Service-user participation in coordinated planning, from the perspective of involved professionals

References

• Ahlström, G., J. Å. Hansson, J. Kristensson, I. Runesson, M. Persson, and C. Bökberg. 2021. “Collaboration and Guidelines for the Coordination of Health Care for Frail Older Persons with Intellectual Disability: A National Survey of Nurses Working in Municipal Care.” Nursing Open 8 (3): 1369–1379. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg. 2018. Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. Third edition. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Auschra, C. 2018. “Barriers to the Integration of Care in Inter-Organisational Settings: A Literature Review.” International Journal of Integrated Care 18 (1): 5–5. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.3068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A.-M T., B. M. Rasmussen, and T. K. H. Nielsen. 2021. “Action Plans as Active Boundary Objects.” Research on Social Work Practice 31 (4): 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315211002637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biringer, E., O. Hove, Ø. Johnsen, and H. Ø. Lier. 2020. “People Just Don’t Understand Their Role in It.” Collaboration and Coordination of Care for Service Users with Complex and Severe Mental Health Problems.” Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 57 (2): 900–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2019a. “Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 11 (4): 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2019b. “To Saturate or Not to Saturate? Questioning Data Saturation as a Useful Concept for Thematic Analysis and Sample-Size Rationales.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 13 (2): 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breimo, J. P. 2016. “Planning Individually? Spotting International Welfare Trends in the Field of Rehabilitation in Norway.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 18 (1): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2014.972447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, M., C. Bigby, and J. Douglas. 2021. “A Process of Decision-Making Support: Exploring Supported Decision-Making Practice in Canada.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 46 (2): 138–149. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2020.1789269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2016. Social Research Methods (Fifth edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, E. E., K. W. Fisher, K. A. Shogren, and M. L. Wehmeyer. 2016. “Participation and Intellectual Disability: A Review of the Literature.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 54 (6): 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doody, O., R. Lyons, and R. Ryan. 2019. “The Experiences of Adults with Intellectual Disability in the Involvement of Nursing Care Planning in Health Services.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 47 (4): 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eide, A. H., S. Josephsson, and K. Vik. 2017. Participation in Health and Welfare Services: Professional Concepts and Lived Experience (1 ed.). Abingdon, Oxon:Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315628554
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., T. Andersson, A. Hellström, C. Gadolin, and S. Lifvergren. 2020. “Collaborative Public Management: Coordinated Value Propositions among Public Service Organizations.” Public Management Review 22 (6): 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1604793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldvik, I., and O. P. Askheim. 2022. “Constructing User Participation for Disabled People—the Norwegian Context.” Disability & Society 37 (9): 1397–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1867070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedberg, B., E. Nordström, S. Kjellström, and I. Josephson. 2018. “We Found a Solution, Sort of” – a Qualitative Interview Study with Children and Parents on Their Experiences of the Coordinated Individual Plan (CIP) in Sweden.” Cogent Medicine 5 (1): 1428033. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331205X.2018.1428033
   Google Scholar
• Jobe, I., Å. Engström, and B. Lindberg. 2019. “Knowledge and Views about Coordinated Individual Planning from the Perspective of Active Older Adults.” Clinical Journal of Nursing Care and Practice 3 (1): 017–026. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.cjncp.1001012
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., K. Jess, and U.-K. Schön. 2021a. “How Do Users with Comorbidity Perceive Participation in Social Services? A Qualitative Interview Study.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 16 (1): 1901468–1901468. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2021.1901468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., O. Knutsson, and U.-K. Schön. 2021b. “Coordinated Individual Care Planning and Shared Decision Making: Staff Perspectives within the Comorbidity Field of Practice: Personals Perspektiv på Samordnad Individuell Planering Och Delat Beslutsfattande Inom Samsjuklighetsområdet.” European Journal of Social Work 25 (2): 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.2016649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karam, M., I. Brault, T. Van Durme, and J. Macq. 2018. “Comparing Interprofessional and Interorganizational Collaboration in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 79: 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnear, D., J. Morrison, L. Allan, A. Henderson, E. Smiley, and S.-A. Cooper. 2018. “Prevalence of Physical Conditions and Multimorbidity in a Cohort of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities with and without down Syndrome: Cross-Sectional Study.” BMJ Open 8 (2): e018292-e018292. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsson, O., and U.-K. Schön. 2020. “Co-Creating a Process of User Involvement and Shared Decision-Making in Coordinated Care Planning with Users and Caregivers in Social Services.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 15 (1): 1812270–1812270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1812270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvarnström, S., E. Willumsen, B. Andersson-Gäre, and B. Hedberg. 2012. “How Service Users Perceive the Concept of Participation, Specifically in Interprofessional Practice.” British Journal of Social Work 42 (1): 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Källmén, H., A. Hed, and T. H. Elgán. 2017. “Collaboration between Community Social Services and Healthcare Institutions: The Use of a Collaborative Individual Plan.” Nordisk Alkohol- & Narkotikatidskrift: NAT 34 (2): 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1455072517691059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lægreid, P., K. Sarapuu, L. H. Rykkja, and T. Randma-Liiv. 2015. “New Coordination Challenges in the Welfare State.” Public Management Review 17 (7): 927–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1029344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matscheck, D., A. Ljungberg, and A. Topor. 2020. “Beyond Formalized Plans: User Involvement in Support in Daily Living – Users’ and Support Workers’ Experiences.” The International Journal of Social Psychiatry 66 (2): 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764019894603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matscheck, D., K. Piuva, L. Eriksson, and M. Åberg. 2019. “The Coordinated Individual Plan - is This a Solution for Complex Organizations to Handle Complex Needs?” Nordic Social Work Research 9 (1): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1489886
   Google Scholar
• McCausland, D., E. Murphy, M. McCarron, and P. McCallion. 2022. “The Potential for Person-Centred Planning to Support the Community Participation of Adults with an Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Intellectual Disabilities: JOID 26 (3): 603–623. 174462952110221-17446295211022125. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295211022125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. W., and E. Paradis. 2020. “Making It Real: The Institutionalization of Collaboration through Formal Structure.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 34 (4): 528–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1714563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molin, M. 2020. “The Emerging Concepts of Participation and Belonging in Social Pedagogy.” Papers of Social Pedagogy 13 (1): 9–33. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.4350
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, N., and P. Boland. 2020. “Organization and System Theories in Interprofessional Research: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 34 (1): 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1632815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, E. 2017. “When I Say … Decoupling.” Medical Education 51 (10): 992–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, L.-M L. 2020. “Interprofessional Collaboration in the Norwegian Welfare Context: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 34 (6): 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1693353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., and P. J. DiMaggio. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Chicago U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, R., M. Brostrøm Kousgaard, and A. S. Davidsen. 2021. “We Have Two Different Agendas": the Views of General Practitioners, Social Workers and Hospital Staff on Interprofessional Coordination for Patients with Chronic Widespread Pain.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 35 (2): 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1749576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., and J. W. Meyer. 1994. Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• SFS1993:387. Act concerning Support and Service for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments (LSS). Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Parliament. Retrieved 211001 from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/lag-1993387-om-stod-och-service-till-vissa_sfs-1993-387 (In. Swedish)
   Google Scholar
• SFS2001:453. The Swedish Social Services Act. (Socialtjänstlag, in Swedish). Swedish Parliament. Retrieved 211008 from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/socialtjanstlag-2001453_sfs-2001-453 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• SFS 2017:30. The Health and Medical Services Act. (Hälso- och sjukvårdslag, in Swedish). Swedish Parliament. Retrieved 211008 from https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/halso–och-sjukvardslag_sfs-2017-30 (In Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. 2017. Good Research Practice. Vetenskapsrådet, Stockholm. ISBN: 978-91-7307-354-7 https://publikationer.vr.se/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, Umb. 2021. “Health-Promotion Intervention in a Group Home: Perspectives of Residents, Staff and Rehabilitation Professionals.” Journal of Intellectual Disabilities: JOID 25 (2): 210–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629519874970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2006. The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Geneva: United Nations. Retrieved 211008 from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. A., and A. Buchanan. 2017. “An Exploration of Person-Centred Concepts in Human Services: A Thematic Analysis of the Literature.” Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) ), 121 (10): 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xyrichis, A., S. Reeves, and M. Zwarenstein. 2018. “Examining the Nature of Interprofessional Practice: An Initial Framework Validation and Creation of the InterProfessional Activity Classification Tool (InterPACT).” Journal of Interprofessional Care 32 (4): 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2017.1408576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. 2017. “The Evolving Role of Meaning in Theorizing Institutions.” In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526415066
   Google Scholar