The gravity equation in international trade: an overview of the introduction of gravity to the study of economics and its systematic barriers

References

• Allen, Treb, and Costas Arkolakis. 2014. “Trade and the Topography of the Spatial Economy.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 129 (3): 1085–1140. doi:10.1093/qje/qju016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, James E. 1979. “A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation.” The American Economic Review 69 (1): 106–116. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1802501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, James E. 2011. “The Gravity Model.” Annual Review of Economics 3 (1): 133–160. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, James E., and Eric van Wincoop. 2003. “Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle.” American Economic Review 93 (1): 170–192. doi:10.1257/000282803321455214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, James E., and Yoto V. Yotov. 2016. “Terms of Trade and Global Efficiency Effects of Free Trade Agreements, 1990–2002.” Journal of International Economics 99: 279–298. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Shiro P. 2007. “Measuring trade and trade potential: A survey.” Crawford School Asia Pacific Economic Paper, 368. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1760426
   Google Scholar
• Baier, Scott L., and Samuel Standaert. 2020. Gravity Models and Empirical Trade. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.327.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, Richard, and Daria Taglioni. 2006. “Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations.” National Bureau of Economic Research: 1–29. https://www.nber.org/papers/w12516.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R. J., and B. Thalberg. 1967. “A Trade Cycle Analysis. Lund Economic Studies.” The Economic Journal 77 (308): 889–891. doi:10.2307/2229587.
   Google Scholar
• Baltagi, Badi H. 2008. “Forecasting with Panel Data.” Journal of Forecasting 27 (2): 153–173. doi:10.1002/for.1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, James T. 2006. “Regional Integration, Spatial Effects, and the Gravity Equation.”
   Google Scholar
• Batty, Michael. 1970. “An Activity Allocation Model for the Nottinghamshire-Derbyshire Subregion.” Regional Studies 4 (3): 307–332. doi:10.1080/09595237000185321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, G. David, Tom C. Russ, Emmanuel Stamatakis, and Mika Kivimäki. 2017. “Psychological Distress in Relation to Site Specific Cancer Mortality: pooling of Unpublished Data from 16 Prospective Cohort Studies.” BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 356: j108. doi:10.1136/bmj.j108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baty, Phil. 2010. “The World University Rankings: history, Methodology and Influence.” In Times Higher Education World University Rankings, Poster Presented at the Homologous Conference, Beijing, 25 June, 2010. https://image.sciencenet.cn/olddata/kexue.com.cn/upload/blog/file/2010/6/201062818725140198.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, William J. 1979. “Quasi-Permanence of Price Reductions: A Policy for Prevention of Predatory Pricing.” The Yale Law Journal 89 (1): 1–26. doi:10.2307/795909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1985. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 67 (3): 474–481. doi:10.2307/1925976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1989. “The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (1): 143–153. doi:10.2307/1928061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1990. “The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, the Linder Hypothesis and the Determinants of Bilateral Intra-Industry Trade.” The Economic Journal 100 (403): 1216–1229. doi:10.2307/2233969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, Brian J. L., and P. J. Schwind. 1969. “Information and Entropy in Migrant Flows.” Geographical Analysis 1 (1): 5–14. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1969.tb00601.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevis, Howard W. 1959. “A Model for Predicting Urban Travel Patterns.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25 (2): 87–89. doi:10.1080/01944365908978310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonigen, Bruce A., Ronald B. Davies, Glen R. Waddell, and Helen T. Naughton. 2007. “FDI in Space: Spatial Autoregressive Relationships in Foreign Direct Investment.” European Economic Review 51 (5): 1303–1325. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges Aguiar, Giovanna M., and Elena Cossu. 2019. “The Gravity Model for Trade Theory.” Köz-gazdaság-Review of Economic Theory and Policy 14 (3): 293–299. https://retp.eu/index.php/retp/article/view/180.
   Google Scholar
• Bussière, R., and F. Snickars. 1970. “Derivation of the Negative Exponential Model by an Entropy Maximising Method.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 2 (3): 295–301. doi:10.1068/a020295.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, Lorenzo, and Fernando Parro. 2015. “Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA.” The Review of Economic Studies 82 (1): 1–44. doi:10.1093/restud/rdu035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capoani, Luigi. 2023. “Review of the Gravity Model: origins and Critical Analysis of Its Theoretical Development.” SN Business & Economics 3 (5): 95. doi:10.1007/s43546-023-00461-0.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, Henry C. 1858. Principles of Social Science. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott & co.
   Google Scholar
• Carrothers, Gerald A. 1956. “An Historical Review of the Gravity and Potential Concepts of Human Interaction.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 22 (2): 94–102. doi:10.1080/01944365608979229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesario, Frank J. 1973. “A Generalized Trip Distribution Model.” Regional Science Journal 13 (2): 233–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champernowne, David G., and T. Barker. 1972. “The Determinants of Britain’s Visible Imports 1949–66.” The Economic Journal 82 (325): 227–230. doi:10.2307/2230224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney, Thomas. 2008. “Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade.” American Economic Review 98 (4): 1707–1721. doi:10.1257/aer.98.4.1707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., W. M. Raike, and C. O. Bettinger. 1972. “An Extremal and Information-Theoretic Characterization of Some Interzonal Transfer Models.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 6 (6): 531–537. doi:10.1016/0038-0121(72)90020-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, James. 2023. Heuristics. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/heuristics.asp
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Natalie. 2004. “Intra-National versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter?” Journal of International Economics 63 (1): 93–118. doi:10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00042-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chor, Davin. 2010. “Unpacking Sources of Comparative Advantage: A Quantitative Approach.” Journal of International Economics 82 (2): 152–167. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Leon. 1972. “The Transportation-Location Problem.” Operations Research 20 (1): 94–108. https://www.jstor.org/stable/169341. doi:10.1287/opre.20.1.94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costinot, A., D. Donaldson, and I. Komunjer. 2012. “What Goods Do Countries Trade? A Quantitative Exploration of Ricardo’s Ideas.” The Review of Economic Studies 79 (2): 581–608. doi:10.1093/restud/rdr033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Benedictis, Luca, and Daria Taglioni. 2011. The Gravity Model in International Trade (pp. 55–89). Berlin: Springer. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2384045.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, Alan V. 1984. “Testing Trade Theories and Predicting Trade Flows.” In Handbook of International Economics, edited by Jones, Ronald W., and Peter B. Kenen, vol. 1, 467–517. Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S1573-4404(84)01013-3.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, Alan V. 1995. “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?” In NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. W5377, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff, Alan V. 1998. “Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?” National Bureau of Economic Research, 7–32. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c7818/c7818.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deza, Michel M., and Elena Deza. 2006. Dictionary of distances. Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg: Elsevier. http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/53969/1/Michel%20Marie%20Deza.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dziecielski, Michal, Karima Kourtit, Peter Nijkamp, and Waldemar Ratajczak. 2021. “Basins of Attraction around Large Cities – a Study of Urban Interaction Spaces in Europe.” Cities 119: 103366. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum. 2002. “Technology, Geography, and Trade.” Econometrica 70 (5): 1741–1779. doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, Jonathan, S. Kortum, Brent Neiman, and John Romalis. 2016. “Trade and the Global Recession.” American Economic Review 106 (11): 3401–3438. doi:10.1257/aer.20101557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, Barry, and Douglas A. Irwin. 1998. “The Role of History in Bilateral Trade Flows.” In The Regionalization of the World Economy, edited by Jeffrey A. Frankel, 33–62. Cambridge, Mass: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erlander, Sven, and Neil F. Stewart. 1990. The Gravity Model in Transportation Analysis: Theory and Extensions, Vol. 3. Vsp. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Nancy H. 1976. “Tourism and Cross-Cultural Communication.” Annals of Tourism Research 3 (4): 189–198. doi:10.1016/0160-7383(76)90036-0.
   Google Scholar
• Evenett, Simon J., and Wolfgang Keller. 2002. “On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation.” Journal of Political Economy 110 (2): 281–316. doi:10.1086/338746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, Manfred M., and James P. LeSage. 2020. “Network Dependence in Multi-Indexed Data on International Trade Flows.” Journal of Spatial Econometrics 1 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1007/s43071-020-00005-w.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, Robin, and John Salt. 1979. “Migration between Labour Market Areas in Great Britain, 1970–1971.” Regional Studies 13 (2): 211–231. doi:10.1080/09595237900185181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, A. Stewart, and Morton E. O’Kelly. 1989. Spatial Interaction Models: formulations and Applications, vol. 1, p. 989. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frisch, Ragnar. 1947. “On the Need for Forecasting a Multilateral Balance of Payments.” The American Economic Review 37 (4): 535–551. https://www.jstor.org/stable/643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, M., P. R. Krugman, and A. J. Venables. 1999. The Spatial Economy. Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M., P. R. Krugman, and A. J. Venables. 2001. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. Cambridge-London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, Masahisa, and Jacques F. Thisse. 2009. “New Economic Geography: An Appraisal on the Occasion of Paul Krugman’s 2008 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 39 (2): 109–119. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelade, Garry A., and Paul Dobson. 2009. “The cross-cultural geography of nations: Using the spatial autocorrelation coefficient to test Tobler’s first law.” https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Garry-Gelade/publication/267199580_Cultural_Geography_1_The_Cross-Cultural_Geography_of_Nations_Using_the_Spatial_Autocorrelation_Coefficient_to_test_Tobler%27s_First_Law/links/57611fd408aeeada5bc4a604/Cultural-Geography-1-The-Cross-Cultural-Geography-of-Nations-Using-the-Spatial-Autocorrelation-Coefficient-to-test-Toblers-First-Law.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Genç, Murat, and David Law. 2014. “A Gravity Model of Barriers to Trade in New Zealand.” WP 14/(05) https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/205660.
   Google Scholar
• Gyftopoulos, Elias P., and Erol ̧Cubuķcu. 1997. “Entropy: Thermodynamic Definition and Quantum Expression.” Physical Review E 55 (4): 3851–3858. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.55.3851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakimi, Louis S. 1964. “Optimum Locations of Switching Centers and the Absolute Centers and Medians of a Graph.” Operations Research 12 (3): 450–459. doi:10.1287/opre.12.3.450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, Karl-Erik. 1952. “A General Theory of the System of Multilateral Trade.” The American Economic Review 42 (1): 59–68. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1914415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Chauncy D. 1954. “The Market as a Factor in the Localization of Industry in the United States.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 44 (4): 315–348. doi:10.2307/2561395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, Martyn C., and Alan G. Wilson. 1971. “Spatial Interaction.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 5 (1): 73–95. doi:10.1016/0038-0121(71)90042-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, Keith, and Thierry Mayer. 2014. “Chapter 3 - Gravity Equations: Workhorse, Toolkit, and Cookbook.” In Handbook of International Economics, edited by Gita Gopinath, vol. 4, 131–195. Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Head, Keith. 2003. Gravity for Beginners, version prepared for UBC Econ 590a students 1-11. https://artnet.unescap.org/tid/artnet/mtg/gravity10_reading1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, Brent, and Emily Moxley. 2009. “Terabytes of Tobler: Evaluating the First Law in a Massive, Domain-Neutral Representation of World Knowledge.” In Proceedings of 9th International Conference of Spatial Information Theory, 21–25. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. 10.1007/978-3-642-03832-7.
   Google Scholar
• Helliwell, John F. 1997. “National Borders, Trade and Migration.” Pacific Economic Review 2 (3): 165–185. doi:10.1111/1468-0106.00032.
   Google Scholar
• Helpman, E., M. Melitz, and Y. Rubinstein. 2008. “Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (2): 441–487. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helpman, Elhanan. 1987. “Imperfect Competition and International Trade: Evidence from Fourteen Industrial Countries.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 1 (1): 62–81. doi:10.1016/0889-1583(87)90027-X.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, Norriss S. 1983. “Isaac Newton’s Influence on Adam Smith’s Natural Laws in Economics.” Journal of the History of Ideas 44 (3): 497. doi:10.2307/2709178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, Arthur. 1971. Concepts in Statistical Mechanics. Gordon and Breach, New York. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hummels, David L. 1999. Toward a Geography of Trade Costs. Purdue University. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=160533
   Google Scholar
• Ippoliti, Emiliano. 2014a. “Dynamic Generation of Hypotheses: Mandelbrot, Soros and Far-from-Equilibrium.” In Heuristic Reasoning, 163–191. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ippoliti, Emiliano. 2014b. “Reasoning at the Frontier of Knowledge: Introductory Essay.” In Heuristic Reasoning, 1–10. Cham: Springer International Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Isard, Walter, and Merton J. Peck. 1954. “Location Theory and International and Interregional Trade Theory.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 68 (1): 97–114. doi:10.2307/1881920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isard, Walter. 1954. “Location Theory and Trade Theory: Short-Run Analysis.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 68 (2): 305–320. doi:10.2307/1884452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isard, Walter. 1956. Location and Space-Economy; a General Theory Relating to Industrial Location, Market Areas, Land Use, Trade, and Urban Structure. New York: Technology Press of MIT and Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Isard, Walter. 1960. Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isard, Walter. 1986. “Reflections on the Relevance of Integrated Multiregion Models: Lessons from Physics.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 16 (2): 165–180. doi:10.1016/0166-0462(86)90002-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaynes, E. T. 1957. “Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics.” Physical Review 106 (4): 620–630. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.106.620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kembhavi, A., and P. Khare. 2020. “Gravitational Waves: The New Window to the Universe.” In Gravitational Waves, 55–60. Springer, Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5709-5_4.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura, Fukunari, and Hyun-Hoon Lee. 2006. “The Gravity Equation in International Trade in Services.” Review of World Economics 142(1): 92–121. doi:10.1007/s10290-006-0058-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul R. 1980. “Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade.” The American Economic Review70 (5): 950–959. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1805774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul R. 1985. “Increasing returns and the theory of international trade.” https://www.nber.org/papers/w1752
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul R. 1991. “Increasing Returns and Economic Geography.” Journal of Political Economy 99 (3): 483–499. doi:10.1086/261763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul R. 1993. “The Hub Effect: Or, Threeness in Interregional Trade.” In Theory, Policy, and Dynamics in International Trade, 29–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul R. 1995. “Urban Concentration: The Role of Increasing Returns and Transport Costs.” In Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, 241–263. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank. doi:10.1080/0042098975358.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, Paul R., and Maurice Obstfeld. 2005. International Economics, Theory and Practice. Northbrook, Illinois: Scott Foresman & Co. https://cdn.prexams.com/8978/International%20Economics%20Theory%20and%20Policy%20Book%209th%20Edition.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Krzysztofik, Robert. 2016. “Revisiting the Question of Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces in Urban Systems.” Geographia Polonica 89 (4): 429–442. https://rcin.org.pl/dlibra/show-content/publication/edition/61190?id=61190. doi:10.7163/GPol.0066.
   Google Scholar
• Labory, Sandrine, and Patrizio Bianchi. 2021. “Regional Industrial Policy in Times of Big Disruption: building Dynamic Capabilities in Regions.” Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1829–1838. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1928043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejour, Arjan, and J. W. de Paiva Verheijden. 2004. “Services Trade Within Canada and the European Union: What do They Have in Common?”. CPB Discussion Paper, No. 42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4833616_Services_trade_within_Canada_and_the_European_Union_what_do_they_have_in_common
   Google Scholar
• Li, Haitao, Zhenhui Kang, Yang Liu, and Shuit-Tong Lee. 2012. “Carbon Nanodots: Synthesis, Properties and Applications.” Journal of Materials Chemistry 22 (46): 24230–24253. doi:10.1039/c2jm34690g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limão, Nuno, and Anthony J. Venables. 2001. “Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade.” The World Bank Economic Review 15 (3): 451–479. doi:10.1093/wber/15.3.451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, Staffan B. 1961. An Essay on Trade and Transformation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Linders, Gert-Jan, and Henri L. F. de Groot. 2006. “Estimation of the Gravity Equation in the Presence of Zero Flows”. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 06-072/3. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=924160
   Google Scholar
• Linnemann, Hans. 1966. An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, John C., and S. Moryadas. 1975. The Geography of Movement. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Machlup, Fritz. 1943. International Trade and the National Income Multiplier. New York: A.M. Kelley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Martini, Alberto. 2017. “Modelli Gravitazionali e Commercio Internazionale: un’analisi Empirica.” Master’s Thesis, Università degli Studi di Padova. https://thesis.unipd.it/handle/20.500.12608/25436.
   Google Scholar
• Mathai, A. M., and P. N. Rathie. 1975. “Basic Concepts in Information Theory and Statistics: Axiomatic Foundations and Applications.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 71 (355): 777. doi:10.2307/2285642.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, John. 1995. “National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns.” The American Economic Review 85 (3): 615–623. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele, Marco, and Paola A. Baistrocchi. 2012. “A Critique of the Gravitational Model in Estimating the Determinants of Trade Flows.” International Journal of Business and Commerce 2 (1): 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Metzler, Lloyd A. 1950. “A Multiple-Region Theory of Income and Trade.” Econometrica 18 (4): 329–354. doi:10.2307/1907833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Harvey J. 2004. “Tobler’s First Law and Spatial Analysis.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2): 284–289. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402005.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, Chris, and Danny McGowan. 2013. “Trade Costs and Trade Composition.” Economic Inquiry 51 (3): 1886–1902. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00496.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, Peter, and Aura Reggiani. 1988. “Entropy, Spatial Interaction Models and Discrete Choice Analysis: Static and Dynamic Analogies.” European Journal of Operational Research 36 (2): 186–196. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(88)90424-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, Peter, and Jean H. Paelinck. 1974. “A Dual Interpretation and Generalization of Entropy-Maximization Models in Regional Science.” In Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 33(1), 13–31. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/BF01943636.
   Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, Peter, and Waldemar Ratajczak. 2021. “Gravitational Analysis in Regional Science and Spatial Economics: A Vector Gradient Approach to Trade.” International Regional Science Review 44 (3–4): 400–431. doi:10.1177/0160017620980519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, Peter. 1975. “Reflections on Gravity and Entropy Models.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 5 (2): 203–225. doi:10.1016/0166-0462(75)90004-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, Peter. 1976. “Spatial Mobility and Settlement Patterns: An Application of a Behavioural Entropy.” IIASA Research Memorandum https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/33892111.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nijkamp, Peter. 1977. Gravity and Entropy Models: The State of the Art. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, Economische Fakulteit.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsch, Volker. 2000. “National Borders and International Trade: evidence from the European Union.” Canadian Journal of Economics 3 (2): 178–201. doi:10.1111/0008-4085.00055.
   Google Scholar
• Noronha, Gregory M., Nilanjan Sen, and David M. Smith. 1995. “Determinants of the Medium of Payment in Corporate Acquisitions.” Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) 11(1): 15–23. doi:10.19030/jabr.v11i1.5887.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, Arthur, and Steven M. Sheffrin. 2003. Economics: Principles in Action, 157. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin, Bertil. 1933. Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olanike Kareem, Fatima, and Idowu O. Kareem. 2014. Specification and Estimation of Gravity Models: A Review of the Issues in the Literature”. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2014/74. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2459484
   Google Scholar
• Olivero, Maria P., and Yoto V. Yotov. 2012. “Dynamic Gravity: endogenous Country Size and Asset Accumulation.” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d'économique 45 (1): 64–92. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01687.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Openshaw, Stan. 1976. “An Empirical Study of Some Spatial Interaction Models.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 8 (1): 23–41. doi:10.1068/a080023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, Iman, and Saibal Kar. 2021. “Gravity Models in International Trade: An Exploration in Econo-Physics.” South Asian Journal of Macroeconomics and Public Finance 10 (1): 72–104. doi:10.1177/2277978721989922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirie, Gordon. 2009. Distance. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Polak, Jacques J. 1996. “Is APEC a Natural Regional Trading Bloc? A Critique of the ‘Gravity Model’ of International Trade.” The World Economy 19 (5): 533–543. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.1996.tb00695.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porojan, Anca. 2000. “Trade Flows and Spatial Effects: The Gravity Model Revisited.” Discussion Papers, University of Exeter, Department of Economics. doi:10.1023/a:1011129422190.
   Google Scholar
• Pöyhönen, Pentti. 1963. “A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 90 (1): 93–100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40436776.
   Google Scholar
• Pulliainen, Kyösti. 1963. “A World Trade Study: An Econometric Model of the Pattern of the Commodity Flows in International Trade in 1948-1960.” Ekonomiska Samfundets Tidskrift 16: 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Redding, Sthephen, and Anthony J. Venables. 2004. “Economic Geography and International Inequality.” Journal of International Economics 62 (1): 53–82. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reggiani, Aura. 2021. “Complexity and Spatial Networks.” In Handbook of Regional Science, 325–347. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-60723-7_48.
   Google Scholar
• Reinert, Kenneth A. 2013. “Gravity models.” In The Princeton encyclopedia of the World Economy, edited by K Reinert and R Rajan. Massachusetts, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, Sergio J. 2015. “Mathematical Models in Geography.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 785–790. Arizona State University: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ricardo, David. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray, Albemarle-Street.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Alex. 1992. Economics–Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, Paul A. 1949. “International Factor-Price Equalization Once Again.” The Economic Journal 59 (234): 181–197. doi:10.2307/2226683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samy, Yiagadeesen, and Vivek H. Dehejia. 2011. “Trade and Labor Standards in the European Union: A Gravity Model Approach.” The International Trade Journal 25 (5): 581–618. doi:10.1080/08853908.2011.604300.
   Google Scholar
• Santos Silva, J. M. C., and Silvana Tenreyro. 2006. “The Log of Gravity.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (4): 641–658. doi:10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schad, J., M. W. Lewis, and W. K. Smith. 2019. “Quo Vadis, Paradox? Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces in Theory Development.” Strategic Organization 17 (1): 107–119. doi:10.1177/1476127018786218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Allen J. 1971. “Dynamic Location-Allocation Systems: Some Basic Planning Strategies.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 3 (1): 73–82. doi:10.1068/a030073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahriar, Saleh, Lu Qian, Sokvibol Kea, and Nazir M. Abdullahi. 2019. “The Gravity Model of Trade: A Theoretical Perspective.” Review of Innovation and Competitiveness 5 (1): 21–42. doi:10.32728/ric.2019.51/2.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, Eric S. 1976. “Entropy, Theory Construction and Spatial Analysis.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 8 (7): 741–752. doi:10.1068/a080741.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan.
   Google Scholar
• Snickars, Folke, and Jören W. Weibull. 1977. “A Minimum Information Principle: Theory and Practice.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 7 (1–2): 137–168. doi:10.1016/0166-0462(77)90021-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, John Q. 1941. “An Inverse Distance Variation for Certain Social Influences.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 93 (2404): 89–90. doi:10.1126/science.93.2404.89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart, John Q. 1947. “Empirical Mathematical Rules concerning the Distribution and Equilibrium of Population.” Geographical Review 37 (3): 461–485. doi:10.2307/211132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, John Q. 1948. “Demographic Gravitation: Evidence and Applications.” Sociometry 11 (1/2): 31–58. doi:10.2307/2785468.
   Google Scholar
• Sui, Daniel Z. 2004. “Tobler’s First Law of Geography: A Big Idea for a Small World?” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2): 269–277. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402003.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theil, Henri, and Pedro Uribe. 1967. “The Information Approach to the Aggregation of Input-Output Tables.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 49 (4): 451–462. doi:10.2307/1928329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Isabelle. 2002. Transportation Networks and the Optimal Location of Human Activities: A Numerical Geography Approach. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, J. J. 1962. “Shaping the World Economy; Suggestions for an International Economic Policy.” Thunderbird International Business Review 5 (1): 27–30. https://www.pfw.edu/publications/jgbt/current-previous-issues/JGBT-2022-18-5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, Waldo R. 1970. “A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region.” Economic Geography 46 (3): 234–240. doi:10.2307/143141.
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, Waldo R. 1975. Spatial Interaction Patterns.” IIASA Research Report: 1–35. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/241/
   Google Scholar
• Tobler, Waldo R. 2004. “On the First Law of Geography: A Reply.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (2): 304–310. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, André, and Fred Wallet. 2014. Regional Development and Proximity Relations. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Paul M. 2014. “High-Fidelity Behaviors for Model People on Model Streetscapes.” Annals of GIS 20 (3): 139–157. doi:10.1080/19475683.2014.944933.
   Google Scholar
• Trefler, Daniel. 1995. “The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries.” The American Economic Review 85 (5): 1029–1046. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2950973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bergeijk, Peter A. G., and Steven Brakman. 2010. The Gravity Model in International Trade. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vining, Rutledge. 1949. “The Region as an Economic Entity and Certain Variations to Be Observed in the Study of Systems of Regions.” The American Economic Review 39 (3): 89–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1831736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vozna, Liudmyla Y. 2016. “The Notion of Entropy in an Economic Analysis: The Classical Examples and New Perspectives.” Journal of Heterodox Economics 3 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1515/jheec-2016-0001.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, Keith. 2006. “Trade in Services: Does Gravity Hold? A Gravity Model Approach to Estimating Barriers to Services Trade.” IIS Discussion Paper No. 183. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=945335
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, Warren. 2021. “Recent Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Communication.” ETC: A Review of General Semantics 10 (4): 261–281. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42581364.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, Melvin W. 1976. “The BART experience – what have we learned?” IURD Monograph Series. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7pd9k5g0#main
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Alfred von. 1911. “Die Standortslehre und die Handelspolitik.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 32 (3): 674–677.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Shang-Jin. 1996. “Intra-National versus International Trade: How Stubborn Are Nations in Global Integration?” National Bureau of Economic Research 1–41. https://www.nber.org/papers/w5531.
   Google Scholar
• Wiant, Rex H. 1961. “A Simplified Method for Forecasting Urban Traffic.” Highway Research Board Bulletin 97 http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/hrbbulletin/297/297-012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Alan G. 1967. “A Statistical Theory of Spatial Distribution Models.” Transportation Research 1 (3): 253–269. doi:10.1016/0041-1647(67)90035-4.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Alan G. 1969. “Developments of Some Elementary Residential Location Models.” Journal of Regional Science 9 (3): 377–385. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.1969.tb01351.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Alan G. 1970. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, F. W., and D. Bennett. 1985. “The Land.” In Natural Kansas, edited by J.T. Collins, 13–38. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Winker, Peter, and Manfred Gilli. 2008. “Heuristic Optimization in Economics and Econometrics.” VoxEU. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/heuristic-optimisation-economics-and-econometrics
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Zhikun, Fang Wang, Bin Quan, and Liangmei Jiang. 2012. “The Study of Urban Interaction Based on Modified Gravity Model—A Case of Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan.” In Proceedings of World Automation Congress, 1–4. Puerto Vallarta, Mexico: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Yotov, Yoto V. 2012. “A Simple Solution to the Distance Puzzle in International Trade.” Economics Letters 117 (3): 794–798. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2012.08.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yotov, Yoto V. 2022. “On the Role of Domestic Trade Flows for Estimating the Gravity Model of Trade.” Contemporary Economic Policy 40 (3): 526–540. doi:10.1111/coep.12567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yotov, Yoto V., Roberta Piermartini, José-Antonio Monteiro, and Mario Larch. 2016. An Advanced Guide to Trade Policy Analysis: The Structural Gravity Model. United Nations, [Geneva], New York, NY: WTO.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Jie, and Gustav Kristensen. 1995. “A Gravity Model with Variable Coefficients: The EEC Trade with Third Countries.” Geographical Analysis 27 (4): 307–320. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00913.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Boming, Xijie Lin, Duo Yin, and Xinhua Qi. 2023. “Does Tobler’s First Law of Geography Apply to Internet Attention? A Case Study of the Asian Elephant Northern Migration Event.” PLoS One 18 (3): e0282474. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0282474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, George K. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Boston: Addison-Wesley Press.
   Google Scholar