Recovering the social interpretation of disability

References

• Abberley, P. 1987. “The Concept of Oppression and the Development of a Social Theory of Disability.” Disability, Handicap & Society 2(1): 5–19. doi:10.1080/02674648766780021.
   Google Scholar
• Abberley, P. 1996. “Work, Utopia and Impairment.” In Disability and Society: Emerging Issues and Insights, edited by L. Barton, 61–79. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, G. L., and J. A. Levy. 1984. “A Sociological Perspective of Physical Disability.” In Advances in Medical Social Science, edited by J. L. Ruffini, Vol. 2, 45–106. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C. 2012. “Understanding the Social Model of Disability: Past, Present and Future.” In Rouledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 12–29. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. 1976. Vico and Herder. London: Chatto and Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach, J. E. 2012. “The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and Its Relationship to Disability Studies.” In Rouledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 51–66. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach, J. E., S. Chatterji, E. M. Badley, and T. B. Üstün. 1999. “Models of Disablement, Universalism and the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps.” Social Science & Medicine 48(9): 1173–1187. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00441-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, L. 1996. “Including All of Our Lives: Renewing the Social Model of Disability.” In Exploring the Divide: Illness and Disability, edited by C. Barnes and G. Mercer, 55–72. Leeds: Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cudd, A. E. 2005. Analyzing Oppression. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donohue, D., and J. Bornman. 2014. “The Challenges of Realising Inclusive Education in South Africa.” South African Journal of Education 34(2): 1–14. doi:10.15700/201412071114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, S. D. 2008. “The Impairment/Disability Distinction: A Response to Shakespeare.” Journal of Medical Ethics 34(1): 26–27. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, V. 1980. Attitudes and Disabled People. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, V. 1992. “Setting Future Agendas.” Accessed May 1, 2018. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/finkelstein-futures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, V. 2001a. “A Personal Journey into Disability Politics.” Accessed April 8, 2018. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/finkelstein-presentn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, V. 2001b. “The Social Model of Disability Repossessed.” Accessed April 8, 2018. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/finkelstein-soc-mod-repossessed.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, V. 2005. “Reflections on the Social Model of Disability: The South African Connection.” Accessed April 8, 2018. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/finkelstein-Reflections-on-the-Social-Model-of-Disability.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. 1960 [1739]. A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B., and K. Paterson. 1997. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society 12(3): 325–340. doi:10.1080/09687599727209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1981. “A New Model of the Social Work Role in Relation to Disability.” In The Handicapped Person: A New Perspective for Social Workers, edited by J. Campling, 19–32. London: Radar.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability. From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1999 [1983] Social Work and Disabled People. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., and C. Barnes. 2012 [1990]. The New Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2006a. Disability: Rights and Wrongs. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2006b. “The Social Model of Disability.” In The Disability Studies Reader. 2nd ed., edited by L. J. Davis, 197–204. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2008. “Debating Disability.” Journal of Medical Ethics 34(1): 11–14. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2012a. “Disability in Developing Countries.” In Rouledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 271–284. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2012b. “Nasty, Brutish, and Short? On the Predicament of Disability and Embodiment.” In Disability and the Good Human Life, edited by J. Bickenbach, F. Felder, and B. Schmitz, 93–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2014 [2006]. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., N. Watson, and O. A. Alghaib. 2017. “Blaming the Victim, All over Again: Waddell and Aylward’s Biopsychosocial (BPS) Model of Disability.” Critical Social Policy 37(1): 22–41. doi:10.1177/0261018316649120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvers, A. 1994. ““Defective” Agents: Equality, Difference and the Tyranny of the Normal.” Journal of Social Philosophy 25(s1): 154–175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.1994.tb00353.x.
   Google Scholar
• Slorach, R. 2016. A Very Capitalist Condition. A History and Politics of Disability. London: Bookmarks.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, J., S. French, and C. Cameron. 2003. Controversial Issues in a Disabling Society. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. 2004. “The Social Model of Disability: A Philosophical Critique.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 21(2): 141–157. doi:10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00269.x.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 1999. Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2002. “Disability Theory: Key Ideas, Issues and Thinkers.” In Disability Studies Today, edited by C. Barnes, M. Oliver, L. Barton, 38–57. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2004. “How Is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches.” Disability & Society 19(6): 569–583. doi:10.1080/0968759042000252506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2008. “Disability: Getting It “Right”.” Journal of Medical Ethics 34(1): 15–17. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. 1974/5. “Policy Statement.” Accessed December 8, 2018. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/UPIAS-UPIAS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. 1976. Fundamental Principles of Disability. London: UPIAS.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. W. 2008. Kantian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 1980. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH). Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar