Disability, family and technical aids: a study of how disabling/enabling experiences come about in hybrid family relations

References

• Bleyen, Jan. 2012. Doodgeboren. Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, Marian, and Tom Shakespeare. 2002. Disability/ Postmodernity. Embodying Disability Theory. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, Liz. 2000. “Helen Keller: Rethinking the Problematic Icon.” Disability & Society 15(6): 845–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galis, Vasilis. 2011. “Enacting Disability: How Can Science and Technology Studies Inform Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 26 (7): 825–838. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.618737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Grue, Lars and Kristin, Lærum. 2002. “‘Doing Motherhood’: Some Experiences of Mothers with Physical Disabilities.” Disability and Society 17 (6): 671–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simions, Cyborgs and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogsteyns, Maartje, and Hilje van der Horst. 2013. “Wearing the Arm or not Reconceptualising Notions of in- and Exclusion in Disability Studies.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 15 (1): 58–69.
   Google Scholar
• Hétu, Raymond, Lesley Jones, and Louise Getty. 1993. “The Impact of Acquired Hearing Impairments on Intimate Relationships: Implications for Rehabilitation.” Audiology 32: 363–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imrie, Rob. 2004. “Disability, Embodiment and the Meaning of the Home.” Housing Studies 19 (5): 745–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imrie, Rob, and Claire Edwards. 2007. “The Geographies of Disability: Reflections on the Development of a Sub-Discipline.” Geography Compass 1 (3): 623–640.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall-Tackett, Kathleen, Thomas Lyon, Greg Taliaferro, and Liza Little. 2005. “Why Child Maltreatment Researchers Should Include children’s Disability Status in Their Maltreatment Studies.” Child Abuse and Neglect 29 (2): 147–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, John. 1992. “Notes on the Theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, Strategy and Heterogeneity.” Systems Practice 5: 379–393. doi:10.1007/BF01059830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingsom, S. 2008. “Invisible Impairments: Dilemmas of Concealment and Disclosure.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 10 (1): 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Jenny. 1992. “Personal and Political: A Feminist Perspective on Researching Physical Disability.” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2): 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Ingunn. 2000. “Against Normalisation. Subverting Norms of Ability and Disability.” Science as Culture 9 (2): 201–240.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Ingunn. 2005. “On Becoming Disabled and Articulating Alternatives. the Multiple Modes of Ordering Disability and Their Interferences.” Cultural Studies 19 (6): 667–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Ingunn. 2006. “Disability and the Promises of Technology. Technology, Subjectivity and Embodiment within an Order of the Normal.” Information, Communication & Society 9 (3): 373–395. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751348.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Mike. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pols, J. 2010. “Breathtaking Practicalities: A Politics of Embodied Patient Positions.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 1: 1–18. doi:10.1080/09687590902876144.
   Google Scholar
• Scully, Jacky Leach. 2008. Disability Bioethics. Moral Bodies Moral Difference. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, Tom. 2000. “Disabled Sexuality towards Rights and Recognition.” Sexuality and Disability. 18 (3): 159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, Tom. 2005. “Disability Studies Today and Tomorrow.” Sociology of Health and Illness 27 (1): 138–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titchosky, Tanya. 2000. “Disability Studies: The Old and the New.” The Canadian Journal of Sociology 25 (2): 197–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wengraf, T. 2001. Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Winance, M. 2006. “Trying out the Wheelchair. the Mutual Shaping of People and Devices through Adjustment.” Science, Technology and Human Values 31 (1): 52–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winance, M. 2007. “Being Normally Different? Changes to Normalization Processes: From Alignment to Work on the Norm.” Disability & Society 22 (6): 625–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winance, Myriam. 2010. “Care and Disability. Practices of Experimenting, Tinkering with, and Arranging People and Technical Aids.” In Care in Practice. on Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, Transcript, edited by A. Mol, I. Moser and J. Pols, 93–117. Bielefeld: Sage.
   Google Scholar