Trapped behind the glass: crip theory and disability identity

References

• “cripple, n. and adj.” December 2016. OED Online. Oxford University Press. Accessed January 20, 2017. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/44529?rskey=p01HCl&result=1.
   Google Scholar
• “handicap, n. and v.” December 2016. OED Online. Oxford University Press. Accessed October 8, 2014. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/83859?rskey=IzOGre&result=1.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, Elizabeth, Cynthia L. Selfe, and Melanie Yergeau. 2014. “Creating a Culture of Access in Composition Studies.” Composition Studies 42 (2): 151–155.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Gregory, James Vigil, and Eric Taylor. 2012. “The Ghettoization of Blacks in Los Angeles: The Emergence of Street Gangs.” Journal of African American Studies 16 (2): 209–225. doi:10.1007/s12111-012-9212-7.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Jane, and Mike Oliver. 1996. Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canguilhem, Georges, and Therese Jaeger. 1962. “Monstrosity and the Monstrous.” Diogenes 40: 27-42. Accessed 16 March 2012. doi: 10.1177/039219216201004002.
   Google Scholar
• Craton, Lillian E. 2009. The Victorian Freak Show: The Significance of Disability and Physical Differences in 19th-Century Fiction. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, Charles. 2004. A Christmas Carol. Salt Lake City, UT: Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Erevelles, Nirmala. 2014. “Thinking with Disability Studies.” Disability Studies Quarterly 34 (2): doi:10.18061/dsq.v34i2.4248.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2009. Staring: How We Look. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, Dan. 2001. “‘Learning Difficulties’, the Social Model of Disability and Impairment: Challenging Epistemologies.” Disability & Society 16 (2): 207–231. doi:10.1080/09687590120035816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, Dan. 2011. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Reader. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Barbara S. S. 2015. “Qualitative Analysis of the Barriers College Students with Disabilities Experience in Higher Education.” Journal of College Student Development 56 (3): 209–226. doi:10.1353/csd.2015.0032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inckle, Kay. 2014. “A Lame Argument: Profoundly Disabled Embodiment as Critical Gender Politics.” Disability & Society 29 (3): 388-401. Accessed July 15, 2016. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2013.823077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Merri Lisa and Robert McRuer. 2014. “Introduction: Cripistemologies and the Masturbating Girl.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 8 (3): 245–255. Accessed November 10, 2015. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/548847 10.3828/jlcds.2014.12
   Google Scholar
• Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Crip, and Queer. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladau, Emily. 2017. “Disability Rights Are Conspiculously absent from the Women’s March Platform.” The Establishment Accessed January 25, 2017. https://theestablishment.co/disability-rights-are-conspicuously-absent-from-the-womens-march-platform-1d61cee62593#.kk0diudur (accessed January 24, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren-Mårtenson, Lotta. 2013. “‘Hip to Be Crip?’ about Crip Theory, Sexuality and People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Sexuality and Disability 31 (4): 413–424. doi:10.1007/s11195-013-9287-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyshaug, Brenda. March 2006. “Solidarity without ‘Sisterhood‘? Feminism and the Ethics of Coalition Building.” Politics & Gender 1: 77-100. Accessed May 4, 2016. doi: S1743923X06060041
   Google Scholar
• McRuer, Robert. 2002. “Compulsory Able-Bodiedness and Queer/Disabled Existence.” In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, edited by Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann, and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, 88–99. New York, NY: Modern Language Association.
   Google Scholar
• McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Michael, and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick. 1994. “Across Genders, across Sexualities: Divinity: A Dossier a Performance Piece a Little-Understood Emotion.” In Tendencies, edited by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, 211-245. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, Carol Thomas. 2004. Distracted Subjects: Madness and Gender in Shakespeare and Early Modern Culture. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Mike. 2013. “The Social Model of Disability: Thirty Years on.” Disability & Society 28 (7): 1024–1026. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.818773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré, Ambroise. 1995. On Monsters and Marvels. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Katharine, and Lorraine J. Daston. Aug 1981. “Unnatural Conceptions: The Study of Monsters in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century France and England.” Past & Present 92: 20-54. Accessed March 2, 2012. http://www.jstor.org/stable/650748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pino, Marco, and Luigina Mortari. 2014. “The Inclusion of Students with Dyslexia in Higher Education: A Systemic Review Using Narrative Synthesis.” Dyslexia 20 (4): 346–369. doi:10.1002/dys.1484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Margaret. 2008. “Inversion Therapy: A Review of Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability by Robert McRuer.” Ninteenth-Century Gender Studies 4 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Pryal, Katie Rose Guest. 2015. “Coming ‘Into’ Adjacency in Disability Studies.” Conference on College Composition and Communication, Tampa, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Sandahl, Carrie. 2003. “Queering the Crip or Cripping the Queer? Intersections of Queer and Crip Identities in Solo Autobiographical Performance.” GLQ: A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies 9 (1/2): 25-56. Accessed June 11, 2014. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/40804. 10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalk, Sami. 2013. “Coming to Claim Crip: Disidentification with/in Disability Studies.” Disablity Studies Quarterly 33 (2): n.p. Accessed Dec 10, 2014. doi: 10.18061/dsq.v33i2.3705.
   Google Scholar
• Schalk, Sami. 2016. “Reevaluating the Supercrip.” Journal of Literacy & Cultural Disability Studies 10 (1): 71–86. doi:10.3828/jlcds.2016.5.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, Mark. 2004. “Overlaps and Contradictions between Queer Theory and Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 19 (7): 769-783. Accessed July 15, 2016. doi: 10.1080/0968759042000284231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, Mark. 2013. “Crip Politics? Just … No.” The Feminist Wire, November 23. Accessed December 15, 2015. http://www.thefeministwire.com/2013/11/crip-politics-just-no.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas, Simo, and Nick Watson. 2014. “Moral Wrongs, Disadvantages, and Disability: A Critique of Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 29 (4): 638–650. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.831751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstraete, Pieter. 2011. “Doing Disability History and the Notion of Limit-Experience.” History of Education & Children’s Literature 1 (2): 321-336. December 6, 2014. http://libdata.lib.ua.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=30 h&AN=70126843&site=eds-live&scope=site.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Stanley Tookie. 2007. Blue Rage, Black Redemption. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar