China’s rise in a liberal world order in transition – introduction to the FORUM

References

• Allan, B., Vucetic, S., & Hopf, T. (2018). The distribution of identity and the future of international order: China's hegemonic prospects. International Organization, 72(4), 839–869. doi:10.1017/S0020818318000267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, G. (2017). Destined for war: can America and China escape Thucydides's trap? Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Arnason, J. P. (2003). Civilizations in dispute: Historical questions and theoretical traditions. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Breslin, S. (2011). The ‘China model’ and the global crisis: From Friedrich List to a Chinese mode of governance? International Affairs, 87 (6), 1323–1343. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01039.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, S. (2013). China and the global order: Signalling threat or friendship? International Affairs, 89 (3), 615–634. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2016). The rise and fall of the great powers in the twenty-first century: China's rise and the fate of America's global position. International Security, 40 (3), 7–53. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, W. A. (2012). Sinospeak: Chinese Exceptionalism and the Politics of History. The Journal of Asian Studies, 71 (1), 33–55. doi:10.1017/S0021911811002919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS. (2019). Trump says future belongs to ‘patriots’ not ‘globalists’ at U.N. General Assembly speech. 24 September. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/live-news/trump-un-speech-future-belongs-to-patriots-not-globalists-united-nations-general-assembly-today/.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K. (2010). The making of a transnational capitalist class: Corporate power in the 21st century. London and New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chacko, P., & Jayasuriya, K. (2018). A capitalising foreign policy: Regulatory geographies and transnationalised state projects. European Journal of International Relations, 24 (1), 82–105. doi:10.1177/1354066117694702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, P. (2011). Confucian China and Jeffersonian America: Beyond liberal democracy. Asian Studies Review, 35(1), 43–62. doi:10.1080/10357823.2011.552100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. W., & Mocker, S. T. (2017). The end of exceptionalism? Explaining Chinese National Oil Companies’ overseas investments. Review of International Political Economy, 24 (1), 119–143. doi:10.1080/09692290.2016.1275743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2017). A U-Turn or Just Pendulum Swing? Tides of bottom-up and top-down reforms in contemporary China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 22 (4), 651–673. doi:10.1007/s11366-017-9515-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. (2016). China, the European Union and the fragile world order. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54 (4), 775–792. doi:10.1111/jcms.12383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Naughton, B. (2017). A dynamic China model: The co-evolution of economics and politics in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 26 (103), 18–34. doi:10.1080/10670564.2016.1206278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, G., Pearson, M. M., & Yong, W. (2013). Introduction – IPE with China's characteristics. Review of International Political Economy, 20 (6), 1145–1164. doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.831370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, X., & Renn, D. (2016). China and international order: The limits of integration. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 21 (2), 177–197. doi:10.1007/s11366-016-9403-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deudney, D., & Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). Liberal world: The resilient order. Foreign Affairs, 97 (July/August), 16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaff, N. (2014). Global networks and the two faces of Chinese national oil companies. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 13 (5-6), 539–563. doi:10.1163/15691497-12341317
   Google Scholar
• De Graaff, N. (2019). China Inc. goes global. Transnational and national networks of China’s globalizing business elite. Review of International Political Economy, 1–26. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09692290.2019.1675741. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1675741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirlik, A. (1997). Critical reflections on ‘Chinese Capitalism’ as paradigm. Identities, 3 (3), 303–330. doi:10.1080/1070289X.1997.9962566
   Google Scholar
• Dikotter, F. (1994). The discourse of race in modern China. London: Hurst and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, A. L. (2018). Globalisation and Chinese grand strategy. Survival, 60 (1), 7–40. doi:10.1080/00396338.2018.1427362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, S. (2017). China and global energy governance: Integration or confrontation? Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 23 (2), 307–325. doi:10.1163/19426720-02302010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germain, R., & Schwartz, H. M. (2017). The political economy of currency internationalisation: The case of the RMB. Review of International Studies, 43 (4), 765–787. doi:10.1017/S0260210517000109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Times. (2019). President Xi makes major announcements reflecting China's commitment to free trade. June 28, http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1156090.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, E. (2013). The struggle for order: Hegemony, hierarchy, and transition in post-Cold War East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Vicente, R. (2017). South–South relations under world market capitalism: The state and the elusive promise of national development in the China–Ecuador resource-development nexus. Review of International Political Economy, 24 (5), 881–903. doi:10.1080/09692290.2017.1357646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güven, A. B. (2017). Defending supremacy: How the IMF and the World Bank navigate the challenge of rising powers. International Affairs, 93 (5), 1149–1166. doi:10.1093/ia/iix167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameiri, S., & Jones, L. (2016). Rising powers and state transformation: The case of China. European Journal of International Relations, 22 (1), 72–98. doi:10.1177/1354066115578952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpaz, M. D. (2016). China’s coherence in international economic governance. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 21 (2), 123–147. doi:10.1007/s11366-016-9400-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilmann, S., Rudolf, M., Huotari, M., & Buckow, J. (2014). China’s shadow foreign policy: Parallel structures challenge the established international order. China Monitor, 18 (Oct), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., Appelbaum, R., & Ho, S. Y. (2013). Globalization with Chinese characteristics: Externalization, dynamics and transformations. Development and Change, 44(6), 1221–1425. doi:10.1111/dech.12066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H.-F. (2015). The China boom: Why China will not rule the world. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, M. H. (1987). Ideology and US foreign policy. New Haven: Yale University Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/93.4.1103
   Google Scholar
• Huo, S., & Parmar, I. (2019). A new type of great power relationship’? Gramsci, Kautsky and the role of the Ford Foundation’s transformational elite knowledge networks in China. Review of International Political Economy, 1–24. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1625427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2008). The rise of China and the future of the West-Can the liberal system survive. Foreign Affairs, 87 (January/February), 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2009). Liberal internationalism 3.0: America and the dilemmas of liberal world order. Perspectives on Politics, 7 (1), 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2014). The illusion of geopolitics: The enduring power of the liberal order. Foreign Affairs, 93 (May/June), 80–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). Why the liberal world order will survive. Ethics & International Affairs, 32 (1), 17–29. doi:10.1017/S0892679418000072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L., & Zhou, Y. (2017). Rethinking the role of state-owned enterprises in China’s rise. New Political Economy, 22 (6), 743–760. doi:10.1080/13563467.2017.1321625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. B. (2016). Banking unconditionally: The political economy of Chinese finance in Latin America. Review of International Political Economy, 23 (4), 643–676. doi:10.1080/09692290.2016.1216005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalilzad, Z. (2017, June 19). The Case for Congagement with China. The National Interest. Retrieved from: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-case-congagement-china-21232.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, B., & Gallagher, K. P. (2017). Globalizing Chinese energy finance: The role of policy banks. Journal of Contemporary China, 26 (108), 834–851. doi:10.1080/10670564.2017.1337307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krickovic, A. (2017). The symbiotic China-Russia partnership: Cautious riser and desperate challenger. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 10 (3), 299–329. doi:10.1093/cjip/pox011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurlantzick, J. (2016). State capitalism: How the return of statism is transforming the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• La Forgia, R. (2017). Listening to China’s Multilateral Voice for the First Time: Analysing the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank for Soft Power Opportunities and Risks in the Narrative of ‘Lean, Clean and Green. Journal of Contemporary China, 26 (107), 633–649. doi:10.1080/10670564.2017.1305389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, C. (2018). The US–Chinese power shift and the end of the Pax Americana. International Affairs, 94 (1), 89–111. doi:10.1093/ia/iix249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J. (2008). Power transition theory and the rise of China. In R. S. Ross and Z. Feng (Eds.), China’s ascent: Power, security, and the future of international politics (pp.11–33). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieber, R. J. (2014). The rise of the BRICS and American primacy. International Politics, 51 (2), 137–154. doi:10.1057/ip.2014.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liff, A. P. (2016). Whither the balancers? The case for a methodological reset. Security Studies, 25 (3), 420–459. doi:10.1080/09636412.2016.1195624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loke, B. (2016). Unpacking the politics of great power responsibility: Nationalist and Maoist China in international order-building. European Journal of International Relations, 22 (4), 847–871. doi:10.1177/1354066115611968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally, C. A. (2012). Sino-capitalism: China's reemergence and the international political economy. World Politics, 64 (4), 741–776. doi:10.1017/S0043887112000202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally, C. A., & Gruin, J. (2017). A novel pathway to power? Contestation and adaptation in China's internationalization of the RMB. Review of International Political Economy, 24 (4), 599–628. doi:10.1080/09692290.2017.1319400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNally, C. A. (2019). Chaotic mélange: Neo-liberalism and neo-statism in the age of Sino-capitalism. Review of International Political Economy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, W. R. (2008). God and gold: Britain, America and the making of the modern world. New York: Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2010). The gathering storm: China’s challenge to US power in Asia. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3 (4), 381–396. doi:10.1093/cjip/poq016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. C. (2016). The role of beliefs in identifying rising powers. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 9 (2), 211–238. doi:10.1093/cjip/pow006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G. J. (2017). Avoiding a Thucydides Trap in Sino-American Relations (… and 7 Reasons Why that Might be Difficult). Asian Security, 13 (2), 98–115. doi:10.1080/14799855.2017.1286162
   Google Scholar
• New York Times. (2018, October 6). The Trump trade strategy is coming into focus. That doesn’t Necessarily Mean It Will Work. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/06/upshot/trump-trade-strategy-coming-into-focus.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-upshotnyt.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., ten Brink, T., Claar, S., & May, C. (2015). Domestic structures, foreign economic policies and global economic order: Implications from the rise of large emerging economies. European Journal of International Relations, 21 (3), 538–567. doi:10.1177/1354066114553682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noesselt, N. (2015). Revisiting the Debate on Constructing a Theory of International Relations with Chinese Characteristics. The China Quarterly, 222, 430–448. doi:10.1017/S0305741015000387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar, I. (2012). Foundations of the American Century. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parmar, I. (2016). Racial and imperial thinking in international theory and politics: Truman, Attlee and the Korean War. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18 (2), 351–369. doi:10.1177/1369148115613657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmar, I. (2018). The US-led liberal order: Imperialism by another name? International Affairs, 94 (1), 151–172. doi:10.1093/ia/iix240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presidential Memoranda. (2019). Memorandum on Reforming Developing-Country Status in the World Trade Organization; July 26, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/memorandum-reforming-developing-country-status-world-trade-organization/.
   Google Scholar
• Rapkin, D. P., & Thompson, W. R. (2013). Transition scenarios: China and the United States in the twenty-first century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schake, K. (2017). Safe passage: The transition from British to American Hegemony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schleifer, P., & Sun, Y. (2018). Emerging markets and private governance: The political economy of sustainable palm oil in China and India. Review of International Political Economy, 25 (2), 190–214. doi:10.1080/09692290.2017.1418759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, O. (2016). China and India's insertion in the intellectual property rights regime: Sustaining or disrupting the rules? New Political Economy, 21 (4), 343–364. doi:10.1080/13563467.2016.1113950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, C. T. (2015). The Significance of Xi Jinping's “Chinese Dream” for Chinese Foreign Policy: From “Tao Guang Yang Hui” to “Fen Fa You Wei”. Journal of China and International Relations, 3 (1), 53–73.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfeld, E. S. (2010). Playing our game: Why China's rise doesn't threaten the West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephen, M. D. (2017). Emerging Powers and Emerging Trends in Global Governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 23 (3), 483–502. doi:10.1163/19426720-02303009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South China Morning Post. (2019). Slip-up or signal? What US official’s ‘clash of civilisations’ remarks suggest. 25 May. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/3011763/slip-or-signal-what-us-officials-clash-civilisations-remarks-suggest.
   Google Scholar
• ten Brink, T. (2013). Paradoxes of prosperity in China’s new capitalism. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 42 (4), 17–44. doi:10.1177/186810261304200402
   Google Scholar
• ten Brink, T. (2015). Chinese Firms ‘Going Global’: Recent OFDI Trends, Policy Support, and International Implications. International Politics, 52 (6), 666–683. doi:10.1057/ip.2015.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ten Brink, T. (2019). China’s capitalism. A paradoxical route to economic prosperity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, O. (2014). American images of China: Identity, power, policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Töpfer, L. M. (2017). Institutional change in Chinese cross-border finance: Foreign investors, the party-state and power resources. Review of International Political Economy, 24 (1), 144–175. doi:10.1080/09692290.2016.1273842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Apeldoorn, B., & De Graaff, N. (2016). American grand strategy and corporate elite networks: The Open Door since the end of the Cold War. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D. (2014). Confucius in the American founding: The founders’ efforts to use Confucian moral philosophy in their endeavor to create new virtue for the nation. Virginia Review of Asian Studies, 16, 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. K., & Blyth, M. (2013). Constructivism and the study of international political economy in China. Review of International Political Economy, 20 (6), 1276–1299. doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.791336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinhardt, C., & ten Brink, T. (2019). Varieties of contestation: China’s rise and the liberal trade order. Review of International Political Economy. doi:10.1080/09692290.2019.1699145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House. (2018). Assessing and Strengthening the Manufacturing and Defense Industrial Base and Supply Chain Resiliency of the United States. Report to President Donald J. Trump by the Interagency Task Force in Fulfilment of Executive Order 13806. Retrieved from https://media.defense.gov/2018/oct/05/2002048904/-1/-1/1/assessing-and-strengthening-the-manufacturing-and%20defense-industrial-base-and-supply-chain-resiliency.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Womack, B. (2016). Asymmetric parity: US–China relations in a multinodal world. International Affairs, 92 (6), 1463–1480. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, J. (2014). The governance of China. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, X. (2010). The instability of China–US relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3 (3), 263–292. doi:10.1093/cjip/poq009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong, W., & Pauly, L. (2013). Chinese IPE debates on (American) hegemony. Review of International Political Economy, 20 (6), 1165–1188. doi:10.1080/09692290.2012.761641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H. (2017). Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiatives and establishment of the Asian infrastructure investment bank. Journal of Contemporary China, 26 (105), 353–368. doi:10.1080/10670564.2016.1245894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, J. (2016). China, global capitalism and the quest for legitimacy. International Politics, 53 (6), 752–774. doi:10.1057/s41311-016-0013-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, K., & Liang, W. (Eds.). (2013). China and global trade governance: China's first decade in the World Trade Organization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. (2016). China and liberal hierarchies in global international society: Power and negotiation for normative change. International Affairs, 92 (4), 795–816. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig, D. (2002). Internationalizing China: Domestic interests and global linkages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zoellick, R. (2005). Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility?–Remarks to National Committee on US-China Relations New York City, September 21, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zhongying, P., & Wang, H. (2013). Debating international institutions and global governance: The missing Chinese IPE contribution. Review of International Political Economy, 20(6), 1189–1214. doi:10.1080/09692290.2013.784210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar