Vietnam’s Chinese-style ‘tributary system’ in South East Asia in the nineteenth century

References

• Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Di Cosmo, Nicola. 2003. “Kirghiz Nomads on the Qing Frontier: Tribute, Trade, or Gift-Exchange?” In Political Frontiers, Ethnic Boundaries, and Human Geographies in Chinese History, edited by Nicola Di Cosmo, and Don J. Wyatt, 351–372. London: Curzon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer, June Teufel. 2014. “China’s Tianxia: Do All Under Heaven Need One Arbiter?” Yale Global (blog), October 30.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbank, John K. 1942. “Tributary Trade and China’s Relations with the West.” The Far Eastern Quarterly 1 (2): 129–149.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbank, John K. 1953. Trade and Diplomacy on the China Coast: The Opening of the Treaty Ports, 1842–1854. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbank, John K., ed. 1968. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbank, John K., and S. Y. Teng. 1941. “On the Ch’ing Tributary System.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 6 (2): 135–246.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. F. 1968. “China and Central Asia, 1368–1884.” In The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations, edited by John K. Fairbank, 206–224. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HIND [Quốc sử quán triều Nguyễn; Historiography Institute of Nguyễn Dynasty]. 1994. Minh Mệnh chính yếu [Essential Records of Minh Mệnh], Vol. 3. Translated by Translation Committee of Vietnamese Historical Documents. Hue: Thuan Hoa Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• HIND. 2002. Đại Nam thực lục [Veritable records of Dai Nam], Vol. I. Translated by Translation Team of Institute of History. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• HIND. 2004a. Đại Nam thực lục [Veritable records of Dai Nam], Vol. II. Translated by Translation Team of Institute of History. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• HIND. 2004b. Đại Nam thực lục [Veritable records of Dai Nam], Vol. III. Translated by Translation Team of Institute of History. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• HIND. 2007a. Đại Nam thực lục [Veritable records of Dai Nam], Vol. IV. Translated by Translation Team of Institute of History. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• HIND. 2007b. Đại Nam thực lục [Veritable records of Dai Nam], Vol. V. Translated by Translation Team of Institute of History. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• HIND. 2007c. Đại Nam thực lục [Veritable records of Dai Nam], Vol. VI. Translated by Translation Team of Institute of History. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• HIND. 2007d. Đại Nam thực lục [Veritable records of Dai Nam], Vol. VII. Translated by Translation Team of Institute of History. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• HIND. 2007e. Đại Nam thực lục [Veritable records of Dai Nam], Vol. VIII. Translated by Translation Team of Institute of History. Hanoi: Education Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Michael H. 1984. “Chinese Foreign Relations in Historical Perspective.” In China’s Foreign Relations in the 1980s, edited by Harry Harding, 1–42. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Dun J. 1967. The Essence of Chinese Civilization. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Co.
   Google Scholar
• Li Yunquan. 2004. Chaogong zhidu shilun: Zhongguo gudai duiwai guanxi tizhi yanjiu [A History of the Tribute System: Research on China's Premodern Foreign Relation Institution]. Beijing: Xinhua chubanshe.
   Google Scholar
• Millward, James A. 1998. Beyond the Pass: Economy, Ethnicity, and Empire in Qing Central Asia, 1759–1864. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. Frederick. 1946. Korea and the Old Orders in Eastern Asia. Baton Rouge: Lousiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyễn Thị Mỹ Hạnh. 2018. “Mối quan hệ giữa Việt Nam và Lào trong nửa đầu thế kỷ XIX: Đặc điểm, thực chất và những bài học kinh nghiệm [Relations Between Vietnam and Laos in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century: Characteristics, Essence and Lessons Learned].” Journal of Historical Studies Hanoi 2 (502): 12–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyễn Thị Mỹ Hạnh. 2019. “Application of Center-Periphery Theory to the Study of Vietnam–China Relations in the Middle Ages.” Southeast Asian Studies 8 (1): 53–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossabi, Morris, ed. 1983. China among Equals: The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th–14th Centuries. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shils, Edward A. 1961. “Centre and Periphery.” In The Logic of Personal Knowledge: Essays Presented to Michael Polanyi on His Seventieth Birthday, 11th March 1961, edited by Polanyi Festschrift Committee, 117–130. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Shils, Edward A. 1975. Centre and Periphery: Essays in Macro Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuboi, Yoshiharu. 1992. Nước Đại Nam đối diện với Pháp và Trung Hoa 1847–1885 [Dai Nam Confronted France and China 1847–1885]. Hanoi: Vietnam History Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tạ, Ngọc Liễn. 1995. Quan hệ giữa Việt Nam và Trung Quốc thế kỷ XV–đầu thế kỷ XVI [Relationship Between Vietnam and China in the 15th Century–Early 16th Century]. Hanoi: Social Science Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 1979. The Capitalist World-Economy, Part I: The Inequalities of Core and Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Gung-Wu. 1958. “The Nanhai Trade: A Study of the Early History of Chinese Trade in the South China Sea.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society Malayan Branch 31 (2): 1. 3–135.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, John E., Jr. 1988. “Tribute, Defensiveness, and Dependency: Uses and Limits of Some Basic Ideas About Mid-Qing Dynasty Foreign Relations.” American Neptune 48 (4): 225–229.
   Google Scholar
• Winthrop, Robert H. 1991. Dictionary of Concepts in Cultural Anthropology. New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, Brantly. 2004. “Asymmetry Theory and China’s Concept of Multipolarity.” Journal of Contemporary China 13 (39): 351–366.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, Brantly. 2006. China and Vietnam: Politics and Asymmetry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, Brantly. 2012a. Asymmetry and International Relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, Brantly. 2012b. “Asymmetry and China’s Tributary System.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 5 (1): 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodside, Alexander B. 1971. Vietnam and the Chinese Model: A Comparative Study of Vietnamese and Chinese Government in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yung-Cheng, Emperor. 1967. “Chinese and Foreigners are Members of One Family.” In The Essence of Chinese Civilization, edited by Dun J. Li, 129–131. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Co.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yongjin. 2001. “System, Empire and State in Chinese International Relations.” In Empires, Systems and States: Great Transformation in International Politics, edited by Michael Cox, Tim Dunne, and Ken Booth, 43–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Feng. 2009. “Rethinking the ‘Tribute System’: Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 2: 545–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar