Today’s economics: one, no one and one hundred thousand

References

• Aistleitner, M., J. Kapeller, and D. Kronberger. 2023. “The Authors of Economics Journals Revisited: evidence from a Large-Scale Replication of Hodgson and Rothman.” Journal of Institutional Economics 19 (1): 86–101. doi:10.1017/S174413742200025X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosino, A., M. Cedrini, and J. B. Davis. 2021. “The Unity of Science and the Disunity of Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 45 (4): 631–654. doi:10.1093/cje/beab014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. E., and B. Cherrier. 2017. “The Age of the Applied Economist: The Transformation of Economics since the 1970s.” History of Political Economy 49 (Supplement): 1–33. doi:10.1215/00182702-4166239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. E., and P. Fontaine. 2018. “Economics and Other Social Sciences: A Historical Perspective.” Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi 52 (2): 7–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bögenhold, D. 2018. “Economics between Insulation and Social-Scienciation: Observations by a Sociology of Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 52 (4): 1125–1142. doi:10.1080/00213624.2018.1535954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. J., and M. Casson. 1993. “Economics as an Imperialist Social Science.” Human Relations 46 (9): 1035–1052. doi:10.1177/001872679304600902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabelli, A., and M. Cedrini. 2014. “Chapter 18 of the General Theory ‘Further Analysed’: economics as a Way of Thinking.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (1): 23–47. doi:10.1093/cje/bet017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cedrini, M., and J. Dagnes. 2022. “Economics Imperialism and a Transdisciplinary Perspective.” In Elgar Handbook of Alternative Theories of Political Economy, edited by D. Primrose, F. Stilwell, and T. Thornton, 428–442. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cedrini, M., and M. Fontana. 2018. “Just Another Niche in the Wall? How Specialization is Changing the Face of Mainstream Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 42 (2): 427–451. doi:10.1093/cje/bex003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coase, R. 1978. “Economics and Contiguous Disciplines.” The Journal of Legal Studies 7 (2): 201–211. doi:10.1086/467590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., and G. Harcourt. 2003. “Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 199–214. doi:10.1257/089533003321165010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, D., R. Holt, and J. B. Rosser. Jr 2004. “The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics.” Review of Political Economy 16 (4): 485–499. doi:10.1080/0953825042000256702.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. 1993. “The Impact of Gary Becker’s Work on Sociology.” Acta Sociologica 36 (3): 169–178. doi:10.1177/000169939303600302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. 2006. “The Turn in Economics: neoclassical Dominance to Mainstream Pluralism?” Journal of Institutional Economics 2 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1017/S1744137405000263.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. 2013. “Mäki on Economics Imperialism.” In Economics for Real: Uskali Mäki and the Place of Truth in Economics, edited by A. Lehtinen, J. Kuorikoski and P. Ylikoski, 217–234. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. 2019a. “Specialization, Fragmentation, and Pluralism in Economics.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26 (2): 271–293. doi:10.1080/09672567.2018.1555604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. 2019b. “Economics and Economic Methodology in a Core-Periphery Economic World.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 39 (3): 408–426. doi:10.1590/0101-35172019-3004.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. 2022a. “Change in and Changing Economics”. Paper presented at the VIII Congreso Latinoamericano de Historia del Pensamiento Económico, Montevideo.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. 2022b. “Social Economics.” In Elgar Handbook of Alternative Theories of Political Economy, edited by D. Primrose, F. Stilwell, and T. Thornton, 286–300. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H. 1997. “The Primacy of Economics: An Explanation of the Comparative Success of Economics in the Social Sciences.” Economic Inquiry 35 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1997.tb01890.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan, M., and R. Pahre. 1989. “Fragmentation and Recombination of the Social Sciences.” Studies in Comparative International Development 24 (2): 56–72. doi:10.1007/BF02687172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupré, J. 1994. “Against Scientific Imperialism.” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994 (2): 374–381. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1994.2.192948.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B., and D. Milonakis. 2009. From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics: The Shifting Boundaries between Economics and Other Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. 2015. “What Kind of Re-Imagining Does Economic Sociology Need?” In Re-Imagining Economic Sociology, edited by P. Aspers, and N. Dodd, 301–316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M., E. Ollion, and Y. Algan. 2015. “The Superiority of Economists.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (1): 89–114. doi:10.1257/jep.29.1.89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M. 2018. “Economics: The View from below.” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 154 (1): 5. doi:10.1186/s41937-017-0019-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frey, B., and M. Benz. 2004. “From Imperialism to Inspiration: A Survey of Economics and Psychology.” In The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, edited by J. B. Davis, A. Marciano, and J. Runde, 61–83. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Guala, F. 2006. Filosofia dell’economia: modelli, causalità, previsione. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. 2015. “Gary Becker: Model Economic Scientist.” The American Economic Review 105 (5): 74–79. doi:10.1257/aer.p20151106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbert, R. 2016. “What is an Immature Science?” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/02698595.2016.1240433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, H. J. 2001. “John Stuart Mill’s Theories of Wealth and Income Distribution.” Review of Social Economy 59 (4): 491–507. doi:10.1080/00346760110081599.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, C. 2003. “The Essential Tension in the Social Sciences: Between the ‘Unification’ and ‘Fragmentation’ Trap.” In The Evolution of Scientific Knowledge, edited by H. S. Jensen, L. Richter, M. T. Vendelø, 13–36. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1962 [1970]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 2000. The Road since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, edited by J. Conant and J. Haugeland, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazear, E. P. 2000. “Economic Imperialism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (1): 99–146. doi:10.1162/003355300554683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loasby, B. J. 2003. “Closed Models and Open Systems.” Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3): 285–306. doi:10.1080/1350178032000110864.
   Google Scholar
• Lucente, G. L. 1984. “Non Conclude’: Self-Consciousness and the Boundaries of Modernism in Pirandello’s Narrative.” Criticism 26 (1): 21–47.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, U. 2009. “Economics Imperialism: concept and Constraints.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (3): 351–380. doi:10.1177/0048393108319023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, U. 2020. “Notes on Economics Imperialism and Norms of Scientific Inquiry.” Revue de Philosophie Économique 21 (1): 95–127. doi:10.3917/rpec.211.0095.
   Google Scholar
• Marchionatti, R., and M. Cedrini. 2017. Economics as Social Science: Economics Imperialism and the Challenge of Interdisciplinarity. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. 1963–1991. Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, edited by J. M. Robson. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neves, V. 2012. “Sciences as Open Systems–the Case of Economics.” In Special Sciences and the Unity of Science, edited by O. Pombo, J. M. Torres, J. Symons, and S. Rahman, 205–217. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Orléan, A. 2005. “Economic Sociology and the Question of the Unity of the Social Sciences.” L’Année Sociologique 55 (2): 279–305. doi:10.3917/anso.052.0279.
   Google Scholar
• Panther, S. 2019. “What Can Teaching Critical Pluralist Economics Gain from “De-Othering” Sociology?” In Principles and Pluralist Approaches in Teaching Economics: Towards a Transformative Science, edited by S. Decker, W. Elsner, and S. Flechtner, 52–64. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pencavel, J. 1991. “Prospects for Economics.” The Economic Journal 101 (404): 81–87. doi:10.2307/2233842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepe, A., S. Wolff, and K. Van Godtsenhoven. 2012. “One, None and One Hundred Thousand Profiles.” First Monday 17 (4). Accessed March 5, 2023. https://firstmonday.org/article/view/3918/3191.
   Google Scholar
• Pirandello, L. 1990. One, No One and One Hundred Thousand. Boston, Mass.: Eridanos Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, J. 2000. The New Evolutionary Microeconomics: Complexity, Competence and Adaptive Behaviour. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 2015. Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science. New York: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Roncaglia, A. 2019. The Age of Fragmentation: A History of Contemporary Economic Thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salanti, A. 2020. “All That Glitters is Not Gold: The Case of Mainstream Pluralism.” Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi 54 (2): 287–310.
   Google Scholar
• Shapere, D. 1986. “External and Internal Factors in the Development of Science.” Science and Technology Studies 4 (1): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 2000. “Can There Be a Science of Complex Systems?” In Unifying Themes in Complex Systems Volume I. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Complex Systems, edited by Y. Bar-Yam, 1–12. Boca Raton: Imprint CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Song, S. 2009. “What Does It Mean to Be an American?” Daedalus 138 (2): 31–40. doi:10.1162/daed.2009.138.2.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. 1931. “Surplus Product.” D3/12/7, August. Cambridge UK: Wren Library, Trinity College.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. 1984. “Economics: The Imperial Science?” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 86 (3): 301–313. doi:10.2307/3439864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein, H.-M. 2017. “The Last Generalists.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 24 (6): 1134–1166. doi:10.1080/09672567.2017.1378694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallier, K. 2010. “Production, Distribution, an J. S. Mill.” Utilitas 22 (2): 103–125. doi:10.1017/S0953820810000038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. 1990. “What Does It Mean to Be an ‘American’?” Social Research 57 (3): 591–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. 2018. “On the Relationship between Economics and Ethics.” Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi 52 (2): 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. 1986. “The Structure and Context of Economics as a Scientific Field.” Research of the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 4: 179–209.
   Google Scholar