556
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Interdependencies in peer work with people with disability

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 07 Feb 2023, Accepted 13 Dec 2023, Published online: 22 Dec 2023

References

  • Adam, Caroline, and Louise Potvin. 2017. “Understanding Exclusionary Mechanisms at the Individual Level: A Theoretical Proposal.” Health Promotion International 32 (5): 778–789. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw005
  • Angell, A. M., L. Goodman, H. R. Walker, K. E. McDonald, L. E. Kraus, E. H. J. Elms, L. Frieden, A. J. Sheth, and J. Hammel. 2020. “Starting to Live a Life": Understanding Full Participation for People with Disabilities after Institutionalization.” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 74 (4): 7404205030p1–7404205030p11. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2020.038489
  • Attride-Stirling, Jennifer. 2001. “Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 1 (3): 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
  • Bellingham, Brett, Niels Buus, Andrea McCloughen, Lisa Dawson, Richard Schweizer, Kristof Mikes-Liu, Amy Peetz, Katherine Boydell, and Jo River. 2018. “Peer Work in Open Dialogue: A Discussion Paper.” International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 27 (5): 1574–1583. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12457
  • Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2021a. “Can I Use TA? Should I Use TA? Should I Not Use TA? Comparing Reflexive Thematic Analysis and Other Pattern-Based Qualitative Analytic Approaches.” Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 21 (1): 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
  • Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2021b. “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18 (3): 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
  • Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2022. “Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis.” Qualitative Psychology 9 (1): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
  • Bronfenbrenner, Urie. 2000. “Ecological Systems Theory.” In Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 3, edited by Alan E. Kazdin and Alan E. Kazdin, 129–133. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, Oxford University Press.
  • Clement, T., and C. Bigby. 2010. Group Homes for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Encouraging Inclusion and Participation. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Book.
  • Clement, T., and C. Bigby. 2009. “Breaking out of a Distinct Social Space: Reflections on Supporting Community Participation for People with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 22 (3): 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00458.x
  • Collier, Barbara, Sarah W. Blackstone, and Andrew Taylor. 2012. “Communication Access to Businesses and Organizations for People with Complex Communication Needs.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985) 28 (4): 205–218. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2012.732611
  • Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
  • Crosby, Shantel D., Carl L. Algood, Brittany Sayles, and Jayne Cubbage. 2017. “An Ecological Examination of Factors That Impact Well-Being among Developmentally-Disabled Youth in the Juvenile Justice System.” Juvenile and Family Court Journal 68 (2): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12091
  • Fossey, Ellie, Carol Harvey, Fiona McDermott, and Larry Davidson. 2002. “Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research… Second Article in an Occasional Series.” The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36 (6): 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
  • Gardien, Eve, and Christian Laval. 2019. “The Institutionalisation of Peer Support in France: Development of a Social Role and Roll out of Public Policies.” L’institutionnalisation de l’accompagnement par les pairs en France: entre développement d’un rôle social et déploiement de politiques publiques (French) ALTER, European Journal of Disability Research,13 (2): 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2018.09.002
  • Johnston, Marie. 1997. “Integrating Models of Disability: A Reply to Shakespeare and Watson.” Disability & Society 12 (2): 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599727407
  • Kamenopoulou, Leda. 2016. “Ecological Systems Theory: A Valuable Framework for Research on Inclusion and Special Educational Needs/Disabilities.” Pedagogy (0861-3982) 88 (4): 515–527.
  • Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 2013. The Constructivist Credo. Walnut Creek, CA: Routledge. Book.
  • Mahoney, Natasha, Nathan J. Wilson, Angus Buchanan, Ben Milbourn, Ciarain Hoey, and Reinie Cordier. 2020. “Older Male Mentors: Outcomes and Perspectives of an Intergenerational Mentoring Program for Young Adult Males with Intellectual Disability.” Health Promotion Journal of Australia: Official Journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals 31 (1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.250
  • Marks, B., J. Sisirak, R. Magallanes, K. Krok, and D. Donohue-Chase. 2019. “Effectiveness of a Health Messages Peer-to-Peer Program for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 57 (3): 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-57.3.242
  • Scambler, Graham. 2004. “Re-Framing Stigma: Felt and Enacted Stigma and Challenges to the Sociology of Chronic and Disabling Conditions.” Social Theory & Health 2 (1): 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.sth/8700012
  • Scott, Anne, and Carolyn Doughty. 2012. “Care, Empowerment and Self-Determination in the Practice of Peer Support.” Disability & Society 27 (7): 1011–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.695578
  • Shakespeare, Tom. 2013. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. [Electronic Resource]. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
  • Shaw, Robert B., Sarah V. C. Lawrason, Kendra R. Todd, and Kathleen A. Martin Ginis. 2020. “A Scoping Review of Peer Mentorship Studies for People with Disabilities: Exploring Interaction Modality and Frequency of Interaction.” Health Communication 36 (14): 1841–1851. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1796293
  • Solomon, Phyllis. 2004. “Peer Support/Peer Provided Services Underlying Processes, Benefits, and Critical Ingredients.” Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 27 (4): 392–401. https://doi.org/10.2975/27.2004.392.401
  • Stancliffe, Roger J., and Brian H. Abery. 1997. “Longitudinal Study of Deinstitutionalization and the Exercise of Choice.” Mental Retardation 35 (3): 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(1997)035
  • Talking Mats Australia. 2023. "About Talking Mats." Accessed September 1, 2023. https://talkingmatsaustralia.com.au/pages/about-talking-mats.
  • United Nations. 2006. "Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities." Accessed April 27, 2018. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
  • van Toorn, G., and K. Soldatic. 2015. “Disability, Rights Realisation, and Welfare Provisioning: What is It about Sweden?” Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 2 (2): 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2015.1089185
  • Voronka, Jijian. 2019. “The Mental Health Peer Worker as Informant: Performing Authenticity and the Paradoxes of Passing.” Disability & Society 34 (4): 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1545113
  • Walsh, Peter E., Sara S. McMillan, Victoria Stewart, and Amanda J. Wheeler. 2018. “Understanding Paid Peer Support in Mental Health.” Disability & Society 33 (4): 579–597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1441705
  • Watson, Emma. 2019. “The Mechanisms Underpinning Peer Support: A Literature Review.” Journal of Mental Health (Abingdon, England) 28 (6): 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1417559
  • Watson, Joanne. 2016. “Assumptions of Decision-Making Capacity: The Role Supporter Attitudes Play in the Realisation of Article 12 for People with Severe or Profound Intellectual Disability.” Laws 5 (1): 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5010006