On “effectual demand” and the “extent of the market” in Adam Smith and David Ricardo

References

• Aspromourgos, T. 2009. The Science of Wealth: Adam Smith and the Framing of Political Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, K. 1989 [2017]. “Adam Smith’s Political Economy.” In Themes in Value and Distribution: Classical Theory Reappraised. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. 1996. Economic Theory in Retrospect. 5th ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. H., A. S. Skinner and W. B. Todd (eds.) 1976. Adam Smith. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. 2). Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon, R. 1755 [1931]. Essai Sur la Nature du Commerce en Général, H. Higgs (ed) with an English translation and other material, London: Macmillan, for the Royal Economic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, A. K. 1960. “Adam Smith on Value.” Indian Economic Review 5 (2): 105–115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29793223
   Google Scholar
• Davis, T. 2001. “Ricardo’s Use of Say’s Law: The Case of the post-Napoleonic War Depression.” In Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics: Essays in Honor of Samuel Hollander, edited by E. L. Forget and S. Peart. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, T. 2005. Ricardo’s Macroeconomics: Money, Trade Cycles, and Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmslie, B. T. 1998. “Vent for Surplus.” In The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics, A-K., edited by H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Eltis, W. 1984. The Classical Theory of Economic Growth. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiaschi, D., and R. Signorino. 2015. “Colonies.” In The Elgar Companion to David Ricardo, edited by H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. 1978. “Notes on Consumption, Investment and Effective Demand: I.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 2: 335–353. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garegnani, P. 1990. “Sraffa: Classical versus Marginalist Analysis.” In Essays on Piero Sraffa: Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory, edited by K. Bharadwaj and B. Schefold. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gram, H. 1998. “Necessaries, Conveniences, and Luxuries.” In The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics, L-Z, edited by H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann, H. 2015. “General Glut.” In The Elgar Companion to David Ricardo, edited by H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. 1979. The Economics of David Ricardo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, S. 2001. “Classical Economics”: A Reification Wrapped in an Anachronism?” In Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics: Essays in Honor of Samuel Hollander, edited by E. L. Forget and S. Peart. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1936 [2013]. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. as The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, vol. VII, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, published for the Royal Economic Society.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. E. 2013. David Ricardo. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kubin, I. 1998. “Effectual Demand.” In The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics, A-K, edited by H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, H. D. 1985. “Effective Demand in a ‘Classical’ Model of Value and Distribution: The Multiplier in a Sraffian Framework.” The Manchester School 53 (2): 121–137. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.1985.tb01170.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz, H. D. 1992. “Adam Smith on Foreign Trade: A Note on the ‘Vent-for-Surplus’ Argument.” Economica 59 (236): 475–481. doi:10.2307/2554892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz, H. D. 2010. “Technical Progress, Capital Accumulation and Income Distribution in Classical Economics: Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Karl Marx.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17 (5): 1183–1222. doi:10.1080/09672567.2010.522242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. 1890 [2013]. Principles of Economics, Eighth Edition, with an introduction by P. Groenewegen, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, R. L., and D. D. Raphael and P. G. Stein (eds.) 1978. Adam Smith. Lectures on Jurisprudence (Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. 5). Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Morishima, M. 1989. Ricardo’s Economics: A General Equilibrium Theory of Distribution and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myint, H. 1958. “The ‘Classical Theory’ of International Trade and the Underdeveloped Countries.” The Economic Journal 68 (270): 317–337. doi:10.2307/2227598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo, A. 2015. “Demand and Supply.” In The Elgar Companion to David Ricardo, edited by H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Panico, C. 2018. “Effectual Demand” in Adam Smith.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by Macmillan Publishers Ltd. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 3510–3513.
   Google Scholar
• Pasinetti, L. L. 1960 [1974]. “A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System”, as reprinted in Growth and Income Distribution: Essays in Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perrotta, C. 2015. “Riches and Value.” In The Elgar Companion to David Ricardo, edited by H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, D. D. and A. L. Macfie (eds.) 1976. Adam Smith. The Theory of Moral Sentiments (Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, N. 1968. “Adam Smith, Consumer Tastes, and Economic Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 76 (3): 361–374. doi:10.1086/259410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. 1978. “The Canonical Classical Model of Political Economy.” Journal of Economic Literature 16 (4): 1415–1434.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 2009. ‘Introduction’, Adam Smith. Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, A. S. 1996. A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. (ed.) 1951a. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation (The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. 1, with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. (ed.) 1951b. Notes on Malthus’s Principles of Political Economy (The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Vol. 2, with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steuart, J. 1767 [1966]. Sir James Steuart. An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy, edited by A. S. Skinner, vol. 2, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Stirati, A. 1994. The Theory of Wages in Classical Economics: A Study of Adam Smith, David Ricardo and Their Contemporaries, transl. by J. Hall, Aldershot: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. M. 2015. “Consumption and Economic Growth in the Framework of Classical Economics.” PhD thesis., University of Sydney, available at http://hdl.handle.net/2123/14130.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. M. 2018a. “Adam Smith on the Philosophy and Provision of Education.” Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 30 (1): 105–116. doi:10.1177/0260107917728597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. M. 2018b. “Consumption and Activity Levels in Cantillon’s Essai.” History of Economic Ideas 26 (1): 11–29. doi:10.19272/201806101001.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, A. M. 2018c. “A Note on the Role of Aggregate Demand in Ricardo.” History of Economics Review 70 (1): 60–71. doi:10.1080/10370196.2019.1575175.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, D. N. 1963. “Classical Economics and the Case for Colonization.” Economica, New Series 30 (120): 387–399. doi:10.2307/2550802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar