2,376
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Current Issues

The need to bring an end to the era of eligibility policies for a person-centred, financially sustainable future

&
Pages 1263-1268 | Received 13 Apr 2017, Accepted 13 May 2017, Published online: 04 Jun 2017

References

  • Care Quality Commission. 2016. The State of Health Care and Adult Social Care in England 2015/16. London: HMSO.
  • Department of Health. 2014. Care Act 2014. London: HMSO.
  • Department of Health. 2015. The Care and Support (Eligibility Criteria) Regulations 2014. London: HMSO.
  • Evans, Tony. 2011. “Professionals, Managers and Discretion: Critiquing Street-Level Bureaucracy.” British Journal of Social Work 41: 368–386. 10.1093/bjsw/bcq074
  • Henwood, M., and B. Hudson. 2008. Lost to the System? The Impact of Fair Access to Care. London: Commission for Social Care Inspection.
  • House of Lords. 1997. Barry V Gloucestershire County Council. Accessed March 2017. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199697/ldjudgmt/jd970320/barry01.htm
  • Kings Fund. 2016. Social Care for Older People – Home Truths. London: Kings Fund.
  • Lipsky, M. 1976. “Towards a Theory of Street-Level Bureaucracy.” In Theoretical Perspective on Urban Politics, edited by W. Hawley and M. Lipsky, 196–213. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • National Statistics. 2017. “Personal Social Services – Expenditure and Unit Costs.” http://www.content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB22240/pss-exp-eng-15-16-fin-rep.pdfs
  • RIPFA. 2015. Resource Allocation – Leaders Briefing. Research in Practice for Adults. Dartington: Author, Colin Slasberg.
  • Slasberg, C., and P. Beresford. 2014. “Government Guidance to the Care Act – Undermining Ambitions for Change?” Disability and Society 29 (10): 1677–1682.
  • Slasberg, C., and P. Beresford. 2016. “The Eligibility Question – The Real Source of Depersonalisation?” Disability and Society 31 (7): 969–973.
  • Slasberg, C., and P. Beresford. 2017. “Strengths Based Practice – Social Care’s Latest Elixir or Next False Dawn?” Disability and Society 32 (2): 269–273.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.