Recruitment and consent of adults with intellectual disabilities in a classic grounded theory research study: ethical and methodological considerations

References

• Akkerman, Cees G. C., C. G. C. Janssen, S. Kef, and H. P., Meininger. 2014. “Perspectives of Employees with Intellectual Disabilities on Themes Relevant to their Job Satisfaction an Explorative Study Using Photovoice.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27, 542–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson, P. 2004. “Ethics.” In Doing Research with Children and Young People, edited by S. Fraser, V. Lewis, S. Ding, M. Kellett and C. Robinson, 97–111. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• An Bord Altranais (ABA). 2007. Guidance to Nurses and Midwives regarding Ethical Conduct of Nursing and Midwifery Research. Accessed September 30 2014. http://www.nursingboard.ie
   Google Scholar
• Andre-Barron, D., A. Strydom, and A. Hassiotis. 2008. “What to Tell and How to Tell: A Qualitative Study of Information Sharing in Research for Adults with Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Medical Ethics 34: 501–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill (ADMB). 2013. Accessed January 21, 2015. https://www.oireachtas.ie/documents/bills28/bills/2013/8313/b8313d.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bane, G, M. Dooher J. Flaherty, A. Mahon, P. McDonagh, M. Wolfe, M. Deely, et al. 2012. “Relationships of People with Learning Disabilities in Ireland.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 40 (2): 109-122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beart, S., G. Hardy, and L. Buchan. 2004. “Changing Selves: A Grounded Theory Account of Belonging to a Self-Advocacy Group for People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 17 (2): 91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., and P. Frawley. 2010. “Reflections on Doing Inclusive Research in the ‘Making Life Good in the Community’ Study.” Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 35 (2): 53–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., P. Frawley, and P. Ramcharan. 2014. “Conceptualizing Inclusive Research with People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27: 3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, H. 2010. Healthcare Research Ethics and Law: Regulation, Review and Responsibility. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, M., L. Daly, and A. Staines. 2008. “Methodological issues in inclusive intellectual disability research: a health promotion needs assessment of people attending Irish disability services.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 21 (3): 199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella-Malone, H. I., D. G. Brooks, and C. A. Tullis. 2013. “Using Self-Directed Video Prompting to Teach Students with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Behavioural Education 22: 169–189. doi:10.1007/s10864-013-9175-3.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, E. 2010. “Navigating the Process of Ethical Approval: A Methodological Note.” The Grounded Theory Review 9 (3): 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, E., N. Salmon, and A. Higgins. 2014. “Research Active Programme: Views of Service Users.” Learning Disability Practice 17 (4): 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. 2015. “Developing a Code of Ethics for the Digital Repository of Ireland.” New Review of Information Networking 20 (1-2): 48–52. doi:10.1080/13614576.2015.1114838.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2000. “Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. E. Lincoln, 2nd ed., 509–1035. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• College of Psychiatrists of Ireland (CPI). 2014. Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Bill 2013. Comments from of the College of Psychiatrists of Ireland. Accessed October 31 2014. http://www.irishpsychiatry.ie/Libraries/External_Events_Documents/Response_to_Assisted_Decision_Making_Capacity_Bill_Nov_2013.sflb.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Coons, K. D., and S. L. Watson. 2013. “Conducting Research with Individuals Who Have Intellectual Disabilities: Ethical and Practical Implications for Qualitative Research.” Journal on Developmental Disabilities 19 (2): 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, A.J., and K. R. McVilly 2004. “Ethics Guidelines for International, Multicenter Research Involving People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 1 (2): 57–70 June.
   Google Scholar
• Darewych, O. H., N. R. Carlton, and K. Wayne. 2015. “Digital Technology Use in Art Therapy with Adults with Developmental Disabilities.” Journal on Developmental Disabilities 21 (2): 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Data Protection Act. 1988. Accessed October 26 2014. http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1988/en/act/pub/0025/
   Google Scholar
• Data Protection Act. 2003. Accessed October 31 2014. http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/pdf/2003/en.act.2003.0006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (DHSSPS). 2003. Seeking Consent: Working with People with Learning Disabilities. Accessed October 31 2014. http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/consent-guidepart4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dye, L., D. J. Hare, and S. Hendy. 2007. “Capacity of People with Intellectual Disabilities to Consent to Take Part in a Research Study.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 20 (2): 168–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E., C. Grady, R. Crouch, R. Lie, F. Miller, and D. Wendler. 2008. The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. B. 2003. “Goodness-of-Fit Ethic for Informed Consent to Research Involving Adults with Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities.” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 9: 27–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garbutt, R., J. Tattersall, J. Dunn, and R. Boycott-Garnett. 2009. “Accessible Article: Involving People with Learning Disabilities in Research.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 38: 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Iriarte, E., P. O’Brien, R. McConkey, M. Wolfe, and S. O’Doherty. 2014. “Identifying the Key Concerns of Irish Persons with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27: 564–575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerrish, K., and A. Lacey. 2007. The Research Process in Nursing. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, T. 2004. “Involving People with Learning Disabilities in Research: Issues and Possibilities.” Health and Social Care in the Community 12: 298–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. 1978. Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. 1998. Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. 2001. The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description. Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyther.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, L., and H. Skirton. 2015. “Research Involving People with a Learning Disability – Methodological Challenges and Ethical Considerations.” Journal of Research in Nursing 20 (6): 435–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., and M. Moore. 2000. “Doing Disability Research: Activist Lives and the Academy.” Disability and Society 15: 86–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, A. C., A. L. Hill, and S. Flicker. 2014. “Situated Practice of Ethics for Participatory Visual and Digital Methods in Public Health Research and Practice: A Focus on Digital Storytelling.” American Journal of Public Health 104 (9): 1606–1614. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, D. G., and C. Wood. 2011. “Infusing Qualitative Traditions in Counseling Research Designs.” Journal of Counseling and Development 89: 288–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T. 2006. “Ethical Challenges and Complexities of including People with Intellectual Disability as Participants in Research.” Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 31 (3): 173–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson, M. 2015. “Applying the Mental Capacity Act to Research with People with Learning Disabilities.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 43: 128–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. 2009. “No Longer Researching About us Without us: A Researcher’s Reflection on Rights and Inclusive Research in Ireland.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 37 (4): 250–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. J., and D. D. Deshler. 2010. “Literacy Instruction, Technology, and Students with Learning Disabilities: Research We Have, Research We Need.” Learning Disability Quarterly 33: 289–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, J., J. C. Kramer, E. García-Iriarte, and J. Hammel. 2011. “Following through to the End: The Use of Inclusive Strategies to Analyse and Interpret Data in Participatory Action Research with Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 24 (3): 263–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindop, E. 2006. “Research, palliative care and learning disability.” In Palliative Care for People with Learning Disabilities, edited by S. Read, 153–65. London: Quay Books.
   Google Scholar
• LoBiondo-Wood, G., and J. Haber. 2014. Nursing Research Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice. 8th ed. Missouri: Elsevier Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Maltby, J., G. Williams, J. McGarry, and L. Day. 2010. Research Methods for Nursing and Healthcare. United Kingdom: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, C. 2009. “‘My Memory’s Back!’ Inclusive Learning Disability Research Using Ethics, Oral History and Digital Storytelling.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 38: 160–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCleery, J. P. 2015. “Comment on Technology-Based Intervention Research for Individuals on the Autism Spectrum.” Journal of Autism Developmental Disorder 45: 3832–3835. doi:10.1007/s10803-015-2627-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, K. E., and C. A. Kidney. 2012. “What is Right? Ethics in Intellectual Disabilities Research.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 9 (1): 27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, K., C. Kidney, S. Nelms, M. Parker, A. Kimmel, and C. Keys. 2009. “Including Adults with Intellectual Disabilities in Research: Scientists’ Perceptions of Risk and Protections.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 6: 244–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari, A. L., C. E. Gill, H. M. Taylor, and P. D. Charles. 2011. “Barriers to Conducting Research With Community-Dwelling Adults Who Have Intellectual Disabilities.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 49 (5): 392–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. 2007. Disability and Research Ethics Governance in Ireland, a Draft Report for the NDA. Dublin: National Disability Stationary Press Office.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, L. G., and R. Cunningham-Williams. 2009. “The Capacity to Give Informed Consent in a Homeless Population with Developmental Disabilities.” Community Mental Health Journal 45 (5): 341–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moule, P., and M. Goodman. 2013. Nursing research: An introduction. 2nd ed. UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Authority (NDA). 2005a. Guidelines on Person Centred Planning in the Provision of Services for People with Disabilities in Ireland. Dublin: National Disability Authority Stationary Press Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Authority (NDA). 2005b. Ethics in Disability Research. Dublin: National Disability Authority Stationary Press Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Authority (NDA). 2009. Ethical Guidance for Research with People with Disabilities. the Research Strategy for People with Intellectual Disabilities 2008-2013. Dublin: National Disability Authority Stationary Press Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Federation of Voluntary Bodies (NFVB). 2009a. The Research Strategy for People with Intellectual Disabilities 2008–2013. Dublin: Stationery Press Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Federation of Voluntary Bodies (NFVB). 2009b. The Inclusive Research Network. Dublin: Stationery Press Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Federation of Voluntary Bodies (NFVB). 2009c. Vision Statement for Intellectual Disability in Ireland for the 21st Century. Accessed September 26, 2014. http://www.fedvol.ie/_fileupload/Publications/Vision%20Statement%20for%20Intellectual%20Disability%20in%20Ireland%20-%20April%202009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Federation of Voluntary Bodies (NFVB) 2013. National Federation of Voluntary Bodies Secretariat Annual Report 2013. Accessed October 31, 2014. http://www.fedvol.ie/_fileupload/Publications/Annual%20Report%202013%20National%20Federation%20of%20Voluntary%20Bodies%20Secretariat%2031st%20July.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, L., M. Colyer, and S.-A. Cooper. 2013. “Recruitment to intellectual disability research: a qualitative study.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 57 (7): 647–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nind, M., and H. Vinha. 2012. “Doing Research Inclusively: Bridges to Multiple Possibilities in Inclusive Research.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 42: 102–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northway, R., J. Howarth, and L. Evans. 2014. “Participatory Research, People with Intellectual Disabilities and Ethical Approval: Making Reasonable Adjustments to Enable Participation.” Journal of Clinical Nursing 24: 573–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norwood, S. L. 2009. Research Essentials Foundations for Evidence-Based Practice. USA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P., R. McConkey, and E. García-Iriarte. 2014. “Co-Researching with People Who Have Intellectual Disabilities: Insights from a National Survey.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27: 65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Y. Lunsky, R. Lysaght, L. Martin, and R. Saaltink. 2013. “Parterning for Research in the Field of Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities-Lessons for Participant Recruitment.” Journal on Developmental Disabilities 19 (2): 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J., and P. Lacey. 2005. Researching Learning Difficulties a Guide for Practitioners. London: Chapman Publishing Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Puyalto, C., M. Pallisera, J. Fullana, and M. Vilà. 2016. “Doing Research Together: A Study on the Views of Advisors with Intellectual Disabilities and Non-Disabled Researchers Collaborating in Research.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 29 (2): 146–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A., B. Greenhill, A. Talbot, and M. Cuzak. 2011. “Standing up for My Human Rights’: A Group’s Journey beyond Consultation towards Co-Production.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 40: 292–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, N., and E. Carey. 2013. “Research Active Programme: An Inclusive Research Module in 3rd Level Education.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 41: 244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, N., E. Carey, and A. Hunt. 2014. “Research Skills for People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Learning Disability Practice 17 (3): 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, T. A. T., J. Y. ThaliaMoro, A. A. Boyden, and K. L. Kavanaugh Brown. 2015. “Implementation challenges in end-of-life research with adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.” Applied Nursing Research 28: 202–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. K., J. G. Wishart, and D. J. Bowyer. 2006. “Do Current Consent and Confidentiality Requirements Impede or Enhance Research with Children with Learning Disabilities?” Disability and Society 21 (3): 273–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh, A. A. 2008. The Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003: Some Implications for Public Health and Medical Research. Dublin: Health Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. J. 2008. “How Ethical is Ethical Research? Recruiting Marginalized, Vulnerable Groups into Health Services Research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (2): 248–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and J. M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swaine, J., S. L. Parish, K. Luken, and L. Atkins. 2011. “Recruitment and consent of women with intellectual disabilities in a randomised control trial of a health promotion intervention.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 55 (5): 474–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. 2014. The Essentials of Nursing and Healthcare Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J., R. Bogdan, and M. L. DeVault. 2016. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods a Guidebook and Resource. 4th ed. USA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, E. 2009. “Supporting Rights through Research: Development of a National Research Strategy for Intellectual Disability the National Federation of Voluntary Bodies Research Strategy 2008-2013.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 37 (4): 323–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, C. 2003. “Ethics and the Ruling Relations of Research Production.” Sociological Research Online. Accessed February 24, 2014. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/1/truman.html
   Google Scholar
• Tuffrey-Wijne, I., and G. Butler. 2010. “Co-Researching with People with Learning Disabilities; an Experience of Involvement in Qualitative Data Analysis.” Health Expectations 13 (2): 174–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuffrey-Wijne, I., J. Bernal, and S. Hollins. 2008. “Doing research on people with learning disabilities, cancer and dying: ethics, possibilities and pitfalls.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 36 (3): 185–190.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). 2006. Accessed June 15, 2014. www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S., and S. Read. 2011. “Accessing Vulnerable Research Populations: An Experience with Gatekeepers of Ethical Approval.” International Journal of Palliative Nursing 17 (1): 14–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walmsley, J. 2001. “Normalisation, Emancipatory Research and Inclusive Research in Learning Disability.” Disability and Society 16 (2): 187–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J. 2004. “Inclusive Learning Disability Research: The Non-Disabled Researcher’s Role.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 32 (2): 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R. 2013.“What Are Qualitative Research Ethics?” In The ‘What is?’ Research Methods Series. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Accessed July 22, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781849666558
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization 2011. Accessed October 31, 2014. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240685215_eng.pdf?ua=1
   Google Scholar