Sperm toxicity testing: UK best practice guideline from the Association of Biomedical Andrologists

References

• World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward BJ, Tomlinson MJ. How strict should specimen acceptance or rejection criteria be for a diagnostic semen analysis? Hum Fert. 2015;18(2):87–91.10.3109/14647273.2014.958577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CE Marking. Guidance: CE marking [Internet]. Mölndal [updated 2012; cited 2017 Aug 14]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/ce-marking
   Google Scholar
• Owen DH, Katz DF. A review of the physical and chemical properties of human semen and the formulation of a semen stimulant. J Andrology. 2005;26(4):459–469.10.2164/jandrol.04104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjorndahl L, Mortimer D, Barratt CLR, et al. A practical guide to basic laboratory andrology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. ISBN 1139482491, 9781139482493.10.1017/CBO9780511729942
   Google Scholar
• Nidacon International. Products [Internet]. Mölndal. [2017; cited 2017 Aug 14]. Available from: http://nidacon.com/ifu/density_gradient.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th ed. Geneva: WHO Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson MJ, Harbottle SJ, Woodward BJ, et al. Association of biomedical andrologists. Association of biomedical andrologists – laboratory andrology guidelines for good practice version 3 – 2012. Hum Fert. 2012;15(4):156–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt CLR, Tomlinson MJ, Cooke ID, et al. Prognostic significance of computerised motility analysis for in vivo fertility. Fertil Steril. 1993;60:520–525.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56171-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen L, Scheike T, Jensen TK, et al. The danish first pregnancy planner study team. Computer-assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1562–1567.10.1093/humrep/15.7.1562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett C, Liu DY, Clarke GN, et al. Automated semen analysis: ‘zona pellucida preferred’ sperm morphometry and straight-line velocity are related to pregnancy rate in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1643–1649.10.1093/humrep/deg306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders D, Fensome-Rimmer S, Woodward B, et al. Uncertainty of measurement in andrology: UK best practice guideline from the Association of Biomedical Andrologists. Br J Biomed Sci. 2017;74:157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock P, Woodward BJ, Muneer A, et al. Laboratory guidelines for postvasectomy semen analysis: Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the British Andrology Society and the British Association of Urological Surgeons. J Clin Pathol. 2016;69(7):655–660.10.1136/jclinpath-2016-203731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks D. Guidance on the use of clinical samples for a range of purposes that are not within the remit of research ethic committees [Internet]. [2012; cited 2017 Jul 28]. Available from: https://www.rcpath.org/resourceLibrary/guidance-use-of-clinical-samples-nov-12.html
   Google Scholar
• Cooper TG, Yeung CH. Computer-aided evaluation of assessment of “grade a” spermatozoa by experienced technicians. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:220–224.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.1286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper TG, Neuwinger J, Bahrs S, et al. Internal quality control of semen analysis. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(1):172–178.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)55156-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuwinger J, Behre HM, Nieschlag E. External quality control in the andrology laboratory: an experimental multicenter trial. Fertil Steril. 1990;54(2):308–314.10.1016/S0015-0282(16)53709-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijs M, Franssen K, Cox A, et al. Reprotoxicity of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer disposables and products: a 4-year survey. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(2):527–535.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchlow JD, Matson PL, Newman MC, et al. Quality control in an in vitro fertilization laboratory: use of human sperm survival studies. Hum Reprod. 1989;4(5):545–549.10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar