Troubling narratives about dis/ability and the social encounter through conversations between narrative inquiry, critical disability studies, and geographies of disability

References

• Adorno, T. W. 1966. [2007]. Negative Dialectics. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. 2001. Metaphysics: Concepts and Problems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., C. Squire, and M. Tamboukou. 2008. Doing Narrative Research (Eds.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1971. “Thinking and Moral Considerations: A Lecture.” Social Research 38 (3): 417–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnell, L. 2017. “Narrating Family: Talk about a Troublesome Girlhood in the Swedish Context.” In B. Formark, H. Mulari & M. Voipio (Eds.), Nordic Childhoods: New Perspectives and Outlooks, 161–178. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. M. 2001. Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockain, A. 2016. “Making autism through Ocean Heaven (海洋天堂, Haiyang Tiantang) and the possibilities of realizing disability differently.” Disability & Society 31 (4): 535–552.
   Google Scholar
• Cockain, A. 2018. “Shallow inclusion (or integration) and deep exclusion: en-dis-abling identities through government webpages in Hong Kong.” Social Inclusion 6 (2): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cockain, A. 2021a. “De-fusing and re-fusing face-to-face encounters involving autistic persons in Hong Kong.” Tizard Learning Disability Review 26 (1): 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Cockain, A. 2021b. “Temporalities, a Disability Chronotope, and Empathetic Horizons in Still Human.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 15 (1): 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J. A. 2019. “Narrative Analysis: Understanding the Story of a Formerly Homeless Man.” Narrative Works 8 (1–2): 20–37. https://doi.org/10.7202/1059847ar
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. 2008. [2014]“Theodor W. Adorno: An Introduction.” In her (Ed.) Theodor Adorno: Key Concepts, 3–20. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Lauretis, T. 1986. “Feminist Studies/Critical Studies: Issues, Terms and Contexts.” In T. De Lauretis (Ed.), Feminist Critical Studies, 1–19. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1965. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1969. [2002]The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1973. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. 2019. “Rethinking Debates in Narrative Methods: Narrative Orthodoxy and Research Challenges with Children with Intellectual Disability.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 21 (1): 167–176. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garber, M. B. 1992. Vested Interests: Cross-Dressing & Cultural Anxiety. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 1991. “A Linguistic Approach to Narrative.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 1 (1): 15–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.1.1.03ali
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2000. Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. 1999. Geographies of Disability. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2012. “Jacques Lacan + Paul Hunt = Psychoanalytic Disability Studies.” In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions, 179–194. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2014. Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2021. Disability and Other Human Questions. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1997. [2013]“The Spectacle of the “Other.” In S. Hall, J. Evans, & S. Nixon (Eds.), Representation, pp. 215–287. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E., and R. Wilton. 2017. “Towards a Relational Geography of Disability.” Progress in Human Geography 41 (6): 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516659705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2012. “Fear, Pity and Disgust: Emotions and the Non-Disabled Imaginary.” In N. Watson, A. Roulstone & C. Thomas (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, 66–77. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, R., and C. Edwards. 2007. “The Geographies of Disability: Reflections on the Development of a Sub- Discipline.” Geography Compass 1 (3): 623–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00032.x
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2010. Bringing Things to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials’. Retrieved January 2020, <http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1306/1/0510_creative_entanglements.pdf2010>, p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, J. 2000. Dubliners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liddiard, K. 2021. “Theorising Disabled People’s Sexual, Intimate, and Erotic Lives: Current Theories for Disability and Sexuality.” In R. Shuttleworth and L.R. Mona (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Disability and Sexuality, 39–52. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly, C. 2019. “Defrosting Concepts, Destabilizing Doxa: Critical Phenomenology and the Perplexing Particular.” Anthropological Theory 19 (4): 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499619828568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, W. 2008. “Narratives of Events: Labovian Analysis and Its Limitations.” In M. Andrews, C. Squire & M. Tamboukou (Eds.), Doing Narrative Research, 22–40. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rapport, N. 2014. Social and Cultural Anthropology: The Key Concepts. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. 1993. Narrative Analysis. London, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. 2002. “Narrative Analysis.” In A. Michael Huberman & M.B. Miles (Eds.), The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion, 217–270. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sartre, J.-P. 1965. Nausea. New York, Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, E. 1999. “Modern Slogan, Ancient Script: Impairment and Disability in the Chinese Language.” In M. Corker and S. French (Eds.), Disability Discourse, 136–147. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, T. 2001. “Disability: A Rose by Any Other Name? “People-First” Language in Canadian Society.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie 38 (2): 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2001.tb00967.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. 1925. Science and the Modern World. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar