Part 1 – Revealing the Eurocentric foundations of IPE: A critical historiography of the discipline from the classical to the modern era

REFERENCES

• Angell, N. (1913) The Great Illusion, London: G.P. Putnam's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, D. (ed.) (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaney, D.L. and Inayatullah, N. (2010) Savage Economics, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2002) Great Transformations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (ed.) (2009) The Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caves, R.E. (1976) ‘Economic Models of Political Choice: Canada's Tariff Structure’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 9(2): 278–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, B. and Rosamond, B. (2009) ‘Lineages of a British International Political Economy’, in M. Blyth (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy, London: Routledge, pp. 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B.J. (2007) ‘The Transatlantic Divide: Why are American and British IPE so Different?’, Review of International Political Economy, 14(2): 197–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B.J. (2008) International Political Economy: An Intellectual History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R.W. (1981) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium, 10(2): 126–55.
   Google Scholar
• Denemark, R.A. and O’Brien, R. (1997) ‘Contesting the Canon: International Political Economy at UK and US Universities’, Review of International Political Economy, 4(1): 214–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. and Leonard, S.T. (1988) ‘History and Discipline in Political Science’, American Political Science Review, 82(4): 1245–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, A. (1995) ‘The New Political Economy’, Political Studies, 43(3): 516–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (1975) US Power and the Multinational Corporation, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (1987) The Political Economy of International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (2001) Global Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grunberg, I. (1990) ‘Exploring the “Myth” of Hegemonic Stability’, International Organization, 44(4): 431–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E. (2003) ‘Economic Liberalism and its Critics: The Past as Prologue?’, Review of International Political Economy, 10(4): 685–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E. (2009) ‘Division and Dialogue in Anglo-American IPE: A Reluctant Canadian View’, New Political Economy, 14(3): 377–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilferding, R. (1910/1985) Finance Capital, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J.A. (1902/1968) Imperialism: A Study, London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J.M. (2012) The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M. and Seabrooke, L. (eds.) (2007) Everyday Politics of the World Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. (1977) ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, Daedalus, 106: 41–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inayatullah, N. and Blaney, D.L. (2004) International Relations and the Problem of Difference, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, B. (2000) The Cultural Construction of International Relations, Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P.J.O. Keohane, R.O. and Krasner, S.D. (1998) ‘International Organization and the Study of World Politics’, International Organization, 52(4): 645–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P.J. (2009) ‘Mid-Atlantic: Sitting on the knife's sharp edge’, Review of International Political Economy, 16(1): 122–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O. (1984) After Hegemony, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O. (1989) International Institutions and State Power, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O. (1993) ‘Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War’, in D. Baldwin (ed.) Neorealism and Neoliberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 269–300.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O. (2009) ‘The Old IPE and the New’, Review of International Political Economy, 16(1): 34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, S.D. (1992) ‘Realism, Imperialism, and Democracy: A Response to Gilbert’, Political Theory, 20(1): 38–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, D.A. (2009) ‘TRIPS Across the Atlantic: Theory and Epistemology in IPE’, Review of International Political Economy, 16(1): 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2009) ‘Why We need Multiple Stories about the Global Political Economy’, Review of International Political Economy, 16(2): 321–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenin, V.I. (1916/1973) Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, L. H. M. (2002) Postcolonial International Relations, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• List, F. (1841/1909) The National System of Political Economy, London: Longmans, Green and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Mackinder, H.J. (1904) ‘The Geographical Pivot of History’, The Geographical Journal, 23(4): 421–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mahan, A.T. (1897) The Influence of Seapower upon History, London: Sampson, Law, Marston.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1867/1954) Capital, I, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, T. (2009) Race, Empire, and the Idea of Human Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J.J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, R.L. (1976) Social Science and the Ignoble Savage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, U.S. (1999) Liberalism and Empire, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C.N. (2009) ‘Do the Left-Out Matter?’, New Political Economy, 14(3): 357–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, C.N. and Nelson, D.R. (2001) ‘International Political Economy: A Tale of Two Heterodoxies’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3(3): 393–412.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C.N. and Tooze, R. (eds.) (1991) The New International Political Economy, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Muthu, S. (2008) ‘Adam Smith's Critique of International Trading Companies: Theorizing “Globalization” in the Age of Enlightenment’, Political Theory, 36(2): 185–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. and Williams, M. (2004) Global Political Economy, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parekh, B. (1997) ‘The West and its Others’, in K. Ansell-Pearson, B. Parry andJ. Squires (eds.) Cultural Readings of Imperialism, London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 173–93.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, A.J. and Phillips, N. (2010) Development, Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, C.H. (1894) National Life and Character: A Forecast, London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (ed.) (2005) Globalizing International Political Economy, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N. (2009) ‘The Slow Death of Pluralism’, Review of International Political Economy, 16(1): 85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, J. (2005) A Turn to Empire, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E.W. (1978/2003) Orientalism, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, B.C. (1998) The Political Discourse of Anarchy, New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H.M. (2000) States Versus Markets, Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L. (2006) The Social Sources of Financial Power, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. (2002) Visions of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1762–3/1982) Lectures on Jurisprudence, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (1776/1937) The Wealth of Nations, New York: The Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, H. (1902) Facts and Comments, NewYork: D. Appleton and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Spykman, N.J. (1942) America's Strategy in World Politics, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, T.L. (1920) The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1991) ‘An Eclectic Approach’, in C. N. Murphy and R. Tooze (eds.) The New International Political Economy, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, W.G. (1911) War and Other Essays, New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vitalis, R. (Forthcoming) ‘The End of Empire in American Political Science’. Unpublished book manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M. (2005) Foundations of International Political Economy, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar