David Hume on history, development and happiness: interconnections

References

• Berry, C. J. 2008. “Hume and Superfluous Value.” In David Hume’s Political Economy, edited by C. Wennerlind and M. Schabas, 49–64. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biro, J. 2009. “Hume’s New Science of the Mind.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, 2nd ed., edited by D. F. Norton, 40–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadie, A. (ed.) 2003. The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadie, A. 2007. The Scottish Enlightenment: The Historical Age of the Historical Nation. Edinburgh: Birlinn.
   Google Scholar
• Caffentzis, C. G. 2001. “Hume, Money, and Civilization: Or, Why Was Hume a Metallist?” Hume Studies 27 (2): 301–335.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. 1984. Canna: The Story of a Hebridean Island. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. H., and A. S. Skinner. 1976. “General Introduction to Smith ([1776] 1976).” An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Glasgow edition, edited by R. H. Campbell, and A. S. Skinner, 1–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chick, V. 2004. “On Open Systems.” Brazilian Review of Political Economy 24 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Chick, V., and S. Dow. 2005. “The Meaning of Open Systems.” Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (3): 363–381. Reprinted in S. Dow, Foundations for New Economic Thinking. London: Palgrave, 2012, pp. 178–196. doi:10.1080/13501780500223585.
   Google Scholar
• Davie, G. E. 1961. The Democratic Intellect. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dimand, R. W. 2008. “Hume on Canadian Paper Money.” In David Hume’s Political Economy, edited by C. Wennerlind, and M. Schabas, 168–180. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, A., and S. Dow. 2005. “The Application of Development Economics: General Principles and Context Specificity.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 29 (6): 1129–1143. doi:10.1093/cje/bei072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, A., and S. Dow. 2015. “Economic Development in the Scottish Enlightenment: Ideas as Cause and Effect.” In Development and Financial Reform in Emerging Economies, edited by N. Perdikis, and K. Ruziev, 7–22. London: Pickering and Chatto.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, S. 2002a. “Interpretation: The Case of Hume.” History of Political Economy 34 (2): 399–420. doi:10.1215/00182702-34-2-399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, S. 2002b. “Historical Reference: Hume and Critical Realism.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26 (6): 683–695. doi:10.1093/cje/26.6.683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, S. 2009a. “Hume and the Scottish Enlightenment: Two Cultures.” Revista de Economia 35 (3): 7–20. doi:10.5380/re.v35i3.16948.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, S., G. 2020. “The Methodological Role of the History of Economic Thought.” In New Perspectives on Political Economy and Its History, edited by Deleplace, M. C. Marcuzzo, and P. Paesani, 21–38 London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. 2008. “The Scottish Context for David Hume’s Political-Economic Thinking.” In David Hume’s Political Economy, edited by C. Wennerlind, and M. Schabas, 10–30. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. 2009. “What is to Be Done about the Scottish Enlightenment?” In Essays on David Hume, Medical Men and the Scottish Enlightenment, 225–248. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Fogelin, R. J. 2009. “Hume’s Skepticism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, edited by D. F. Norton, 2nd ed., 211–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, D. 1975a. Hume’s Philosophical Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, D. 1975b. “Sceptical Whiggism, Commerce and Liberty.” In Essays on Adam Smith, edited by A. S. Skinner and T. Wilson. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1966. The Order of Things. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1969. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frenkel, J. A. and H. G. Johnson. (eds) 1976. The Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, A. 2003. “Anthropology: The ‘Original’ of Human Nature.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by A. Broadie, 79–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grȕne-Yanoff, T., and E. F. McLennen. 2008. “Hume’s Framework for a Natural History of the Passions.” In David Hume’s Political Economy, edited by C. Wennerlind, and M. Schabas, 86–104. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A. 2007. “Hume’s Four Essays on Happiness and Their Place in the Move from Morals to Politics.” Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 62 (3): 223–235.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. A. 2015. Hume: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 2001. How Economics Forgot History. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfl, H. H. 1978. “From Savage to Scotsman: Conjectural History in the Scottish Enlightenment.” Journal of British Studies 17 (2): 19–40. doi:10.1086/385720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1739–40] 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd ed., edited by L. A. Selby-Bigge, and P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1741–77] 1987. Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by E. F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1741] 1987. “Of the Study of History.” Unpublished, in Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by E. F. Miller, 563–568. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1742a] 1987. “The Epicurean.” In Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by E. F. Miller, I, XV. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1742b] 1987. “The Stoic.” In Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by E. F. Miller, I, XVI. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1742c] 1987. “The Platonist.” In Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by E. F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, I, XVII.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1742d] 1987. “The Sceptic.” In Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by E. F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, I, XVIII.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1752a] 1987. “Of Refinement in the Arts.” In Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by E. F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, II, II.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1752b] 1987. “Of Money.” In Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by E. F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, II, III.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1752c] 1987. “Of Interest.” In Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by E. F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, II, IV.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1752d] 1987. “Of the Balance of Trade.” In Essays Moral, Political and Literary, edited by E. F. Miller. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, II, V.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1754–62] 1983. History of England. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp-Smith, N. [1918] 1962. A Commentary to Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, C. 1993. Subverting Scotland’s Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loasby, B. J. 2003. “Closed Models and Open Systems.” Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3): 285–306. doi:10.1080/1350178032000110864.
   Google Scholar
• Macinnes, A. I. 1996. Clanship, Commerce and the House of Stuart, 1603–1784. East Linton: Tuckwell.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, N. O. 2014. The Cambridge Revival of Political Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matson, E. W. 2019. “Reason and Political Economy in Hume.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 12 (1): 26–51. doi:10.23941/ejpe.v12i1.333.
   Google Scholar
• Mossner, E. C. 1943. The Forgotten Hume. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philipson, N. 1981. “The Scottish Enlightenment.” In The Enlightenment in National Context, edited by R. S. Porter, and M. Teich, 19–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pittock, M. G. H. 2003. “Historiography.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by A. Broadie, 258–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riskin, J. 2002. Science in the Age of Sensibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. [1993] 2003. “Hume and the Philosophy of Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, second edition, edited by D. F. Norton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 64–89.
   Google Scholar
• Schabas, M., and C. Wennerlind. 2020. A Philosopher’s Economist: Hume and the Rise of Capitalism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, A. S. 1965. “Economics and History: The Scottish Enlightenment.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 12 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9485.1965.tb00743.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, A. S. 1996. A System of Social Science: Papers Relating to Adam Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. [1759] 1976. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Glasgow edition, edited by D. D. Raphael and A. Macfie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. Y. 1974. Dependence and Transformation: The Economics of the Transition to Socialism. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vigo de Lima, I. 2010. Foucault’s Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wootton, D. 2009. “David Hume: The Historian.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hume, 2nd ed., edited by D. F. Norton, 448–478. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar