Hyperchromatic crowded cell groups in gynaecological liquid-based cytology samples

References

• Renshaw A, Mody D, Wang E, Haja J, Colgan T. Hyperchromatic crowded cell groups in cervical cytology – differing appearances and interpretations in conventional and ThinPrep preparations. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130 (3): 332–6.
   Google Scholar
• DeMay RM. The art and science of cytopathology. Chicago: ASCP Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Karrer HE. Cell interconnections in normal human cervical epithelium. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1960; 7 (1): 181–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbiner BM. Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 1996; 84: 345–7.
   Google Scholar
• De Boer CJ, Van Dorst E, Van Krieken H et al. Changing roles of cadherins and catenins during progression of squamous intraepithelial lesions in the uterine cervix. J Pathol 1999; 155 (2): 505–15.
   Google Scholar
• Feratovic R, Lewin SN, Sonoda Y et al. Cytological findings after fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy. Cancer Cytopathol 2008; 114 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Faraker CA, Boxer ME. Rapid review (partial rescreening) of cervical cytology. Four years experience and quality assurance implications. J Clin Pathol 1996; 49: 587–91.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson JH, Woodend B. Negative cytology preceding cervical cancer: causes and prevention. J Clin Pathol 1993; 46 (8): 700–2.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KR. Adenocarcinoma in situ with a small cell (endometrioid) pattern in cervical smears. Cancer 1999; 87 (5): 254–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ruba S, Schoolland M, Allpress S, Sterrett G. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix. Screening and diagnostic errors in Papanicolaou smears. Cancer 2004; 102 (5): 280–7.
   Google Scholar
• DeMay RM. Hyperchromatic crowded cell groups: pitfalls in Pap smear diagnosis. Am J Clin Pathol 2000 ; 114 (Suppl 1): S36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Frabie WJ. Error reduction and risk management in cytopathology. Semin Diagn Pathol 2007; 24 (2): 77–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chivukula M, Austin RM, Shidham VB. Evaluation and significance of hyperchromatic crowded cell groups (HCCG) in liquid based paps. Cytojournal 2007; 4: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Pajtler M, Audy-Jurković S, Skopljanac-Mačcina L, Antulov J, Barišsić A, Miličcić-Juhas V. Rapid cervicovaginal smear screening: method of quality control and assessing individual cytotechnologist performance. Cytopathology 2006; 17 (3): 121–6.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). Audit of invasive cervical cancers. Publication No 28, 2006 (www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/publications/nhscsp28.html).
   Google Scholar
• NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology. Publication No 1, 2000 (www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/publications/cc-02.html).
   Google Scholar
• Schooland M, Sterrett GF, Knowles SA, Mitchell KM, Kurinczuk JJ. The inconclusive-possible high-grade epithelial abnormality category in Papanicolaou smear reporting. Cancer 1998; 84 (4): 208–17.
   Google Scholar
• Selvaggi SM. Cytologic features of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions involving endocervical glands on ThinPrep cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 26 (3): 181–5.
   Google Scholar
• Biscotti CV, Gero MA, Toddy SM, Fischler DF, Easley KA. Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ: an analysis of cellular features. Diagn Cytopathol 1997; 17 (5): 326–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkan F, Ramzy I, Mody DR. Glandular lesions of the cervix on thin-layer Pap tests. Validity of cytologic criteria used in identifying significant lesions. Acta Cytol 2004; 48 (3): 372–9.
   Google Scholar
• Thiryayi SA, Marshall J, Rana DN. Differentiating between endocervical glandular neoplasia and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in endocervical crypts: cytological features in ThinPrep and SurePath cervical cytology samples. Diagn Cytopathol 2009; 37 (5): 315–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KR, Genest DR, Minter LJ, Granter SR, Cibas ES. Adenocarcinoma in situ in cervical smears with a small cell (endometrioid) pattern: distinction from cells directly sampled from the upper endocervical canal or lower segment of the endometrium. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 109 (6): 738–42.
   Google Scholar
• Narine N, Rana DN, McVey RJ, Fitzmaurice R. Ancillary testing in liquid-based cytology to distinguish cervical glandular neoplasia from tuboendometrial metaplasia in a young woman. Diagn Cytopathol 2010 Feb 24 (Epub ahead of print; www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121450078/issue).
   Google Scholar
• Harris MV, Cason Z, Benghuzzi H, Tucci M. Cytomorphological assessment of benign and malignant dense hyperchromatic groups in cervicovaginal smears. Biomed Sci Instrum 2000; 36: 349–54.
   Google Scholar