Technologies for inclusive employment: beyond the prosthetic fix–social transformation axis

References

• Akrich, M. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technological Objects.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by Wiebe E Bijker and John Law, 205–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., and B. Latour. 1992. “A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, 59–264. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00081748/.
   Google Scholar
• Balcazar, F., C. Keys, D. Kaplan, and Y. Suarez-Balcazar. 2006. “Participatory Action Research and People with Disabilities: Principles and Challenges.” Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 12 (2): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, F., C. MacDougall, and D. Smith. 2006. “Participatory Action Research.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 60 (10): 854–857. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.028662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beers, P. J., J. A. Turner, K. Rijswijk, T. Williams, T. Barnard, and S. Beechener. 2019. “Learning or Evaluating? Towards a Negotiation of Meaning Approach to Learning in Transitions.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145: 229–239. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M. 1998. “The Politics of Technology: On Bringing Social Theory into Technological Design.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 23 (4): 456–490. doi:10.1177/016224399802300406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H. 2015. The Sage Handbook of Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986. “The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle.” In Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, 19–34. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-07408-2_2.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, K. M., A. Worth, and A. Sheikh. 2010. “Actor-Network Theory and Its Role in Understanding the Implementation of Information Technology Developments in Healthcare.” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 10 (1): 67. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-10-67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CTI. 2020. “Coalitie Voor Technologie En Inclusie.” 2020. https://www.technologievoorinclusie.nl/.
   Google Scholar
• De Schauwer, E., S. Daelman, H. Vandenbussche, S. Sergeant, I. Van de Putte, and B. Davies. 2020. “Desiring and Critiquing Humanity/Ability/Personhood: Disrupting the Ability/Disability Binary.” Disability and Society 36 (2): 1–20. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1735306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1991. Bergsonism. New York, NY: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dewsbury, G. A., B. J. Taylor, and H. M. Edge. 2002. “Designing Dependable Assistive Technology Systems for Vulnerable People.” Health Informatics Journal 8 (2): 104–110. doi:10.1177/146045820200800208.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, G. L., and T. Zuiderent-Jerak. 2021. Making & Doing Activating STS through Knowledge Expression and Travel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, S., F. Carden, and T. Smutylo. 2001. “Outcome Mapping Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs.” https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10625/32122/IDL-32122.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ebuenyi, I. D., M. Guxens, E. Ombati, J. F. G. Bunders-Aelen, and B. J. Regeer. 2019. “Employability of Persons with Mental Disability: Understanding Lived Experiences in Kenya.” Front Psychiatry 10: 539. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. “EU-Funded Research Projects into Technologies for Accessibility.” 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/eu-funded-research-projects-technologies-accessibility.
   Google Scholar
• Fallan, K. 2008. “De-Scribing Design: Appropriating Script Analysis to Design History.” Design Issues 24 (4): 61–75. doi:10.1162/desi.2008.24.4.61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, A., and B. A. Ferri. 2012. “Technology for People, Not Disabilities: Ensuring Access and Inclusion.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 12 (4): 192–200. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01230.x.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, C. 2020. “The Relationship between Disability Prejudice and Disability Employment Rates.” Work (Reading, Mass.) 65 (3): 591–598. doi:10.3233/WOR-203113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gad, C., and D. Ribes. 2014. “The Conceptual and the Empirical in Science and Technology Studies.” Science Technology and Human Values 39 (2): 183–191. doi:10.1177/0162243914522304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galer, D. 2012. “Disabled Capitalists: Exploring the Intersections of Disability and Identity Formation in the World of Work.” Disability Studies Quarterly 32 (3). https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3277. doi:10.18061/dsq.v32i3.3277.
   Google Scholar
• Galis, V. 2011. “Enacting Disability: How Can Science and Technology Studies Inform Disability Studies?” Disability & Society 26 (7): 825–838. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.618737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galis, V., and F. Lee. 2014. “A Sociology of Treason: The Construction of Weakness.” Science Technology and Human Values 39 (1): 154–179. doi:10.1177/0162243913512681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauci, V. 2021. “Dis/Ability-Producing Technology Assemblages and Networks at the Workplace: A New Materialist Analysis.” Disability & Society 36 (3): 488–420. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1758038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genus, A., and A. Coles. 2008. “Rethinking the Multi-Level Perspective of Technological Transitions.” Research Policy 37 (9): 1436–1445. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., G. Newell, and C. Newell. 2003. Digital Disability: The Social Construction of Disability in New Media. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, G., H. Yu, K. R. Fisher, and B. Li. 2019. “Disability, Technology Innovation and Social Development in China and Australia.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 12 (1): 34–50. doi:10.1080/17516234.2018.1492067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, K. Liddiard, and K. Runswick-Cole. 2019. “Provocations for Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 34 (6): 972–997. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, D. E. 2004. Doing Research in the Real World. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2.
   Google Scholar
• Grijseels, M., T. Zuiderent-Jerak, and B. J. Regeer. forthcoming. “Inclusive Employment as a Matter of Care; Balancing Emergence and Commitments by Being Alongside.” In Careful Engagements. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hadders, H. 2009. “Enacting Death in the Intensive Care Unit: Medical Technology and the Multiple Ontologies of Death.” Health (London, England: 1997) 13 (6): 571–587. doi:10.1177/1363459308341869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women the Reinvention of Nature. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, A., S. M. Kyaw-Myint, D. Harris, and H. Denronden. 2012. “Workforce Participation Barriers for People with Disability.” International Journal of Disability Management 7 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1017/idm.2012.1.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B., and C. Gad. 2009. “Philosophy of Technology as Empirical Philosophy: Comparing Technological Scales in Practice.” In New Waves in Philosophy of Technology, 292–314. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230227279_14.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C., and P. Lauritsen. 2005. “Qualitative Research as Partial Connection: Bypassing the Power-Knowledge Nexus.” Qualitative Research 5 (1): 59–77. doi:10.1177/1468794105048652.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesel, L. R., S. Dezelar, and E. Lightfoot. 2019. “Equity in Social Work Employment: Opportunity and Challenge for Social Workers with Disabilities in the United States.” Disability & Society 34 (9–10): 1399–1418. doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1561354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KIT. 2020. “Kennisalliantie Inclusie En Technologie.” https://inclusievetechnologie.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, Y., and B. Yalcin. 2017. “Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Mainstream Employment: Is It Really All about the Money? A Case Study of Four Large Companies in Norway and Sweden.” Disability & Society 32 (2): 233–253. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1281794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoor, M., O. Jansson, V. Vimarlund, C. Keller, and S. Wass. 2018. “From Prototype to Societal Inclusion: Identified Challenges for Sustainable Implementation of E-Services for Individuals with Disabilities.” Technology and Disability 30 (3): 97–103. doi:10.3233/TAD-180198.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, I. 2006. “Disability and the Promises of Technology: Technology, Subjectivity and Embodiment within an Order of the Normal.” Information Communication and Society 9 (3): 373–395. doi:10.1080/13691180600751348.
   Google Scholar
• Nota, L., S. Santilli, M. C. Ginevra, and S. Soresi. 2014. “Employer Attitudes towards the Work Inclusion of People with Disability.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 27 (6): 511–520. doi:10.1111/jar.12081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. Politics of Disablement. London, UK: Macmillan Education UK.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. “The Social Model in Context.” In Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice, 30–42. London, UK:Macmillan Education UK. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6_4.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, B. 1995. “The Ethics of Hybrid Subjects: Feminist Constructivism according to Donna Haraway.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 20 (3): 352–367. doi:10.1177/016224399502000305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 2018. “Sites of a Grand Societal Experiment: A Research Approach.” 2018/02. STEPS. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/sites-of-a-grand-societal-experiment-a-research-approach.
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone, A. 1998. Enabling Technology: Disabled People, Work and New Technology. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone, A. 2016. “Employing Technology to Good Effect: Technology, Disability and the ‘Palace’ of Paid Work.” In Disability and Technology an Interdisciplinary and International Approach, 125–152. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone, A. 2016. Disability and Technology: An Interdisciplinary and International Approach. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sayes, E. 2014. “Actor-Network Theory and Methodology: Just What Does It Mean to Say That Nonhumans Have Agency?” Social Studies of Science 44 (1): 134–149. doi:10.1177/0306312713511867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2013. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley-Egan, C. 2010. “The Ambivalence of Promising Technology.” NanoEthics 4 (2): 183–189. doi:10.1007/s11569-010-0099-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snell, L. 2015. “Documenting the Lived Experiences of Young Adult Cochlear Implant Users: ‘Feeling’ Sound, Fluidity and Blurring Boundaries.” Disability & Society 30 (3): 340–352. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1014086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 1990. “Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions.” The Sociological Review 38 (1_suppl): 26–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03347.x.
   Google Scholar
• Syurina, E. V., P. Klaassen, A. Fraaije, M. C. A. Klein, and B. J. Regeer. 2017. “Technologie & Inclusie: De Rol van Technologie in Arbeidsparticipatie van Mensen Met Een Licht Verstandelijke Beperking.” Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Athena Instituut. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/technology-and-inclusion-the-role-of-technology-in-labor-particip.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, E. M., and D. B. Hershenson. 2005. “An Ecological Approach to Vocational Behavior and Career Development of People with Disabilities.” https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-22159-008.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. B., A. P. Goode, S. Z. George, and C. E. Cook. 2014. “Incidence and Risk Factors for First-Time Incident Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Spine Journal 14 (10): 299–319. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and M. Berg. 2003. “The Practice of Medical Technology.” In Sociology of Health and Illness. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00342.
   Google Scholar
• Trezzini, B., V. Schuller, S. Schüpbach, and J. Bickenbach. 2021. “Environmental Barriers to and Facilitators of Labour Market Participation as Experienced by Disabled People Living in Switzerland.” Disability & Society 36 (6): 925–951. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1768053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mierlo, B. C., B. J. Regeer, M. Van Amstel, M. C. M. Arkesteijn, V. Beekman, J. F. G. Bunders, T. De Cock Buning, B. Elzen, A. Hoes, and C. Leeuwis. 2010. “Reflexive Monitoring in Action A Guide for Monitoring System Innovation Projects.” https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/reports/395732.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, M. M. 2018. “Included in Training and Work: Transforming Policies and Practices for People with Disabilities”. https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/included-in-training-and-work-transforming-policies-and-practices-2.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2015. “WHO Global Disability Action Plan 2014–2021: Better Health for all People with Disability.” https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-global-disability-action-plan-2014-2021.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkie, A. 2010. “User Assemblages in Design: An Ethnographic Study.” (Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK). Retrieved from http://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/4710.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, S. 2008. “Technological Determinism is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism.” In The Handbook of Science & Technology Studies, 165–180. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://pure.knaw.nl/portal/en/publications/technological-determinism-is-dead-long-live-technological-determi.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2013. Case Study Research Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2010.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderent-Jerak, T. 2015. Situated Intervention: Sociological Experiments in Health Care. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar