The AKKA-board – performing mobility, disability and innovation

References

• Allen, C. 2004. “Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology and the Body-in-Space Encounters of Visually Impaired Children.” Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 22: 719–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P., and B. Starrin. 2007. Empowerment in Theory and Practice. Malmö: Gleerups publishers AB.
   Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. 2000. “Policy as Discourse: What Does It Mean? Where Does It Get Us?” Discourse 21: 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., and E. von Hippel. 2009. Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper No. 10–038. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1502864.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., and A. Eriksson. 2011. White Spaces Innovation in Sweden - Innovation Policy for Exploring the Adjacent Possible. Vinnova Report VR 2011:10. Stockholm: VINNOVA –Verket för Innovationssystem [Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation System].
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, D. 1999. Leisure/Tourism Geographies: Practices and Geographical Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1994. What is Philosophy? Translated by H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denham, S., H. Warren, M. von Salisch, O. Benga, J. C. Chin, and E. Geangu. 2002. “Emotions and Social Development in Childhood.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Social Development, edited by P. K. Smith and C. H. Hart, 413–433. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. 1999. Rhythmic Landscapes: Performing a Sense of Place. http://www.cia.com.au/peril/youth/duffy1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Esdaile, S. A. 2004. “Toys for Shade and the Mother Child Co-Occupation of Play.” In Mothering Occupations. Challenge, Agency and Participation, edited by. S. A. Esdaile and J. A. Olson, 95–114. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Esdaile, S. A. 2009. “Valuing Difference: Caregiving by Mothers of Children with Disabilities.” Occupational Therapy International 16: 122–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favre, R. 2007. “A Conceptual Device for Honoring and Enhancing Subjective Biodiversity: A Political Way of Teaching and Experiencing Stanley Kelemans Emotional Anatomy.” Sobama Journal 12: 88–100.
   Google Scholar
• Ferland, F. 1997. Play, Children with Physical Disabilities, and Occupational Therapy: The Ludic Model. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fialka J. 2004. “Advice to Professionals who Must Conference Cases.” In Mothering Occupations. Challenge, Agency and Participation, edited by S. A. Esdaile and J. A. Olson, 391–392. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Florey, L. L. 1981. “Studies of Play: Implications for Growth, Development, and for Clinical Practice.” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 35: 519–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. E. 2003. “What Do You Mean ‘What’s Wrong with Her?’: Stigma and the Lives of Families of Children with Disabilities.” Social Science & Medicine 57: 1361–1374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedvall, P. O. 2009. “The Activity Diamond: Modeling and Enhanced Accessibility.” PhD diss., Certec, Dep of Design Sciences, LTH at Lund University, Sweden. Lund: Media-Tryck.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L., J. Marquis, D. Poston, J. A. Summers, and A. Turnbull. 2006. “Assessing Family Outcomes: Psychometric Evaluation of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale.” Journal of Marriage and Family 68: 1069–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovlin, K., S. Andersson, M. Hjort, and A. Ljung. 2011. Tjänsteinnovationer i Offentlig Sektor – Behov av Forskningsbaserad Kunskap och Kompetens. [Service innovations in the public sector – the need for research based knowledge and competence]. Vinnova Rapport VR 2011:12. Stockholm: Governo. http://www.vinnova.se/sv/Publikationer/Produkter/Tjansteinnovationer-i-offentlig-sektor/.
   Google Scholar
• Hurley-Geffner, C. M. 1995. “Friendships between Children with and without Disabilities.” In Teaching Children with Autism: Strategies for Initiating Positive Interactions and Improving Learning Opportunities, edited by R. L. Koegel and L. K. Koegel, 105–125. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Iarskia-Smirnova, E. 1999. “What the Future Will Bring I Do Not Know: Mothering Children with Disabilities in Russia and the Politics of Exclusion”. Frontiers: A Journal for Women’s Studies 20: 68–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 1995. “Building, Dwelling, Living. How animals and people make themselves at home in the world.” In Shifting Contexts: Transformations of Anthropological Knowledge, edited by M. Strathern, 57–79. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jonasson, M. 2000. “The Creation of Places in Traffic through Performative Action.” PhD diss., School of Economics and Commercial Law at the Department of Geography, Goteborg: Goteborgs University, series B No. 98.
   Google Scholar
• Keleman, S., and V. Perez. 1985. Emotional Anatomy: The Structure of Experience. Berkeley, CA: Center Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landsman, G. 2003. “Emplotting Children’s Lives: Developmental Delay vs. Disability.” Social Science & Medicine 56: 1947–1960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30: 225–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, M., and C. Mattingly. 1998. “The Complexities Embedded in Family-Centered Care.” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 52: 259--267.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2004 Rhythm Analysis. Space, Time and Everyday Life. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad, B. M., B. H. Rasmussen, and P. O. Sandman. 2005. “Being Invigorated in Parenthood.” Journal of Pediatric Nursing 20: 288–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindehag, A.-G., and A. Rudolfsson. 1994. Ethics, Disability, Rehabilitation. Nykoping: ATHENA teaches AB.
   Google Scholar
• LSS. 1993. Public laws and conventions LSS Stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade, LSS, lagen om. [Swedish Act concerning Support and Service]. SFS-nr: 1993:387. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/regelverk/lagarochforordningar.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 1994. Space, Place, and Gender. Princeton: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• McKeever, P., and K. L. Miller. 2004. “Mothering Children Who Have Disabilities: A Bourdieusian Interpretation of Maternal Practices.” Social Science & Medicine 59: 1177–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. 2006. Conceptualising Intensive Caring Activities: The Changing Lives of Families with Young Disabled Children. Sociological Research Online 11. https://www.socresonline.org.uk/11/1/mclaughlin.html.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. D., and P. Metzger. 2001. “Play.” In Occupational Therapy for Children, edited by J. Case-Smith, 528–544. St Louis, MO: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Moula, A., T. Timpka, and A. J. Puddephatt. 2009. “Adult – Adolescent Interaction and Adolescents’ Brain Development: Integrating Pragmatism/Interactionism and Neuroscience to Develop a Platform for Research on Adolescents’ Life Regulation.” Sociology Compass 3: 118–136.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, D. 1997. “The Power of Object Play for Infants and Toddlers at Risk for Developmental Delays.” In Play in Occupational Therapy for Children, edited by L. D. Parham and L. S. Fazio, 86–111. St Louis, MO: Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 1996. “Competitive Advantage, Agglomeration Economies, and Regional Policy.” International Regional Science Review 19: 85–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pred, A. R. 1990. Lost Words and Lost Worlds: Modernity and the Language of Everyday Life in Late Nineteenth-Century Stockholm. Princeton: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Proshansky, H. M., A. K. Fabian, and R. Kaminoff. 1983. “Place-Identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 3: 57–83.
   Google Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer, D. J., P. Bonato, M. Boninger, C. Leighton, R. E. Cowan, B. J. Fregly, and M. M. Rodgers. 2012. WTEC Panel Report on European Research and Development in Mobility Technology for People with Disabilities. Final Report, August 2012. http://www.wtec.org/disability_research/docs/Mobility-Tech-final-02.17.12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ringquist, A., L. Byding, and Å. Wulff, 2011. “Ge barnen lek, så kommer allt det andra. En studie om barn med funktionsnedsättning och deras användande av AKKA-plattan [Let the children play, and everything else will come. A study of children with disabilities and their use of the AKKA-board].” Unpublished student essay in Social Work, Halmstad University.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2007. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S., and K. Runswick-Cole. 2008. “Repositioning Mothers: Mothers, Disabled Children and Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 23: 199–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamon, D. 2009. “Existentialism/Existential Geography.” In The International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Vol. 3, edited by R. Kitchen and N. Thrift, 666--671. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Serres, M. 1995. Genesis. Translated by G. James and J. Nielson. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, M. 1996. Ung med funktionshinder. [Young with disabilities]. Falköping: Gummessons.
   Google Scholar
• Skär, L. 2002. Barn och Ungdomar med Rörelsehinder: Deras Uppfattningar om Roller, Relationer och Aktiviteter. [Children and youth with disabilities: Attitudes about roles and activities]. PhD diss., Luleå: Luleå tekniska universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, K. 2001. Disability is Natural: Revolutionary Common Sense for Raising Successful Children with Disabilities. Princeton: Braveheart.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N., and J. D. Dewsbury. 2000. “Dead Geographies — and How to make them Live.” Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 18: 411–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toombs, S. K. 1995. “The Lived Experience of Disability.” Human Studies 18: 9–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traustadottir, R. 2000. “Disability Reform and Women’s Caring Work.” In Care Work, Gender, Class and the Welfare State, edited by M. H. Myer, 249–269. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UNCRC Unicef Convention of the Rights of the Child 1982. http://www.unicef.org/crc/, Swedish Health Act [Hälso – och sjukvårdslagen, HSL] SFS-nr: 1982:763. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/regelverk/lagaro.
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. 2006. “Materialist Returns: Practising Cultural Geography in and for a More-than-Human World.” Cultural Geographies 13: 600–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, J. 2002. “An Essay on Ascending Glastonbury Tor.” Geoforum 33: 441–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigova, T., E. Snyder, and P. Sanberg, eds. 2004. Neural Stem Cells for Brain and SpinalCord Repair. Totowa, NJ: Humaina Press.
   Google Scholar