907728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vols. London: Strahan and Cadell.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. 1925. “Sulle Relazioni fra Costo e Quantità Prodotta.” Annali di Economia 2 (1): 277–328.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. 1926. “The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions.” Economic Journal 36 (Dec): 535–550. doi:10.2307/2959866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. 1998. “On the Relations between Cost and Quantity Produced.” In Italian Economic Papers, vol. 3, edited by L. L. Pasinetti, 323–363. Translated by J. Eatwell and A. Roncaglia. Il Mulino and Oxford University Press (Italian ed., 1925).
   Google Scholar
• Streissler, E. W. 1990. “The Influence of German Economics on the Work of Menger and Marshall.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics (History of Political Economy 22, Annual Supplement), edited by B. J. Caldwell, 31–68. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, J.K., ed. 1975. The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall, 1867–1890, 2 vols. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar