Survivor research and Mad Studies: the role and value of experiential knowledge in mental health research

References

• Allam, S., S. Blyth, A. Fraser, S. Hodgson, J. Howes, J. Repper, and A. Newman. 2004. “Our Experience of Collaborative Research: Service Users, Carers and Researchers Work Together to Evaluate an Assertive Outreach Service.” Commentary in Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 11: 365–373.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angell, M. 2009. “Drug Companies and Doctors: A Story of Corruption.” New York Review of Books, January 15.
   Google Scholar
• Bentall, R., and D. Pilgrim. 2016. “There Are No Schizophrenia Genes: Here’s Why.” The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/there-are-no-schizophrenia-genes-heres-why-57294
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2003. It’s Our Lives: A Short Theory of Knowledge, Distance and Experience. London: Citizen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2010. “‘Re-Examining Relationships between Experience, Knowledge, Ideas and Research: A Key Role for Recipients of State Welfare and Their Movements.” Social Work and Society International Online Journal 8 (1). www.socwork.net/sws/article/view/19/56
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2014. “Mad Studies Brings a Voice of Sanity to Psychiatry.” The Guardian, Tuesday October 7. www.theguardian.com/society/2014/oct/07/mad-studies-voice-of-sanity-psychiatry
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., and R. Menzies. 2014. “Developing Partnerships to Resist Psychiatry within Academia.” In Psychiatry Disrupted: Theorizing Resistance and Crafting the (R)Evolution, edited by B. Burstow, B. LeFrançois and S. Diamond, 77–95. Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., M. Nettle, and R. Perring. 2010. Towards a Social Model of Madness and Distress? Exploring What Service Users Say. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/mental-health-service-models-full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., and J. Wallcraft. 1997. “Psychiatric System Survivors and Emancipatory Research: Issues, Overlaps and Differences.” Chap. 5 in Doing Disability Research, edited by Barnes and Mercer. http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Barnes-Chapter-5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, Dorothy V. M. 2014. “Changing the Landscape of Psychiatric Research: What Will the RDoC Initiative by NIMH Achieve?” Bishopblog. http://deevybee.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/changing-landscape-of-psychiatric.html
   Google Scholar
• Borkman, T. J. 1990. “Experiential, Professional, and Lay Frames of Reference.” In Chapter in Working with Self-Help, edited by T. J. Powell, 3–30. Silver Spring, Maryland: NASW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boxall, K., and P. Beresford. 2013. “Service User Research in Social Work and Disability Studies in the United Kingdom.” Disability & Society 28 (5): 587–600.10.1080/09687599.2012.717876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradstreet, S. 2006. “Harnessing the ‘Lived Experience’: Formalising Peer Support Approaches to Promote Recovery.” The Mental Health Review 11 (2): 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., and G. Saini. 2016. A Day in the Life: What Happens When You Ask People Who Live with Mental Health Difficulties to Write about Their Everyday Life?. London: Centre for Mental Health. www.centreformentalhealth.org.uk/adayinthelifemh
   Google Scholar
• Burstow, B. 2015. Psychiatry and the Business of Madness: An Ethical and Epistemological Accounting. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, P. 2005. “From Little Acorns: The Mental Health Service User Movement.” Chap. 6 in Beyond the Water Towers. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, T. A., and D. Pilgrim. 2010. “Diagnosis and Formulation: What Should We Tell the Students?” Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 17: 447–454.10.1002/cpp.v17.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, S. 2013. “Individual Narratives and Collective Knowledge: Capturing Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Service User Experiences.” Chap. 10 in Mental Health Service Users in Research, edited by P. Staddon, 135–152. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Church, K. 2013. “In Whose Interests? Complicating Narrative Research.” Asylum 20 (4): 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Church, K. 2015. Making Mad Studies: Process, Practice and Contestations – Presentation to Ryerson University. Toronto, Canada. https://ryecast.ryerson.ca/80/Watch/8844.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Coles, S., S. Keenan, and B. Diamond. 2013. Madness Contested: Power and Practice. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, L., J. Voronka, D. Landry, J. Reid, B. McFarlane, D. Reville, and K. Church. 2012. “Recovering Our Stories: A Small Act of Resistance.” Studies in Social Justice 6 (1): 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. 2011. No Health Without Mental Health: A Cross-Government Mental Health Outcomes Strategy for People of All Ages. London: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J., and R. May. 2002. “Reclaiming Experience.” Clinical Psychology 17: 25–77.
   Google Scholar
• Emerick, R. E. 1996. “Mad Liberation: The Sociology of Knowledge and the Ultimate Civil Rights Movement.” The Journal of Mind and Behaviour 17 (2): 135–160.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., D. Rose, C. Flach, E. Csipke, H. Glossop, P. McCrone, T. Craig, and T. Wykes. 2012. “Voice: Developing a New Measure of Service Users’ Perceptions of Inpatient Care, Using a Participatory Methodology.” Journal of Mental Health 21 (1): 57–71.10.3109/09638237.2011.629240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A. 2010. Changing Our Worlds: Examples of User-Controlled Research in Action. Eastleigh: INVOLVE.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A. 2015. Randomised Controlled Trials: The Straitjacket of Mental Health Research? Talking Point Papers 1. London: The McPin Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A., and T. Basset. 2010. A Helping Hand: Consultations with Service Users about Peer Support. London: Together for Mental Wellbeing.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A., and J. Kalathil. 2012. The Freedom to Be, the Chance to Dream. London: Together for Mental Wellbeing.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A., and S. Layzell. 2000. Strategies for Living: A Report of User-Led Research into People’s Strategies for Living with Mental Distress. London: Mental Health Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A., and P. Thomas. 2002. “User-Led Research and Evidence Based Medicine.” Editorial British Journal of Psychiatry 180: 1–3.10.1192/bjp.180.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A., S. Gillespie, S. Imlack, K. Dhillon, and M. Crawford. 2008. “Learning the Lessons Together.” Mental Health Today February: 24–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleischmann, P. 2009. “Literature Reviews: An Example of Making Traditional Research Methods User Focused.” Chap. 9 in This is Survivor Research, edited by A. Sweeney, P. Beresford, A. Faulkner, M. Nettle, and D. Rose, 82–97. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gillard, S., R. Borschmann, K. Turner, and M. Chambers. 2010. “What Difference Does It Make? Finding Evidence of the Impact of Mental Health Service User Researchers on Research into the Experiences of Detained Psychiatric Patients.” Health Expectations 13: 185–194.10.1111/hex.2010.13.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasby, J., and P. Beresford. 2006. “Who Knows Best? Evidence-Based Practice and the Service User Contribution.” Critical Social Policy 26 (1): 268–284.10.1177/0261018306059775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldacre, B. 2013. Bad Pharma. London: Fourth Estate.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, R. 2013. “Mad Nation? Thinking Through Race, Class and Mad Identity Politics.” In Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies, 269–280. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1993. “Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is ‘Strong Objectivity?”. Chap. 3 in Feminist Epistemologies, edited by L. Alcoff and E. Potter, 49–82. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harmless. 2009. “In Our Own Words: Promoting Insight and Understanding of Self Harm.” Harmless. www.harmless.org.uk/store/Merchandise-Books/In-Our-Own-Words-Electronic
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, A., and A. Lovell. 2012. “Participatory Action Research: Moving beyond the Mental Health ‘Service User’ Identity.” Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2013 20: 641–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. 2010. “Critical Friends.” Openmind 161 January/February: 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., and R. L. Brown. 2013. “The Absence of Psychiatric C/S/X Perspectives in Academic Discourse: Consequences and Implications.” Disability Studies Quarterly 33 (1): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., J. Harrison, R. Aguiar, and L. Munro. 2014. “Transforming Research for Transformative Change in Mental Health: Towards the Future.” Chap. 17 in Community Psychology and Community Mental Health: Towards Transformative Change, edited by G. Nelson, B. Kloos, and J. Ornelas, 351–372. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalathil, J. 2011a. Dancing to Our Own Tunes: Reassessing Black and Minority Ethnic Mental Health Service User Involvement: Reprint of the 2008 Report with a Review of Work Undertaken to Take the Recommendations Forward. London: NSUN.
   Google Scholar
• Kalathil, J. 2011b. Recovery and Resilience: African, African-Caribbean and South Asian Women’s Narratives of Recovering from Mental Distress. London: Mental Health Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kokushkin, M. 2014. “Standpoint Theory is Dead, Long Live Standpoint Theory! Why Standpoint Thinking Should Be Embraced by Scholars Who Do Not Identify as Feminists?” Journal of Arts and Humanities 3 (7): 8–20.
   Google Scholar
• LeFrancois, B. 2015. “Acknowledging the past and Challenging the Present, in Contemplation of the Future: Some (Un)Doings of Mad Studies.” Presentation given to conference, Durham University.
   Google Scholar
• LeFrancois, B. A., R. Menzies, and G. Reaume. 2013. Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lindow, V. 2001. “Survivor Research.” In This is Madness Too, edited by C. Newnes, G. Holmes, and C. Dunn, 135–146. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Marzillier, J., and J. Hall. 2009. “The Challenge of the Layard Initiative.” The Psychologist 2 (5): 396–399.
   Google Scholar
• Menzies, R., B. A. LeFrancois, and G. Reaume. 2013. “Introducing Mad Studies.” In Mad Matters: A Critical Reader in Canadian Mad Studies, edited by LeFrancois et al. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, H. 2013. “Mental Health Service Users’ Experiences and Epistemological Fallacy.” Chap. 2 in Staddon.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, A., A. Felton, B. Fulford, J. Kalathil, and G. Stacey. 2016. Values and Ethics in Mental Health: An Exploration for Practice. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Munn-Giddings, C., M. Boyce, L. Smith, and S. Campbell. 2009. “The Innovative Role of User Led Organisations.” A Life in the Day 13 (3): 14–20.10.1108/13666282200900026
   Google Scholar
• Noorani, T. 2013. “Service User Involvement, Authority and the ‘Expert-by-Experience’ in Mental Health.” Journal of Political Power 6 (1): 49–68.10.1080/2158379X.2013.774979
   Google Scholar
• Pembroke, L., ed. 1994. Eating Distress: Perspectives from Personal Experience. London: Survivors Speak Out. http://studymore.org.uk/edpfpe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pembroke, L., ed. 1996. Self Harm: Perspectives from Personal Experience. London: Survivors Speak Out. http://studymore.org.uk/shpfpe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Petrie, D. A. 1998. “RCTs on Trial.” Correspondence in Annals of Emergency Medicine 32 (5): 633–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, D. 2007. “The Survivor of Psychiatric Diagnosis.” Social Science & Medicine 65 (2007): 536–547.10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repper, J., and T. Carter. 2011. “A Review of the Literature on Peer Support in Mental Health Services.” Journal of Mental Health August 2011 20 (4): 392–411.10.3109/09638237.2011.583947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 2004. “Telling Different Stories: User Involvement in Mental Health Research.” Research and Policy Planning 22 (2): 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 2008. “Commentary: Madness Strikes Back.” Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 18: 638–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 2009. “Survivor-Produced Knowledge.” Chap. 4 in This is Survivor Research, edited by A. Sweeney, P. Beresford, A. Faulkner, M. Nettle, and D. Rose, 38–43. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 2014. “Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research: Ethical Imperative and/or Radical Challenge?” Journal of Health Psychology 19 (1): 149–158.10.1177/1359105313500249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. 2015. “The Contemporary State of Service-User-Led Research.” The Lancet Psychiatry 2 (11): 959–960.10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00435-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., P. Fleischmann, T. Wykes, M. Leese, and J. Bindman. 2003. “Patients’ Perspectives on Electroconvulsive Therapy: Systematic Review.” BMJ 326: 1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D., P. Fleischmann, and T. Wykes. 2004. “Consumers’ Perspectives on ECT: A Qualitative Analysis.” Journal of Mental Health 13 (3): 285–294.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J. 2012. “Survivor-Controlled Research: A New Foundation for Thinking about Psychiatry and Mental Health.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13 (1) Art. 8 January 2012. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs120187.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J. 2014. “Mental Health Service Users in Research: Critical Sociological Perspectives.” Book Review in Disability & Society. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.864873.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J., and P. Beresford. 2015. “Between Exclusion and Colonisation: Seeking a Place for Mad People’s Knowledge in Academia.” Disability and Society 30 (1): 153–157. doi:10.1080/09687599.2014.957925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seebohm, P., P. Henderson, C. Munn-Giddings, P. Thomas, and S. Yasmeen. 2005. Together We Will Change: Community Development, Mental Health and Diversity. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Seebohm, P., C. Munn‐Giddings, and P. Brewer. 2010. “What’s in a Name? A Discussion Paper on the Labels and Location of Self‐Organising Community Groups, with Particular Reference to Mental Health and Black Groups.” Mental Health and Social Inclusion 14 (3): 23–49.10.5042/mhsi.2010.0441
   Google Scholar
• Slade, M., and S. Priebe. 2012. “Conceptual Limitations of Randomised Controlled Trials.” Chap. 10 in Evidence in Mental Health Care, edited by S. Priebe and M. Slade, 101–108. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smail, D. 2006. “Implications for Practice.” Clinical Psychology Forum, Number 162: 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Staddon, P., ed. 2013. Mental Health Service Users in Research: Critical Sociological Perspectives. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, A. 2013. “Sociology and Survivor Research: An Introduction.” Chap. 1 in Mental Health Service Users in Research: Critical Sociological Perspectives, edited by P. Staddon, 1–10. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, A. 2016. “Why Mad Studies Needs Survivor Research and Survivor Research Needs Mad Studies.” Intersectionalities: A Global Journal of Social Work Analysis, Research, Polity and Practice. Special Issue: Mad Studies: Intersections with Disability Studies, Social Work and ‘Mental Health’ 5 (3): 36–61.
   Google Scholar
• Telford, R., and A. Faulkner. 2004. “Learning about Service User Involvement in Mental Health Research.” Journal of Mental Health 13 (6): 549–559.10.1080/09638230400017137
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. 2013. “Pinball Wizards and the Doomed Project of Psychiatric Diagnosis.” Mad in America Blog. www.madinamerica.com/2013/02/pinball-wizards-and-the-doomed-project-of-psychiatric-diagnosis/
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. 2014. Psychiatry in Context: Experience, Meaning and Communities. Monmouth: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi, P. 2009. “Black Service User Involvement: Rhetoric or Reality?” Chap. 10 in Mental Health in a Multi-Ethnic Society, edited by S. Fernando and F. Keating, 136–146. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., and P. Beresford. 2005. User-Controlled Research: Its Meaning and Potential. London: Shaping Our Lives and the Centre for Citizen Participation, Brunel University. Commissioned by INVOLVE www.invo.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Wallcraft, J. 2009. “From Activist to Researcher and Part-Way Back.” In This is Survivor Research, edited by A. Sweeney, P. Beresford, A. Faulkner, M. Nettle, and D. Rose, 132–139. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wallcraft, J., J. Read, and A. Sweeney. 2003. On Our Own Terms: Users and Survivors of Mental Health Services Working Together for Support and Change. London: Mental Health Foundation/User Survey Steering Group.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J., and J. Boyle. 2009. “Improving Acute Psychiatric Hospital Services According to Inpatient Experiences: A User-led Piece of Research as a Means to Empowerment.” Issues in Mental Health Nursing 30 (1): 31–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williamson, T., J. Brogden, E. Jones, and J. Ryan. 2010. “Impact of Public Involvement in Research on Quality of Life and Society: A Case Study Of Research Career Trajectories.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 34: 551–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. 2001. “Black Women and Mental Health: Working towards Inclusive Mental Health Services.” Feminist Review 68: 34–51.10.1080/01417780110042383
   Google Scholar