Frank H. Knight on social values in economic consumption: an archival note

References

• Asso, Pier Francesco, and Luca Fiorito. 2003. “Waging War against Mechanical Man: The Knight-Copeland Controversy over Behaviorism in Economics. Research in the.” History of Economic Thought and Methodology 21A: 65–103.
   Google Scholar
• Asso, Pier Francesco, and Fiorito Luca. 2008. Was Frank Knight an institutionalist? Review of Political Economy, 20 (1): 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Asso, Pier Francesco, and Luca Fiorito. 2013. “Studying Institutional Economics at Chicago in the 1930s: The Case of Arthur Bloomfield.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 31B: 57–77.
   Google Scholar
• Dudden, Faye E. 1986. “Experts and Servants: The National Council on Household Employment and the Decline of Domestic Service in the Twentieth Century.” Journal of Social History 20 (2): 269–289. doi:10.1353/jsh/20.2.269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duesemberry, James S. 1949. Income, Saving, and the Theory of Consumer’s Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emmett, Ross B. 2006. “De Gustibus Est Disputandum: Frank H. Knight’s Reply to George Stigler and Gary Becker’s “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum” with an Introductory Essay.” Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (1): 97–111. doi:10.1080/13501780600566453.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorito, Luca. 2000. “The Years of High Pluralism; US Interwar Economics: New Light from the Mitchell Correspondence.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 18C: 267–335.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorito, Luca. 2009. “Frank H. Knight, Pragmatism, and American Institutionalism: A Note.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 16 (3): 475–487. doi:10.1080/09672560903101344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorito, Luca. 2011. “Frank H. Knight, John Dewey, and American Pragmatism: A Further Note.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 29-A: 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorito, Luca. 2016. “A Certain Amount of ‘Recantation’”: On the Origins of Frank H. Knight’s Antipositivism.” History of Political Economy 48 (1): 1–34. doi:10.1215/00182702-3452279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorito, Luca, and Massimiliano Vatiero. 2018. “Positional Goods and Social Welfare: A Note on George Pendleton Watkins’ Neglected Contribution.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (3): 460–472. doi:10.1080/09672567.2018.1449875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsell, Willystine. 1932. “The American Family in the Nineteenth Century.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 160 (1): 13–22. doi:10.1177/000271623216000129.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J. Daniel. 1991. “Frank Knight’s Antipositivism.” History of Political Economy 23 (3): 359–381. doi:10.1215/00182702-23-3-359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hands, D. Wade. 2006. “Frank Knight and Pragmatism.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13 (4): 571–605. doi:10.1080/09672560601025779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2004. The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kyrk, Hazel. 1923. A Theory of Consumption. New York and Boston: Houghton Miffin.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank H. 1922. “Ethics and the Economic Interpretation.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 36 (3): 454–481. doi:10.2307/1886033.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank H. 1923. “The Ethics of Competition.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 37 (4): 579–624.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank H. 1924. “The Limitations of the Scientific Method in Economics.” In The Trend of Economics, edited by Rexford G. Tugwell, 229–267. New York: Alfred A. Knop.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank H. 1929. “Economic History.” American Economic Review 19 (1): 155–171.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank H. 1931. “Relation of Utility Theory to Economic Method in the Work of William Stanley Jevons and Others.” In Methods in Social Science, edited by Stuart A. Rice, 59–69. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank H. 1935. Value and Price. Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan. Reprinted in Frank H. Knight. 1935. The Ethics of Competition and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Bros, 237–250.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank H. 1941. “Social Science.” Ethics 51 (2): 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank H. 1944. “Realism and Relevance in the Theory of Demand.” Journal of Political Economy 52 (4): 289–318.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Frank H. 1950. “Comment on Professor Parson’s Article.” Journal of Farm Economics 32 (1): 112–122. doi:10.2307/1233167.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, Philip, and D. Wade Hands. 1998. A Paradox of Budgets: The Postwar Stabilization of American Neoclassical Demand Theory. In From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, edited by Mary S. Morgan and Malcolm Rutherford, 260–292. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/00182702-30-Supplement-260.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcolm. 2011. The Institutional Movement in American Economics, 1918–1947. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcolm. 1944. “Realism and Relevance in the Theory of Demand.” Journal of Political Economy 52 (4): 289–318.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, Malcolm. 2010. Chicago economics and institutionalism. In Ross E. Emmett (Ed.), Elgar Companion to the Chicago School of Economics. Cheltenham: Elgar, 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, Paul. 1995. “The Construction of Preference.” American Psychologist 50 (5): 364–371. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Science Research Council. 1931. Seventh Annual Report: 1930-1931. New York: Social Science Research Council. doi:10.1086/ahr/52.1.98.
   Google Scholar
• Vatiero, Massimiliano. 2013. “Positional Goods and Robert Lee Hale’s Legal Economics.” Journal of Institutional Economics 9 (3): 351–362. doi:10.1017/S1744137413000076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Albert B. 1936. “Institutional Reasonableness and Value.” The Philosophical Review 45 (2): 192–206. doi:10.2307/2180309.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Carle C. 1932. “Ernst Engel’s Law of Expenditures for Food.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 47 (1): 78–101. doi:10.2307/1885186.
   Google Scholar