Wealthy, urban, educated. Who is represented in population surveys of women’s menstrual hygiene management?

References

• Sommer M, Figueroa C, Kwauk C, et al. Attention to menstrual hygiene management in schools: an analysis of education policy documents in low-and middle-income countries. Int J Educ Dev. 2017;57:73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chothe V, Khubchandani J, Seabert D, et al. Students’ perceptions and doubts about menstruation in developing countries a case study from India. Health Promot Pract. 2014:1524839914525175.
   Google Scholar
• Ameade EPK, Majeed SF. Improving girl child education and menstrual hygiene through free sanitary pad provision to secondary school girls-opinion of female university students in Ghana. J Heal Educ Res Dev. 2015;3:143.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Water Supply Sanitation, Water Supply and Sanitation Collaborative Council. National policy consultation workshop on menstrual hygiene management. Nepal: Government of Nepal in collaboration with WSSCC; 2017 [cited 2018 Jan]. Available from: http://wsscc.org/resources-feed/national-policy-consultation-workshop-menstrual-hygiene-management/
   Google Scholar
• Muthengi E, Farris E, Austrian K. The Nia project: baseline report. Nairobi: Population Council; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Menstrual Health Hub [Internet]. Policy: a global think tank; 2018 [cited 2018 Jan 30]. Available from: https://mhhub.org/policy/2017
   Google Scholar
• Sommer M, Chandraratna S, Cavill S, et al. Managing menstruation in the workplace: an overlooked issue in low- and middle income countries. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:86. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0379-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennegan J, Montgomery P. Do menstrual hygiene management interventions improve education and psychosocial outcomes for women and girls in low and middle income countries? A systematic review. PloS one. 2016;11(2):e0146985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman L, Olson H, Tsui A, et al. PMA2020: rapid turn-around survey data to monitor family planning service and practice in ten countries. Stud Family Plann. 2017;48(3):293–303. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SM, Bain RE, Lunze K, et al. Optimizing household survey methods to monitor the sustainable development goals targets 6.1 and 6.2 on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: a mixed-methods field-test in Belize. PloS one. 2017;12(12):e0189089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum EB, Peterson ZD. Investigating the impact of inquiry mode on self-reported sexual behavior: theoretical considerations and review of the literature. J Sex Res. 2012;49(2–3):212–226. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.658923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Master-Hunter T, Heiman DL. Amenorrhea: evaluation and treatment. Women. 2006;100(1):18.
   Google Scholar
• Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475–490. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury R, Sinha B, Sankar MJ, et al. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(S467):96–113. doi: 10.1111/apa.13102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aleem H, d’Arcangues C, Vogelsong KM, Gulmezoglu A. Treatment of vaginal bleeding irregularities induced by progestin only contraceptives. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. Adding it up: investing in contraception and maternal and newborn health. New York (NY): Gutmacher Institute; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Burkina Faso Institut national de la statistique et de la démographie (National Institute of Statistics and Demography), The Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health at The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Performance monitoring and accountability 2020 (PMA2020) survey round 4, PMA2016/Burkina Faso-R4. Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso and Baltimore (MD), USA; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Addis Ababa University School of Public Health. Performance monitoring and accountability 2020 (PMA2020) survey round 5, PMA2016/Ethiopia-R5. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Baltimore (MD), USA; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kwame Nkrumah University of Science & Technology School of Medicine. Performance monitoring and accountability 2020 (PMA2020) survey round 5, PMA2016/Ghana-R5. Kumasi, Ghana and Baltimore (MD), USA; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Indian Institute of Health Management Research (IIHMR) University in Jaipur. Performance monitoring and accountability 2020 (PMA2020) survey round 2, PMA2017/India-R2 (Rajasthan). Jaipur, India and Baltimore (MD), USA; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• International Centre for Reproductive Health Kenya (ICRHK). Performance monitoring and accountability 2020 (PMA2020) survey round 5, PMA2016/Kenya-R5. Nairobi, Kenya and Baltimore (MD), USA; 2016
   Google Scholar
• Niger/Niamey Institut National de la Statistique (National Institute of Statistics). Performance monitoring and accountability 2020 (PMA2020) survey round 2, PMA2016/Niger-R2 (National). Niamey, Niger and Baltimore (MD), USA; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Research, Evaluation Resources and Development (CRERD), Bayero University Kano (BUK), and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (JHSPH). Performance monitoring and accountability 2020 (PMA2020) survey round 2, PMA2015/Nigeria-R2 (Kaduna & Lagos). Lagos, Nigeria and Baltimore (MD), USA.
   Google Scholar
• Makerere University, School of Public Health at the College of Health Sciences. Performance monitoring and accountability 2020 (PMA2020) survey round 5, PMA2017/Uganda-R5. Kampala, Uganda and Baltimore, USA (MD), USA; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Alvergne A, Stevens R, Gurmu E. Side effects and the need for secrecy: characterising discontinuation of modern contraception and its causes in Ethiopia using mixed methods. Contracep Repr Med. 2017;2(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40834-017-0052-7
   Google Scholar