Brexit and the political economy of euro-denominated clearing

References

• Adolph, C. (2013). Bankers, bureaucrats and central bank politics: The myth of neutrality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF). (2017). Priorities in the EMIR Review. May, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, T., De Francesco, F., Maggetti, M., & Ruffing, E. (2016). Transnational bureaucratic politics: An institutional rivalry perspective on EU network governance. Public Administration, 94(1), 9–24. doi:10.1111/padm.12252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2013). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsden, J., & Stafford, P. (2017, June 13). London warns Brussels of risk in moving euro clearing business. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, L. (2017, May 10). US regulator warns Europe to tread carefully on euro clearing. Telegraph.
   Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M. (2016). Friend or foe? Inter-agency cooperation, organizational reputation and turf. Public Administration, 94(1), 40–56. doi:10.1111/padm.12160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). The new global rulers: The privatization of regulation in the world economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canepa, F., & Koranyi, B. (2017, May 22). Exclusive: ECB plan to take euro clearing from London stalled by infighting. Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, M. (2017, June 20). ‘A fine balance’, Speech at Mansion House. London.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks and policy innovation in executive agencies (pp. 1862–1928). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. (2010). Rethinking world politics: A theory of transnational pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). (2017, October 30). ‘Response to Consultation re. EMIR review’. Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Clift, B., & Woll, C. (2012). Economic patriotism: Reinventing control over open markets. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 307–323. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.638117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D., & Thatcher, M. (2008). Network governance and multi-level delegation: European networks of regulatory agencies. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 49–71. doi:10.1017/S0143814X08000779
   Google Scholar
• Coeure, B. (2017). ‘Speech: European CCPs after Brexit’. Frankfurt: ECB.
   Google Scholar
• Commission. (2017a, June 7). Proposal concerning the procedures and authorities involved for the authorisation of CCPs and requirements for the recognition of third-country CCPs (EMIR II). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Commission. (2017b, June 13). Commission Staff Working Document: Impact Assessment (amending Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 and Regulation (EU) No 648/2012. Strasbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Djelic, M.-L., Quack, S. (Eds.). (2010). Transnational communities: Shaping global economic governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dombret, A. (2017, February 7). ‘Uncertain times - Brexit and its impact on the financial sector’. Frankfurt: Bundesbank.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, S. (2014). Power politics and the undersupply of financial stability in Europe. Review of International Political Economy, 21, 980–1005. doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.801021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. (2007). All politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P. (1991). Democracy, bureaucracy and public choice. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Eberlein, B., & Newman, A. L. (2008). Escaping the international governance dilemma? Incorporated transgovernmental networks in the European Union. Governance, 21(1), 25–52. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECB. (2015, March 29). European Central Bank and Bank of England announce measures to enhance financial stability in relation to centrally cleared markets in the EU. Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• ECB. (2017, June 23). Recommendation amending Article 22 of ECB Statute. Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• ECB. (2019, March 20). ‘Letter concerning the Withdrawal of the Recommendation of the ECB for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Article 22 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank’. Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2011). EU-level agencies: New executive centre formation or vehicles for national control? Journal of European Public Policy, 18, 868–887. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.593314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, R., & Rhodes, M. (2016). The political dynamics behind Europe’s new Banking Union. West European Politics, 39, 415–437. doi:10.1080/01402382.2016.1143238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Central Bank (ECB). (2011, September 11). Eurosystem oversight policy framework. Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (EP) (2018, January 3). Draft Report of the Committee on Economic and Financial Affairs on EMIR II, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Securities Markets Authority (ESMA). (2017, July 10). Letter to European Commission on third-country regimes. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Newman, A. (2015). The new politics of interdependence: Cross-national layering in Trans-Atlantic regulatory disputes. Comparative Political Studies, 48, 497–526. doi:10.1177/0010414014542330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Newman, A. (2016). The new interdependence approach: Theoretical development and empirical demonstration. Review of International Political Economy, 23, 713–736. doi:10.1080/09692290.2016.1247009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fioretos, O. (2010). Capitalist diversity and the international regulation of hedge funds. Review of International Political Economy, 17, 696–723. doi:10.1080/09692291003723789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fioretos, O. (2011). Creative reconstructions: Multilateralism and European varieties of capitalism after 1950. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fouquet, H., & Detrixhe, J. (2016). Hollande takes aim at City of London in euro clearing threat. Bloomberg, 29.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt Finance and Paris Europlace. (2017, July 12). Joint statement on euro clearing. Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, J., & Thiemann, M. (2018). A new governance architecture for European financial markets? Towards a European supervision of CCPs, White Paper Series, No. 53, SAFE - Sustainable Architecture for Finance in Europe, Frankfurt. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hebis.:30:3–472301
   Google Scholar
• Gabor, D. (2016). The (impossible) repo trinity: The political economy of repo markets. Review of International Political Economy, 23, 967–1000. doi:10.1080/09692290.2016.1207699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GFMA, SIFMA, AFME, ASIFMA. (2017, October 30). Response to consultation EMIR review. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Giancarlo, C. (2017a, September 14). Future of CFTC-EU regulatory coordination in the financial sector. Washington: CFTC.
   Google Scholar
• Giancarlo, C. (2017b, November 6). An EU plan to invade the US market. Washington: CFTC.
   Google Scholar
• Goldbach, R. (2015a). Global Governance and Regulatory Failures. Basingstoke: Palgrave
   Google Scholar
• Goldbach, R. (2015b). Asymmetric influence in global banking regulation, transnational harmonization, the competition state, and the roots of regulatory failure. Review of International Political Economy, 22, 1087–1127. doi:10.1080/09692290.2015.1050440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, C. (2009, February 17). Banque de France in CDS clearing plea. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Graz, C., & Noelke, A. (Eds.). (2008). Transnational private governance and its limits. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E. (2014). The status quo crisis: Global financial governance after the 2008 financial meltdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E., Pagliari, S., & Spagna, I. (Eds.). (2018). Governing the world's biggest market: The politics of derivatives regulation after the 2008 crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, K. (2017, June 13). What on earth is euro clearing - and why should you care? BBC News.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., & Quaglia, L. (2016). The comparative political Economy of Basel III in Europe. Policy and Society, 35, 205–214. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., & Quaglia, L. (2017). Brexit and the Single European Financial Market. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55, 149–164. doi:10.1111/jcms.12589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., & Quaglia, L. (2018). Brexit and the battle for financial services. Journal of European Public Policy, 25, 1118–1136. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1467950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intercontinental Exchange (ICE). (2016). Access to global markets to sustain jobs and growth: A financial infrastructure perspective, Working paper. Retrieved from https://www.theice.com/publicdocs/ICE_Working_Paper_Access_Global_Markets.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA). (2017, October 30). Response to consultation EMIR review. London.
   Google Scholar
• Jabko, N. (2006). Playing the market: A political strategy for uniting Europe, 1985–2005. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. (2017a, June 12). Derivatives body warns EU against moving euro clearing from London. Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. (2017b, June 12). France wants right to Veto Euro Clearing in the UK after Brexit. Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Jupille, J., Caporaso, J. A., & Checkel, J. T. (2003). Integrating institutions: Rationalism, constructivism and the study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 36(1–2), 7–40. doi:10.1177/0010414002239370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaack, P. (2015). Innovation and deadlock in global financial governance: Transatlantic coordination failure in OTC derivatives regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 22, 1217–1232. doi:10.1080/09692290.2015.1099555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, G. A., & Meier, K. J. (Eds.). (2003). Politics, policy and organizations: Frontiers in the scientific study of bureaucracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavery, S., Quaglia, L., & Dannreuther, C. (2018). Brexit and the future of British capitalism: First symposium. New Political Economy. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13563467.2018.1484716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London Stock Exchange (LSE). (2017, October 30). Response to EMIR consultation. London.
   Google Scholar
• Macartney, H. (2010). Variegated Neoliberalism: EU varieties of capitalism and International Political Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maijoor, S. (2018). Resilience, recovery and resolution: Three essential Rs for CCPs. Speech at the ILF Conference “Resolution in Europe: The Unresolved Questions”, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, 23 April. Retrieved from https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/speech_ilf_conference-_in_frankfurt_23_april_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maor, M. (2010). Organizational reputation and jurisdictional claims: The case of the U.S. food and drug administration. Governance, 23(1), 133–159. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01470.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, F. (2017, July 7). City cheers looming end of euro-clearing oversight. Politico.
   Google Scholar
• McKeen-Edwards, H., & Porter, T. (2013). Transnational financial associations and the governance of global finance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mersch, E. (2017). Evolving regulatory environment for CCPs – The perspective of a Central Bank. Frankfurt: ECB. Retrieved from http://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2017/html/ecb.sp171110.en.html
   Google Scholar
• Mügge, D. (2010). Widen the market, narrow the competition: Banker interests and the making of a European capital market. Colchester: ECPR
   Google Scholar
• Newman, A., & Bach, D. (2014). The European Union as hardening agent: Soft law and the diffusion of global financial regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 21, 430–452. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.882968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A., & Posner, E. (2016). Transnational feedback, soft law, and preferences in global financial regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 23(1), 123–152. doi:10.1080/09692290.2015.1104375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, A., & Posner, E. (2018). Voluntary disruptions. International soft law, finance, and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver Wyman. (2016). Report on ‘The Impact of the UK’s Exit from the EU on the UK-Based Financial Services Sector’. Retrieved from https://www.oliverwyman.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/global/en/2016/oct/Brexit_POV.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Pagliari, S. (2013). A wall around Europe? The European regulatory response to the global financial crisis and the turn in Transatlantic relations. Journal of European Integration, 35, 391–408. doi:10.1080/07036337.2012.689830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagliari, S., & Young, K. L. (2014). Leveraged interests: Financial industry power and the role of private sector coalitions. Review of International Political Economy, 21, 575–610. doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.819811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B. (2002). The politics of bureaucracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (2014). Technical systems and the architecture of transnational business governance interactions. Regulation & Governance, 8(1), 110–125. doi:10.1111/rego.12016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, E. (2009). The origins of Europe’s new stock markets. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, E. (2010). The lamfalussy process: Polyarchic origins of networked financial rulemaking in the EU. In C. F. Sabel & J. Zeitlin (Eds.), EU governance: Towards a new architecture? (pp. 43–60) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rixen, T. (2010). Bilateralism or multilateralism? The political economy of avoiding international double taxation. European Journal of International Relations, 16, 589–614. doi:10.1177/1354066109346891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rixen, T. (2013). Why reregulation after the crisis is feeble: Shadow banking, offshore financial centers, and jurisdictional competition. Regulation & Governance, 7, 435–459. doi:10.1111/rego.12024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolet, X. (2016, December). ‘Oral Evidence, Brexit: Financial services’, 9th Report of Session 2016-17, London: European Union Committee, House of Lords.
   Google Scholar
• Rosamond, B. (2012). Supranational governance as economic patriotism? The European Union, legitimacy and the reconstruction of state space. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 324–341. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.638119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., & Henriksen, L. F. (Eds.). (2017). Professional networks in transnational governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., & Wigan, D. (2016). Powering ideas through expertise: Professionals in global tax battles. Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 357–374. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, P. (2017, November 20). Deutsche Börse eyes City of London’s euro clearing crown. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D., & Ladi, S. (2015). Special Issue: Symposium: Global policy and transnational administration. Public Administration, (4), 93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storbeck, O. (2018, July 29). Deutsche Bank shifts half of euro clearing from London to Frankfurt. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Thiemann, M. (2014). In the shadow of Basel: How competitive politics bred the crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 21, 1203–1239. doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.860612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiemann, M. (2018). The growth of shadow banking: A comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trondal, J., Marcussen, M., Larsson, T., & Veggeland, F. (2013). Unpacking international organisations: The dynamics of compound bureaucracies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsingou, E. (2015). Club governance and the making of global financial rules. Review of International Political Economy, 22, 225–256. doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.890952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, P. (2011, June 11). ‘Speech given the financial innovation (CSFI) post trade fellowship launch’. London.
   Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. (2017). Political leadership of the European Central Bank. Journal of European Integration, 39, 207–221. doi:10.1080/07036337.2016.1277715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstyl, S., & Chazan, G. (2016, November 17). Wolfgang Schäuble sets out a tough line on Brexit. Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Wermuth, T. (2017, June 20). Carney warns EU against splitting euro clearing market. Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Washington: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K. (2012). Transnational regulatory capture? An empirical examination of the transnational lobbying of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Review of International Political Economy, 19, 663–688. doi:10.1080/09692290.2011.624976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar