A philosophical critique of United States housing policy for adults with intellectual disabilities

References

• American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2015. “Community Living and Participation for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: What the Research Tells Us.” www.aaidd.org.
   Google Scholar
• American Civil Liberties Union. 2018. “The Home and Community Based Services Settings Rule.” www.aclu.org.
   Google Scholar
• American Network of Community Options and Resources. 2022. “The State of America’s Direct Support Workforce Crisis 2022.” www.ancor.org.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, D. 2021. “When It Comes to People like My Daughter, One Size Does Not Fit All.” New York Times www.nytimes.com.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D. 2011. The Politics of Neurodiversity: Why Public Policy Matters. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. 2019. “The Principle of Beneficence in Applied Ethics.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.plato.stanford.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Berens, M., and P. Callahan. 2016. “In the Rush to Close Institutions, Illinois Glossed over Serious Problems in Group Homes.” Chicago Tribune. www.chicagotribune.com.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, Christine, Sian Anderson, and Nadine Cameron. 2018. “Identifying Conceptualizations and Theories of Change Embedded in Interventions to Facilitate Community Participation for People with Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID 31 (2): 165–180. https:// https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredewold, Femmianne, Margot Hermus, and Margo Trappenburg. 2020. “Living in the Community’ the Pros and Cons: A Systematic Literature Review of the Impact of Deinstitutionalization on People with Intellectual and Psychiatric Disabilities.” Journal of Social Work 20 (1): 83–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017318793620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, J. 2020. “Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.plato.stanford.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Colello, K. 2014. “Medicaid Home and Community Based Settings Final Rule: In Brief.” Congressional Research Service. 1–12. www.crsreports.congress.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Cumella, S., and M. Lyons. 2018. “Shared Life Communities for People with a Learning Disability: A Review of the Evidence.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 46 (3): 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, R., and A. Lau. 2004. “Cluster Housing and Freedom of Choice: A Response to Emerson (2004).” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 29 (3): 198–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250412331285190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushing, P. 2015. “What Counts as a Community? Alternative Approaches to Inclusion and Developmental Disability.” International Journal of Developmental Disabilities 61 (2): 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047386914Z.00000000091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, R. 2016. “Realities of Social Life and Their Implications for Social Inclusion.”. In Community Care and Inclusion for People with an Intellectual Disability, edited by R. Jackson and M. Lyons, 57–73. Edinburgh: Floris.
   Google Scholar
• Dym, S. 2022. “Stop Chronic Underfunding of Services for People with Developmental Disabilities.” Seattle Times www.seattletimes.com.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, E. 2004. “Cluster Housing for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 29 (3): 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250412331285208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, Eric, Janet Robertson, Nicky Gregory, Chris Hatton, Sophia Kessissoglou, Angela Hallam, Martin Knapp, et al. 2000. “Quality and Costs of Community-Based Residential Supports, Village Communities and Residential Campuses in the United Kingdom.” American Journal on Mental Retardation 105 (2): 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO;2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Equality and Human Rights Commission. 2017. Being Disabled in Britain: A Journey Less Equal. www.equalityhumanrights.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. 2013. “The Development of Systems of Supports: Intellectual Disability in Middle Modern Times.” In The Story of Intellectual Disability, edited by M. Wehmeyer, 79–116. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, C. 2019. “There’s No Place like Home: A National Study of How People with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities and Their Families Choose Where to Live.” The Council on Quality and Leadership. 1–89. www.researchgate.net.
   Google Scholar
• Goeschel, J., and D. Heitzman. 2010. “Providing Quality-of-Life through Intentional Community Living.” The Camphill Association of North America 1–118. www.research.camphill.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. 2020. “Duty, not Gratuity: The Ethics of Social Support for People with Intellectual Disabilities in the United States.” Disability & Society 36 (8): 1240–1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1787817.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen-Turton, T. 2016. “Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Services Are Dangerously Underfunded.” Philadelphia Inquirer www.inquirer.com.
   Google Scholar
• HCBS Advocacy Coalition. n.d. www.hcbsadvocacy.org.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2011. “Challenges of Residential and Community Care: ‘the Times They Are A-Changin.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 55 (9): 933–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01461.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson, R., and H. Irvine. 2013. “The Impact of Ideology on Provision of Services for People with an Intellectual Disability.” International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 59 (1): 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047387711Y.0000000013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, T. 2014. “Evidence.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy www.plato.stanford.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, Agnes, Jim Mansell, and Julie Beadle-Brown. 2009. “Outcomes in Different Residential Settings for People with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.” American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 114 (3): 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-114.3.193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamont, J., and C. Favor. 2017. “Distributive Justice.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy www.plato.stanford.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, J., and J. Beadle-Brown. 2009. “Dispersed or Clustered Housing for Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 34 (4): 313–323. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250903310701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, E., and S. Laurence. 2019. “Concepts.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy www.plato.stanford.edu.
   Google Scholar
• McCarron, Mary, Richard Lombard-Vance, Esther Murphy, Peter May, Naoise Webb, Greg Sheaf, Philip McCallion, et al. 2019. “Effect of Deinstitutionalization on Quality-of-Life for Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.” BMJ Open 9 (4): e025735. www.bmjopen.bmj.com. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCausland, D, et al. 2022. “The Potential for Person-Centered Planning to Support the Community Participation of Adults with an Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 26 (3): 603–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/174462952110221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, E. 2023. Developmental Disability Consulting: Ed’s Newsletter 278. www.facebook.com/EdMcManusDDC.
   Google Scholar
• Medicaid. 2014. Home and Community Based Services Final Regulation. www.medicaid.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Misericordia. 2022. Annual Report 2022. www.misericordia.com.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Disability. 2012. Institutions: Definitions, Populations and Trends. www.ncd.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Power, A. 2013. “Making Space for Belonging: Critical Reflections on the Implementation of Personalized Adult Social Care under the Veil of Meaningful Inclusion.” Social Science & Medicine 88: 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Health England. 2019. People with Learning Disabilities in England—Chapter 5 : Adult Social Care. www.gov.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Schalock, R., and M. Verdugo. 2002. Handbook on Quality-of-Life for Human Service Practitioners. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
   Google Scholar
• Scior, K. 2011. “Public Awareness, Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 32 (6): 2164–2182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., C. Cartwright, and J. Craig. 2011. “The Housing and Support Needs of People with an Intellectual Disability into Older Age.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR 55 (9): 895–903. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01449.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simplican, Stacy Clifford, Geraldine Leader, John Kosciulek, and Michael Leahy. 2015. “Defining Social Inclusion of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: An Ecological Model of Social Networks and Community Participation.” Research in Developmental Disabilities 38: 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steup, M., and R. Neta. 2020. “Epistemology.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy www.plato.stanford.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Tanis, E. 2020. The State of the States in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Data Brief 2020. www.stateofthestates.org.
   Google Scholar
• Thomasson, A. 2022. “Categories.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy www.plato.stanford.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Together for Choice. ( n.d.). Frequently Asked Questions. www.togetherforchoice.org.
   Google Scholar
• Together for Choice. 2022. Important Letter from CMS Regarding the HCBS Settings Rule. www.togetherforchoice.org.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. www.un.org.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas, S., and R. Mietola. 2021. Narrowed Lives: Meaning, Moral Value and Profound Intellectual Disability. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. 2015. “Social Minimum.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy www.plato.stanford.edu.
   Google Scholar
• White House. 2021. Fact Sheet: Biden-Harris Administration Efforts to Support Full Participation and Equality for People with Disabilities. www.whitehouse.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger, W. 1972. The Principle of Normalization in Human Services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. 2010. Cognitive Disability in a Society of Equals. In Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy, edited by E. Kittay and L. Carlson, 147–160. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Young, L., and A. Ashman. 2004. “Deinstitutionalization in Australia Part II: Results from a Long-Term Study.” British Journal of Developmental Disabilities 50: 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1179/096979504799103967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar