‘Making lovely nonsense out of everything’: individuated receptions of eugenic theories of cognitive disability

References

• Borsay, Anne, and Pamela Dale, eds. 2012. Disabled Children: Contested Caring, 1850–1979. Studies for the Society for the Social History of Medicine, no. 8. London: Pickering & Chatto.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, Allison C. 2014. “Parents and Professionals: Parents’ Reflections on Professionals, the Support System, and the Family in the Twentieth-Century United States.” In Disability Histories, edited by Susan Burch and Michael A. Rembis, 58–77. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cogdell, Christina. 2004. Eugenic Design: Streamlining America in the 1930s. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, Jay. 2014a. “Framing Disability, Developing Race: Photography as Eugenic Technology.” Enculturation (17). http://enculturation.camden.rutgers.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, Jay. 2014b. Disability Rhetoric. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, Henry H. 1912. The Kallikak Family. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hasian, Marouf Arif. 1996. The Rhetoric of Eugenics in Anglo-American Thought. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry Herbert Goddard Papers. The Center for the History of Psychology Archives, The University of Akron.
   Google Scholar
• Kipling, Rudyard. (1893) 1994. The Collected Poems of Rudyard Kipling. London: Wordsworth Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Lanham, Richard A. 1991. A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Berkley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• London, Jack. 1916. “Told in the Drooling Ward.” In The Turtles of Tasman. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.
   Google Scholar
• Monk, Lee-Ann, and Corinne Manning. 2012. “Exploring Patient Experience in an Australian Institutions for Children with Learning Disabilities, 1877–1933.” In Disabled Children: Contested Caring, 1850–1979, edited by Anne Borsay and Pamela Dale, 73–86. Studies for the Society for the Social History of Medicine, no. 8. London: Pickering & Chatto.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Gerald. 2011. “Anchors on the Ship of Progress and Weeds in the Human Garden: Objectivist Rhetoric in American Eugenic Writings.” Disability Studies Quarterly 31(3). http://www.dsq-sds.org/
   Google Scholar
• Roche, Claire M. 2003. “‘Feebleminded’ White Women and the Spectre of Proliferating Perversity in American Eugenics Narratives.” In Evolution and Eugenics in American Literature and Culture, 1880–1940: Essays on Ideological Conflict and Complicity, edited by Lois A. Cuddy and Claire M. Roche, 259–275. London: Bucknell UP.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, Amy Rebok. 2012. “Insanity, Family and Community in Late Victorian Britain.” In Disabled Children: Contested Caring, 1850–1979, edited by Anne Borsay and Pamela Dale, 29–42. Studies for the Society for the Social History of Medicine, no. 8. London: Pickering & Chatto.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. David. 1985. Minds Made Feeble: The Myth and Legacy of the Kallikaks. Rockville: Aspen Systems Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey, Zosha. 2011. “‘What Has Become of Jimmy Thornton?’: The Rhetoric(s) of Letter-Writing at The New York State Asylum for Idiots, 1855–1866.” Disability Studies Quarterly 31(3). http://www.dsq-sds.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Trent, James W. 1994. Inventing the Feeble Mind: A History of Mental Retardation in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yukins, Elizabeth. 2003. “‘Feebleminded’ White Women and the Spectre of Proliferating Perversity in American Eugenics Narratives.” In Evolution and Eugenics in American Literature and Culture, 1880–1940: Essays on Ideological Conflict and Complicity, edited by Lois A. Cuddy and Claire M. Roche, 164–186. London: Bucknell UP.
   Google Scholar
• Zenderland, Leila. 2001. Measuring Minds: Henry Herbert Goddard and the Origins of American Intelligence Testing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar