Evaluation of the QBC Star centrifugal three-part differential haematology system

References

• Briggs C, Harrison P, Grant D, Staves J, Chavada N, Machin S. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XE-2100 automated haematology analyser. Sysmex Journal International 1999; 9 (2): 113–9.
   Google Scholar
• Walters J, Garrity P Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XE-2100 haematology analyzer. Lab Hematol 2000; 6: 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Thom R, Hampe A, Sauerbrey G. Electronic determination of the volume of blood corpuscles and its sources of errors (in German). Z Gesamte Exp Med 1969; 151 (4): 331–49.
   Google Scholar
• Jones AR. Counting and sizing of blood cells using aperture-impedance systems. In: van Assendelft OW, England J eds. Advances in haematological methods: the blood count. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1982: 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline 2nd edn. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Preliminary evaluation of quantitative clinical laboratory methods; approved guideline. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Field D, Taube E, Heumann S. Performance evaluation of the immature granulocyte parameter on the Sysmex XE-2100 automated haematology analyzer. Lab Hematol 2006; 12 (1): 11–4.
   Google Scholar
• Langford K, Luchtman-Jones L, Miller R, Walck D. Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XT-2000i automated haematology analyzer. Lab Hematol 2003; 9 (1): 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by skin puncture; approved standard 4th edn. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Recommendations of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology for ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid anticoagulation of blood for blood cell counting and sizing. International Council for Standardization in Haematology: Expert Panel on Cytometry. Am J Clin Path 1993; 100 (4): 371–2.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. User verification of performance for precision and trueness; approved guidelines 2nd edn. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ricos C, Alvarez V, Cava F et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999; 59 (7): 491–500.
   Google Scholar
• Chesher D. Evaluating assay precision. Clin Biochem Rev 2008; 29 (Suppl 1): S23–6.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Association of Clinical Biochemists’ website — Tools (www.aacb.asn.au).
   Google Scholar
• Wieringa G. High street testing. Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority, Manchester, UK, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Leman P, Guthrie D, Simpson R, Little F. Improving access to diagnostics: an evaluation of a satellite laboratory service in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 2004; 21 (4): 452–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney JR, Cembrowski GS. The use of retained patient specimens for haematology quality control. Clin Lab Haematol 1990; 12 (Suppl 1): 83–9.
   Google Scholar
• Levy WC, Hay KL, Bull BS. Preserved blood versus patient data for quality control — Bull’s algorithm revisited. Am J Clin Pathol 1986; 85 (6): 719–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cembrowski GS, Westgard JO. Quality control of multichannel hematology analyzers: evaluation of Bull’s algorithm. Am J Clin Pathol 1985; 83 (3): 337–45.
   Google Scholar
• Cembrowski GS, Hodgson DL, Etches WS. Strict use of moving averages for quality control of multichannel hematology analyzers requires optimal control of ambient temperature. Lab Hematol 2002; 8: 200–3.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati GL, Hyun BH. Quality control in hematology. Clin Lab Med 1986; 6 (4): 675–88.
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analyzers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting and cell marker applications. International Council for Standardization in Haematology: prepared by the ICSH Expert Panel on Cytometry. Clin Lab Haematol 1994; 16 (2): 157–74.
   Google Scholar