The new interdependence approach: theoretical development and empirical demonstration

References

• Ahlquist, J. S. (2006) ‘Economic policy, institutions, and capital flows: portfolio and direct investment flows in developing countries’, International Studies Quarterly 50(3): 681–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alden, C. and Vieira, M. A. (2005) ‘The new diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and trilateralism’, Third World Quarterly 26(7): 1077–95.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K. (1998) ‘Who are the ‘masters of the treaty’? European Governments and the European court of justice’, International Organization 52(1): 121–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonova, L. B. (2014) ‘Boomerangs to partnerships? Explaining state participation in transnational partnerships for sustainability’, Comparative Political Studies 47(3): 481–515.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. M. (1994) ‘Capital mobility and state autonomy: toward a structural theory of international monetary relations’, International Studies Quarterly 38(2): 193–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccini, L. and Dür, A. (2012) ‘The new regionalism and policy interdependence’, British Journal of Political Science 42(1): 57–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, D. and Newman, A. (2007) ‘The European regulatory state and global public policy: micro-institutions and macro-influence’, Journal of European Public Policy 16(4): 827–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, D. and Newman, A. L. (2010) ‘Transgovernmental networks and domestic policy convergence: Evidence from insider trading regulation’, International Organization 64(3): 505–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley, T. (2011) ‘Transnational governance as the layering of rules: intersections of public and private standards’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law 12(2): 517–42.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, S. (2000) ‘Globalization and politics’, Annual Review of Political Science 3: 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boas, T. C. (2006) ‘Weaving the authoritarian web: The control of Internet use in nondemocratic regimes,’ in A. Newman and J. Zysman (eds) How Revolutionary was the Digital Revolution, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A. and Risse, T. (2003) ‘Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe,’ in K. Featherstone and K. Radaelli (eds) The Politics of Europeanization, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. M. and Kurtz, M. J. (2012) ‘Paths to financial policy diffusion: statist legacies in Latin America's globalization’, International Organization 66(1): 95–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L. and McDermott, G. A. (2012) ‘Integrating rule takers: transnational integration regimes shaping institutional change in emerging market democracies’, Review of International Political Economy 19(5): 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büthe, T. and Milner, H. V. (2008) ‘The politics of foreign direct investment into developing countries: increasing FDI through international trade agreements?’ American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 741–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büthe, T. and Mattli, W. (2011) The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, H. (2010) ‘Beyond methodological nationalism: how multilevel governance affects the clash of capitalisms’, Journal of European Public Policy 17(4): 564–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (2004) Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, A. (2014) ‘States held hostage: political hold-up problems and the effects of international institutions’, American Political Science Review 108(1): 54–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudoin, S., Milner, H. V. and Pang, X. (2015) ‘International systems and domestic politics: linking complex interactions with empirical models in international relations’, International Organization 69(2): 275–309. doi:10.1017/S0020818314000356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colgan, J. D. (2014) ‘The Emperor has no clothes: the limits of OPEC in the global oil market’, International Organization 68(3): 599–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copelovitch, M. S. and Putnam, T. L. (2014) ‘Design in context: existing international agreements and new cooperation’, International Organization 68(2): 471–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. (2015) ‘Structural power and political science’, Business and Government 17(3): 391–409.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. and Reinke, R. (2014) ‘Structural Power and bank bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States’, Politics and Society 42(4): 427–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, K. A., Jupille, J. and Leblang, D. (2014) ‘Iceland on the rocks: the mass political economy of sovereign debt resettlement’, International Organization 68(3): 721–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D. and Tarrow, S. (2005). Transnational Protest and Global Activism, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K. (2008) ‘Private transnational governance and the developing world: A comparative perspective’, International Studies Quarterly 52(3): 607–34.
   Google Scholar
• Djelic, M.-L. and Quack, S. (2010) Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobusch, L. and Quack, S. (2012) ‘Framing standards, mobilizing users: copyright versus fair use in transnational regulation’, Review of International Political Economy 20(1): 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. (2007) All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, Z. (2010) ‘Diffusion and the Constitutionalization of Europe’, Comparative Political Studies 43(8–9): 969–99.
   Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, P. (2015) ‘The long arm of justice: U.S. structural power and international banking’, Business and Politics 17(3): 473–93.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P., Jacobson, H. and Putnam, R. (1993) Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Newman, A. (2010) ‘Making global markets: historical institutionalism in international political economy’, Review of International Political Economy 17(4): 609–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Newman, A. L. (2014) ‘Domestic institutions beyond the nation-state: charting the NIA’, World Politics 66(2): 331–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Newman, A. (2015) ‘The new politics of interdependence cross-national layering in trans-Atlantic regulatory disputes’, Comparative Political Studies 48(4): 497–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H. and Newman, A. (forthcoming) ‘Rethinking electoral politics in an age of interdependence: Brexit through the lens of the new interdependence approach,’ Review of International Political Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Fioretes, O. (2011) ‘Historical institutionalism in international relations’, International Organization 65(2): 367–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, G. and Lange, P. (1991) ‘Political responses to interdependence; what's ‘left’ for the left?’, International Organization 45(4): 539–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F. (2012) ‘Transnational diffusion: Norms, ideas, and policies‘, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 453–77.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. (1996) ‘International law and domestic institutions: reconciling North American ‘unfair’ trade laws’, International Organization 50(4): 541–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P. (1977) ‘International rrade, domestic coalitions, and liberty: comparative responses to the crisis of 1873-1896’. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8(2): 281–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P. (2013) ‘Yet more hard times? Reflections on the great recession in the frame of earlier hard times,’ in M. Kahler and D. Lake (eds) Politics in New Hard Times, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press , pp. 253–74.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. (2014) Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopewell, K. (2014) ‘The transformation of state-business relations in an emerging economy: The case of Brazilian agribusiness’, Critical Perspectives on International Business 10(4): 291–309.
   Google Scholar
• Jabko, N. (2006) Playing the Market: A Political Strategy for Uniting Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell.
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, J. (2003) ‘Framing issues and seizing opportunities: the UN, NGOs, and Women's Rights’, International Studies Quarterly 47(2): 247–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (2013) ‘Institutional design and bureaucrats’ impact on political control’, The Journal of Politics 75(1): 183–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (2014) Organizational Progeny: Why Governments Are Losing Control over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordana, J., Levi-Faur, D. and i Marín, X. F. (2011) ‘The global diffusion of regulatory agencies: channels of transfer and stages of diffusion’, Comparative Political Studies, 0010414011407466.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, S. C. and Newman, A. L. (2011) ‘The long arm of the law: extraterritoriality and the national implementation of foreign bribery legislation’, International Organization 65(4): 745–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. (2009) Networked Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. and Lake, D. (2003) Governance in a Global Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, K. (1971) ‘Transnational politics: toward a theory of multinational politics’, International Organization 25(4): 790–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (2009) ‘The old IPE and the new’, Review of International Political Economy 16(1): 34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. and Nye, J. (1974) ‘Transgovernmental relations and international organizations’, World Politics 27(October): 39–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. and Nye, J. (1977) Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. and Victor, D. G. (2011) ‘The regime complex for climate change’, Perspectives on Politics 9(1): 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koremenos, B., Lipson, C. and Snidal, D. (2001) ‘The rational design of international institutions’, International Organization 55(4): 761–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. (1991) ‘Global communications and national power’, World Politics 43(3): 336—66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A. (2009) ‘Open economy politics: a critical review’, The Review of International Organizations 4(3): 219–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2011) ‘After Egypt: The limits and promise of online challenges to the authoritarian Arab state’, Perspectives on Politics 9(2): 301–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. (2009) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, E. J. (2008) ‘Straight ahead on red: How foreign direct investment empowers subnational leaders’, The Journal of Politics 70(1): 97–119.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. D., Milner, H. V. and Pevehouse, J. C. (2007) ‘Vetoing co-operation: the impact of veto players on preferential trading arrangements’, British Journal of Political Science 37(3): 403–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E., Milner, H. and Rosendorff, B. (2002) ‘Why democracies cooperate more: electoral control and international trade agreements’, International Organization 56(3): 477–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. J. and Swank, D. (2004) ‘Does the organization of capital matter? Employers and active labor market policy at the national and firm levels’, American Political Science Review 98(4): 593–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattli, W. and Woods, N. (2009) The Politics of Global Regulation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier, S. (2005) Trading Voices: The European Union in International Commercial Negotiations, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. (1997) Interests, Institutions, and Information, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, H. V. and Tingley, D. H. (2011) ‘Who supports global economic engagement? The sources of preferences in American foreign economic policy’, International Organization 65(1): 37–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosley, L. (2003) Global Capital and National Governments, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, A. (2008) Protectors of Privacy: Regulating Personal Data in the Global Economy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, A. and Posner, E. (2011) ‘International interdependence and regulatory power: authority, mobility, and markets’, European Journal of International Relations, 17(4): 589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A. and Posner, E. (2016) ‘Structuring transnational interests: the second-order effects of soft law in the politics of global finance’, Review of International Political Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Nexon, D. (2009) The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., ten Brink, T., Claar, S. and May, C. (2014) ‘Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies’, European Journal of International Relations, 1354066114553682.
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, T. (2011) ‘The reductionist gamble: open economy politics in the global economy’, International Organization 65(2): 311–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, E. (2009) ‘Making rules for global finance: transatlantic regulatory cooperation at the turn of the millennium’, International Organization 63(4): 665–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V. (2008) ‘The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities’, International Organization 62(2): 257–88.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games’, International Organization 42(3): 427–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, T. L. (2009) ‘Courts without borders: domestic sources of U.S. extraterritoriality in the regulatory sphere’, International Organization 63(3): 459–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K. (2004) ‘The regime complex for plant genetic resources’, International Organization 58(2): 277–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K. (2009) Does the Constitution Follow the Flag? The Evolution of Territoriality in American Law, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risse-Kappan, T. (1995) Bringing Transnational Actors Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogowski, R. (1989) Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudra, N. (2008) Globalization and the Race to the Bottom in Developing Countries: Who Really Gets Hurt?, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schickler, E. (2001) Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the US Congress, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L. and Tsingou, E. (2014) ‘Distinctions, affiliations, and professional knowledge in financial reform expert groups’, Journal of European Public Policy 21(3): 389–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, G. C. (2012) Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. (2000) ‘International law and state behavior: commitment and compliance in international monetary affairs’, American Political Science Review 94(4): 819–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A. and Danner, A. (2010) ‘Credible commitments and the international criminal court’, International Organization 64(2): 225–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B., Dobbins, F. and Garrett, G. (2006) ‘The international diffusion of liberalism’, International Organization 60(4): 781–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, A. (2007) ‘Global linkages and domestic politics trade reform and institution building in India in comparative perspective’, Comparative Political Studies 40(10): 1183–210.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, M. D. (2014) ‘Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge’, European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 912–38.
   Google Scholar
• Swank, D. (2006) ‘Tax policy in an era of internationalization: Explaining the spread of neoliberalism’, International Organization 60(4): 847.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (2004) How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonnelson, A. (2000) The Race to the Bottom, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, J. (2016) ‘European union member states in cross-national analyses: the danger of neglecting supranational policymaking’, International Studies Quarterly 60(1): 98–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. R. (2003) ‘Political transfer and “trading up”?: Transatlantic trade in genetically modified food and US politics’, World Politics 55(4): 457–84.
   Google Scholar