The impact of compliance with a compulsory model of drug diversion on treatment engagement and reoffending

References

• Andrews, D.A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R.D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 17, 19–52. doi: 10.1177/0093854890017001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, T., Holloway, K., & Farrington, D. (2008). The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 13, 107–118. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, D., Day, E., Homayoun, S., Lenton, H., Moverley, R., & Openshaw, M. (2008). Treatment retention in the drug intervention programme: Do primary drug users fare better than primary offenders? Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 15, 201–209. doi: 10.1080/09687630701198165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, A. (2001). Compliance with community penalties. In Bottoms, A., Gelsthorpe, L., & Rex, S. (Eds.), Community penalties: Changes and challenges (pp. 87–116). Cullompton: Willan
   Google Scholar
• Bright, D.A., & Martire, K.A. (2012). Does coerced treatment of substance-using offenders lead to improvements in substance use and recidivism? A review of the treatment efficacy literature. Australian Psychologist, 48, 69–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-9544.2012.00072.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancey, G., & Howard, J. (2006). Diversion and criminal justice drug treatment: Mechanism of emancipation or social control? Drug and Alcohol Review, 25, 377–385. doi: 10.1080/09595230600741388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud, W., & Granfield, R. (2008). Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use & Misuse, 43, 1971–1986. doi: 10.1080/10826080802289762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2015). Annual penal statistics: SPACE I – 2014. Strasbourg: Council of Europe
   Google Scholar
• Eastwood, N., Fox, E., & Rosmarin, A. (2016). A quiet revolution: Drug decriminalisation across the globe. London: Release
   Google Scholar
• European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). (2015). Alternatives to punishment for drug-using offenders. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
   Google Scholar
• Gossop, M., Trakada, K., Stewart, D., & Witton, J. (2005). Reductions in criminal convictions after addiction treatment: 5-year follow-up. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 79, 295–302. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.01.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyateng, T., McSweeney, T., & Hough, M. (2010). Key predictors of compliance with community supervision in London. London: London Criminal Justice Partnership
   Google Scholar
• Hansard. (2011). Prisons: Sentencing, 13 January, Column 404W
   Google Scholar
• Hansard. (2012). Drug Interventions Programme, Home Department, 27 November, Column 174W
   Google Scholar
• Hansard. (2014). Drugs: Rehabilitation, 5 February, Column 232W
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, B.B., & Bowers, J. (2008). Covariate imbalance in simple, stratified and clustered comparative studies. Statistical Science, 23, 219–236. doi: 10.1214/08-STS254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, G., & Chitty, C. (Eds.) (2005). The impact of corrections on re-offending: A review of ‘What Works’ (3rd ed.). Home office research study 291. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Hawken, A., & Kleiman, M. (2009). Managing drug involved probationers with swift and certain sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii’s HOPE. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice
   Google Scholar
• Hayhurst, K.P., Leitner, M., Davies, L., Flentje, R., Millar, T., Jones, A., … Jennifer Shaw. (2015). The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diversion and aftercare programmes for offenders using class A drugs: A systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment, 19, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2012). Drug strategy – Reducing demand managing drug misusing offenders – Update. Bulletin 1, 24 July. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Hollin, C.R. (2008). Evaluating offending behaviour programmes: Does only randomisation glister? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8, 89–106. doi: 10.1177/1748895807085871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, V. (2007). Reconviction analysis of programme data using interim accredited programmes software (IAPS). London: RDS/NOMS
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., & Ritter, A. (2008). A summary of diversion programmes for drug and drug-related offenders in Australia. DPMP Monograph Series No. 16. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C.E., & Stevens, A. (2012). A resounding success or a disastrous failure: Re-examining the interpretation of evidence on the Portuguese decriminalisation of illicit drugs. Drug and Alcohol Review, 31, 101–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00383.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacus, S.M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2009). CEM: Coarsened exact matching software. Journal of Statistical Software, 30, 1–27. doi: 10.18637/jss.v030.i09
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, D., Hedderman, C., Palmer, E., & Hollin, C. (2011). Re-offending analysis of women offenders referred to Together Women (TW) and the scope to divert from custody. Ministry of Justice Research Series 11/11. London: Ministry of Justice
   Google Scholar
• Kilmer, B., Nicosia, N., Heaton, P., & Midgette, G. (2013). Efficacy of frequent monitoring with swift, certain, and modest sanctions for violations: Insights from South Dakota's 24/7 Sobriety Project. American Journal of Public Health, 103, e37–e43. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300989
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maguire, M. (2007). Crime data and statistics. In Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (4th ed.) (pp. 241–301). Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Mallender, J., Roberts, E., & Seddon, T. (2002). Evaluation of drug testing in the criminal justice system in three pilot areas. Home Office Research Findings 176. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D.B. (2006). Depot naltrexone in lieu of incarceration: A behavioral analysis of coerced treatment for addicted offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, J., Eastwood, B., Jones, H., Bradbury, C., Hickman, M., Knight, J., … National Drug Treatment Monitoring System Outcomes Study Group. (2012). Risk adjustment of heroin treatment outcomes for comparative performance assessment in England. Addiction, 107, 2161–2172. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03971.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC). (2013). London crime prevention fund – Final allocation. London: MOPAC
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, J., Bilby, C.A.L., Hatcher, R.M., Hollin, C.R., Hounsome, J., & Palmer, E.J. (2008). Evaluation of structured cognitive-behavioural programmes in reducing criminal recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 21–40. doi: 10.1007/s11292-007-9047-8
   Google Scholar
• Millar, T., Jones, A., Donmall, M., & Roxburgh, M. (2008). Changes in offending following prescribing treatment for drug misuse. London: National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2009). Offender management caseload statistics 2008. Ministry of Justice Statistics bulletin. London: Ministry of Justice
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2011). Adult re-convictions: Results from the 2009 cohort, E&W. London: Ministry of Justice
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2014). Transforming rehabilitation: A summary of evidence on reducing Reoffending (2nd ed.). London: Ministry of Justice
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2016a). Justice Data Lab re-offending analysis: Leeds Drug Intervention Programme/Integrated Offender Management programme run by Developing Initiatives for Support in the Community (DISC Leeds DIP/IOM project). London: Ministry of Justice
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice. (2016b). Offender management statistics bulletin, England and Wales. London: Ministry of Justice
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, N., Heap, D., Elliott, A., & Millar, T. (2016). New opiate and crack-cocaine users: Characteristics and trends. Home Office Research Report 90. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, M., Bird, S.M., Hickman, M., Marsden, J., Dunn, G., Jones, A., & Millar, T. (2016). Impact of treatment for opioid dependence on fatal drug-related poisoning: A national cohort study in England. Addiction, 111, 298–308. doi: 10.1111/add.13193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, M., Hayhurst, K., Bird, S.M., Hickman, M., Seddon, T., Dunn, G., & Millar, T. (2015). Quantifying crime associated with drug use among a large cohort of sanctioned offenders in England and Wales. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 155, 52–59. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prime Minister's Strategy Unit. (2003). Drugs project phase 2 report: Diagnosis and recommendations. London: Cabinet Office
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. (2002). Observational studies. New York: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R., & Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. doi: 10.2307/2335942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaub, M., Stevens, A., Berto, D., Hunt, N., Kerschl, V., McSweeney, T., … Uchtenhagen, A. (2010). Comparing outcomes of ‘Voluntary’ and ‘Quasi-Compulsory’ treatment of substance dependence in Europe. European Addiction Research, 16, 53–60. doi: 10.1159/000265938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, T., Williams, L., & Ralphs, R. (2012). Tough choices. Clarendon studies in criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, N. (2008). The role of drug testing in the criminal justice system. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 8, 4–8. doi: 10.1108/17459265200800019
   Google Scholar
• Skodbo, S., Brown, G., Deacon, S., Cooper, A., Hall, A., Millar, T., … Whitham, K. (2007). The Drug Interventions Programme (DIP): Addressing drug use and offending through tough choices’. Home Office Research Report 2. London: Home Office
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F.S., Henderson, C., & Belenko, S. (2009). Organisational context, systems change, and adopting treatment delivery systems in the criminal justice system. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103, S1–S6. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoemmes, F. (2012). Propensity score matching in SPSS. New York: Cornell University
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, P.J., & Webster, R. (1998). An overview of demand reduction activity in the criminal justice system in the European Union. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 5, 177–184. doi: 10.3109/09687639809006683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Drug Policy Commission (UKDPC). (2008). Reducing drug use, reducing reoffending: Are programmes for problem drug-using offenders in the UK supported by the evidence? London: UKDPC
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, R. (2016). World prison population list (11th ed.). London: ICPR
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M., Cattell, J., Hales, G., Lord, C., Kenny, T., & Capes, T. (2013). Re-offending by offenders on community orders: Preliminary findings from the offender management community cohort study. London: Ministry of Justice
   Google Scholar
• Wundersitz, J. (2007). Criminal justice responses to drug and drug-related offending: Are they working? Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology
   Google Scholar