Claiming space: photovoice, identity, inclusion and the work of disability

References

• Aguierre, Reina. 2018. “The Evolution of the “We Can Do It” Poster and American Feminist Movements.” McNair Research Journal SJSU 14 (1): 3.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, Gordon Willard, Kenneth Clark, and Thomas Pettigrew. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 2015. “Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers.” unpaginated, 18 October 2016. Accessed 3 May 2018. www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Latestproducts/ 4430.0Main%20Features202015? opendocument&tabname=Summary&prodno=4430.0&issue=2015&num=&view=.
   Google Scholar
• Beckwith, Denise. 2019. “An Interview and PhotoVoice Exploration of Sexual Education Provision to Women with Physical Disability and Potential Experiences of Violence.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 13 (8): 1084–1089.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 2016. Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Tim, and Wendy Booth. 2003. “In the Frame: Photovoice and Mothers with Learning Difficulties.” Disability & Society 18 (4): 431–442. doi:10.1080/0968759032000080986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boydell, Katherine M., Brenda M. Gladstone, Tiziana Volpe, Brooke Allemang, and Elaine Stasiulis. 2012. “The Production and Dissemination of Knowledge: A Scoping Review of Arts-Based Health Research.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13 (1): 1–30. doi:10.17169/fqs-13.1.1711.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In APA Handbooks in Psychology®. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2. Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, edited byH. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher. 57–71. New York: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2014. “What Can “Thematic Analysis” Offer Health and Wellbeing Researchers?” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 9 (1): 26152. doi:10.3402/qhw.v9.26152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Sumi, Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, and Leslie McCall. 2013. “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (4): 785–810. doi:10.1086/669608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2018. Research Overview: Arts and Disability in Australia. Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241. doi:10.2307/1229039.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Kathy. 2008. “Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful.” Feminist Theory 9 (1): 67–85. doi:10.1177/1464700108086364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disch, Lisa, and Mary Hawkesworth. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, Dana S., and Shane Burcaw. 2013. “Disability Identity: Exploring Narrative Accounts of Disability.” Rehabilitation Psychology 58 (2): 148–157. doi:10.1037/a0031691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Claire, and Rob Imrie. 2003. “Disability and Bodies as Bearers of Value.” Sociology 37 (2): 239–256. doi:10.1177/0038038503037002002.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Karen R., and Christiane Purcal. 2017. “Policies to Change Attitudes to People with Disabilities.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 19 (2): 161–174. doi:10.1080/15017419.2016.1222303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Amber J. 2017. “Applying Critical Realism in Qualitative Research: Methodology Meets Method.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (2): 181–194. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohmader, Carolyn. 2010. Gendering the National Disability Care and Support Scheme. WWDA. http://wwda.org.au/papers/subs/subs2006/. Hobart.
   Google Scholar
• Frohmader, Carolyn. 2018. “An Overview of the Status of Women with Disabilities in Australia.” Accessed 24 April 2018. http://wwda.org.au/about/snapshot/.
   Google Scholar
• Frohmader, Carolyn. 2019. The Status of Women and Girls with Disability in Australia. Women with Disabilities Australia, Disabled People’s Organisations Australia and the National Women’s Alliances. http://wwda.org.au/position-paper-the-status-of-women-and-girls-with-disability-in-australia/. Hobart.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2009. Staring: How We Look. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson. Rosemarie 2011. “Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept.” Hypatia 26 (3): 591–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 2009. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Sara, Christine Davis, Elana Karshmer, Pete Marsh, and Benjamin Straight. 2005. “Living Stigma: The Impact of Labeling, Stereotyping, Separation, Status Loss, and Discrimination in the Lives of Individuals with Disabilities and Their Families.” Sociological Inquiry 75 (2): 197–215. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00119.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooks, bell. 2000. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Bill, and Kevin Paterson. 1997. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society 12 (3): 325–340. doi:10.1080/09687599727209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Juston. 2007. "When It Comes to Politics, Friendship Has Its Limits." New York Times. Accessed 24 July 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/23/us/politics/23oprah.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lal, Shalini, Tal Jarus, and Melinda J. Suto. 2012. “A Scoping Review of the Photovoice Method: Implications for Occupational Therapy Research.” Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. Revue Canadienne D’ergotherapie 79 (3): 181–190. doi:10.2182/cjot.2012.79.3.8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, Lawrence. 2015. “Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability in Qualitative Research.” Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 4 (3): 324–327. doi:10.4103/2249-4863.161306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macdonald, Diane, Angela Dew, and Katherine Boydell. 2019. “Representation and Knowledge Exchange: A Scoping Review of Photovoice and Disability.” Journal of Applied Arts & Health 10 (2): 185–201. doi:10.1386/jaah.10.2.185_1.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, Diane, Angela Dew, and Katherine Boydell. 2020. “Structuring Photovoice for Community Impact: A Protocol for Research with Women with Physical Disability.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 21 (2): 1–17. doi:10.17169/fqs-21.2.3420.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, Diane, Evianne L. van Gijn-Grosvenor, Montgomery Melinda, Angela Dew, and Katherine Boydell. 2021. “Through my Eyes’: Feminist Self-Portraits of Osteogenesis Imperfecta as Arts-Based Knowledge Translation.” Visual Studies 36 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2021.1899849.
   Google Scholar
• Meekosha, Helen. 2002. “Virtual Activists? Women and the Making of Identities of Disability.” Hypatia 17 (3): 67–88. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2002.tb00942.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Claudia. 2011. Doing Visual Research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Claudia, Naydene de Lange, and Relebohile Moletsane. 2017. Participatory Visual Methodologies: Social Change, Community and Policy. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moodley, Jacqueline, and Lauren Graham. 2015. “The Importance of Intersectionality in Disability and Gender Studies.” Agenda 29 (2): 24–33. doi:10.1080/10130950.2015.1041802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, Jenny. 2001. “Impairment and Disability: Constructing an Ethics of Care That Promotes Human Rights.” Hypatia 16 (4): 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00750.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Xuan Thuy, Claudia Mitchell, Naydene De Lange, and Kelly Fritsch. 2015. “Engaging Girls with Disabilities in Vietnam: Making Their Voices Count.” Disability & Society 30 (5): 773–787. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1051515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, Amie, and Patsie Frawley. 2020. “Gender, Sexuality and Relationships for Young Australian Women with Intellectual Disability.” Disability & Society 35 (4): 654–675. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1647148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyserman, Daphna, Kristen Elmore, and George Smith. 2012. Handbook of Self and Identity: Self, Self-Concept, and Identity. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, Deborah Ann., Huhana Hickey, Anna Nelson, Katherine Rees, Henrietta Bollinger, and Stephanie Hartley. 2016. “Physically Disabled Women and Sexual Identity: A Photovoice Study.” Disability & Society 31 (8): 1030–1049. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1230044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PWDA. 2019. “People with Disability Australia.” Accessed 09 May 2019. https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-faqs/social-model-of-disability/.
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, F. 2018. “Exploring the Identity and Relationship Experiences of Lesbian and Bisexual Women with Intellectual Disabilities.” Doctoral diss., University of East London. doi:10.15123/uel.874x6.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, Tom. 1999. “The Sexual Politics of Disabled Masculinity.” A Journal Devoted to the Psychological and Medical Aspects of Sexuality in Rehabilitation and Community Settings 17 (1): 53–64. doi:10.1023/A:1021403829826.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, Joey, and Jeanne Hayes. 2000. “Self-Determination and Empowerment: A Feminist Standpoint Analysis of Talk about Disability.” American Journal of Community Psychology 28 (5): 671–695. doi:10.1023/A:1005197704441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stets, Jan E., and Peter J. Burke. 2000. “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 63 (3): 224–237. doi:10.2307/2695870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton-Brown, Camille A. 2014. “Photovoice: A Methodological Guide.” Photography and Culture 7 (2): 169–185. doi:10.2752/175145214X13999922103165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szto, Peter, Rich Furman, and Carol Langer. 2005. “Poetry and Photography: An Exploration into Expressive/Creative Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Social Work 4 (2): 135–156. doi:10.1177/1473325005052390.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, Henri. 1974. “Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour.” Social Science Information 13 (2): 65–93. doi:10.1177/053901847401300204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Carol. 2006. “Disability and Gender: Reflections on Theory and Research.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8 (2-3): 177–185. doi:10.1080/15017410600731368.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Caroline, and Mary Ann Burris. 1997. “Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment.” Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education 24 (3): 369–387. doi:10.1177/109019819702400309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Caroline, Mary Ann Burris, and Xu Yong Ping. 1996. “Chinese Village Women as Visual Anthropologists: A Participatory Approach to Reaching Policymakers.” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 1982. 42 (10): 1391–1400. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00287-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Alice. 2000. “The Work of Disabled Women Seeking Reproductive Health Care.” Sexuality and Disability 18 (4): 301–306. doi:10.1023/A:1005602512300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2013. Inclusion Matters: The Foundation for Shared Prosperity. Advance ed. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar