International development aid and the politics of scale

References

• Ansori, M. H. (2012). From insurgency to bureaucracy: Free Aceh movement, Aceh party and the new face of conflict. Stability, 1(1), 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Askhalani. (2013). Birokrasi ‘Dagang Sap’ ala Aceh. [Bureaucratic ‘horse-trading’ ala Aceh], Serambi Indonesia. Retrieved from http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2013/02/13/birokrasi-dagang-sap-ala-aceh
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. (2007). From Islamism to nationalism in Aceh, Indonesia. Nations and Nationalism, 13(2), 245–263.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. (2009). Combatants to contractors: The political economy of peace in Aceh. Indonesia, 87, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E. (2011). Aceh's no win election. Inside Indonesia, Retrieved from http://www.insideindonesia.org/aceh-s-no-win-election
   Google Scholar
• Aspinall, E., Hillman, B., & McCawley, P. (2012). Governance and capacity building in post-crisis Aceh. Canberra: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Atjehpost.co. (2014). Masa Anggaran Berakhir, Realisasi APBA Dinas Pendidikan Aceh Masih di Bawah Target. [End of Busget Period; Realisation Education Department below Target]. Retrieved from http://atjehpost.co/berita2/read/Masa-Anggaran-Berakhir-Realisasi-APBA-Dinas-Pendidikan-Aceh-Masih-di-Bawah-Target-17306
   Google Scholar
• Barron, P., & Clark, S. (2006). Decentralizing inequality? Center-periphery relations, local governance, and conflict in Aceh. Jakarta: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M., & MacLeod, G. (2003). Introduction: State space in question. In N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones, & G. MacLeod (Eds.), State/space: A reader (pp. 1–26). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, D. W., Wetterberg, A., & Dunn, S. (2012). Service delivery and legitimacy in fragile and conflict-affected states: Evidence from water services in Iraq. Public Management Review, 14(2), 273–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2005). Horizontal inequalities, ethnic separatism, and violent conflict: The case of Aceh, Indonesia. Human Development Report 2005. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2005_brown_graham_28.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scale and networks. Political Geography, 24(8), 875–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahyono, H. (2016). Evaluasi atas pelaksanaan otonomi khusus Aceh: Gagal menyejahterakan rakyat dan sarat konflik internal. [Evaluation of the implementation of Special Autonomy in Aceh: Failed people's welfare and internal conflicts]. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9(2), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T., & De Gramont, D. (2013). Development aid confronts politics: The almost revolution. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, T. (2010). Delusions of development: The world bank and the post-Washington consensus in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fadillah, A. (2016). Korupsi di Aceh: Ironi pembangunan Aceh. [Corruption in Aceh: The Irony of Aceh Development]. Retrieved from http://leuserantara.com/ironi-pembangunan-aceh-beraroma-korupsi/
   Google Scholar
• Faust, J. (2010). Policy experiments, democratic ownership and development assistance. Development Policy Review, 28(5), 515–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, V., & Menocal, A. R. (2007). Developmental states in the new millennium: Concepts and challenges for a new aid agenda. Development Policy Review, 25(5), 531–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GeRAK Aceh. (2016). GeRAK: Pemerintah Aceh Adalah Pemerintah Yang Gemar Gonta-Ganti Kabinet. [GeRAK: Aceh Government Loves Reshuffling the Cabinet], Banda Aceh. Retrieved from http://baranewsaceh.co/gerak-aceh-pertanyakan-gonta-ganti-kabinet-di-tubuh-pemerintah-aceh22/
   Google Scholar
• Gisselquist, R. M. (2015). Varieties of fragility: Implications for aid. Third World Quarterly, 36(7), 1269–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, J. (2004). Changing scale as changing class relations: Variety and contradiction in the politics of scale. Political Geography, 23(2), 185–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. S. (2009). Going local: Decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Decentralising power in post-authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asian perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S. (2010). Regulating statehood: State building and the transformation of the global order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2015). Governing borderless threats: Non-Traditional security and the politics of state transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2017). Beyond hybridity to the politics of scale: International intervention and “Local” politics. Development and Change, 48(1), 54–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harun, H., An, Y., & Kahar, A. (2013). Implementation and challenges of introducing NPM and accrual accounting in Indonesian local government. Public Money & Management, 33(5), 383–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (2006). The limits to capital. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hewison, K., Robison, R., & Rodan, G. (1993). Introduction: Changing forms of state power in Southeast Asia. In K. Hewison, R. Robison, & G. Rodan (Eds.), Southeast Asia in the 1990s: Authoritarianism, democracy and capitalism (pp. 2–8). St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, B. (2013). Public administration reform in post-conflict societies: Lessons from Aceh, Indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 33(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, J., Hout, W., Hughes, C., & Robison, R. (2014). Political economy and the Aid industry in Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• ICG [International Crisis Group]. (2007). Aceh: Post-conflict complications. Jakarta: International Crisis Group.
   Google Scholar
• IPAC [Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict]. (2014). Aceh's surprising election results. Jakarta: Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict.
   Google Scholar
• Islahuddin. (2010). Some preliminary notes on the Aceh special autonomy fund and the shared oil and gas earning fund. Banda Aceh: Syiah Kuala University.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2008). State power: A strategic-relational approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kell, T. (2010 [1995]). The roots of Acehnese rebellion, 1989–1992. Jakarta: Equinox Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• klikkabar.com. (2015). Mualem Minta SKPA Berapor Merah Percepat Realisasi Anggaran. [Mualem Asks SPKA in Red to Accelerate Budget Realisation]. Retrieved from https://klikkabar.com/2015/09/25/mualem-minta-skpa-berapor-merah-percepat-realisasi-anggaran/
   Google Scholar
• Leftwich, A. (2012). Coalitions in the politics of development: Findings, insights and guidance from the DLP coalitions workshop. Developmental Leadership Program, Research and Policy Workshop Report, Sydney, Australia, 15–16 February.
   Google Scholar
• LintasGayo.co. (2016). Bersama kegiatan strategis APBA 2016. [Joint Strategic Activity Budget 2016]. Retrieved from http://lintasgayo.co/2016/04/27/kontrak-bersama-kegiatan-strategis-apba-2016-gubernur-jangan-hanya-duduk-di-belakang-meja
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, L., Brinkerhoff, D., & Najib, M. (2012). Community engagement and performance-based incentives: The view from Indonesia. In PBI case studies. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2002). Political economies of scale: Fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography, 78(3), 331–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, power, socialism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Pusat Pengembangan Keuangan Daerah. (2016). Kajian Pelaksanaan Dana Otonomi Khusus Kabupaten/Kota [Study on the Implementation of Special Autonomy Fund Regency / City]. Banda Aceh: BAPPEDA.
   Google Scholar
• Rachman, R. A. (2012). TOMMY Si Agen Tak Tuk [Tommy, the ‘Tak Tuk’ agent]. Banda Aceh: P2K-ABBA, Aceh Provincial Government.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, M. L. (2005). Resources and rebellion in Aceh, Indonesia. In P. Collier & N. A. Sambanis (Eds.), Understanding civil war (pp. 35–58). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Santoso, A. (2006). GAM and former rebels in elections victory. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved http://asia-pacificsolidarity.net/southeastasia/indonesia/netnews/2006/ind47v10.htm#.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze, K. E. (2004). The free Aceh movement (GAM): Anatomy of a separatist organization. Washington, DC: East-West Center.
   Google Scholar
• Serambi Indonesia. (2012a). Anggota Dewan Protes Otsus Kabupaten Dikurangi. [Board Members Protests Cuts to Districts Allocation of Special Autonomy Fund]. Retrieved from http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2012/12/21/anggota-dewan-protes-otsus-kabupaten-dikurangi
   Google Scholar
• Serambi Indonesia. (2012b). Pemerintah Aceh Akan Revisi Qanun Otsus. [Aceh Government to revise Special Autonomy Fund Bylaw]. Retrieved from http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2012/08/04/pemerintah-aceh-akan-revisi-qanun-otsus
   Google Scholar
• Serambi Indonesia. (2012c). Provinsi tidak Boleh Kaku Soal Dana Otsus. [Province Cannot Impose Inflexible Special Autonomy Fund Earmarking]. Retrieved from http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2012/11/09/provinsi-tidak-boleh-kaku-soal-dana-otsus
   Google Scholar
• Serambi Indonesia. (2013). Dana Otsus Ditransfer ke Daerah. [Special Autonomy Fund Transferred to Disctricts]. Retrieved from http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2013/03/19/dana-otsus-ditransfer-ke-daerah
   Google Scholar
• Serambi Indonesia. (2015a). Reformasi Birokrasi Tetap Jadi Prioritas. [Bureaucratic Reform Remains a Priority]. Retrieved from http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2015/12/14/reformasi-birokrasi-tetap-jadi-prioritas
   Google Scholar
• Serambi Indonesia. (2015b). Saatnya KPK Action di Aceh. [Time for KPK Action in Aceh]. Retrieved from http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2014/10/26/saatnya-kpk-action-di-aceh
   Google Scholar
• Serambi Indonesia. (2016). Gubernur: Tenaga honor yang Malas Distop Saja. [Governor: Committed to Stop Lazy Workers]. Retrieved from http://aceh.tribunnews.com/2016/03/22/gubernur-tenaga-honor-yang-malas-distop-saja
   Google Scholar
• Sindre, G. M. (2014). Internal party democracy in former rebel parties. Part Politics, 22(4), 501–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindre, G. M. (2016). In whose interests? Former rebel parties and ex-combatant interest group mobilisation in Aceh and East Timor. Civil Wars, 18(2), 192–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, N. (2010). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space (3rd ed.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Stange, G., & Patock, R. (2010). From rebels to rulers and legislators: The political transformation of the free Aceh Movement (GAM) in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(1), 95–120.
   Google Scholar
• Sulistiyanto, P. (2001). Whither Aceh? Third World Quarterly, 22(3), 437–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. A. (1997). Neither global nor local: “Glocalization” and the politics of scale. In K. R. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–166). New York, NY: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. A. (2004). Scaled geographies: Nature, place and the politics of scale. In E. Sheppard & R. McMaster (Eds.), Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society and method (pp. 129–153). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Taqwaddin, A. (2010). Pengelolaan Dana Otsus. [The Managment of the Special Autonomy Fund]. Retrieved from https://pekikdaerah.wordpress.com/artikel-makalah/pengelolaan-dana-otsus/
   Google Scholar
• Tryatmoko, M. W. (2016). Problematika peran ganda gubernur di daerah otonomi khusus. [The problematic double role of the governor in the special autonomy areas]. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 9, 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP [United Nations Development Programme]. (2004). Practice note on public administration reform. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2008). Aceh government transformation programme project appraisal document. Jakarta: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2010). Aceh government transformation programme annual report: January–December 2010. Jakarta: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2012a). Aceh government transformation programme final evaluation. Jakarta: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2012b). The legacy of AGTP. Jakarta: United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, L., & Therkildsen, O. (2011). What drives states to support the development of productive sectors? Strategies ruling elites pursue for political survival and their policy implications. DIIS Working Paper No 2011:15. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Zyad, T. (2014). The Aceh exception. New Mandala. Retrieved from http://www.newmandala.org/the-aceh-exception/
   Google Scholar