Academics Applying Interventionist Research to Deal with Wicked and Complex Societal Problems

References

• Alawattage, Chandana, Diane-Laure Arjaliès, Mereana Barrett, Julie Bernard, Silvia Pereira de Castro Casa Nova, Charles H. Cho, Christine Cooper, et al. 2021. Opening accounting: A manifesto. Accounting Forum July: 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2021.1952685.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, Mats, and Stanley Deetz. 2020. Doing critical research. London: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, Mats, and Kaj Sköldberg. 2009. Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, Mats, and Hugh Willmott. 1992. On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. The Academy of Management Review 17, no. 3: 432–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolopoulou, Elia, and Jose A. Cortes-Vazquez. 2018. The right to nature: Social movements, environmental justice and neoliberal natures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ariemma, Lisa, and Judith Burnside-Lawry. 2016. Transnational resistance networks: New democratic prospects? The Lyon-Turin railway and No Tav movement. In Research in social movements, conflicts and change. Vol. 39, 137–65. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0163-786X20160000039006.
   Google Scholar
• Baard, Vicki C, and John Dumay. 2020a. Interventionist research in accounting: A methodological approach. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baard, Vicki C, and John Dumay. 2020b. Interventionist research in accounting: Reflections on the good, the bad and the ugly. Accounting & Finance 60 no. 3: 1979–2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., J. Brown, B. Frame, and I. Thomson. 2007. Theorizing engagement: The potential of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 20, no. 3: 356–381.
   Google Scholar
• Berger Peter, L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Ulrich, Barbara Muraca, Éric Pineault, Marlyne Sahakian, Anke Schaffartzik, Andreas Novy, Christoph Streissler, et al. 2021. From planetary to societal boundaries: An argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 17, no. 1: 264–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Judy, and Jesse Dillard. 2013. Agonizing over engagement: SEA and the “death of environmentalism” debates. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 24, no. 1: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Judy, and Jesse Dillard. 2015. Dialogic accountings for stakeholders: On opening up and closing down participatory governance. Journal of Management Studies 52, no. 7: 961–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnside-Lawry, Judy, and Lisa Ariemma. 2015. Global governance and communicative action: A study of democratic participation during planning for the Lyon-Turin rail link. Journal of Public Affairs 15, no. 2: 129–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1528.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, Gibson, and Gareth Morgan. 1979. Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Vol. 248. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Company Limited Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, George. 2008. Encountering the ethics of engaged scholarship. Journal of Applied Communication Research 36, no. 3: 281–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, Stewart R., Shankar Sankaran, Chris Biesenthal, and Julien Pollack. 2017. Power and sensemaking in megaprojects. In The Oxford handbook of megaproject management, edited by Bent Flyvbjerg, 238–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cottafava, D., and L. Corazza. 2020. Co-design of a stakeholders’ ecosystem: An assessment methodology by linking social network analysis, stakeholder theory and participatory mapping. Kybernetes 50, no. 3: 836–858. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, Jesse. 1991. Accounting as a critical social science. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 4, no. 1: 0–0. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579110143849.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, Jesse, and Judy Brown. 2012. Agonistic pluralism and imagining CSEAR into the future. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 32, no. 1: 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160x.2012.656403.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, Jesse, and Robin Roslender. 2011. Taking pluralism seriously: Embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 22, no. 2: 135–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.014.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, Jesse, and Eija Vinnari. 2019. Critical dialogical accountability: From accounting-based accountability to accountability-based accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 62: 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumay, John. 2010. A critical reflective discourse of an interventionist research project. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 7, no. 1: 46–70.
   Google Scholar
• Dumay, John, and Vicki Baard. 2017. “An introduction to interventionist research in accounting.” In The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research Methods, edited by Zahirul Hoque, Lee Parker, Mark Covaleski, and Kathryn Hines, 265–83. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, Giovanni, Teresa Nelson, Ewan Ferlie, and Nathalie Crutzen. 2021. The institutional shaping of global megaprojects: The case of the Lyon-Turin high-speed railway. International Journal of Project Management 39, no. 6: 658–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, Giovanni, Andrea Terlizzi, and Nathalie Crutzen. 2022. Policy narratives and megaprojects: The case of the Lyon-Turin high-speed railway. Public Management Review 24, no. 1: 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1795230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – Putting European Transport on Track for the Future. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14012-2020-INIT/en/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ferdinand, J., G. Pearson, M. Rowe, and F. Worthington. 2007. A different kind of ethics. Ethnography 8, no. 4: 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138107083566.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhendler, Itay, Galit Cohen-Blankshtain, Yoav Shuali, and Max Boykoff. 2015. Communicating mega-projects in the face of uncertainties: Israeli mass media treatment of the Dead Sea water canal. Public Understanding of Science 24, no. 7: 794–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513512440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2014. What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal 45, no. 2: 6–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2017. The Oxford handbook of megaproject management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallhofer, Sonja, Jim Haslam, and Akira Yonekura. 2015. Accounting as differentiated universal for emancipatory praxis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 28, no. 5: 846–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellert, Paul K, and Barbara D Lynch. 2003. Mega-projects as displacements*. International Social Science Journal 55, no. 175: 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.5501002.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Davydd J., and Morten Levin. 2007. An epistemological foundation for action research. In Introduction to action research, edited by Davydd J. Greenwood and Levin Morten, 55–75. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, Christopher, and Amanda Sinclair. 2006. Writing differently. Organization 13, no. 3: 443–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2016. Collaborative rationality as a strategy for working with wicked problems. Landscape and Urban Planning 154: 8–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, Sten, and Kari Lukka. 2006. There and back again: Doing interventionist research in management accounting. In Handbooks of management accounting research, Vol. 1,, edited by Christopher Chapman, Anthony Hopwood, and Michael Shields, 373–97. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinidis, George. 2015. Spaces of possibilities: Workers’ self-management in Greece. Organization 22, no. 6: 847–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. Historical structure of scientific discovery. Science 136, no. 3518: 760–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, Matias, Matthew Scobie, Matthew Sorola, and Helen Tregidga. 2020. Special issue editorial: Social and environmental account/ability 2020 and beyond. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 40, no. 1: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2020.1733631.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. J., P. Yeow, and J. Y. Chew. 2022. Empowering change for future-making: Developing agency by framing wicked problems through design. Futures 139: 102952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Yongkui, Yujie Lu, John E Taylor, and Yilong Han. 2018. Bibliographic and comparative analyses to explore emerging classic texts in megaproject management. International Journal of Project Management 36, no. 2: 342–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Han, Saixing Zeng, Hanyang Ma, Ruochen Zeng, and Vivian W.Y. Tam. 2017. An indicator system for evaluating megaproject social responsibility. International Journal of Project Management 35, no. 7: 1415–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukka, Kari, and Petri Suomala. 2014. Relevant interventionist research: Balancing three intellectual virtues. Accounting and Business Research 44, no. 2: 204–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Hanyang, Zheming Liu, Saixing Zeng, Han Lin, and Vivian W Y Tam. 2020. Does megaproject social responsibility improve the sustainability of the construction industry? Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 27, no. 4: 975–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2019-0363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, H., Z. Liu, S. Zeng, H. Lin, and V. W. Y. Tam. 2020. “Does megaproject social responsibility improve the sustainability of the construction industry?” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 27: 975–996. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2019-0363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, H., S. Zeng, H. Lin, H. Chen, and J. J. Shi. 2017. “The societal governance of megaproject social responsibility.” International Journal of Project Management 35, no. 7: 1365–1377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maanen, John Van. 2011. Ethnography as work: Some rules of engagement. Journal of Management Studies 48, no. 1: 218–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marincioni, Fausto, and Federica Appiotti. 2009. The Lyon-Turin high-speed rail: The public debate and perception of environmental risk in Susa Valley, Italy. Environmental Management 43, no. 5: 863–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9271-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melé, Domènec, and Jaume Armengou. 2016. Moral legitimacy in controversial projects and its relationship with social license to operate: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics 136, no. 4: 729–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2866-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, Martin. 1995. Critique in the name of what? Postmodernism and critical approaches to organization. Organization Studies 16, no. 4: 553–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, Martin. 2002. Utopia and the organizational imagination: Outopia. The Sociological Review 50, no. 1_suppl: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Perrow, Charles. 2008. Conservative radicalism. Organization 15, no. 6: 915–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B Guy. 2017. What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society 36, no. 3: 385–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, Trish, Karen Golden-Biddle, and Kathy Germann. 2006. Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal 49, no. 5: 977–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., and M. M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4, no. 2: 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roloff, J. 2008. Learning from multi-stakeholder networks: Issue-focussed stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics 82, no. 1: 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9573-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, T. J. 2017. The power of and in stakeholder networks. In Stakeholder management, 101–122. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Science Advice for Policy by European Academies. 2019. Making sense of science under conditions of complexity and uncertainty. Berlin: SAPEA. https://doi.org/10.26356/masos.
   Google Scholar
• Shockley-Zalabak, Pamela, J. Kevin Barge, Laurie Lewis, and Jennifer Lynn Simpson. 2017. Engaged scholarship. In The international encyclopedia of organizational communication, edited by C. R. Scott, R. Barker, T. Kuhn, J. Keyton, P. K. Turner, and L. K. Lewis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc071.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2014. What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energy Research & Social Science 1: 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer, André, Mats Alvesson, and Dan Kärreman. 2009. Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations 62, no. 4: 537–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, André, Mats Alvesson, and Dan Kärreman. 2016. Extending critical performativity. Human Relations 69, no. 2: 225–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suomala, Petri, Jouni Lyly-Yrjänäinen, and Kari Lukka. 2014. Battlefield around interventions: A reflective analysis of conducting interventionist research in management accounting. Management Accounting Research 25, no. 4: 304–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temper, Leah, Daniela Del Bene, and Joan Martinez-Alier. 2015. Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: The EJAtlas. Journal of Political Ecology 22, no. 1: 255–78.
   Google Scholar
• Termeer, Catrien, and Art Dewulf. 2019. A small wins framework to overcome the evaluation paradox of governing wicked problems. Policy and Society 38, no. 2: 298–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, Catrien, and T. A. P. Metze. 2019. More than peanuts: Transformation towards a circular economy through a small-wins governance framework. Journal of Cleaner Production 240: 118272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, Andrew H. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Fenema, Paul C., Sebastiaan Rietjens, and Peter van Baalen. 2016. Stability & reconstruction operations as mega projects: Drivers of temporary network effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management 34, no. 5: 839–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnari, Eija. 2021. Animals, activists and accounting: On confronting an intellectual dead end. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 41, no. 3: 194–200.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Ge, Qinghua He, Xianhai Meng, Giorgio Locatelli, Tao Yu, and Xue Yan. 2017. Exploring the impact of megaproject environmental responsibility on organizational citizenship behaviors for the environment: A social identity perspective. International Journal of Project Management 35, no. 7: 1402–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickert, Christopher, and Stephan M Schaefer. 2015. Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies. Human Relations 68, no. 1: 107–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Hu, Albert P. C. Chan, Yun Le, and Run-zhi Jin. 2015. From construction megaproject management to complex project management: Bibliographic analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering 31, no. 4: 4014052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellner, Moira, and Scott D. Campbell. 2015. Planning for deep-rooted problems: What can we learn from aligning complex systems and wicked problems? Planning Theory & Practice 16, no. 4: 457–478. doi:10.1080/14649357.2015.1084360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, S. X., H. Y. Ma, H. Lin, R. C. Zeng, and V. W. Y. Tam. 2015. “Social responsibility of major infrastructure projects in China.” International Journal of Project Management 33, no. 3: 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar