Ideational power and pathways to legitimation in the euro crisis

References

• Auel, K., & Höing, O. (2014). Parliaments in the Euro crisis: Can the losers of integration still fight back? Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6), 1184–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C., & Schmidt, V. A. (n/a) “Governing Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Comparing EU Financial Institutional Actors—the European Stability Mechanism and the Juncker Plan.”, unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaan van, A. (2013). The European capitalist class and the crisis of its Hegemonic project. Socialist Register, 2014 Pontypool: Merlin.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. (2013). Revisiting legitimacy, twenty years on. In J. Tankebee & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice (pp. 19–36). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, D., & Lord, C. (1998). Legitimacy and the European Union. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. (2010). Democracy without democracy? Can the EU’s democratic ‘outputs’ be separated from the democratic ‘inputs’ provided by competitive parties and majority rule?. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), 2–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., & Weale, A. (2015). Political legitimacy and European monetary union: Contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 257–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C. (2012). European integration: From Nation states to member states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2007). Powering, puzzling, or persuading? The mechanisms of building instituional orders. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 761–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., & Hübner, M. (2018). Fiscal fault, financial fix? Capital Market Union and the quest for macroeconomic stabilization in the Euro Area. Competition & Change, 22(2), 117–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, B., Gabor, D., & Hübner, M. (2018). Governing through financial markets: Towards a critical political economy of Capital Market Union. Competition & Change, 22(2), 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Brug, W., & De Vreese, C. H. (Eds). (2016). (Un)intended consequences of EU Parliamentary elections. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2018). Power and changing modes of governance in the euro crisis. Governance, forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerutti, F. (2008). Why legitimacy and political identity are connected to each other, especially in the case of the European Union. In F. Cerutti & S. Lucarelli (Eds.), The search for a European identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Champeau, S., Closa, C., Innerarity, D., & Maduro, M. (Eds.). (2015). The future of Europe: Democracy, legitimacy and justice after the Euro crisis. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Copelovitch, M., Frieden, J., & Walter, S. (2016). The political economy of the euro crisis. Comparative Political Studies, 49(7), 811–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramme, O., & Hobolt, S. B. (Eds.). (2015). Democratic politics in a European Union under stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, B., & Deirdre, C. (2015). The challenge of making European Union executive power accountable. In S. Piattoni (Ed.), The European Union: Democratic principles and institutional architectures in times of crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. (2011). Quiet politics and business power: Corporate control in Europe and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. (2015). Structural power and political science in the post-crisis era. Business and Politics, 17(03), 391–409.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. D., & Reinke, R. (2014). Structural power and bank bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States. Politics & Society, 42(4), 427–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draghi, M. (2011). Introductory statement to the press conference. The European Central Bank, 3. November 2011, Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pressconf/2011/html/is111103.en.html
   Google Scholar
• Drudi, F., Durré, A., & Mongelli, F. P. (2012). The interplay of economic reforms and monetary policy: The case of the Euro crisis. ECB Working Paper Series, No 1467, September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Engelen, E., & Glasmacher, A. (2018). The waiting game: How securitization became the solution for the growth problem of the Eurozone. Competition & Change, 22(2), 165–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, C., & Rhodes, M. (2018). From governance to government: Banking union, capital markets union and the new EU. Competition & Change, 22(2), 205–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S. (2013). Intergovernmentalism and its limits: Assessing the European Union’s Answer to the Euro Crisis. Comparative Political Studies, 46(9), 1003–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, P., & Marsh, D. (2014). Depoliticisation, governance and political participation. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 171–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinders, M., & Wood, M. (2014). Depoliticisation, governance and the state. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A. (2006). The legitimacy deficits of the European Union. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 441–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilley, B. (2009). The right to rule: How states win and lose legitimacy. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1958). The uniting of Europe: Political, social and economic forces, 1950-1957. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (2016). The Euro crisis and the future of European integration. In The search for Europe: Contrasting approaches (pp. 47–67). Madrid: BBVA.
   Google Scholar
• Helgadottir, O. (2016). The Bocconi boys go to Brussels: Italian economic ideas, professional networks and European austerity. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 392–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A. (1999). Policy-making and diversity in Europe: Escape from deadlock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., Moury, C., Magnus, G., Schoeller, K., & Meissner, I. (2016). The European Parliament as a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation. Report for the Constitutional Affairs Committee of the European Parliament. PE 536.467 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/supporting-analyses-search.html
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2008). What’s wrong with the European Union and how to fix it. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., & Høyland, B. (2013). Empowerment of the European Parliament. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 171–189
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., & Hoyland, B. (2015). The political system of the European Union (3rd ed.). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of european integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(01), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., & Rommerskirchen, C. (2013). A panacea for all times? The German stability culture as strategic political resource. West European Politics, 36(4), 750–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. (2013). The collapse of the Brussels-Frankfurt Consensus and the Future of the Euro. In V. A. Schmidt & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Resilient liberalism: European political economy through boom and bust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, E., Kelemen, D., & Meunier, S. (2016). Failing forward? The Euro crisis and the incomplete nature of european integration. Comparative Political Studies, 49(7), 1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R., S., B. & Wessels, (1999). The European Parliament, the National Parliaments, and European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D. (2017). Europe’s other democratic deficit: National authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union. Government and Opposition, 52(02), 211–238.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R., & Hoffmann, S. (1991). The New European community. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (Eds.). (2010). The making of a European public sphere: Media discourse and political contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., Grande, E., & Lachat, R. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 379–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L., & Stuart, S. (1970). Europe's would-be polity: Patterns of change in the European community. New York: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (1977). Power and structure. In Steven Lukes essays in social theory. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power, freedom and reason. In S. Lukes (Ed.), Power: A radical view (2nd ed., pp. 60–107). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1996). Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (2001). Nonmajoritarian institutions and the limits of democratic governance: A political transaction-approach. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics Jite, 157 (1), 57–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1998). Europe’s democratic deficit. European Law Journal, 4(1), 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M. (2016). Powerful rules governing the euro: The perverse logic of German ideas. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 375–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M. (2017a). Europe after Brexit: A less perfect Union. Foreign Affairs, 96(1), 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M. (2016). The Euro’s ‘Winner-Take-All’ political economy: Institutional choices, policy drift, and diverging patterns of inequality. Politics & Society, 44(3), 393–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M., & Blyth, M. (2015). Introduction: The future of the Euro and the politics of embedded currency areas. In M. Matthijs & M. Blyth (Eds.), The future of the Euro. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M., & Blyth, M. (2017). When is it rational to learn the wrong lessons? Technocratic authority, social learning, and euro fragility. Perspectives on Politics, forthcoming, doi:10.1017/S1537592717002171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthijs, M., & McNamara, K. R. (2015). The Euro Crisis’ theory effect: Northern Saints, Southern sinners, and the demise of the Eurobond. Journal of European Integration, 37(2), 229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcevoy, C. (2016). The role of political efficacy on public opinion in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(5), 1159–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, K. R. (2015). The politics of everyday Europe: Constructing authority in the European Union. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2002). Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliari, S., & Young, K. (2016). The interest ecology of financial regulation: Interest group plurality in the design of financial regulatory policies. Socio-Economic Review, 14(2), 309–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in times. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reus-Smit, C. (2007). International crises of legitimacy. International Politics, 44(2–3), 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2010). A community of Europeans? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. (2014). Integration without representation? The European Parliament and the reforms of economic governance in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(6), 1174–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B., & Philipp, S. (2016). The Legitimacy of Regional Institutions. In T. A. Börzel & T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 579–599). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salines, M., Glöckler, G., & Truchlewski, Z. (2012). Existential crisis, incremental response: The Eurozone’s dual institutional evolution 2007-2011. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 665–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W., & Sweet, A. S. (1998). European integration and supranational governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, D. (2016). A Banking union of ideas? The impact of ordoliberalism and the vicious circle on the Banking Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(4), 961–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1970). Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2013). Monetary Union, fiscal crisis and the disabling of democratic accountability. In A. Schäfer & W. Streeck (Eds.), Politics in the age of austerity (pp. 108–142). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2014a). After the Crash: A Perspective on Multilevel European Democracy, MPIfG Discussion Paper 14/21, Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2014b). Political legitimacy in a non-optimal currency area. In O. Cramme & S. B. Hobolt (Eds.), Democratic Politics in a European Union under stress. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2016). De-Constitutionalization and Majority Rule: A Democratic Vision for Europe, MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/14, Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2014). European integration in the euro crisis: The limits of postfunctionalism. Journal of European Integration, 36(3), 321–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2015). Liberal intergovernmentalism and the euro area crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 177–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2006). Democracy in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2013). Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: Input, output and ‘throughput’. Political Studies, 61(1), 2–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2015). Forgotten democratic legitimacy: ‘Governing by the rules’ and ‘ruling by the numbers’. In M. Matthijs & M. Blyth (Eds.), The future of the Euro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Reinterpreting the Rules ‘by Stealth’ in Times of Crisis: The European Central Bank and the European Commission. West European Politics, 39(5), 1032–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2017). Britain-Out and Trump-In: A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis of the British Referendum on the EU and the US Presidential Election. Review of International Political Economy, 24(2), 248–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A., & Mark, T. (2013). Resilient liberalism in Europe’s political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H., & Thomassen, J. (1999). Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L. (2006). The social sources of financial power: Domestic legitimacy and international financial orders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L. (2014). Epistemic arbitrage: Transnational professional knowledge in action. Journal of Professions and Organization, 1(1), 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., & Tsingou, E. (2018). Europe’s fast- and slow-burning crises. Journal of European Public Policy, 1. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2018.1446456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, C. S. (2013). The struggle for EU legitimacy: Public contestation, 1950-2005. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, C. S. (2015). Political legitimacy between democracy and effectiveness: Trade-offs, interdependencies, and discursive constructions by the EU institutions. European Political Science Review, 7(04), 615–638.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, C. S., Gartzou-Katsouyanni, K., & Nicholaidis, K. (2018). The Greco-German affair in the Euro Crisis: Mutual recognition lost?, London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W. (2014). Buying time: The delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, F. (2006). On the efficiency-legitimacy trade-off in EMU In F. T. Amy Verdun & H. Zimmerman (Eds.), EMU rules: The political and economic consequences of European monetary integration (pp. 31–48). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, F. (2013). The EMU’s Legitimacy and the ECB as a Strategic Political Player in the Crisis Context. Journal of European Integration, 35(3), 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2016). Lessons from the Greek crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(1), 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukalis, L. (2016). In defence of Europe: Can the European project be saved? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. (2015). A historical institutionalist explanation of the EU’s responses to the euro area financial crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, J. H. H. (2010). Does Europe need a constitution? Demos, telos and the German Maastricht decision. European Law Journal, 1(3), 219–258.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels, W., & Rozenberg, O. (2013). Democratic control in the member states of the European Council and the Euro Zone Summits. Study PE 474, 392 Available at: «http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2013/474392/IPOLAFCO_ET(2013)474392_EN.pdf».
   Google Scholar
• Widmaier, W., Blyth, M., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Exogenous shocks or endogenous constructions? The meanings of wars and crises. International Studies Quarterly, 51(4), 747–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woll, C. (2014). The power of inaction: Bank bailouts in comparison. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar